Hearth Record

Caring Heart Hospice Inc.

A hospice in Brentwood, California 94513

191 Sand Creek Road, Suite 225, Brentwood, California 94513. (408) 482-5735.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 45 hospices serving ZIP code 94513 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Nov 19, 2025: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Nov 19, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 289 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #8, #10) did not contain evidence that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient #1: Diclofenac 1% gel did not indicate which knee(s) to be applied to. During home visit it was noted that patient had both Acetaminophen 650mg tabs 1 tab three times daily and 325mg 2 tabs two times daily. Acetaminophen 325mg tab was not listed on medication profile. During home visit it was noted that patient was using Senna 8.6mg tabs but both tablets and Senna 8.8mg/5mL syrup were listed on medication profile. Patient #2: Furosemide 20mg tab daily was listed on medication profile but was not found in the home during home visit. Senna 8.6mg tab and 8.8mg/5mL liquid on medication profile but only Senna liquid 8.8mg/5mL was in the home during home visit. Patient #3: Patient has order for oxygen 2L/NC PRN but this was not listed on medication profile. Patient #4: Patient has order for oxygen 2L/NC PRN but this was not listed on medication profile. Patient #6: 11/04/25 order date - Amoxicillin 500mg 1 tab three times daily for 10 days. There was no end date and medication was not discontinued. Patient #8: Diclofenac 1% gel did not indicate which knee(s) to be applied to. Patient #10: 10/08/25 order date - Bactrim DS 800/160mg 1 tab two times daily for 7 days. There was no end date and medication was not discontinued.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 340 words

    “Upon patient record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1, #2, #3, #4, #6, #7, #8, #10) did not contain evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #1: Initial POC and all updated POCs - Diclofenac 1% gel did not indicate which knee(s) to be applied to. During home visit it was noted that patient had both Acetaminophen 650mg tabs 1 tab three times daily and 325mg 2 tabs two times daily PRN. The 325mg tabs was not listed on POCs. During home visit it was noted that patient was using Senna 8.6mg tabs but both tablets and Senna 8.8mg/5mL syrup were listed on POC. Patient #2: Initial POC and all updated POCs - Furosemide 20mg tab daily was listed on POC but was not found in the home during home visit. Senna 8.6mg tab and 8.8mg/5mL liquid on POC but only Senna liquid 8.8mg/5mL in the home during home visit. Patient #3: Initial POC and all updated POCs - Patient has order for oxygen 2L/NC PRN but this is not listed on POC and was indicated on nurses comprehensive assessment. Patient #4: Initial POC and all updated POCs - Patient has order for oxygen 2L/NC PRN but this is not listed on POC and was indicated on nurses comprehensive assessment. Patient #6: 11/04/25 (order date) and following updated POCs - Amoxicillin 500mg 1 tab three times daily for 10 days. There was no end date and medication was not discontinued. Patient #7: Patient had 2 wounds indicated on POCs dated 07/18/25 and 11/05/25. Neither indicated who would perform wound care on days that hospice nurse was not present. Patient #8: Initial POC and all updated POCs - Diclofenac 1% gel did not indicate which knee(s) to be applied to. Patient #10: 10/08/25 (order date) and following updated POCs - Bactrim DS 800/160mg 1 tab two times daily for 7 days. There was no end date and medication was not discontinued.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 367 words

    “Upon client record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #2, #4, #5, #7, #8, #10, #11) did not contain evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care: Patient #2: SN updated POC/IDG dated 09/05/25 reflected 1x/weekly visit. There were no visits made week of 10/26/25. Initial POC/IDG reflected MSW 1x/month visit and no visits were made during the month of September. Patient #4: Updated POC/IDG starting on 06/13/25 - 09/05/25 indicated SN visit frequency 2x/week. Week of 08/17/25 there was only 1 visit made. Updated POC/IDG starting on 09/06/25 - 11/14/25 indicated SN visit frequency 3x/week. Weeks of 10/19/25 and 10/26/25 there was only 2 visits made each week. MSW initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 1x/month visit frequency. There were no visits made during September or October. Patient #5: MSW Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 1x/month visit frequency. There were no visits made during September. SN initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 2x/weekly visit frequency. SN only made 1 visit week of 10/12/25. Patient #7: MSW Initial POC/IDG all updated indicated 1x/month visit frequency. There were no visit made during September. SN Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 2x/weekly visit frequency. There was only 1 visit made during weeks of 08/17/25 and 11/02/25. Patient #8: MSW Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 1x/month visit frequency. There were 2 visits made during July. There were no visits made during months of September and October. SC Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 1x/month visit frequency. During month of July and September there were 2 visits made. SN Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 2x/weekly visit frequency. Weeks of 04/27/25 and 07/20/25 there were 3 visits made. During week of 10/12/25 there was only 1 visit made. Patient #10: MSW Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 1x/month visit frequency. There were no visits made during September. SN IDG/POC beginning on 07/25/25 indicated visit frequency 1x/weekly. Week of 08/03/25 2 visits were made. Week of 08/17/25 there were no visits made. Week of 10/05/25 there were 3 visits made. Patient #11: MSW Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated 1x/month visit frequency. There were no visits made following 08/26/25 visit.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #1) did not contain evidence that the hospice aide POC/assignments and duties indicated what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable. Patient #1: POC/assignments included changing patient linens but did not indicate the frequency for this to be completed. Bathing/hygiene indicated shampoo and shave but did not give frequency for either. Aide stated that she shampoos and shaves on M/W/F every week.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 155 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patient #1, #8, #10) did not contain evidence of documentation that a hospice aide provides services that were included in the plan of care: Patient #1: Plan of care indicated nails to be cleaned/filed at each visit and these were not completed during home visit. Deodorant to be applied at each visit and this was not done during home visit. At every visit patient’s trash/light housekeeping were to be performed and these were not done during home visit. Visit notes documented aide performed shampoo and shave although not frequency on POC, aide verbally stated these are performed every M/W/F. Patient #8: Aide Initial POC/IDG and all updated indicated visit frequency 2x/weekly. There were no visits made after 11/06/25. Patient #10: Aide IDG/POC beginning 07/10/25 indicated 2x/weekly visit frequency. Weeks of 07/20/25, 07/27/25, 08/03/25 and 08/10/25 there were 3 visits made. Week of 08/31/25 there were 4 visits made.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. 2024 cost savings report only reflected savings of 3.29%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #14) did not contain evidence that if a patient revokes the election of hospice care or is discharged from hospice in accordance with §418.26, the hospice must forward to the patient’s attending physician: • A copy of the hospice discharge summary • The patient’s clinical record, if requested Patient #14: there was no documentation providing proof that a copy of the discharge summary was provided to whomever was assuming care of patient.”

    Rule L0683. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #14) did not have evidence that the discharge summary included all required information.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Upon personnel record review, 1 of 11 (Personnel #8) did not contain evidence the hospice obtained a criminal background check on all contracted individuals who have direct patient care and access to patient records. Personnel #8: did not have criminal background checks, National sex offender, or OIG checks done.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 19, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 20, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 9.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 77.8% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 81% at home, 12% in assisted living, 8% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends9.1%
Visits near death77.8% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Dolly Thomas (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Dolly Thomas (corporate officer, 100%); Dolly Thomas (corporate director, 100%); Dolly Thomas (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Pacita R Aducayen (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 92.68% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 16.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 45 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 94513, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.