Loma Linda Hospice Care Inc.
A hospice in West Hills, California 91307
7301 Medical Center Dr Suite 302, West Hills, California 91307. (714) 882-1135.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 32 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- Not available CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
32 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 128 hospices serving ZIP code 91307 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Dec 11, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
5 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
32 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Nov 5, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
-
Medical director (42 CFR 418.102)
“Condition of Participation: Medical Director.”
-
In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 6 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the hospice aide had received at least l2 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. In-service training may occur while an aide is furnishing care to a patient. Personnel #6: No HR record for aide that has been with the agency for 1 year or more to abate this condition level.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 6 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the hospice aide personnel file that a registered nurse made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she is performing care. Personnel #6: No HR record for aide that has been with the agency for 1 year or more to abate this condition level.”
-
Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Upon patient record review, agency did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness Unable to abate condition level deficiency as there have been no new admissions since prior survey to demonstrate compliance.”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
The inspectors’ words, 341 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 5 (Patient #1, 2, 3) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. Patient #1: The form does not include physician written certification statement of 6 month or less life expectancy. “Given the advanced nature of the disease, it is my medical opinion that the patient is approaching the final stages of heart failure with a prognosis of six months or less. the patient and family have been counseled on the progression of the condition and are aware of the likely outcomes. “ is in the space allocated for RN assessment narrative. Patient #2: Physician narrative includes details that are inconsistent with POC and RN/LVN notes for this patient. The physician references that patient is on oxygen 2lpm 24 seven and that uses multiple inhalers without improvement. Upon review, there is no oxygen ordered or inhalers listed in orders, med profile, POC or RN/LVN notes. Furthermore, “Given the advanced nature of the disease, it is my medical opinion that the patient is approaching the final stages of heart failure with a prognosis of six months or less. the patient and family have been counseled on the progression of the condition and are aware of the likely outcomes” is in the space allocated for RN Assessment narrative. MD narrative ends with plan continue hospice care in view of declining, but does not include related certification of 6 month or less prognosis. Patient #3: The F2F documentation, partially copied to the Certifying Physician Narrative does not include specific prognosis. “Given the advanced stage of COPD, it is my medical opinion that the patient’s condition is deteriorating with a life expectancy of six moths or less. The patient and their family have been informed about the prognosis and are aware of the anticipated outcomes” is documented in the space allocated for RN Assessment narrative.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, the agency did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Unable to abate condition level deficiency as there have been no new admissions since prior survey to demonstrate compliance.”
Sep 12, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care26 deficiencies
-
Hospice aide and homemaker services (42 CFR 418.76)
“Condition of Participation: Hospice Aide and Homemaker Services. L607”
-
Organizational environment (42 CFR 418.100)
“Condition of Participation: Organization and Administration of Services.”
-
Medical director (42 CFR 418.102)
“Condition of Participation: Medical Director.”
-
Clinical records (42 CFR 418.104)
“Condition of Participation: Clinical Records.”
-
EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 110 words
“Upon personnel record review, 7 of 10 (Personnel #1,2,3,4,5,9,10) did not have evidence Emergency Preparedness training including: • Initial training in emergency preparedness policies and procedures to all new and existing hospice employees, and individuals providing services under arrangement, consistent with their expected roles • Demonstrate staff knowledge of emergency procedures • Provide emergency preparedness training at least annually • Periodically review and rehearse its emergency preparedness plan with hospice employees (including nonemployee staff), with special emphasis placed on carrying out the procedures necessary to protect patients and others • Maintain documentation of all emergency preparedness training There is no evidence of emergency preparedness training in the reference employee files.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 100 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,6,7,8,10,11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring All referenced patients had orders for “Oxygen 1-5L per NC for shortness of breath or to maintain O2 sat above 90%.” Oxygen was not included on the medication profile.”
-
Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))
The inspectors’ words, 241 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,3,4,6,8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days #1-There is no evidence that the RN updated the comprehensive assessment prior to recertification on 08/02/24, the RN was performing supervisory visits however, there was no assessment of the patient. #3-There is no evidence that the RN updated the comprehensive assessment prior to recertification on 07/03/24, the RN was performing supervisory visits however, there was no assessment of the patient.. #4-There is no evidence that the RN updated the comprehensive assessment prior to recertification on 08/21/24, the RN was performing supervisory visits however, there was no assessment of the patient. #6-There is no evidence that the RN updated the comprehensive assessment prior to recertification on 07/22/24, the RN was performing supervisory visits however, there was no assessment of the patient. #8-There is no evidence that the RN updated the comprehensive assessment prior to recertification on 06/24/24.\, the RN was performing supervisory visits however, there was no assessment of the patient.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14(Patient #8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. #8-Plan of care lists oxygen concentrator as DME, but patient did not have oxygen.”
-
Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 114 words
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #14) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery #14-There is no evidence of a post-death bereavement plan of care.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 162 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. #5-There are no evidence of skills competencies for the aide.”
