Hearth Record

Well Care Hospice Inc.

A hospice in Palmdale, California 93550

1543 E Palmdale Blvd Suite J, Palmdale, California 93550. (661) 365-0078.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

15 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 207 hospices serving ZIP code 93550 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on Dec 19, 2024: an initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

15 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

15 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Dec 19, 2024: initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies
  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 2: No evidence that SCC contributed to the IDG. SCC signed the IDG as completed but the area for contribution left blank.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 5 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 5: Order written on 10/27/2024 has SN/LVN frequency ordered as every 14 days. No evidence that the SN is visiting the patient every 14 days. No evidence that a SN visit has been completed since 11/04/2024. No evidence that the visits were missed at the request of the patient/family or that an order was received by the physician to stop/decrease visit frequency.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

Nov 8, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies
  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Initial assessment (42 CFR 418.54(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Upon patient record review 7 of 14 (Patient #4,5,6,7,8,9,10) did not have evidence that the hospice Registered Nurse must complete an initial assessment within 48 hours after the election of hospice care in accordance with §418.24 Patient #4,5,6,7,8,9,10 All had documentation of initial comprehensive nursing assessments. Agency staff interview indicates these patients were all hospital referrals, seen in the hospital with plan for discharging home and initial comprehensive assessments performed in hospital. Agency states all passed prior to going home from the hospital. There was no evidence the initial comprehensive assessment took place in the location where hospice services are being delivered or were intended to be delivered.”

    Rule L0522. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 229 words

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice has an interdisciplinary group (IDG) or groups composed of individuals who work together to meet the physical, medical, psychosocial, emotional, and spiritual needs of the hospice patients and families facing terminal illness and bereavement. Interdisciplinary group members must provide the care and services offered by the hospice, and the group, in its entirety, must supervise the care and services. Patient #1 IDG documentation dated 10/16/24 (for Recert 10/25/24) had a skilled nurse contribution of a pasted LVN visit narrative dated 10/23/24. There were no SN signatures for attendance of the meeting. The next IDG dated 10/26/24 had the same LVN visit narrative as the SN contribution and again had no SN signatures for attendance. Patient #2 IDG 10/16/24 had a skilled nurse contribution of a pasted LVN visit narrative dated 10/14/24. There were no SN signatures for attendance of the meeting. Patient #3 IDG 10/30/24 SN contribution was a pasted RN visit narrative. No SN signature for attendance. Patient #13 “Initial Orders & IDG Notification” box checked stating “Serves as IDT” dated 11/13/23 many sections blank and NO Signatures from any discipline or MD. IDG dated 11/22/23 no contribution from RN (only contribution was from MSW) NO Signatures. IDT dated 12/6/23 BLANK no contributions, NO signatures. IDG dated 12/20/23 and IDG dated 01/03/24 had only contribution from MSW and NO signatures.”

    Rule L0539. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,13,14) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #1,2,3,13,14 did not have discipline visit frequencies on the POC.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #7,9,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #7 POC established 1/8/24 did not include any medications from the Medication profile. Patient #9 POC established 6/4/24 did not include medications. Patient #10 POC established 02/21/24 did not include medications (Comfort Kit) that were listed on the comprehensive assessment.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 112 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #2,3,7,9,10,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient #2,3 had oxygen concentrators in the home. Oxygen was not listed on the current POC provided for home visit. Patient #7 POC established 1/8/24 did not include any DME listed on Comprehensive admission assessment (bed, wheelchair). Patient #9 POC established 6/4/24 did not include any DME. Patient #10 POC established 02/21/24 did not include any DME (oxygen). Patient #13 POC established 11/13/23 did not include any DME listed on comprehensive assessment. (Bed)”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(6))

    “Upon client record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,13,14) did not have evidence that the plan of care included IDG’s documentation of the patient’s or families level of understanding, involvement and agreement with the plan of care.”

    Rule L0551. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 137 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: • Making bereavement services available to the family and other individuals in the bereavement plan of care up to 1 year following the death of the patient. Bereavement counseling also extends to residents of a SNF/NF or ICF/IID when appropriate and identified in the bereavement plan of care • Ensuring that bereavement services reflect the needs of the bereaved • Development of a bereavement plan of care that notes the kind of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery Patient #12 contained no evidence that the initial bereavement assessment was completed or updated at the time of death. No evidence of a bereavement plan of care. No evidence of post-death contact or mailings.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Patient #2 Upon Home visit observation, the patient folder was for Ensure Hospice. The educational information was Ensure Hospice, the 24 hour number was for Ensure Hospice, however; the copies of admission papers were Well Care Hospice and when the patient was asked how she reaches Well Care Hospice, she did not refer to the folder, she had the correct number on a notebook in her own notes. SN states that she works for both hospices and it was likely a mistake on admission. Agency provided patient with the Well Care patient folder.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. •The patient’s current plan of care •The patient’s latest physician orders •Any other documentation that will assist in post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the attending physician or receiving facility”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Administration of drugs and biologicals (42 CFR 418.106(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 14 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14 ) did not have evidence in the patient record that the interdisciplinary group, as part of the review of the plan of care, determines the ability of the patient and/or family to safely self-administer drugs and biologicals to the patient in his or her home. If the patient and/or family are not capable of safely administering drugs and biologicals in the home, the hospice must address this issue in the patient’s plan of care.”

    Rule L0692. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 19, 2024Initial follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care2 deficiencies cited
Nov 8, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care13 deficiencies cited
Sep 11, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareAccreditation denied: the survey was refused

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Oct 4, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
  • An accrediting organisation denied it accreditation in the last three years because it refused a survey.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 19.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day9.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends19.9%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Nikko Saratsi (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Nikko Saratsi (corporate officer, 100%); Nikko Saratsi (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Raymond John Dorio (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 6 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold6 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 207 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93550, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 15.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.