Hearth Record

Americus Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Simi Valley, California 93063

5924 East Los Angeles Avenue, Suite T, Simi Valley, California 93063. (805) 520-5863.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 140 hospices serving ZIP code 93063 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 1, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 1, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies
  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(3)(iii))

    The inspectors’ words, 132 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. the organization failed to review and evaluate all exercises and actual emergency or disaster incidents. During the emergency management session the leadership was unable to produce documentation of any after action improvement plans or program updates based on the evaluation or review of the exercises conducted nor had they identified gaps in their response procedures or determined plans for improvement. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS and DPCS Designee. Observed in Emergency Management Session. the organization failed to analyze the hospice’s response to and maintain documentation of all drills, tabletop exercises, and emergency events and revise the hospice’s emergency plan as the organization was unable to produce any after action reports to exercises conducted on survey. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS and DPCS Designee.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, for live discharge, the organization failed to respect the patient’s right to participate in decisions about their care, treatment, or services. For example: in RRDC#1 the organization failed to follow their process for presenting the patient with the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage as required, as there was no documentation of the form noted on the patient’s record. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS, and DPCS Designee.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record was complete, promptly and accurately documented. For example: in review of RRNHV#7 the admission orders noted the patient was a Full Code however the record contained a signed POLST indicating the patient was a DNR. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS and DPCS Designee.”

    Rule L0535. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 103 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 9 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: on review of RRHV#1, RRHV#2, RRHV#3, and RRNHV#5 the patient was being seen by the chaplain yet there was no spiritual care plan as part of the plan of care. In RRHV#2, and RRHV#3 the patient was being seen by the social worker yet no psychosocial care was noted on the plan of care. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS, and the DPCS Designee.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 9 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions to include medications ad treatments necessary to meet the patient needs. For example: in RRNHV#5, and RRNHV#6 there was an order for thickener as part of the diet, yet the order was incomplete as there were no instructions as to what thickener consistency was to be utilized. In RRNHV#8 there was an order for buspirone where the frequency noted single dose yet there were no specific instruction to indicate when the single dose was to be given. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS and DPCS Designee.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 9 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care was revised based on information from updates to the patient’s comprehensive assessment addressing the patient’s progress toward goals and outcomes. For example, in RRHV#1 the care plan goals were noted to not be updated based on changes in the patient’s assessment as the goals remained un-updated throughout care IDG to IDG. In the most recent July IDG meeting the target resolution dates were beyond the dates set to resolve in June. In RRHV#2, RRNHV#4, and RRNHV#8 similar pattern of goals remaining un-updated throughout care with the current date being well beyond the established target resolution dates. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS, and DPCS Designee.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 163 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for CHHA, the organization failed to ensure an RN evaluate the following areas by observing a home health or hospice aide’s performance of the tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation: - Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other staff - Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respirations - Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include bed, sponge, tub, or shower bath; sink, tub, or bed shampoo; nail and skin care; oral hygiene; toileting and elimination - Safe transfer techniques and ambulation - Normal range of motion and positioning. On Review of HR#4 for the CHHA the initial competency evaluation was documented that all skills were evaluated verbally and not via direct observation with a patient or pseudo patient as required. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS Designee, and Office Manager.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 9 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the registered nurse prepare written patient care instructions for the hospice aide. On review of RRHV#2 the hospice aide plan of care did not include specific instructions on whether or not the aide was to remove oxygen while preforming care. On home observation the aide was observed to remove the patient’s oxygen to transfer and transport to the patient’s room to provide care yet there was no instructions on the plan of care to do so. In RRNHV#8 the aide plan of care assigned the aide to perform foley care, yet the patient did not have a foley. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 3 patient records reviewed, for live discharge, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment and services. For example: on review of RRDC#1 the patient was discharged for extended prognosis yet there was no documentation noted in the record on what led the IDG team to make the decision to discharge the patient. This observation was reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS and the DPCS Designee.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record contain information that reflected the patient’s care, treatment, and services. For example: during medication reconciliation with the RN for RRHV#2 it was noted that the hospice medication profile noted Seroquel 50mg 1 tab daily, yet the patient caregiver and the medication bottle in the patient home noted the med was to be given PRN. Further, there was another order for Seroquel 25 mg 1 tab daily PRN that the caregiver noted was not in use, and an order for Quetiapine Fumarate 25 mg daily at night that the caregiver also noted was not being used in the home. There was also a PRN order for Benzonatate on the hospice medication profile that the caregiver noted was given in the past for a cough but was no longer being used in the home. In Review of RRNHV#8 there were signed physicians orders for comfort medications to include morphine, lorazepam, and ondansetron yet the medications were not included on the patient’s medication profile. Discussion with the staff noted that the family had declined delivery of the comfort medications yet this documentation was not noted on the record. These observations were reviewed with the Administrator/DPCS.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 1, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 28, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 15.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 6.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 84.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 94% at home, 5% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day15.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends6.9%
Visits near death84.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 11 owners or officers are people: Romeo O Gumba (corporate officer, 100%); Romeo O Gumba (corporate director, 100%); Romeo O Gumba (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Mario Aquino (corporate officer, 100%); Mario Aquino (corporate director, 100%); Mario Aquino (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Maria Socorro A Gumba (corporate officer, 100%); Maria Socorro A Gumba (corporate director, 100%); Romeo O Gumba (owns 5% or more directly, 33.34%); Mario Aquino (owns 5% or more directly, 33.3%); Maria Socorro A Gumba (owns 5% or more directly, 33.3%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 80% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 0% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 140 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93063, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.