Hearth Record

Ardent Hospice of the Valley

A hospice in Delano, California 93215

601 High St, Unit E, Delano, California 93215. (661) 586-5729.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 39 hospices serving ZIP code 93215 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on May 16, 2024: a recertification inspection by the state.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 16, 2024: recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 263 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure one of three sampled home visit patient’s (Patient 13) medication supply was filled and provided. This failure had the potential for Patient 13 not getting the treatment required per physician’s order and potential for adverse health outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/14/24, at 10:54 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN), in Patient 13’s home, RN was asking Caregiver (CG) 13 for Patient 13’s medication box. RN was reconciling the current medication order with the available medications. RN stated the Robitussin (medication for cough) was an active order but was not available on hand. RN stated the cough medication should be available for use but was not. RN stated the agency failed to follow the physician’s order. During a review of Patient 13’s “Current Ordered Medications (COM),” dated 5/13/24, the COM indicated, “Robitussin [cough medicine] Cough-Chest Congestion DM 5 MG [milligram]-100 MG/5 ML [milliliter] Oral Liquid, 10 ML every 6 hours/PRN [as needed].” During an interview on 5/14/24, at 11:26 a.m., with CG 13, CG 13 stated the cough medicine (Robitussin) was not available and they never had it. During a review of Patient 13’s “Hospice Recertification Plan of Care Update (HRPOCU),” dated 4/29/24, the HRPOCU indicated, “Goals: Patient will receive medications as prescribed.” During an interview on 5/15/24, at 10:11 a.m., with Administrator/Director of Patient Clinical Services (ADPCS), ADPCS reviewed Patient 13’s drug profile and stated the medication was discontinued (5/14/24 - during the home visit). Requested a policy and procedure for refilling medications and none was provided.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 123 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 14 sampled patients (Patient 1) had an Interdisciplinary Group (IDG-a group comprised of the Physician, Registered Nurse, Social Worker, Chaplain, and patient or caregiver) meeting at least every 15 days to discuss the Plan of Care (POC). This failure had the potential for Patient 1s POC to not be updated, resulting in unmet needs for Patient 1. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/16/24 at 2:27 p.m. with Administrator/Director of Patient Care Services (ADPCS), Patient 1s Medical Record (MR), dated 2/16/24 was reviewed. The MR indicated, Patient 1 was admitted on 2/16/24, and Patient 1 should have had her first IDG meeting by 2/28/24 and did not.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 501 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure one of three sampled home visit patient’s (Patient 13) Caregiver (CG) 13 was educated on medication administration and pain management. This failure had the potential for Patient 13’s suffering from unrelieved pain due to not receiving the correct medication dose. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/14/24, at 10:32 a.m., in Patient 13’s room, Registered Nurse (RN) was asking Patient 13 what his pain level was. Patient 13 reported having pain at a level 5 out of 10 (Pain scales are used to rate the intensity of a patient’s pain. Pain scales ranges from 0 [no pain] to 10 [sever pain] with a level 5 considered moderate pain). Patient 13 stated, “Its [pain] all over. I have pain on my back and on my legs. It’s all over my body.” During a review of Patient 13’s “Current Ordered Medications (COM),” dated 3/11/24, the COM indicated, “Hydrocodone [strong pain medication] 10 MG [milligram] Acetaminophen 325 MG tablet, 1 tablet every 4 hours.” During an interview on 5/14/24, at 11:26 a.m., with CG 13, CG 13 stated she was giving Patient 13 his pain medicine (Hydrocodone) four times a day, after each meal and before going to bed. CG 13 stated, “First dose [given] after breakfast at 8 a.m., second dose after lunch at 1 p.m. [five hours later], third dose after dinner at 6 p.m. [fiver hours later], and fourth dose before going to sleep at 9 p.m.” CG 13 stated Patient 13 was always in pain and they give it (pain medication) to him four times a day. During an interview on 5/14/24, with RN, RN stated, “The pain medication was not given [to Patient 13] according to the physician’s order. Patient [13] was only receiving four tablets daily since 4/19/24, it should be six tablets daily and every four hours routinely.” RN stated the agency failed to meet Patient 13’s goal of managing his pain. RN stated the medications should be reconciled every visit and it was not done. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 1:34 p.m., with Administrator/Director of Patient Care Services (ADPCS), ADPCS stated, “Hospice is comfort based and we [hospice agency] failed to meet the hospice goal for this patient [13].” During a review of Patient 13’s “Hospice Recertification Plan of Care Update (HRPOCU),” dated 4/29/24, the HRPOCU indicated, “Goals: Patient/Caregiver will understand the pain scale, how to manage pain and report changes to hospice. Orders: Skilled Nurse to review medication profile and reconcile medications as needed. Skilled Nurse may instruct and reinforce medication teaching related to use of medications to treat disease processes.” During a review of agency’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Pain Management Education” dated 5/2022, the P&P indicated, “Patients and family/caregiver will receive information regarding pain and the management of pain as an integral part of hospice care. 2. The patient and family/caregiver will receive verbal or written instructions, as appropriate, regarding: D. The importance of effective pain management.””

