Pure Care Hospice, Inc.
A hospice in Cerritos, California 90701
11911 Artesia Blvd, Suite 208, Cerritos, California 90701. (562) 474-1690.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 20 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
20 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 74 hospices serving ZIP code 90701 had 6.5.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 4, 2024: a follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
20 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Jun 4, 2024: follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care1 deficiency
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 5 (Patients #1,2,4,5) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patients #1,2,4,5: Have nebulizer machine on POC. These patients are currently not on nebulizer meds. Per agency, the nebulizer machine is part of DME package sent to all patient homes and most patients at end of life will eventually receive nebulized medications.”
Mar 28, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care19 deficiencies
-
IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)
“Condition of Participation: Interdisciplinary Group, Care Planning, and Coordination of Services. L536”
-
Names and Contact Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(1))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the Emergency Plan communication plan includes all of the following: • Names and contact information for the following: • Hospice employees • Entities providing services under arrangement • Patients’ physicians • Other hospices Corrected on site.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 139 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #5,#8,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications. Patient 5: The medication profile identified a nebulized albuterol treatment ordered. There was no evidence of the medication in the home upon visit. Facility identified artificial tears as part of patient’s administered medications. There was no evidence the eye drops were included on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile contained nystatin and hydrocortisone topical medications with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medication profile contained triamcinolone topical medication with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Upon home visit medication reconciliation, the home had 500 mg acetaminophen with medications instead of the 325 mg tablets identified in the physician orders.”
-
Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))
“Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 2: There was no evidence of wound measurements and assessments documented since the start of care.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 232 words
“Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #3,#4,#7,#10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon recertification 2/1/24 identifying patient issues with dysphagia and risk for skin breakdown. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia and skin impairment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient issues with dysphagia. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient issues with risk for skin impairment. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to skin impairment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient issues with dysphagia. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to dysphagia included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 149 words
“Upon patient record review, 10 of 14 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7,#8,#9,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patients 1-10: The medical records contained orders for Social Work and Spiritual Care frequencies every recertification and as needed. There was no allowable quantity defined for PRNs. The records also contained differing frequency orders in the plan of care update orders that did not match the current orders in the profile. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 115 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #5,#8,#10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 5: Upon observation during the home visit, the caregivers identified the patient is administered artificial tears. There was no evidence of an order for artificial tears included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medical record contained orders for nystatin and hydrocortisone topical ointments with no area defined for administration. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained an order for triamcinolone topical no are defined for administration. Corrected on site.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 301 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patients #1,#2,#3,#4,#5,#6,#7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of an air mattress. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 2: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of an air mattress. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 3: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of an air mattress and walker. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 4:The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of a Hoyer lift. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of a walker. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. The care plan identified oxygen and nebulizer required for patient care. There was no evidence of the equipment on site during home visit. Corrected on site. Patient 6: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of a walker. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of a walker. There was no evidence of an order for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 162 words
“Upon client record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #3,#4,#11,#12) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 3: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency for once weekly. There was evidence of two scheduled visits completed the week of 2/18/24. Patient 4: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency for skilled nursing once weekly and RN visit every 14 days. There was evidence of 2 LVN visits the weeks of 2/4/24, 2/18/24, and 3/3/24. Patient 11: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency for skilled nursing once weekly and RN visit every 14 days. There was evidence of two scheduled LVN visits the weeks of 8/15/23 and 8/20/24. Patient 12: The medical record contained an ordered nursing frequency for skilled nursing once weekly and RN visit every 14 days. There was evidence of two scheduled LVN visits the weeks of 6/13/23, 6/25/23, and 7/2/23.”
