Hearth Record

Perpetual Care Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Simi Valley, California 93063

1985 Yosemite Avenue, Suite #250, Simi Valley, California 93063. (818) 687-2423.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 140 hospices serving ZIP code 93063 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 1, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 1, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “It is required that the written Patient Bill of Rights includes the right to be involved in the development of his or her plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical records reviewed in which a patient was discharged for extended prognosis revealed the agency did not ensure the patient was given sufficient notice of non-coverage. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/15/2022 for the diagnosis of encephalopathy. The patient was discharged for extended prognosis on 11/06/2023. The notification of Medicare non-coverage (NOMNC) was signed by the patient/family on the day of discharge, instead of the required 48 hours before discharge. During an interview and joint record review with the Director of Patient Care Services on 07/31/2024, stated she “realized the notice should have been given to the family earlier than the day of discharge.””

    Rule L0513. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 154 words

    “It is required that the hospice Interdisciplinary Group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completes an initial comprehensive assessment no later than five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 14 (7%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the interdisciplinary group completed the initial comprehensive assessment within five (5) calendar days after the election of hospice care. Clinical Record 4: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/16/2024 with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The social worker’s initial comprehensive assessment was completed on 07/23/2024, seven (7) days after the election of hospice care. During an interview and joint record review with the Director of Patient Care Services on 07/31/2024, she stated “There should have been a communication note explaining a reason if the social worker assessment was late.””

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 325 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician (if any), reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 14 (14%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the individualized plan of care was revised as frequently as the patient’s condition required. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/05/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the right breast. The initial plan of care dated 06/05/2024 included a problem titled “Pain/Fever greater than 100 due to disease process.” A nursing visit dated 07/15/2024 included “Tramadol 50 mg for moderate c/o pain.” A nursing visit dated 07/27/2024 noted “pain 8/10, physician consulted, and medication changes made. Patient now reporting pain managed.” The written plan of care was not updated to reflect the changes noted in the nursing visits. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/22/2023 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the bladder. A nursing visit was made on 01/03/2024 in which it was noted “patient declining and now needs aide assistance. Pain has increased. Medication changes were made.” During the time frame of 01/03/2024 to 01/06/2024 the patient’s daughter called the hospice office to express the patient had “vomited green bile and was continuing to decline.” She was advised to give medications from the comfort kit for nausea/vomiting. On 01/06/2024 a nursing visit was made that noted, “the patient was imminent.” The patient died later that day. During this time frame, the plan of care was not updated to reflect the changes in patient status. During an interview and joint record review with the Director of Patient Care Services on 07/31/2024, she stated “I need to update the plan of care during the visits or while things happen instead of just putting it in my notes.””

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 538 words

    “It is required that written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 4 of 10 (40%) clinical records reviewed in which hospice aide services were accepted revealed the agency did not ensure the registered nurse provided specific written instructions for the hospice aide. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/29/2024 for the diagnosis of acute kidney failure. The initial nursing assessment dated 02/29/2024 noted the patient to have 18 wounds in various stages (Stage II to Stage IV) covered with foam dressings. The hospice aide care plan dated 02/29/2024 included the relevant tasks of bathing via bed bath and visualize skin and report changes to nurse. Home Visit 1 was conducted on 07/31/2024 to observe Staff 7 (hospice aide). During this home visit, the care home’s owner advised the site visitor the number of wounds had healed from 18 to 11. The care home owner advised she had given the patient pain medication in “advance of the aide visit to ensure he was comfortable during the bath.” The wound dressings covered large portions of the patient’s body, especially the coccyx, hips, heels, and shoulders. Staff 7 advised she was “nervous as this was not normally her patient and she didn’t know about all these wounds,” The aide care plan did not include specific written instructions for the aide regarding the wounds, including notification of the wound location(s) or to notify the nurse if the dressings became soiled, dislodged or wet. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2024 for the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. The hospice aide care plan dated 06/13/2024 included the relevant task of “checking vitals every visit” without including specific parameters of when the aide should notify the nurse. Clinical Record 6: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2024 for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The hospice aide care plan dated 06/13/2024 included the relevant task of “checking vitals every visit” without including specific parameters of when the aide should notify the nurse. Clinical Record 7: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/5/2024 for the diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the right breast. A physician order dated 06/5/2024 stated “Malignant wound on right breast, extending from right chest to mid abdomen and left chest wall. Do not wash or get chest area/cancer site wet per patient request.” The hospice aide care plan dated 06/5/2024 included the relevant tasks of bathing via a bed bath and visualize condition of skin and report to nurse. It did not notify the aide of the wound on the right breast or chest area or the patient’s specific request. During an interview and joint record review with the Director of Patient Care Services on 07/31/2024, she stated “We normally don’t have the aides take vital signs, but parameters should have been added if we request they take vital signs. I didn’t do those admissions (Clinical Records 5 and 6).” When discussing the wounds, she agreed the aides needed to be aware “to notify the nurse regarding the dressing needing to be replaced.””

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 274 words

    “It is required that the hospice medical director or physician-designee provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification is completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 7 (29%) clinical records reviewed in which the patient was recertified, revealed the agency did not ensure the recertification of the terminal illness was completed by the physician no later than two calendar days after the first day of the benefit period and no more than 15 days before the next benefit period. Clinical Record 3: Clinical record review revealed the 15th benefit period started on 07/23/2024. The recertification of terminal illness was not signed by the hospice medical director at the time of record review on 07/31/2024, 8 days after the start of the benefit period and 6 days outstanding. There was not a verbal order present. Clinical Record 10: Clinical record review revealed the 3rd benefit period started on 07/23/2024 and the recertification of terminal illness was not signed by the hospice medical director at the time of record review on 08/01/2024, 9 days after the start of the benefit period and 7 days outstanding. There was not a verbal order present. During an interview and joint record review with the Director of Patient Care Services on 08/01/2024, she stated “I do not know why these have not been signed by the physician or a verbal order put in.””

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 143 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care, the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 1 (100%) clinical records reviewed in which a patient revoked the election of hospice care revealed the agency did not ensure the attending physician received a copy of the discharge summary. Clinical Record 12: The patient elected to revoke their hospice benefit for aggressive treatment on 09/04/2023. The clinical record did not contain evidence that the discharge summary had been forwarded to the attending physician. During an interview and joint record review with the Director of Patient Care Services on 07/31/2024, she stated they had not faxed or sent a copy of the discharge summary to the attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 1, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner6 deficiencies cited
Feb 28, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 24, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 16.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.6 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends16.8%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Susana San Agustin (corporate officer, 100%); Susana San Agustin (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Susana San Agustin (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Michael Rosales (corporate officer, 100%); Churchill Ray Buela (corporate officer, 100%); Susana San Agustin (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Michael Rosales (owns 5% or more directly, 30%); Churchill Ray Buela (owns 5% or more directly, 30%); Jessica Marie Adkins (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 74% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.14% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 20.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 140 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93063, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.