Hearth Record

Grace and Glory Hospice, Inc.

A hospice in Brentwood, California 94513

2145 Elkins Way, Suite A, Brentwood, California 94513. (650) 898-5784.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 45 hospices serving ZIP code 94513 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Jan 19, 2024: an initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Jan 19, 2024: initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 176 words

    “It is required that the comprehensive assessment includes an initial bereavement assessment of the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals, focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and considered in the bereavement plan of care. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 19 (5%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the initial bereavement assessment was completed. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/29/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of degenerative disease of the nervous system. Clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that the initial bereavement assessment had been completed as part of the comprehensive assessment and was not incorporated into the patient’s plan of care. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 01/18/2024, the Administrator /Director of Patient Care Services agreed the bereavement assessment was not present in the clinical record.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 241 words

    “It is required that each patient’s individualized written plan of care identifies planned interventions based on problems identified in the initial and updated comprehensive assessments. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed, the agency did not ensure the individualized plan of care included planned interventions based on problems identified in the comprehensive assessment. Clinical Record 1: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 02/21/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of protein-calorie malnutrition. The plan of care dated 02/21/2023 contained no documented evidence of planned interventions based on the patient’s terminal diagnosis documented on the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Clinical Record 2: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/29/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of degenerative disease of the nervous system. The plan of care dated 12/29/2023 contained no documented evidence of planned interventions based on the patient’s terminal diagnosis documented on the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia. The plan of care dated 06/13/2023 contained no documented evidence of planned interventions based on the patient’s terminal diagnosis documented on the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 01/18/2024, the Administrator /Director of Patient Care Services agreed problems for the primary diagnosis should have been added to the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 358 words

    “It is required that the Interdisciplinary Group, in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician reviews, revises, and documents the individualized care plan as frequently as the patient’s condition requires. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 3 of 19 (16%) clinical records reviewed revealed the agency did not ensure the individualized plan of care was updated based on changes identified in the comprehensive assessment. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia. Clinical record review revealed the skilled nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 08/31/2023 the patient had a “left heel deep tissue injury (DTI) fully healed no eschar and pink dry healthy wound bed.” The nursing visit notes dated 10/26/2023 and 12/30/2023 documented the patient’s skin was “clean dry and intact.” Review of the patient’s plans of care from admission on 06/13/2023 through the current plan of care dated 12/10/2023 revealed no documented evidence that the patient’s plan of care was updated with assessed changes in the patient’s skin integrity and wound status. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/08/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of pneumonia. The initial plan of care dated 11/08/2023 listed the patient as “imminently dying.” The problems, goals, and interventions on the plan of care suggested this would be within 24 to 48 hours. The plan of care was not updated as the patient status changed to reflect that the patient was no longer imminently dying. Clinical Record 11: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/17/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of malignant neoplasm of the left bronchus. The skilled nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 11/06/2023 that “the patient is observed holding her abdomen and appears restless. Answer to pain controlled with current intervention: NO-Pain of 4.” The plan of care did not include a problem, goal or an intervention for pain and was not updated to include a pain intervention. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 01/19/2024, the Administrator /Director of Patient Care Services agreed the plans of care should have been updated.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 602 words

    “It is required that hospice aides are assigned to a specific patient by a Registered Nurse (RN) who is a member of the Interdisciplinary Group. Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide are prepared by a RN who is responsible for the supervision of the hospice aide. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 6 of 19 (32%) clinical records reviewed with aide services provided, the agency did not ensure specific written patient care instructions were provided for the hospice aides. Clinical Record 3: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 06/13/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s dementia. The nurse documented on the initial comprehensive assessment dated 06/13/2023 that the patient had a secondary diagnosis of seizures, and the patient was prescribed medications of Keppra and Depakote for seizures. The aide care plan assignment dated 06/13/2023 did not include information to the aide that the patient had a diagnosis of the seizures and should be on seizure precautions. Clinical Record 5: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 12/29/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. The nurse documented on the initial comprehensive assessment dated 12/29/2023 that the patient was on continuous oxygen at 2 liters per minute. The aide care plan dated 12/29/2023 did not include specific instructions to the aide related to the patient’s need for oxygen during tasks. Clinical Record 8: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/08/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of pneumonia. The aide care plan assignment dated 11/13/2023 assigned the tasks of bed bath and dressing the patient. Review of the nursing visit note dated 12/28/2023 revealed documentation that the patient had “pressure wounds dressing changed frequently and getting better.” The aide care plan did not include information or instructions to the aide related to the patient’s wound(s) and how to care for the wound(s)/dressing(s) during assigned tasks. Clinical Record 9: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 11/06/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of pathological fracture of the right femur. The aide care plan assignment dated 11/06/2023 assigned the tasks of bed bath and dressing the patient. The skilled nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 11/07/2023 that the patient had a wound on the right heel covered with adhesive foam dressing. The aide care plan assignment did not include instructions to the aide related to the patient’s wound and how to care for the wound and dressing during assigned tasks. Clinical Record 10: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 10/24/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The skilled nurse documented on the nursing assessment dated 10/24/2023 that the patient had “bilateral wounds in different stages of care, Calmoseptine, non-adhesive dressing wrapped with kerlix.” The aide care plan assignment dated 10/24/2023 did not notify the aide of the wounds and did not include instructions on how to care for the wound/dressing while providing care to the patient. Clinical Record 13: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 04/20/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The aide care assignment dated 04/20/2023 assigned the tasks of shower and dressing patient. The skilled nurse documented on the nursing visit note dated 11/21/2023 that the patient had “left calf Unna boots and kerlix were applied to the patient.” The aide care plan assignment was not updated to include instructions to the aide on how to care for the wound/dressing while providing care to the patient. During joint clinical record review and interview on 01/18/2024, the Administrator /Director of Patient Care Services agreed these items had not been included in the aide care plans.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 179 words