-
Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c))
The inspectors’ words, 177 words
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the personnel file that the following competency assessment was performed by the aide with a patient: (This standard applies to all Hospice Aides providing care/service who are directly employed by the hospice or through a contractual agreement.) ·Communication skills, including the ability to read, write, and verbally report clinical information to patients, caregivers, and other hospice staff. ·Reading and recording temperature, pulse, and respiration ·Safe transfer techniques and ambulation. ·Normal range of motion and positioning ·Appropriate and safe techniques in personal hygiene and grooming that include-- ·(A) Bed bath ·(B) Sponge, tub, and shower bath ·(C) Shampoo, sink, tub, and bed ·(D) Nail and skin care ·(E) Oral hygiene ·(F) Toileting and elimination The other subject areas in this section may be evaluated through written examination, oral examination or after observation of a Hospice Aide with a patient. Personnel 6: There was no evidence of observation of obtaining vital signs, ambulation, sponge, tub, and shower for bathing, or sink and tub for shampooing.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Upon patient record review 2 of 14 (Patients #2,#4) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 2: The medical record contained ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the week of 3/10/24. Second visit completed per route sheet but not documented per agency policy of completion within 48 hours. Patient 4: The medical record contained ordered aide frequency of twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the weeks of 2/4/24 and 2/25/24.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(2))
“Upon personnel record review, 1 of 14 (Personnel #6) did not have evidence in the hospice aide personnel file that a registered nurse made an annual on-site visit to the location where a patient is receiving care in order to observe and assess each aide while he or she is performing care. Personnel 6: There was no evidence of an annual on-sit visit.”
-
Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice documents and demonstrates viable and ongoing efforts to recruit and retain volunteers.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Upon observation, there was no evidence the hospice is directed by a Board of Directors/governing body which assumes full legal authority and responsibility for the operation of the hospice. The governing body meeting minutes did not reflect evidence of periodic review of bylaws, policies, procedures, and human resource management. Corrected on site with meeting held 3/27/24.”
-
Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(1))
“Upon personnel record review, 2 of 14 (Personnel #12,#13) did not have evidence the hospice employees and contract employees have received orientation on the hospice philosophy. Personnel 12: There was no evidence of orientation on the hospice philosophy. Corrected on site. Personnel 13: There was no evidence of orientation on the hospice philosophy.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
“Upon patient client record review, 7 of 14 (Patients #1,#3,#4,#6,#7, #8, #9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 1,3,6,7,8,9: There was no evidence the QIO identification and contact information was given with the election forms and addendum to receive the Notification of Non-Covered Items. Patient 4: The Notification of Non-Covered Items did not identify non-covered medications to match the medication profile.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patient 4: The patient profile inaccurately identified patient as DNR, the POLST identified patient as full code. Corrected on site.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
“Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: The medical record contained consents incomplete with no identifying reason beneficiary is unable to sign and representative’s relationship to beneficiary in the space provided on the forms.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Upon personnel record review, 3 of 14 (Personnel #12,#13,#14) did not have evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel 12,13,14: There was no evidence of criminal background checks in the contracted personnel files. The agency submitted on site, however no results were received by end of survey.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2024 | Follow-up inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 1 deficiency cited |
| Mar 28, 2024 | Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 19 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Mar 30, 2021.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.6 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 82.7% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 95% at home, 5% in assisted living.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 12.6 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 4% |
| Visits near death | 82.7% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 5 owners or officers are people: Maye Ungria (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Maye Ungria (corporate officer, 100%); Maye Ungria (corporate director, 100%); Maye Ungria (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Evelyn Ganaden Basco (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 90.91% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 2.2% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 74 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 90701, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 20.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Nurses Plus Hospice | 3 |
| C V Hospice Care Inc. | 10 |
| Passionate Heart Hospice, Inc. | 5 |
| Sdkj Forever, LLC | Not given |
| Pure Care Hospice, Inc. This hospice | 20 |
| Hadassa Hospice | 9 |
| Hospice of the East and Palliative Care Inc. | Not given |
| Ambassadore Hospice Care, Inc. | 0 |
| Davida Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Evergreen Hospice Care, Inc. | 5 |
| Reliance Hospice and Palliative Care | 25 |
| Healthview Hospice & Palliative Care | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.