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Medical social services (42 CFR 418.64(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 373 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to provide social work services for two of 14 sampled patients (Patient 13 and Patient 14). This failure had the potential for not meeting Patient 13 and Patient 14’s psychosocial needs during their end of life. During a review of Patient 13’s “Hospice Recertification Plan of Care Update (HRPOCU)”, dated 4/24/24, the HRPOCU indicated, “Orders: Patient [13] will have an increased sense of security, peacefulness, ability to express love/forgiveness. Plans for funeral/memorial will be completed.” During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/15/24, at 10:11 a.m. with Administrator/Director of Patient Care Services (ADPCS), Patient 13’s Social Worker Notes were reviewed. ADPCS stated, “I can’t find any Social Worker (SW) Notes for this patient [13].” There was no documentation of MSW visit notes and there were no documented plans for funeral/memorial according to the plan of care. During an interview on 5/16/24, at 9:15 a.m. with Medical Social Worker (MSW), MSW stated he did not complete his coordination notes within five days. MSW stated, “That’s [provision of social work services] my delinquent.” MSW stated he is the only MSW of the agency and all patients should receive social work services and Patient 13 did not receive social work services. During a review of the agency’s job description titled, “Medical Social Worker (MSW),” undated, the job description indicated, “Job Summary: The medical social worker is responsible for the implementation of standards of care for medical social work services. Duties and Responsibilities: 1. Assumes responsibility for the ongoing interdisciplinary assessment and development of the individualized plan of care in partnership with the patients, representative (if any), and caregiver(s). 5. Providing services that are ordered by the physician as indicated in the plan of care. 8. Prepares clinical notes on all patients referred to social work.” Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/16/24 at 9:50 a.m. with Clinical Resource (CR), Patient 14’s medical record was reviewed. There was no MSW’s psychosocial assessment noted. CR stated, “I don’t see a Social Worker note on the Initial Assessment. I don’t see a note from the Social Worker for any decline or anything [from the patient or family]. It should have been documented. I’m not seeing it.””

    Rule L0594. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure one of 14 sampled patients (Patient 14’s) home visit was completed according to the plan of care. This failure had the potential for the patient not reaching her established goal. Findings: During a review of Patient 14’s “Hospice Certification And Plan Of Care (HCPOC),” dated 3/11/24 to 6/8/24, the “HCPOC” indicated, “HHA [Home Health Aide] effective 3/17/24 2WK12 [two times a week for 12 weeks].” During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/16/24 at 9:50 a.m. with Clinical Resource (CR), Patient 14’s HHA home visits for Patient 14 were reviewed. The HHA conducted a home visit for Patient 14 one time during the week starting 3/31/24. CR stated, “I did not see documentation for the missed visit.” CR stated the HHA for Patient 14 should have conducted two home visits as indicated in the “HCPOC.””

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) conducted an onsite supervisory home visit no less frequently than every 14 days for one of three sampled home visit patients (Patient 14’s) who was receiving Home Health Aide (HHA) services. This failure had the potential for unmet HHA care needs for Patient 14. Findings: During a review of Patient 7’s “Hospice Recertification Plan of Care Update (HRPOC),” dated 3/28/24, the “HRPOC” indicated, “HHA effective 4/14/24 3WK8 [three times a week for eight weeks], 1WK1 [one time a week for one week].” During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/16/24 at 12:05 p.m. with Clinical Resource (CR), RN 1’s onsite supervisory visits were reviewed. HHA did the home visits for Patient 7 three times a week on 4/15/24, 4/17/24, and 4/19/24, and the week after on 4/22/24, 4/24/24, and 4/26/24. CR stated there was no documented evidence RN 1 conducted any onsite supervisory visit in the two week period starting 4/14/24. CR stated the RN should have conducted onsite supervisory HHA visit for Patient 7 every two weeks. The policy and procedure for RN supervisory visits was requested and none was provided.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Role (42 CFR 418.78(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 426 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure volunteer staff were available to be utilized for 14 of 14 sampled patients (Patient 1, Patient 2, Patient 3, Patient 4, Patient 5, Patient 6, Patient 7, Patient 8, Patient 9, Patient 10, Patient 11, Patient 12, Patient 13, and Patient 14) in patients’ care with terminal illness (a disease that cannot be cured or adequately treated and is expected to result in the death of the patient within a short period of time) as per the agency’s policy and procedure. This had the potential for patients’ needs with terminal illness and their families not to receive the optimal support and services they need from the volunteer services. Findings: During an interview on 5/14/24 at 3:30 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated the hospice agency had no volunteer services since the agency opened approximately two years ago in 2022. LVN 1 stated the agency had no hired volunteers. LVN 1 stated no volunteers were available and the agency was unable to provide volunteer services for Patient 1, Patient 2, Patient 3, Patient 4, Patient 5, Patient 6, Patient 7, Patient 8, Patient 9, Patient 10, Patient 11, Patient 12, Patient 13, Patient 14 to help with the patients’ care needs and their families’ care needs (companionship, household chores, and shopping). During an interview on 5/15/24 at 10:42 a.m. with Patient 14, Patient 14 stated she lived alone. Patient 14 stated she had to pay somebody to do her grocery shopping and her laundry. Patient 14 stated she wanted to have somebody to talk to and she liked the staff coming to her house to assist her and talk to her. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Volunteer Services,” dated 5/22, the P&P indicated, “Policy [Name of the Hospice Agency) will provide volunteer services under the direction of a Volunteer Coordinator and with assistance of trained hospice volunteers. . . Volunteers may work in a variety of capacities, including: 1. Patient care volunteers provide a personal care or emotional support and practical assistance, which enhance the comfort and quality of life for patients and families/caregivers. These services include being available for companionship, listening, simply “being there,” and preparing meals. Patient care volunteers may also provide relief for caregivers or assist them with household chores. . . 3. Errands and transportation volunteers offer a type of practical support often needed by hospice patients and families/caregivers. These duties may include picking up needed prescriptions or supplies, or grocery shopping.””

