Hearth Record

Geana Hospice Care Inc.

A hospice in Upland, California 91786

820 N Mountain Ave Suite 107, Upland, California 91786. (909) 000-0000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 164 hospices serving ZIP code 91786 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on May 3, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 3, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies
  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse, the patient was not seen by a RN every 15 days as required to complete an assessment. For RRNHV#5, the assessment was completed by the RN on day 16. Finding was verified by the Director of Patient Care Services. Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 9 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the IDG meeting notes were signed only by the Registered Nurse and the Medical Director and did not document who else attended the meeting. No other documentation was included in the EMR to indicate who attended each IDG meeting. The organization kept a separate notebook with sign in sheets. Finding was verified by the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 108 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor upon review of the patient admission folder and observation in the homes that patients were not given any written information or education regarding infection control beyond “cover the cough”, medication safety, pain control, or basic health practices and safety. Interview with the Director of Patient care services revealed that this information is taught to patients from a comprehensive admission notebook the admitting nurses take into the home but no printed education is left in the home for the patient/family to reference or for future education use by the skilled nurse.”

    Rule L0544. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 267 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 3 of 3 home visits conducted, it was observed by the Nurse Surveyor that the organization did not implement the infection prevention and control activities it had planned per “Hand Washing Policy No. 7-009.01”. For example, during RRHV#1 the registered nurse washed his hands, then donned gloves and did not change them between assessing the patient and documenting. He did not perform hand hygiene after completing the medication reconciliation and beginning to document. For RRHV#2, the CHHA washed her hands with soap and water and applied gloves, she did not perform hand hygiene again between removing and changing gloves. For RRHV#3, the LVN did not hand sanitize after removing her gloves after performing the patient’s vital signs. Findings were discussed with the Director of Patient Care Services upon return to the office. Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, it was observed by the nurse surveyor that the nurses did not clean their equipment per agency “Bag Technique Policy No. 7-014.1”. For RRHV#1 the registered nurse cleaned his equipment (BP cuff, stethoscope, thermometer, pulse oximeter) with disinfectant wipes and put them back on the dirty portion of the barrier that he had taken them off. He then put them into their case without allowing them to dry per the recommended product dry time of three minutes. For RRHV#3, the LVN cleaned her equipment (BP cuff, stethoscope, thermometer, pulse oximeter) with disinfectant wipes and dropped them into her bag without allowing for dry time. Findings were discussed with the Director of Patient Care Services upon return to the office.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 148 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 9 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that the hospice aide care plan did not include all of the information for the hospice aide to effectively provide care. For RRHV#2, the patient was to have a shower every visit, however per patient/daughter request the CHHA was only showering the patient once a week and performing a chair bath on the first visit of the week and only getting her hair washed once a week, not every visit. The care plan had not been updated to reflect the changes. RRNHV#5, the patient was on oxygen continuously and there were no instructions to indicate if the patient’s oxygen could be removed for her bed bath. Additionally, for both CHHA care plans, PRN visit orders were included. Findings were verified by the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for RRHV#2 the CHHA did not provide care according to the hospice aide plan of care. The CHHA plan of care had that the patient was to get a shower every visit, however the CHHA assisted the patient to take a shower once a week and provided a chair bath the other visit. Additionally, she only washed the patient’s hair once a week, not every visit as indicated in the care plan. Finding was discussed with the Director of Patient Care Services upon return to the office.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 9 patient records reviewed, for active patients, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that Hospice Aide Supervisory visits were not documented the required every fourteen days per regulation. For RRHV#1, there were no documented Hospice Aide Supervisory visits for fifteen days and for RRNHV#5 there were no documented Hospice Aide Supervisory visit for sixteen days. Findings were verified with the Director of Patient Care Services.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Volunteers (42 CFR 418.78)

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 2 of 9 HR files reviewed, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that for the HR#8 and HR#9, Hospice Volunteers both had a job description for patient care, but neither performed patient care. They did not have a written job description for the bereavement or office work they were doing. They were both interviewed, and they understood their roles in the volunteer program. Finding was verified by the Director of Patient Care Services and the Human Resource Manager.”

    Rule L0641. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 124 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 2 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted by the surveyor that the medication profile was inaccurate. During RRHV#1, the skilled nurse performed a medication reconciliation with the board and care staff. She had stopped giving the patient her Cranberry Extract with Vitamin over two weeks ago. Additionally, was giving a different dose of Acetaminophen Extra Strength than what was on the medication profile. For RRHV#2 with the hospice aide, a medication reconciliation was not done, however the patient’s daughter volunteered the information that she was giving her mother medication for a yeast infection. The prescription was filled almost a month ago and was not on the current. medication profile or updated on the patient’s home list. Findings”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, it was noted by the nurse surveyor that backup oxygen cylinders were not properly stored. During RRHV#2 it was noted that the patient’s backup G tank was secured in a stand but stored in the garage surrounded and covered by clutter where it was unable to be accessed and not safely stored. Findings were discussed with the Director of Patient Care Services upon return to the office.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 3, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 17, 2017.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 12.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 82.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 96% at home, 2% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends12.9%
Visits near death82.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Gerald P Tasin (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Gerald P Tasin (corporate officer, 100%); Gerald P Tasin (corporate director, 100%); Gerald P Tasin (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Morgan B Garcia (corporate officer, 100%); Morgan B Garcia (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Siamak Movaghar (corporate officer, 100%); Siamak Movaghar (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 79.41% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 17.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 164 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91786, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.