Hearth Record

New Hope Hospice Care

A hospice in North Hollywood, California 91606

12444 Victory Blvd Ste 408, North Hollywood, California 91606. (747) 254-6055.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 289 hospices serving ZIP code 91606 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 5, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 5, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 532 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,5,8,9) did not contain evidence that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: In the home; Gabapentin was in a bottle with no label. Per patient she takes 2 caps in the afternoon and 2 at night. Medication record reflects that she takes 1 “tab” 2 times daily. Atorvastatin Calcium 40mg tab reflects this to be taken at bedtime but medication record reflects “daily”. Mirtazapine 15mg tab on medication record was not found in the home. Patient is on 3L continuous oxygen via NC and this is not on her medication record. Patient also reported and bottles found for vitamins and medication that she takes that are not on medication record; Beet Root 500mg, Immune support, Alpha lipoic Acid 200mg, Advance Multi 50+ Her, B12 1000mcg, MK7 K2 100mcg, GHR Platinum, Herbavision Gold, Melatonin 6mg, Magnesium Glycinate 200mg, B-Complex with Vit C, Advil Dual Action 250mg acetaminophen with 125mg NSAID. Patient #2: In the home; meclizine 25mg tab reflects one tablet once daily as needed but medication record reflects “1 tab twice daily by mouth.” Olmesartan Medoxomil 40-25mg tab reflects one tablet daily but medication record reflects “1 tab daily by mouth as needed.” Pantoprazole Chloride 10mEq cap reflects one capsule in the morning 30 mins before breakfast but medication record reflects “once a day.” Sertraline Hydrochloride 100mg tab reflects one tablet at bedtime but medication record reflects “1 tab daily by mouth.” Vascepa 1gm cap reflects twice daily but medication record reflects “1gm2 twice daily.” Patient #5: Diclofenac 1% gel ordered on 10/31/25; does not indicate where to be applied to. Arthritis Pain Reliever 1% ointment ordered on 11/06/25; listed as PRN but does not indicate how often it can be used nor does it indicate where to be applied to. Miconazole Nitrate 2% Antifungal Cream ordered on 11/06/25; listed as PRN but does not indicate how often it can be used nor does it indicate where to be applied to. Patient #8: All ordered on 10/11/25: Diclofenac 1% gel listed as PRN but does not indicate how often it can be used and does not indicate where to be applied to. Icy Hot Maximum Strength listed as “As needed” but does indicate how often it can be used nor does it indicate where to be applied to. Proctozone-HC 2.5% cream does not indicate where to be applied to. Triamcinolone Actinide 0.025% ointment does not indicate where to be applied to. Duplicate drug therapy - both Pantoprazole sodium 40mg delayed-release tablet to be taken “one tablet 30 mins before breakfast” and Prilosec 20mg delayed-release tablet to be taken “once a day.” Patient #9: All ordered on 09/30/25: Acyclovir 800mg tab indicated as “!tab” 5 times per day for 10days. It did not contain a discontinued date and still showing as active on current medication list. Hydrocortisone 2.5% did not indicate where to be applied to.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 522 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,5,8,9) did not contain evidence that plan of care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: The initial POC/IDG dated 12/01/25 did not have any medications listed on it at time of survey. Gabapentin in home was in a bottle with no label. Per patient she takes 2 caps in the afternoon and 2 at night. Medication profile reflects that she takes 1 “tab” 2 times daily. Atorvastatin Calcium 40mg tab in home reflects this to be taken at bedtime but medication record reflects “daily”. Mirtazapine 15mg tab on medication record was not found in the home. Patient is on 3L continuous oxygen via NC and this is not on her medication record. Patient also reported and bottles found for vitamins that she takes that are not on medication record; Beet Root 500mg, Immune support, Alpha lipoic Acid 200mg, Advance Multi 50+ Her, B12 1000mcg, MK7 K2 100mcg, GHR Platinum, Herbavision Gold, Melatonin 6mg, Magnesium Glycinate 200mg, B-Complex with Vit C, Advil Dual Action 250mg acetaminophen with 125mg NSAID. Patient #2: Initial POC and all updated POCs following - In the home; meclizine 25mg tab reflects one tablet once daily as needed but medication record reflects “1 tab twice daily by mouth.” Olmesartan Medoxomil 40-25mg tab reflects one tablet daily but medication record reflects “1 tab daily by mouth as needed.” Pantoprazole Chloride 10mEq cap reflects one capsule in the morning 30 mins before breakfast but medication record reflects “ once a day.” Sertraline Hydrochloride 100mg tab reflects one tablet at bedtime but medication record reflects “1 tab daily by mouth.” Vascepa 1gm cap reflects twice daily but medication record reflects “1gm2 twice daily.” Patient #5: Initial POC and all updated POCs following - Diclofenac 1% gel ordered on 10/31/25; does not indicate where to be applied to. POCs updated following order date of 11/06/25 - Arthritis Pain Reliever 1% ointment listed as PRN but does not indicate how often it can be used nor does it indicate where to be applied to. POCs updated following order date of 11/06/25 - Miconazole Nitrate 2% Antifungal Cream ordered listed as PRN but does not indicate how often it can be used nor does it indicate where to be applied to. Patient #8: Initial POC and all updated POCs following - All ordered on 10/11/25: Diclofenac 1% gel listed as PRN but does not indicate how often it can be used not does it indicate where to be applied to. Icy Hot Maximum Strength listed as “As needed” but does indicate how often it can be used nor does it indicate where to be applied to. Proctozone-HC 2.5% cream does not indicate where to be applied to. Triamcinolone Actinide 0.025% ointment does not indicate where to be applied to. Duplicate drug therapy - both Pantoprazole sodium 40mg delayed-release tablet to be taken “one tablet 30 mins before breakfast” and Prilosec 20mg delayed-release tablet to be taken “once a day.” Patient #9: Hydrocortisone 2.5% did not indicate where to be applied to.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Upon patient record review, 11 of 14 (Patient #2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,13) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #2,3,4,5,6,7,10: Initial POC and all subsequent reflect MSW, SC and BC “initial comprehensive within 5 days” with no further updates. Patient #8: Initial POC and all subsequent reflect MSW, SC and BC “initial comprehensive within 5 days” with no further updates. Patient #9: Initial POC and all subsequent reflect MSW, SC and BC “initial comprehensive within 5 days” with no further updates. Patient #11 and #13: Initial POC reflects MSW, SC and BC “initial comprehensive within 5 days” with no further updates.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #8) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #8: The Initial POC and all subsequent indicated RN visits every 2 weeks. However, there were no visits made between the visit dated 10/13/25 and the next one on 11/21/25.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 618 words

