Hearth Record

Faith, Hope & Love Hospice Care Inc.

A hospice in Montclair, California 91763

4959 Palo Verde Street Suite 201b-1, Montclair, California 91763. (442) 888-5505.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

12 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 146 hospices serving ZIP code 91763 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on May 16, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

12 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

12 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 16, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies
  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During the Emergency Management session it was noted that the organization had a conducted a Hazard Vulnerability Analysis with an all hazards approach in 2022 but the analysis had not been conducted and evaluated annually as required by organization policy. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS and Office Manager.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 patient records reviewed, for live discharge, the organization failed to ensure the patient/caregiver is involved in making decisions about their care, treatment, or services. On review of RRDC#1 where the patient was discharged for extended prognosis the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was presented yet signed on the day prior to discharge, not allowing for the required 2 days prior to discharge. This observation was reviewed with the Office Manager.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the interdisciplinary group update the comprehensive assessment in collaboration with the patient’s attending physician, if any, as frequently as the patient’s condition requires, but no less than every 15 days. On review of RRHV#2 there were greater than 15 day gaps between RN visits for comprehensive assessment. For example: there was 24 days from March to April, 20 day gap in April, and at 22 day gap from April to date of survey. In RRNHV#10 the RN was visiting the monthly instead of at least every 15 days or less and the LVN was conducting weekly visits. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS, and Office Manager.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 104 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care reflect patient and family goals that were specific, measurable, and time-bound. On review of RRNHV#7 there was goals that were not specific, measurable, and timebound such as: Maintain mobility and independence and Minimize complications due impaired mobility. In RRNHV#8 example was Pain will remain in comfortable level during care and Patient will have mortuary plans in place. In RRNHV#9 and example was Pt/Family/PCG will verbalize having urinary elimination needs met at an acceptable level. These observations were reviewed with the Office Manager and DPCS.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 169 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care includes all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. For example: on review of RRHV#2 the patient had wounds with a suspected wound infection in April yet there was no infection care plan to guide the care. There was a new wound to the great toe and no care plan open to address the care of the toe. Further the wound care was changed from wound vac to dressing changes yet the care plan did not reflect the change in the patient status. In RRHV#3 the patient had orders for utilizing a Purewick urinary catheter yet there was no urinary care plan to guide the care. In RRNHV#9 the documentation noted issues with back pain with Lidocaine patches added for pain control, yet there was no care plan for pain open. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS and the Office Manager.”

    Rule L0546. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 196 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 9 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the plan of care was revised based on information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and noting the patient’s progress toward goals. For example: throughout all records reviewed there were examples of the care plans not being updated based as the goals and interventions remained the same, unchanged from IDG to IDG throughout the patient’s care. Examples from RRHV#2 were PCG will be able to care for the wound vacuum within the next 1-2 weeks and Patient will tolerate wound dressing and wound vacuum care within the next 2-3 weeks yet the patient had been on service over 5 months with any update to the goals. In RRHV#3 goals were Patient will have less or decreased episode of feeling dizzy within the next 3-5 days and Patient will have no discomfort due to dizziness within the next 1-2 weeks yet the patient had been on service nearly 5 months without updates. Further examples can be noted on all records reviewed that had been on service greater than 3-4 weeks. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS and Office Manager. 
”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Prevention (42 CFR 418.60(a))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 3 home visits conducted, the organization failed to ensure the staff follow accepted standards of practice to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. For example: on review of RRHV#1 home observation with the Hospice Aide, the Aide failed to sanitize hands and change gloves after cleansing the perineal area prior to dressing patient. Further, the gloves were noted to be ripped in a few places during the bath but aide continued and did not change to new pair. This observation was reviewed with the Aide, and the DPCS. 
”

    Rule L0579. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 111 words

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for the Hospice Aide, the organization failed to ensure the supervisor evaluates the required areas by observing a home health or hospice aide’s performance of the tasks with a patient or pseudo-patient as part of a simulation. On review of HR#4 for the CHHA the initial competency evaluation noted that Safe transfer techniques and ambulation - Normal range of motion and positioning were not assessed by observation with a patient or pseudo-patient. There was no indication that range of motion competency was assessed, and the others were noted to be assessed verbally. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 9 patient records reviewed, with hospice aide services, the organization failed to ensure the written patient care instructions were complete. For example: on review of RRHV#3 the patient had orders for utilizing a Purewick urinary catheter, yet the aide assignment did not address how to handle the catheter while providing care. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS and Office Manager.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 125 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the patient record contain all information that reflects the patient care, treatment, and services. For example on review of RRNHV#6 the was no documentation of the first IDG meeting. Upon discussion, the staff was able present verification that the patient comprehensive assessment was discussed in the IDG meeting with meeting minutes and sign-in sheet yet the documentation was not found in the clinical record. In RRNHV#8 there was also another example of a missed IDG meeting, yet there was a sign in sheet with meeting minutes that noted the patient discussion, yet the information was not documented in the patient record. These observations were reviewed with the Office Manager.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Retrieval of clinical records (42 CFR 418.104(f))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient record was complete, promptly and accurately documented. For example: on review of RRNHV#7 the Hospice Aide was discontinued in mid April yet the RN continued to document an aide supervisory each visit through May to current. This observation was reviewed with the Office Manager.”

    Rule L0685. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(2))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 7 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to obtain criminal background check on the MSW upon hire in accordance with requirement as the documentation could not be produced on survey. This observation was reviewed with the Office Manager and DPCS.”

    Rule L0796. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 16, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission12 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 8, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.5 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 19.7% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 100% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 87% at home, 13% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.5 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends19.7%
Visits near death100.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 87.27% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 146 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91763, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 12.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.