Hearth Record

Holly Trinity Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in North Hollywood, California 91606

6340 North Coldwater Canyon Avenue, Suite 203, North Hollywood, California 91606. (818) 502-0724.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 24 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

24 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 289 hospices serving ZIP code 91606 had 4.

The last inspection on record was on Jun 29, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

24 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

24 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jun 18, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care24 deficiencies
  • Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)

    “Condition of Participation: Organization and administration of services. The hospice must organize, manage, and administer its resources to provide the hospice care and services to patients, caregivers and families necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions.”

    Rule L0648. Condition-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(1))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence that during the initial assessment visit in advance of furnishing care, the hospice provided the patient and/or family with verbal (meaning spoken) and written notice of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities in a language and manner that the patient understands. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0502. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the hospice informed and provided written information to the patient concerning its policies on advance directives, including a description of applicable state law. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the hospice obtained the patient’s or representative’s signature confirming that they received a copy of the Patient’s Rights and Responsibilities. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0504. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(iii))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the patient has the right to voice grievances/complaints regarding treatment or care that is (or fails to be) furnished and lack of respect of property by anyone who is furnishing care/service on behalf of the hospice. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that if a state court has not adjudged a patient incompetent, any legal representative designated by the patient in accordance with state law may exercise the patient’s rights to the extent allowed by state law. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0507. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the plan of care included IDG’s documentation of the patient’s or families level of understanding, involvement and agreement with the plan of care. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0513. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the patient chooses a health care provider, including an attending physician. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0515. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(5))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence of the appropriate documentation for release of confidential information. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0516. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(7))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the services covered under the hospice benefit. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0518. Standard-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(8))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the patient received information about the scope of services that the hospice will provide and specific limitations on those services. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0519. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #4: Oxygen prescribed, but no related problem, goals, interventions specific to oxygen on initial or subsequent plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Upon home visit observation in 1 of the 3 visits, there was no evidence the hospice follows acceptable standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases, including standard precautions. Patient Visit #3: Upon observation, the RN placed nursing bag on barrier, but when preparing for closure of visit, lifted bag to gather barrier and placed the bag on the bare upholstered chair, before soon lifting and picking up/carrying with shoulder strap. (Policy 9-014.1) The bag will be placed on a clean dry surface (i.e. surface that can be easily disinfected) in the car and in the home”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 6 of 14 (Personnel #2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 ) did not have evidence that the hospice routinely provide substantially all core services directly by hospice personnel (The hospice issues a W-2 form for the employee). These services include: • Physician services (may contract for physician services) • Nursing • Medical social services • Counseling Personnel #2, 3: Personnel file included both W4 and W9 with same effective dates. (RN/Alt Admin/Alt DPCS #2 and RN #3) Personnel #6: The is no evidence of W4 or W9. W4 provided prior to end of survey. (MSW) Personnel #4, 7, 8: There is only evidence of aW9 in personnel file. (LVN #4, SC #7, BC/VC #8)”

    Rule L0587. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 165 words

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel #5: Specific types of shampoo are not validated, shampoo is generally listed.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #14) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #14: Hospice Aide assignment for 2x/wk tub bath every visit with RN additional instructions for Hospice Aide may do a bed bath or bathe the patient in the bathtub/shower per RN assignment sheet. There is no qualifying statement regarding cognitive ability of patient and/or caregiver to verbalize choice. There is no evidence of separate assignment sheets.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 110 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. The governing body/Administrator did not provide Human resource management as evidenced by Personnel #1: There was no signed job description for administrator at time of personnel file review for comparison of qualifications; only alt DPCS job description was filed. Signed job description provided prior to end of survey and qualifications met. Personnel #2: There was no signed job description for Alternate Administrator. It was provided prior to end of survey. In addition, did not ensure core services are provided by employees.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Medical director contract (42 CFR 418.102(a))

    “Upon contract review, 2 of 4 (Dr. Soffwer and Dr Pines contracts) did not have evidence of a contract to fulfill the role of medical director or alternate medical director, if applicable. Both contracts presented as Medical Director. Dr. Soffwer is reported to be Medical Director and Dr. Pines is alternate.”

    Rule L0666. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient #9: Patient SOC 7/14/23. Record identifies patient code status as Attempt CPR/Full Code in demographic information. MSW most recent assessment 9/5/24 identifies patient as full code. However, there is a POLST form dated 7/14/23, with option chosen as do not attempt CPR. There is no documented evidence of update at time of record review.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #10, 11, 12) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patients #10, 11, 12: There is no documented evidence that patients’ discharge summary was forwarded to attending physician following revocation.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #9, 10, 11, 12) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 9, 10, 11, 12: Discharge Summary does not include a summary of the patient’s stay, current plan of care, orders”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i)(C))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the written policies and procedures for managing controlled drugs was provided and discussed. Patient #11: Admission forms, including consent and hospice election are signed by patient with documented confusion and secondary diagnosis of dementia. Family was present during admission process, but only patient signed forms.”

    Rule L0697. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 3 of 14 (Personnel #12, 13, 14 ) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel #12, 13, 14: No criminal background check prior to end of survey. (PT/OT/SLP)”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 29, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Aug 4, 2025Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareNo deficiencies cited
Jun 18, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care24 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 19, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 289 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91606, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 4; this one had 24.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.