Hearth Record

Living Angels Hospice Care

A hospice in Montclair, California 91763

4959 Palo Verde Street Suite 208c-1, Montclair, California 91763. (909) 675-7055.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

13 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 146 hospices serving ZIP code 91763 had 6.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 10, 2024: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

13 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

13 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jul 31, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, During RR#5 it was noted lack of an initial bereavement assessment documented in the medical record. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 350 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, Review of the following records documented many of the patient/family goals were either generic, not measurable or not individualized. During RR#3 it was assessed by the RN at the initial evaluation that the patient was imminently terminal, however goals were written to be accomplished throughout the certification or by the next IDG. For example: participate management activities and a balanced plan of activities and rest to prevent stress throughout the cert period. The patient will maintain or achieve a slight increase in activity tolerance evidenced by an acceptable level of fatigue/weakness maintain and improve functional abilities through maintaining normal functioning and alignment, preventing edema of extremities, and preventing complications of immobility during hospice stay. During RR#4 it was noted the goals were generic and were not individualized. For example: Patient will reduce discomfort with improved bowel elimination status with the help of proper diet in this certification period. -Patient will be free from signs and symptoms of urinary infection, distention, or retention with in hospice stay. -Increase strength/energy for functional activities and patient will remain safe from any fall or injury in this certification period. Patient will exhibit minimal or reduced confusion, memory loss, and cognitive disturbances with the use of medication as interventions during hospice stay. Pt will have adequate food and fluids as tolerated or desired with in hospice stay. During RR#1 it was noted some goals were generic, not individualized and not meaurable. For example: ADL needs are met., pt will verbalize and/or express decreased episodes of chest pain. Pt will maintain optimum peripheral circulation. During RR#2 it was noted the following goals were not measurable: Optimal bowel elimination and comfort. -Pt/Family/PCG will verbalize having elimination needs met at an acceptable level. -Promote optimal rest status for Pt/Family/PCG. During RR#7 it was noted goals without a measurable time frame to assess progress as follows: Pt will maintain good peripheral circulation; Patient will maintain BP within individually acceptable range. Pt/Family/PCG will verbalize having urinary elimination needs met at an acceptable level. This was discussed with the Administrator.
”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, During HV#2 record review it was noted interventions in the POC did not reflect the patient clinical skin condition. The skin was assessed as intact without any breakdown or wounds documented. The interventions added to the POC were: Assess changes in wound status - check size, integrity, location, type/stage, signs and symptoms of infection, drainage, effectiveness of current treatment. This was discussed with the Administrator. Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, During HV#1 record review it was noted the MSW documented during an IDG meeting the end of July 2024, an update to the POC that included in-person monthly visits to provide emotional support and other necessary psychosocial assistance. It was noted MSW interventions were not added to the POC. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, During HV#1 record review it was noted the MSW visited the patient in July 2024, the day of a scheduled IDG meeting. The frequency of visits on the POC for the MSW was documented as declined and was not updated to reflect the visit that documented the MSW would continue in-person monthly visits to provide emotional support and other necessary psychosocial assistance. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, During RR#2 it was noted the patient was prescribed Pradaxa 110mg 2x/day. The POC lacked interventions and goals for S/S bleeding and bleeding precautions. During RR#6 it was noted the patient was prescribed Warfarin daily. The POC lacked interventions and goals for S/S bleeding and bleeding precautions. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, During RR#1 it was noted a comm note that the patient was c/o nausea and vomiting in June 2024. An SN visit was provided to assess with documentation that the IDG was notified. The nausea and vomiting deficit were not added to the POC for continued assessment, interventions and goals. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, During RR#3 it was noted orders for the following were obtained during the initial RN assessment: Right foot wound. Cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry. Apply Triple Antibiotic ointment. Cover with kerlix dressing daily and as needed when soiled or dislodged x 21 days then re eval. Stage 2 coccyx pressure sore: Cleanse with wound cleanser ,pat dry. Apply Medihoney. Cover with bordered dressing daily and as needed when soiled or dislodged x 21 days then re eval. There is lack of SN documentation after the initial RN assessment of wound care being performed for the next 4 days prior to the patient’s discharge. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 102 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, During HV#1 it was noted the SN after disinfecting equipment used to assess vital signs did not place the equipment on a clean barrier to dry instead placed the disinfected equipment on the same barrier used to place the equipment after use. This was discussed with the Administrator. Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, During HV#1 it was noted the SN did not disinfect her hands after removing gloves 3 times during a wound care procedure before donning clean pairs. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 284 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 8 patient records reviewed, receiving aide services. During HV#1 record review it was noted the hospice aide assignment form care plan lacked the order for oxygen 2L/min PRN SOB. The aide plan of care also lacked an update in April 2024 when the patient developed a buttock pressure ulcer with direction to the aide not to remove the dressing and when to notify the RN and lacked an update in July 2024 when the patient sustained a skin tear to the left forearm after a fall at home with direction to the aide not to remove the dressing and when to notify the RN. During RR#3 it was noted an oxygen order on CHHA form was documented by the RN as 2-5L/min PRN without a specific liter flow for the aide to follow. In addition, there is instruction at the bottom of the assignment form to leave the oxygen on during the bath but did not indicate the liter flow.
During RR#4 it was noted an oxygen order on CHHA form was documented by the RN as 2-5L/min PRN without a specific liter flow for the aide to follow. In addition, there is instruction at the bottom of the assignment form to leave the oxygen on during the bath but did not indicate the liter flow. During RR#2 it was noted the oxygen order on the aide assignment form was documented, 2-5L/min PRN SOB without a specific liter flow for the aide to follow. During RR#7 it was noted the oxygen order on the aide assignment form was documented, 2-5L/min PRN SOB without a specific liter flow for the aide to follow This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Document Review. There was lack of evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by a conditional finding in 418.56 and 418.100. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 14 patient records reviewed, During HV#1 record review it was noted the medication profile in the patient medical record and in the home did not match one of the medication bottle labels. Quetiapine (Seroquel) 25mg, 12.5 mg dose (1/2, 25 mg tab) 2x/day for agitation was documented on the medication profile in the home. The label on the bottle also included take an additional 1/2 tab daily PRN agitation that was omitted on the medication profile. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 6 patient records reviewed, who were discharged. During RR#1 it was noted the D/C summary lacked documentation that the hospice informed the attending physician of the availability of a discharge summary. During RR#5 it was noted lack of a D/C summary in the patient medical record. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, During HV#1 it was noted the organization individualized disaster preparedness form was blank in the home folder reviewed. The patient record also lacked a completed individualized disaster preparedness form. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 10, 2024Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 31, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission13 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 13, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 16.9% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 90.9% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 44% at home, 52% in assisted living, 4% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends16.9%
Visits near death90.9% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 17 owners or officers are people: Verna E. Mon (corporate officer, 100%); Verna E. Mon (corporate director, 100%); Hermie A Davis (corporate officer, 100%); Hermie A Davis (corporate director, 100%); Hermie A Davis (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Noralyn Edejer (corporate officer, 100%); Noralyn Edejer (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Richel Agra (corporate officer, 100%); Richel Agra (corporate director, 100%); Richel Agra (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Woinee Marcelo (corporate director, 100%); Woinee Marcelo (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Verna E. Mon (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Hermie A Davis (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Noralyn Edejer (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Richel Agra (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); Woinee Marcelo (owns 5% or more directly, 20%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 86.67% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 146 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91763, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6.5; this one had 13.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.