    “It is required that the hospice medical director or physician-designee provides written and signed recertification of the terminal illness to meet the hospice care benefit requirement. Recertification is completed no later than two (2) calendar days after the first day of each benefit period, and no more than fifteen (15) days before the next benefit period begins. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 1 of 10 (10%) clinical records reviewed with patient recertification, the agency did not ensure the physician completed the recertification of the terminal illness in the required time frame. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/07/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Clinical record review revealed the second benefit period started 10/05/2023 and the recertification for terminal illness was signed by the physician on 10/16/2023, 11 days after the recertification and 6 days outstanding. During joint clinical record review and interview on 01/18/2024, the Administrator /Director of Patient Care Services confirmed the recertification of terminal illness was signed outside of the required timeframe.”

    Rule L0676. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “It is required that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care the hospice forwards to the patient’s attending physician a copy of the hospice discharge summary. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed in which the patient revoked the hospice benefit, the agency did not ensure the attending physician was forwarded a copy of the discharge summary. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/07/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 10/27/2023 to seek aggressive treatment. Clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that a copy of the discharge summary was sent to the attending physician. Clinical Record 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of nontraumatic hemorrhage of the brain. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 08/21/2023 to seek aggressive treatment. Clinical record review revealed no documented evidence that a copy of the discharge summary was sent to the attending physician. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 01/18/2024, the Administrator /Director of Patient Care Services confirmed a copy of the discharged summary had not been faxed or otherwise sent to the attending physician.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3)(ii))

    The inspectors’ words, 228 words

    “It is required that the hospice discharge summary provided to the patient’s community attending physician upon hospice discharge includes at least the following, a summary of the patient’s hospice stay, including treatments, symptoms, and pain management, the patient’s current plan of care, the patient’s latest physician orders, any other documentation that will assist in the post-discharge continuity of care or that is requested by the receiving facility or the attending physician. This standard was not met as evidenced by clinical record review and interview. In 2 of 2 (100%) clinical records reviewed with patient discharge, the agency did not ensure the discharge summary included the patient’s current plan of care. Clinical Record 15: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 07/07/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 10/27/2023. Review of the discharge summary revealed no documented evidence that the patient’s current plan of care was included. Clinical Record 16: The patient elected the hospice benefit on 08/09/2023 with a terminal diagnosis of nontraumatic hemorrhage of the brain. The patient revoked the hospice benefit on 8/21/2023. Review of the discharge summary revealed no documented evidence that the patient’s current plan of care was included. During a joint clinical record review and interview on 01/18/2024, the Administrator /Director of Patient Care Services agreed the discharge summary did not include the required elements.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 19, 2024Initial inspection by the Community Health Accreditation Partner7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 2, 2021.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 92.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 51% at home, 47% in assisted living, 2% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day14.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.2%
Visits near death92.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 14 owners or officers are people: Jane Porter (owns 5% or more directly, 30%); Jane Porter (corporate officer, 30%); Jane Porter (managing employee (on the payroll), 30%); Bradd Porter (owns 5% or more directly, 30%); Bradd Porter (corporate officer, 30%); James Porter (owns 5% or more directly, 20%); James Porter (corporate officer, 20%); James Porter (managing employee (on the payroll), 20%); Cameron Stolhand (owns 5% or more directly, 10%); Cameron Stolhand (corporate officer, 10%); Gloria Stolhand (owns 5% or more directly, 10%); Gloria Stolhand (corporate officer, 10%); Gloria Stolhand (managing employee (on the payroll), 10%); Robert S Cluff (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 81% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 77.71% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 61.5% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 45 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94513, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.