Hearth Record

Hospice of Southern California

A hospice in Diamond Bar, California 91765

750 North Diamond Bar Blvd. Suite 202, Diamond Bar, California 91765. (909) 612-0085.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 131 hospices serving ZIP code 91765 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Aug 14, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Aug 14, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(4))

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,8,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment takes into consideration the imminence of death. Patient 1,2,3,8,12: There is no evidence in the RN comprehensive assessment that the RN takes into consideration the imminence of death.”

    Rule L0528. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 426 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #2,3,4,6,7,9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 2: On Admission 4/16 MiraLAX 17g is ordered, there is no diluent. Corrected on site. There is an order for Tylenol 325mg 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed and Tylenol 650mg suppository every 4 hours as needed, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Patient 3: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hrs. prn there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Home visit patient had Zofran 4mg 1 tab every 8 hours as needed but not on the plan of care, had lorazepam 2mg/1ml 0.5mg every 2 hours as need not on the plan of care. Corrected on Site Patient 4: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hrs. prn, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Patient 6: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hrs. prn, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Patient 7: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hours prn, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. On the plan of care there are two orders for Aspirin 81mg one tablet daily and Aspirin 81mg tablet, enteric coated. This is a duplicate order for Aspirin. On the plan of care there is an order for Losartan 40mg once daily and for Losartan potassium 50mg tablet once daily. This is a duplicate order for Losartan. Patient 9: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen 650mg one every 6 hours as needed. There is no maximum daily allowable amount. Patient 10: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen 650mg one every 6 hours as needed. There is no maximum daily allowable amount.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 178 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #5,8,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 5: In the patient record there is an order for IV hydration, the IV hydration is not on the plan of care with goals and interventions. In the patient record the patient has a colostomy, the colostomy is not on the plan of care with goals and interventions. Patient 8: In the patient record there is evidence the patient is taking Eliquis 2.5mg, there is not a risk for bleeding on the plan of care. Patient 10: In the patient record there is an order for aspirin 81 mg daily, there is not a risk of bleeding on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 361 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #2,3,4,6,7,9,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 2: On Admission 4/16 MiraLAX 17g is ordered, there is no diluent. Corrected on site. There is an order for Tylenol 325mg 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed and Tylenol 650mg suppository every 4 hours as needed, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Corrected on site. Patient 3: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hrs. prn there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Corrected on site. Patient 4: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hrs. prn, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Patient 6: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hrs. prn, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. Patient 7: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 650mg rectal suppository every 4 hours prn and Acetaminophen 325mg 2 tabs every 6 hours prn, there is no maximum daily allowable amount. On the plan of care there are two orders for Aspirin 81mg one tablet daily and Aspirin 81mg tablet, enteric coated. This is a duplicate order for Aspirin. On the plan of care there is an order for Losartan 40mg once daily and for Losartan potassium 50mg tablet once daily. This is a duplicate order for Losartan. Patient 9: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen 650mg one every 6 hours as needed. There is no maximum daily allowable amount. Patient 10: In the patient record there is an order for Acetaminophen 325 mg 2 tablets every 4 hours as needed and Acetaminophen 650mg one every 6 hours as needed. There is no maximum daily allowable amount.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 129 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #6,7) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 6: On the RN comprehensive assessment there is a need for bed, overbed table, wheelchair, nebulizer, suction machine, O2 concentrator, E-Tank these items are not listed on the Plan of care. On the RN comprehensive assessment there is documentation that the patient has a shower chair, this is not listed on the plan of care. Patient 7: On the RN comprehensive assessment there is documentation of a bed, overbed table, wheelchair, urinal, nebulizer, suction machine, O2 concentrator, E-tank, IV tubing these items are not on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #7) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 7: On 10/15/23 there is an order for daily visits and IV antibiotic administration , there is not a physician order for IV insertion and care for IV on the plan of care however, there is evidence the RN performed the daily visit with IV insertion and IV administration and care for the IV.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 299 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #1,2,3,4,12) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1: On the Aide plan of care there are orders for “turn and reposition, record bowel movements, dress street clothes, provide oral care, change patient linens”, these orders do not contain a frequency. Corrected on Site. Patient 2: On the Aide plan of care there are orders for “turn and reposition, record bowel movements, dress street clothes, change patient’s linens” these orders do not contain a frequency. Corrected on Site. Patient 3: On the Aide plan of care there are orders for “record bowel movements, change pt. linens”, these orders do not contain a frequency. Corrected on Site. In addition, there is not a Hoyer lift for equipment for transfers, this is on the RN comprehensive assessment. Patient 4: On the Aide plan of care there are orders for “Empty collection bag, dressing street clothes, change patient linens”, these orders do not contain a frequency. Patient 12: On the Aide plan of care there are orders for “Empty collection bag, dressing street clothes, change patient linens”, these orders do not contain a frequency.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2,7,9) did not have evidence that each patient record contains responses to medications, symptom management, treatments, and services. Patient 2: On the RN comprehensive assessment 4/16/25 completed wound care, the wound care documentation did not contain documentation of how the patient tolerated the wound care. Patient 7: On 10/16/23 the RN documented, “wound care rendered”, the wound care documentation did not contain documentation of how the patient tolerated the wound care. Patient 9: On 5/2/24 there is documentation of wound care provided by the RN, did not contain documentation of how the patient tolerated the wound care.”

    Rule L0674. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 260 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 8 of 14 (Patient #1,3,4,5,6,8,9,12) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient 1: On the Spiritual initial assessment the SC documented, “Patient resides in his own home with his wife, who serves as the AR/EC/PCG” AR and EC are not approved abbreviations. Patient 3: On the Spiritual initial assessment the SC documented, “Patient resides in his own home with his wife, who serves as the AR/EC” AR and EC are not approved abbreviations. Patient 4: On the RN comprehensive assessment there is documentation, “DMD made aware” DMD is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 5: On RN comprehensive assessment the nurse documented Flush solution “saine and heparin” Saine is misspelled. Patient 6: On 11/3/23 the SC initial assessment documentation “Malignant neoplasm of unsp part of unsp bronchus, AR/EC, these are not approved abbreviations. Patient 8: On initial Spiritual assessment the chaplain documented “Pt. was diagnosed with “Unsp part of unsp bronchus”, unsp is not an approved abbreviation. Patient 9: On 5/2/24 there is documentation of wound care provided by the RN, the RN did not contain details of wound care provided. Patient 12: During the RN comprehensive assessment the RN documented that there is no pitting edema BLE, the RN also documented one plus pitting edema. This is not clear or complete.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 14, 2025Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Dec 22, 2020.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS hasn’t published nursing time from Medicare claims for this hospice.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 45% at home, 55% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jose Vallo Puzon (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Jose Vallo Puzon (corporate officer, 100%); Jose Vallo Puzon (corporate director, 100%); Jose Vallo Puzon (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Riezel De Silva (managing employee (on the payroll)); Shahrukh Mohsin (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS gives no Hospice Care Index for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 131 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91765, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.