Hearth Record

Peace & Comfort Hospice and Palliative Care, Inc.

A hospice in Encino, California 91436

16200 Ventura Blvd Suite 310a, Encino, California 91436. (818) 528-6373.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

11 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 100 hospices serving ZIP code 91436 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on May 2, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

11 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

11 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 2, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 91 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #5) did not contain a current/comprehensive Medication Profile: Patient #5: An RN entered the following note on the 04/17/24 IDG Meeting, “At a recent home visit the patient complained of itching on chest and back. RN assessed, and writes that it appears as though it could be mosquito or flea bites. There is a dog in the home. RN recommended that patient/family begin to use Calamine/Benadryl lotion to effected areas to assist with itching. This medication was not added to the Medication Profile.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 94 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #9) did not contain evidence that a Registered Nurse had been designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs: Patient #9: The IDG POC contained an order, beginning 02/16/24, for “Left foot dermatitis. Cleanse with warm soap and water or wound cleanser, pat dry. Apply Triamcinolone 1% Cream, apply dry dressing every day for 30 days.” The 02/24/24 nursing visit documented the wound section as “none”; and there was no mention of her assessment of, or the status of, such left foot dermatitis.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 185 words

    “Upon patient record review, 9 of 14 (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: A detailed statement of both the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs: Patients #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9: The most recent IDG Plan(s) of Care for each of these patients included the following ‘frequency’ of visits: 1) MSW: Once a month, and as needed, and every recertification period; and 2) Spiritual Counselor: As needed, and every recertification period. This MSW visit frequency statement does not include a quantitative amount for the ‘as needed’ visit frequencies. Nor is it clear as to what exactly the frequency of ‘and every recertification period’ indicates. This Spiritual Counselor visit frequency statement orders visits at a frequency of ‘as needed’ without a baseline visit frequency. Nor is it clear as to what exactly the frequency of ‘and every recertification period’ indicates.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient # 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #10: The initial IDG POC dated 04/25/24 included: 1) May change 24 F foley catheter monthly and as needed, without an indication for such needed change; and 2) May flush 24 F foley catheter with Normal Saline every SN visit as needed, without an indication for such flushes.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #1 and 2) did not contain evidence that the Plan of Care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs: Patient #1: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 04/20/24 it was noted that the patient had the following DME in the home: 1) Hospital bed; 2) Overbed table; 3) Air mattress; and 4) Wheel chair. These DME were not included on the current POC. Patient #2: During Surveyor-attended home visit on 04/20/24 it was noted that the patient had the following DME in the home: 1) Commode; and 2) Gait Belt. These DME/Supply were not included on the current POC.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 173 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #1, 2, 5, and 6) did not contain evidence that the revised Plan of Care included information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment(s): Patient #1: A 12/23/23 SOC order was obtained for, “May suction as tolerated”. This intervention had not been included/forwarded on to the most current/updated IDG POC. Patient #2: A 10/07/23 SOC order was obtained for, “May suction as tolerated”. This intervention had not been included/forwarded on to the most current/updated IDG POC. Patient #5: A 09/21/23 SOC order was obtained for, “May suction as tolerated for excessive secretions”. This intervention had not been included/forwarded on to the most current/updated IDG POC. Additionally, the SOC Consent reflected that the patient had a DPOA-Healthcare. (The Clinical Manager confirmed this). This pertinent Advance Directive information was not included on the most current IDG POC. Patient #6: The SOC Consent reflected that the patient had a DPOA-Healthcare. (The Clinical Manager confirmed this). This pertinent Advance Directive information was not included on the most current IDG POC.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 222 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #13 and 14) did not contain evidence that the Hospice offers Bereavement counseling that includes: The development of a Bereavement Plan of Care that notes the kind of Bereavement services to be offered, and the frequency of such service delivery: Patient #13: Died 11/26/23, with a post-death Bereavement Risk Assessment conducted on 11/28/23. The Bereavement Counselor, per Surveyor phone interview, stated that the intent was for the bereaved to receive a Sympathy card, and ‘multiple’ monthly mailings. However, there was not a fully developed Bereavement POC located. Rather, the Bereavement Counselor had added a notation at the bottom of his post-death Bereavement Risk Assessment to send a Sympathy card within 2 weeks of death, and a 1-month mailing within one month of death. These had been sent. Patient #14: Died 11/19/23, with a post-death Bereavement Risk Assessment conducted on 11/21/23. The Bereavement Counselor, per Surveyor phone interview, stated that the intent was for the bereaved to receive a Sympathy card, and ‘multiple’ monthly mailings. However, there was not a fully developed Bereavement POC located. Rather, the Bereavement Counselor had added a notation at the bottom of his post-death Bereavement Risk Assessment to send a Sympathy card within 2 weeks of death, and a 1-month mailing within one month of death. These had been sent.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel #7) did not contain evidence that their initial Aide Skills Competency Assessment had been performed while the Aide was providing care to a patient: Personnel #7: An RN conducted and Aide Skills Competency Assessment prior to the Aide providing independent patient care/services. However, the following tasks were not evaluated for while the Aide was providing patient care: ·Bed bath ·Nail and Skin care ·Normal Range of Motion”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #5 and 6) did not contain evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives: Patient #5: The SOC Consent reflected that the patient had a DPOA-Healthcare. (The Clinical Manager confirmed this). However, this Advance Directive had not been added to the filed California POLST document as such. Patient #6: The SOC Consent reflected that the patient had a DPOA-Healthcare. (The Clinical Manager confirmed this). However, this Advance Directive had not been added to the filed California POLST document as such.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not contain evidence that all entries were legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice: Patient #1: All of the home visit signature entries made by Aide (TS) did not include the Aide’s credentials.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patients #11 and 12) did not contain evidence that the Discharge Summary included all CMS-required information: Patients #11 and 12: The 04/25/24 and 04/02/24 respective DC Summaries did not include the following content: • A summary of the patient’s stay, including treatments, symptoms and pain management • The patient’s current Plan of Care • The patient’s latest Physician orders”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 2, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care11 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 6, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.9 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 16.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 86.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 100% at home.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.9 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends16.2%
Visits near death86.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: Francis Stephen Ybanez (owns 5% or more directly, 60%); Francis Stephen Ybanez (corporate officer, 60%); Francis Stephen Ybanez (corporate director, 60%); Francis Stephen Ybanez (runs it (operational or managerial control), 60%); Joycelyn Santos (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Joycelyn Santos (corporate officer, 20%); Joycelyn Santos (corporate director, 20%); Joycelyn Santos (runs it (operational or managerial control), 20%); Rosario Reyes (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Rosario Reyes (corporate officer, 20%); Rosario Reyes (corporate director, 20%); Rosario Reyes (runs it (operational or managerial control), 20%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 97.87% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 100 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91436, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 11.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.