Hearth Record

Wetherby Hospice Care, Inc.

A hospice in Upland, California 91786

167 N 3rd Ave Suite E, Upland, California 91786. (909) 999-6186.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

6 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 164 hospices serving ZIP code 91786 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 1, 2024: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

6 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

6 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 1, 2024: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies
  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 145 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patient #2, 3, 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice interdisciplinary group, in consultation with the individual’s attending physician (if any), completed the comprehensive assessment no later than 5 calendar days after the election of hospice care. Patient 2: The patient was admitted for hospice services on 09.16.2023. The comprehensive assessment related to psychosocial needs was not completed by the MSW until 10.01.2023, which exceeds the 5 day requirement. Patient 3: The patient was admitted for hospice services on 10.14.2024. The comprehensive assessment related to psychosocial needs was not completed by the MSW until 10.24.2024, which exceeds the 5 day requirement. Patient 8: The patient was admitted for hospice services on 10.18.2023. The comprehensive assessment related to psychosocial needs was not completed by the MSW until 10.24.2023, which exceeds the 5 day requirement.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 218 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 4, 9, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy Patient 1: The medication list indicates diclofenac gel 3% topical bid PRN joint pain. This fails to specify a quantity or location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 2: The medication list indicates diclofenac gel 1% apply a thin layer topical bid PRN joint pain. This fails to specify a location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 4: The medication list indicates triamcinolone cream 0.1% apply a thin layer bid redness/itching. This fails to specify a location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 9: The medication list indicates diclofenac gel 1% apply a thin layer topical bid PRN pain. This fails to specify a location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 10: The medication list indicates carboxymethylcellulose sodium eye drops 0.5% 1 gtt ophthalmic daily. This fails to specify the location for insertion of this ophthalmic medication. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 330 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #2, 4, 7, 9, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 2: The RN visited the patient and completed a comprehensive assessment on 09.26.2024; the next RN visit and comprehensive assessment was completed on 10.18.2024, which exceeds the 15 day requirement; The LVN saw the patient according to the SN frequency specified via the plan of care. Patient 4: The RN visited the patient and completed a comprehensive assessment on 09.18.2024; the next RN visit and comprehensive assessment was completed on 10.05.2024, which exceeds the 15 day requirement; The LVN saw the patient according to the SN frequency specified via the plan of care. Patient 7: The RN visited the patient and completed a comprehensive assessment on 09.26.2024; the next RN visit and comprehensive assessment was completed on 10.16.2024, which exceeds the 15 day requirement; The LVN saw the patient according to the SN frequency specified via the plan of care. Patient 9: The RN visited the patient and completed a comprehensive assessment on 09.09.2024; the next RN visit and comprehensive assessment was completed on 10.04.2024, which exceeds the 15 day requirement; The LVN saw the patient according to the SN frequency specified via the plan of care. Patient 10: The RN visited the patient and completed a comprehensive assessment on 09.06.2024; the next RN visit and comprehensive assessment was completed on 10.04.2024, which exceeds the 15 day requirement; The LVN saw the patient according to the SN frequency specified via the plan of care.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 201 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1, 2, 4, 9, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: The patient utilizes diclofenac gel for management of the terminal illness; however, the plan of care does not indicate a quantity or location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 2: The patient utilizes diclofenac gel for management of the terminal illness; however, the plan of care does not indicate a location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 4: The patient utilizes triamcinolone cream for management of the terminal illness; however, the plan of care does not indicate a location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 9: The patient utilizes diclofenac gel for management of the terminal illness; however, the plan of care does not indicate a location for application of this topical medication. (corrected onsite) Patient 10: The patient utilizes carboxymethylcellulose sodium eye drops for management of the terminal illness; however, the plan of care does not indicate the location for insertion of this ophthalmic medication. (corrected onsite)”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #4, 9, 10, 14) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 4, 14: The patient/representative requested Notification of Noncovered Items, Services, and Drugs at the time of hospice admission; however, there was no evidence that this notification was provided within the required 5 days, or at any subsequent time. Patient 9, 10: The election form failed to indicate the date hospice services were initiated. Additionally, the patient/representative requested Notification of Noncovered Items, Services, and Drugs at the time of hospice admission; however, there was no evidence that this notification was provided within the required 5 days, or at any subsequent time.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #12) did not have evidence that the hospice forwarded a summary and a copy of the patient record, if requested, to a facility when transferring the patient to that facility. Patient 12: There was no evidence that the hospice forwarded the current plan of care, certification of terminal illness, or other related documents to the receiving agency.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 1, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care6 deficiencies cited
Aug 9, 2024Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health CareAccreditation denied: the survey was refused

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 23, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
  • An accrediting organisation denied it accreditation in the last three years because it refused a survey.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 16.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 11.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.7% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 50% at home, 50% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day16.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends11.2%
Visits near death92.7% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 17 owners or officers are people: Kevin S Galasinao (corporate officer, 100%); Kevin S Galasinao (corporate director, 100%); Kevin S Galasinao (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Alejandra Amparano (corporate officer, 100%); Alejandra Amparano (corporate director, 100%); Kishan B Patel (corporate officer, 100%); Kishan B Patel (corporate director, 100%); Kevin S Galasinao (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Kevin S Galasinao (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Alejandra Amparano (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Maria B Bravo (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Maria B Bravo (corporate director, 20%); Kishan B Patel (owns 5% or more directly, 14%); Viraj Patel (owns 5% or more directly, 13%); Viraj Patel (corporate director, 13%); Sagar Bhakta (owns 5% or more directly, 13%); Sagar Bhakta (corporate director, 13%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 9.7% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 164 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91786, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 6.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.