-
In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the hospice aide had received at least l2 hours of in-service training during each 12-month period. In-service training may occur while an aide is furnishing care to a patient. #5-There is no evidence that the aide received 12 hours of in-service training.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
“Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #9) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training #9-Plan of care includes aide frequency of 1 x wk, but no aide visits are documented.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence in the hospice aide personnel file that a registered nurse made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she is performing care. #5-There is no evidence in the employee file that a registered nurse made an onsite visit with the aide.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. No oversight by governing body/administrator for valid election of benefit for all patients surveyed, CTI’s missing narratives.”
-
Services (42 CFR 418.100(c))
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is primarily engaged in providing the following care and services: • Nursing services • Medical social services • Physician services • Counseling services, including spiritual counseling, dietary counseling and bereavement counseling • Hospice aide, volunteer, homemaker services • Physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology services • Short-term inpatient care • Medical supplies (including drugs and biologicals) and medical appliance The hospice has a facility name, but no contract for inpatient or respite was produced for review prior to the end of survey. No employee files for therapists were available for review.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. #5-There is no evidence of orientation on the hospice philosophy in the employee file.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #5) did not have evidence that the hospice employees have received orientation on their specific job requirements. #5-There is no evidence of job specific orientation for the aide.”
-
Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))
The inspectors’ words, 150 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #1,4,5,10) did not have evidence that the medical director or physician designee provides written certification that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less if the illness runs its normal course. The physician must consider the following when making this determination: • The primary terminal condition • Related diagnosis • Current subjective and objective medical findings • Current medication and treatment orders • Information about the medical management of any of the patient’s conditions unrelated to the terminal illness #1- CTI dated 12/26/23 does not contain a narrative statement. #4- Narrative statement on CTI dated 2/23/24 states “see separate document” - there is no separate document attached. #5-Narrative statement on CTI dated 02/14/24 states “see separate sheet” - there is no attachment. #10-Narrative statement on CTI dated 02/14/24 states “see separate report” - there is no attachment.”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
The inspectors’ words, 223 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,3,4,5,6,9,10) did not have evidence that before the recertification period for each patient, the medical director or physician designee must review the patient’s clinical information and provide written documentation that it is anticipated that the patient’s life expectancy is 6 months or less. #1-Narrative statement for CTI dated 08/02/24 does not contain evidence of patient specific data supporting the terminal diagnosis. #3-Narrative statement for CTI dated 07/03/24does not contain evidence of patient specific data supporting the terminal diagnosis. #4-Narrative statement for CTI dated 05/23/24 states “see separate report,” not report is attached. Narrative statement for CTI dated 08/21/24 is blank. #5-Narrative statement for CTI dated 05/14/24 states “ per review RN assessment, patient is appropriate for benefit period 2. Narrative statement for CTI dated 08/12/24 contains a face to face assessment, but no indication of decline or change in condition from benefit period 2 to 3. #6-Narrative statement on CTI dated 04/23/24 does not contain evidence of information related to the need for hospice services. #9-Narrative statement for CTI dated 06/17/24 does not contain evidence of patient data related to decline or change in condition is included. #10- Narrative statement for CTI dated 08/12/24 contains a face to face assessment, but no indication of decline or change in condition from benefit period 2 to 3.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 14 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 All records are missing the election date on the election statement. Additionally the patients’ signatures on the election statements are not dated.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
“Upon patient client record review, 14 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. All records are missing signature dates on consents and admitting clinician signatures are illegible and without credentials.”
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(4))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #8) did not have evidence that all Speech Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) or Audiologist in accordance with the state’s Speech-Language Pathology Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. #8-There is no evidence of a SLP file to validate licensure.”
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(5))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #7) did not have evidence all Occupational Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Occupational Therapist (OT) in accordance with the state’s Occupational Therapy Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. #7-There is no evidence of an OT employee file to validate licensure.”
-
Personnel qualification (42 CFR 418.114(b)(7))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 10 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence all Physical Therapy Services are provided by a qualified licensed Physical Therapist (PT) in accordance with the state’s Physical Therapy Practice Act and the hospice’s policies and procedures and/or job descriptions. #6-There was no evidence of a PT employee file to validate licensure.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Upon personnel record review, 4 of 10 (Personnel #4,6,7,9) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. There were no criminal background checks found for any contracted individuals.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 6 of 10 (Personnel #1,2,3,5,9,10) did not have evidence of criminal background checks being obtained in accordance with state requirements. In the absence of state requirements, criminal background checks are obtained within three months of the date of employment for all states that the individual has lived or worked in the past 3 years. There is no evidence of criminal background checks for the referenced employees.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | No deficiencies cited |
| Nov 5, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 6 deficiencies cited |
| Sep 12, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 26 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 28, 2021.
- CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 128 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91307, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 32.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Loma Linda Hospice Care Inc. This hospice | 32 |
| Providence at Home With Compassus Hospice Care La County | 5 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Valley Continuing Care | 10 |
| Assisted Home Hospice | 2 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 3 |
| Access Tlc Hospice | 4 |
| Mission Hospice | 15 |
| Assisted Home Hospice | 3 |
| Roze Room Hospice of the Valley | 2 |
| Vnacare | 8 |
| Mission Hospice Services of Los Angeles LLC | 7 |
| Buena Vista Hospice | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.