Hearth Record

White Rose Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Encino, California 91436

16200 Ventura Blvd Suite 202, Encino, California 91436. (818) 848-8863.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 100 hospices serving ZIP code 91436 had 5.

The last inspection on record was on May 22, 2026: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 22, 2026: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient # 14) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patient 14: There is no evidence of assessment of imminence of death in the RN comprehensive assessment at SOC on 04/24/25.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 6) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited tor Patient 1: During home visit, the medication profile on 05/07/26 contains multiple orders for acetaminophen including Oral dose of 500 mg every 4-6 hours prn, Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5mg/325mg every 6 hours prn and rectal supp 650mg every 4 hours prn with no evidence of a limit to not exceed in 24 hour period. Patient 2: During home visit, the medication profile on 05/19/26 does not contain evidence of two medications caregiver reports client is taking including Aldactone and Ticagrelor. Caregiver reports “His daughter brought them in.” The prescriptions were last refilled in 01/26. Patient 6: The medication profile on 12/11/25 contains multiple orders for acetaminophen including rectal suppository every 4 hours and oral tabs 650 mg every 6 hours prn with no evidence of a limit to not exceed in 24 hour period.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient # 1, 2, 6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The updated POC on 05/07/26 contains multiple orders for acetaminophen including Oral dose of 500 mg every 4-6 hours prn, Hydrocodone/acetaminophen 5mg/325mg every 6 hours prn and rectal supp 650mg every 4 hours prn with no evidence of a limit to not exceed in 24 hour period. Patient 2: The updated POC on 05/19/26 does not contain evidence of two medications caregiver reports client is taking including Aldactone and Ticagrelor. Patient 6: The Initial POC on 12/11/25 contains multiple orders for acetaminophen including rectal suppository every 4 hours and oral tabs 650 mg every 6 hours prn with no evidence of a limit to not exceed in 24 hour period.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient # 5 and 9) did not have evidence the hospice offers bereavement counseling that includes: Patient 5: There is no evidence of a Bereavement POC being developed post death 02/28/26. Patient 9: There is no evidence of a Bereavement POC being developed post death 04/25/26.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 398 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 12 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, 13 and 14) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: There is no evidence of aide notes signed and dated on 5/4/26, 5/7/26, 5/11/26 and 5/14/26. Patient 2: There is evidence of Initial Spiritual care note completed by SC on 3/20/26 electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of SC. Patient 3: There is evidence of SN notes 4/27/26 and 5/4/26 not completed with electronic signature and date according to agency Policy WRH-CLN-072 submit and sign all patient-related documentation within 72 hours after actual patient visit. Patient 4: There is evidence of initial comprehensive assessments for visits completed by MSW and SC on 11/30/25 electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of MSW and SC. Patient 5: There is evidence of initial comprehensive assessments for visit completed by SC on 02/23/26 electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of SC. Patient 6: There is evidence of initial comprehensive assessments and initial bereavement assessment for visits completed by MSW and SC on 1/01/25 electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of MSW and SC. Patient 7: There is evidence of initial comprehensive assessments for visits completed by RN on 4/24/25 and SC on 4/25/25 electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of RN and SC. Patient 8: There is evidence of initial comprehensive assessments and initial bereavement assessment for visits completed by RN and MSW on 1/01/25 electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of RN and MSW. Patient 9: There is evidence of initial comprehensive assessments and initial bereavement assessment for visits completed by RN 4/23/25 and SC on 4/24/25 electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of RN and SC. Patient 10: There is evidence of initial RN comprehensive assessments completed by RN 08/18/25 is electronically signed and dated by LVN instead of RN. Patient 13: There is evidence that the initial Bereavement assessment completed by MSW on 5/4/25 is signed and dated by LVN instead of MSW. Patient 14: There is evidence that the initial Bereavement assessment completed by MSW on 4/25/25 is signed and dated by LVN instead of MSW.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 22, 2026Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 14, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 79.7 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 1.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 99% at home, 1% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day79.7 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends1.9%
Visits near death92.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Hakeem Fahm (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Hakeem Fahm (corporate officer, 50%); Hakeem Fahm (corporate director, 50%); Hakeem Fahm (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%); Chikaodi Happiness Fahm (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Chikaodi Happiness Fahm (corporate officer, 50%); Chikaodi Happiness Fahm (corporate director, 50%); Chikaodi Happiness Fahm (managing employee (on the payroll), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 7 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 84.62% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold7 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 100 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91436, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.