    Rule L0644. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 234 words

    “Based on interview and record review, the agency failed to ensure the agency demonstrated an ongoing effort to recruit volunteers. This failure had the potential for patients’ needs with terminal illness and their families not to receive the needed support from the volunteer services. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/15/24 at 3:45 p.m. with Clinical Resource (CR), CR stated the agency had no volunteer staff available who can provide companionship [and other volunteer services like household chores and shopping] to the terminally ill patients.. CR stated the Volunteer Coordinator was the Administrator/Director of Patient Care Services (ADPCS). The agency was unable to provide documentation an ongoing volunteer recruitment process was in place to hire volunteers who can provide services to the terminally ill patients. During an interview on 5/14/24 at 11:30 a.m. with Human Resource Manager (HRM), HRM stated the agency did not have any hired volunteer staff. HRM stated there were no volunteer personnel files to review. During a review of the agency’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “Volunteer Coordinator,” dated 3/14/24, the P&P indicated, “To maintain and coordinate the volunteer program for Hospice. Responsible for the orientation, training, and coordination of all Hospice volunteers, for volunteer program administration and development in all service areas. . . B. Duties & Responsibilities. . . 4. Recruit, interview and select volunteers. 5. Design and supervise the orientation and training of volunteers.””

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Protection of information (42 CFR 418.104(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure patient medical records (MR) were stored in a secure area. This failure had the potential for unauthorized personnel to access the MR. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/13/24 at 11:02 a.m. with Administrator/Director of Patient Care Services (ADPCS) and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in the supply room, one unlocked vertical file cabinet was observed. The file cabinet contained two drawers of paper MR. LVN 1 stated the current MR are all digital, and these were old MR. LVN 1 stated she did not have a key to the file cabinet. ADPCS stated she did not have the key. During a review of the agencys policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “;RECORD RETENTION,” dated 2003, the P&P indicated, “;Paper records will be stored by type of record first and record date second in a secure area with access by authorized personnel only.””

    Rule L0680. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 263 words

    “Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to ensure one of three sampled home visit patient’s (Patient 14’s) expired medication (Senna tablet - used to relieve constipation) was not available for use at the patient’s home. This failure had the potential for the medication to be ineffective. Findings: During a review of Patient 14’s “Hospice Certification And Plan Of Care (HCPOC),” dated 3/11/24 to 6/8/24, the “HCPOC” indicated, “Medications. . . Senna Plus 8.6 mg [milligram]-50 mg tablet 1 tablet daily. Reason: Bowel Management.” During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/15/24 at 10:50 a.m. with Patient 14 and Home Health Aide (HHA) in Patient 14’s home in the living room, Patient 14’s medications stored inside a plastic bag container were reviewed. There was a bottle of Senna tablets 8.6 mg with an expiration date (the time period during which the medication is known to remain stable, retain its strength, quality, and purity) of 2/2024. Patient 1 stated, “I used Senna tablet as a back-up to Lactulose (used to treat constipation).” HHA verified the expiration date for Senna was dated 2/2024. During an interview on 5/15/24 at 2:35 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated and acknowledged the Senna 8.6 mg medication with an expiration date of 2/2024 “has been awhile” and should not be available for use by Patient 14. During a review of the facility’s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, “STORAGE OF MEDICATIONS AND NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS,” dated 5/22, the P&P indicated, “PURPOSE To ensure that medications and nutritional therapy solutions are properly handled and stored.””

    Rule L0693. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 16, 2024Recertification inspection by the state10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Apr 1, 2019.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 4.4% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 65% at home, 27% in assisted living, 5% in a nursing facility, 1% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends4.4%
Visits near death93.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Cornerstone Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Aug 16, 2022.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Jacob Mckenzie (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brent Mills (corporate officer, 0%); Brent Guerisoli (corporate director, 0%); Alyssa Effisimo (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Brent Alan Wilson (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Mika H Roland (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); John Gochnour (corporate officer, 0%); Amber L Tueller (corporate officer, 0%); Elliot Mcmillan (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cornerstone Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 16, 2022
The Pennant Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 16, 2022

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 9 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.77% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 20.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold9 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 39 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93215, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.