Hearth Record

Agape Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Simi Valley, California 93063

5924 East Los Angeles Avenue, Ste L, Simi Valley, California 93063. (805) 422-8760.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 140 hospices serving ZIP code 93063 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Oct 9, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Oct 9, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission4 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6)(iv))

    The inspectors’ words, 117 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. The organization failed to demonstrate a process for medication reconciliation to assess potential medication-related problems as defined in policy No 3-002.01 Medication Profile. The surveyor observed a failed medication reconciliation procedure on HV#2. Examples 1) the clinician could not verbalize a defined process ; 2) the observed process only included a double check of the Fentanyl patch she was scheduled to change during the visit; 3) when asked what the organization defined to be the official and current medication profile had no answer and 4) she did not have a tablet or any source in which to look up or reference current medications, dosages, route of administration etc. Reviewed with Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Observed in Record Review. The hospice did not conduct or document a patient-specific comprehensive assessment or reassessment in response to a patient’s suicidal ideation. The surveyor noted in record review for HV#2 a chaplain note stating the patient’s grand daughter (present at the visit) stated that the patient was in distress and had suicidal ideation due to wanting to get out of her facility but was unable too. The patient had expressed that her twice daily discussions with her second grand daughter is necessary for her to function and to cope with her situation. The record failed to indicate any further assessment, reassessment or follow-up to this issue as defined by organization policy Suicide No. 2-067.1. The policy required the member of the IDT to identify the follow up plan and to contact the attending physician to make any necessary referrals. Reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 170 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, The surveyor noted during HV#1 that the ALF facility had not been provided with the essential documentation as defined by organization policy to adequately coordinate care. The surveyor noted that the patient’s record available to both the facility and the hospice staff did not include: 1) the patient’s most recent hospice plan of care; 2) medication list and 3) advance directives. The facility administrator stated she had requested the information on several occasions. Reviewed with the Director of Nursing. Observed in Patient Home. The organization failed to coordinate the patient’s care, treatment, or services based on the patient’s needs. The surveyor noted during HV#2 that the caregiver staff had not been provided with the essential documentation per organization policy to adequately coordinate care. The patient’s record available to both the group home caregivers and the hospice did not include: 1) the hospice plan of care; 2) a medication list or 3) advanced directives. Reviewed with the Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0558. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 161 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. The hospice did not follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections including the use of standard precautions. HV#2 involved an observed coccyx wound care procedure. The open, non-healing wound (over eight months)was in close proximity to her rectum and high risk for contamination. The nurse multiple times did not follow the organization’s hand hygiene and bag technique policy. Examples: 1) throughout the entire procedure (initiation through completion) hand sanitizer was never utilized; 2) the same gloves that were donned to initially turn the patient were never removed while performing the wound care (dressing removal, cleansing, application of sterile covering) and 3) during the necessary personal care to remove feces very near the coccyx dressing before removing the old dressing; 4: the same donned gloves were used to enter and reenter the bag as needed during the visit. The organization’s handwashing policy and bag technique policies were not followed. Reviewed with Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 9, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 28, 2022.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: Romeo O Gumba (corporate officer, 100%); Romeo O Gumba (corporate director, 100%); Maria Socorro A Gumba (corporate director, 100%); Oneille Garcia (corporate officer, 100%); Oneille Garcia (corporate director, 100%); Maria Clariza Vasquez Garcia (corporate officer, 100%); Maria Clariza Vasquez Garcia (corporate director, 100%); Maria Clariza Vasquez Garcia (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Romeo O Gumba (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Maria Socorro A Gumba (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Oneille Garcia (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Maria Clariza Vasquez Garcia (owns 5% or more directly, 25%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 140 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93063, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 4.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.