Hearth Record

Palomar Health Palliative & Hospice Care

A hospice in San Marcos, California 92078

365 S Rancho Santa Fe, Suite 104, San Marcos, California 92078. (619) 780-5469.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 61 hospices serving ZIP code 92078 had 9.5.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 13, 2026: a complaint inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 9, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #4,#6,#13) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 4: The medical record includes an entry on the medication profile for oxygen 3 liters per minute. There is no evidence of the the frequency for the delivery of the oxygen, PRN or continuous, included on the profile. Patient 6: The medical record includes an entry on the medication profile for Metamucil 52 grams (2 caps full) daily for constipation. There is no evidence of a type and amount of diluent included in the entry. Patient 13: The medical record includes an entry on the medication profile for oxygen 2-3 liters per minutes via nasal cannula. There is no evidence of instructions for titration of oxygen included in the entry.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #4,#9) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse is designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG). The IDG must work together and is responsible for supervision of the care and service for each patient and family. Patient 4:The medical record includes an order dated 11/13/23 for podiatrist consult. There is no evidence of completion of the consult or documentation of any follow up of podiatry order. Patient 9:The medical record includes nursing documentation on 12/6/23 of the caregiver request for a visit due to patient with tongue bleeding. There is no evidence of documentation of visit completed or further communication regarding bleeding of tongue.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #6,13) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 6: On admission, the medical record includes an order on the plan of care for Metamucil 52 grams (2 caps full) daily for constipation. There is no evidence of a type and amount of diluent included in the order Patient 13: On admission, the medical record includes an order on the plan of care for oxygen 2-3 liters per minutes via nasal cannula. There is no evidence of instructions for titration of oxygen included in the order.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 19 (Patient #1,#6,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 1: The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of the patient’s use of siderails and walker. There is no evidence of siderails and walker on the DME/supplies list. Patient 6:The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of the patient’s use of heel protectors and an gel mattress overlay. There is no evidence of heel protectors and gel mattress overlay on the DME/supplies list. Patient 8:The medical record includes nursing documentation on admission of the patient’s use of a pressure relieving mattress. There is no evidence of a pressure relieving mattress on the DME list.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 19 (Patient #6,#10) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 6:The medical record includes nursing documentation on 11/22/23 that physician was contacted regarding symptoms of a urinary tract infection and an order for Cipro 500 mg twice daily x 5 days was obtained. Subsequently on 11/25/23 an order was obtained to change the frequency of Cipro 500 po to every 6 hours x 5 days. There is no evidence of an update to the plan of care to include problems, goals and interventions regarding infection. Patient 10:The medical record includes nursing documentation on 8/25/23 that the patient presented with signs and symptoms of cellulitis to bilateral lower extremities and the physician ordered Cipro 500 mg twice daily x 5 days. There is no evidence of an update to the plan of care to include problems, goals and interventions regarding infection.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #2) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 2:The medical record includes an initial comprehensive assessment with a visit date of 10/26/23. The signature of completion of the assessment is 2/8/23.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 19 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient Patient 3:Upon review of the patient’s facility record, there is no evidence that the hospice provided a copy of the hospice election form. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 13, 2026Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Mar 28, 2024Complaint inspection by the stateNo deficiencies cited
Feb 9, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care7 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Feb 10, 2021.
  • Ownership: other.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.2% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 79.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 52% at home, 36% in assisted living, 11% in a skilled nursing facility, 1% in a hospital.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends8.2%
Visits near death79.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Charmaine Ramos (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Dante Bautista (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 72% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 72% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 98.16% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 41.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 52 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 61 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 92078, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 9.5; this one had 7.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.