    “Upon patient record review 7 of 14 (Patient #2, 3,6,7,8,9,10) did not contain evidence that the IDG ensured that the care and services provided were based on all assessments of the patient and family needs. #2: MSW assessment 11/19/25 reflected “MSW recommends ongoing psychosocial support for the patient, including counseling sessions to address emotional challenges, promote adaptive coping, and encourage expression of feelings. The caregiver should be provided with resources for respite care, education on caregiver self-care, and access to support groups to manage stress. The MSW will continue to provide emotional support, access to coping patterns and connect the family to available hospice and community resources as appropriate.” There was no indication of visit frequency and no further visits have been made since assessment. #3: MSW assessment 11/09/25 reflected “MSW recommends ongoing psychosocial for both the patient and PC through regular counseling, emotional check-ins, and access to community resources such as support groups and volunteer assistance. Respite care options should be discussed to help alleviate caregiver strain. Collaboration with the family, healthcare team, an community programs will ensure a comprehensive and sustained support network for both the patient and caregiver.” There was no indication of visit frequency and no further visits have been made since assessment. #6: MSW assessment 11/02/25 reflected “MSW will continue providing ongoing psychosocial support, coordinate with interdisciplinary team and explore community resources and support groups to ensure comprehensive care for both the patient and caregiver.” There was no indication of visit frequency and no further visits have been made since assessment. #7: MSW assessment 10/28/25 reflected “MSW recommends ongoing emotional support, counseling, and caregiver education. Collaboration with hospice counselling services, support groups, and community resources will be encouraged to strengthen coping and maintain emotional well-being for both the patient and caregiver.” There was no indication of visit frequency and no further visits have been mase since assessment. #8: The chaplain’s assessment 10/11/25 indicated the need for monthly visits. However, there were no further visits noted in the clinical record having been made. #9: The chaplain’s assessment 09/30/25 indicated the need for reassessment with each recertification. However, there has not been any reassessments made prior to or since recertification on 11/25/25. MSW assessment 10/01/25 reflected “MSW will continue collaboration with the interdisciplinary team and explore community-based resources such as caregiver support groups, bereavement counselling, and volunteer assistance programs to ensure a strong support system for both the patient and caregiver, promoting emotional stability and overall well-being throughout the hospice journey.” There was no indication of visit frequency and only one visit as made since initial assessment for the recertification assessment. The recertification assessment 11/26/25 stated the same thing, “MSW will continue collaboration with the interdisciplinary team and explore community-based resources such as caregiver support groups, bereavement counselling, and volunteer assistance programs to ensure a strong support system for both the patient and caregiver, promoting emotional stability and overall well-being throughout the hospice journey.” However, no visit frequency given. #10: MSW assessment 06/21/25 reflected “MSW will collaborate with interdisciplinary team to ensure continued emotional support, caregiver education, and access to counseling, support groups and community resources to improve the overall quality of life for both the patient and caregiver.” There was no indication of visit frequency and the only other visits made since initial assessment were for the recertification assessments. Recertification assessment 09/12/25 reflected “Collaboration with the interdisciplinary will continue to ensure support, caregiver education and access to supportive services that promote comfort and quality of life.” Recertification assessment 11/16/25 reflected “The Medical SW completed a monthly assessment call via phone via PCG. PCG declined home visit at this time.” There is no visit frequency but assessment from 11/16/25 indicated “monthly assessment call via phone.””

    Rule L0556. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 5, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 24, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 85.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.7%
Visits near death85.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 289 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91606, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.