Hearth Record

Gentiva

A hospice in Bakersfield, California 93309

5001 East Commerce Center Drive, Suite 200, Bakersfield, California 93309. (661) 324-1232.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

18 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 54 hospices serving ZIP code 93309 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 19, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

18 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

18 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 19, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies
  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(1))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #17) did not have evidence that the patient has received effective pain management and symptom control from the hospice for conditions related to the terminal illness. Patient 17: The medical record contained nursing documentation 2/21/24 identifying patient had severe vomiting requiring a new order for Compazine suppositories. There was no evidence of follow up for effectiveness with coordination notes and no further visits made prior to the patient’s death 2/23/24.”

    Rule L0512. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 20 (Patients #1,#3,#5,#8,#10,#11) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: The medication profile contained two listings for Humalog, listed with one set dose of 8 units three times daily and one sliding scale dose three times daily. Corrected on site. During the home visit medication reconciliation, the hospice medication profile did not include Benadryl and multivitamin listed on facility MAR; doses for paroxetine was 7.5mg per facility and 10 mg on hospice; and metoprolol was 25mg per facility and 100mg on hospice. Patient 3: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method. Patient 5: The medication profile contained oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 8: The medication profile contained Cipro listed as an active medication that was started 2/2/24 for 7 days; duplicative levetiracetam; and oxygen no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of oxygen included on the medication profile. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medication profile contained polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 147 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 20 (Patients #1,#5,#20) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment is updated including and by: • The hospice interdisciplinary group (in collaboration with the individual’s attending physician, if any) • Changes that have taken place since the initial assessment • Information on the patient’s progress toward desired outcomes • Reassessment of the patient’s response to care • The assessment update must be accomplished as frequently as the condition of the patient requires, but no less frequently than every 15 days Patient 1: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment by an RN from 8/23/24 to current 9/16/24. Patient 5: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment by an RN from 8/23/24 to current 9/16/24. Patient 20: There was no evidence of a comprehensive physical assessment by an RN from 8/2/24 to 8/18/24.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 115 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #11) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 11: The medical record contained nursing documentation since admission identifying patient has a pleural drainage system. There was no evidence of problems, goals, and interventions related to the pleural drainage included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 195 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 20 (Patients #1,#3,#5,#7,#10,#11) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1: During the home visit medication reconciliation, the hospice did not have orders for Benadryl and multivitamin listed on facility MAR. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method. Patient 5:The medical record contained an order for oxygen with no delivery method. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order 8/6/24 stating cleanse with normal saline, pat dry and leave open to air. There was no evidence of a location defined for the wound or abrasion treated. Patient 10: The medical record contained nursing documentation identifying patient use of oxygen. There was no evidence of an order for oxygen. The record also contained an order for Foley placement 9/2/24 with no catheter and balloon size, change frequency, and maintenance included in the order. Corrected on site. Patient 11: The medical record contained an order for polyethylene glycol oral powder with no instructions to mix with a diluent.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 191 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 20 (Patients #2,#4,#5,#7,#8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 2,4: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed. There was no evidence of an order for the bed included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 5: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a commode, over the bed table, oxygen concentrator, walker, and wheelchair. There was no evidence of orders for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site. Patient 7: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a cane. There was no evidence of an order for the cane included in the plan of care. Patient 8: The medical record contained nursing documentation upon admission identifying patient use of a hospital bed, bedrails, and over the bed table. There was no evidence of orders for the equipment included in the plan of care. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #5) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient 5: The plan of care contained active problems, goals, and interventions related to spiritual care to be provided by the spiritual care provider, however spiritual care services were discontinued 8/13/24. Corrected on site.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 3: The medical record contained an order for social work visits once monthly. There was no evidence of an August visit completed.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program activities (42 CFR 418.58(c)(3))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence a written plan of correction is developed in response to any QAPI activity that does not meet an acceptable threshold. The QAPI minutes for Quarter 2, 2024 contained evidence threshold rates set were not met for bereavement chart audits, facility file audits, CAHPS return rate, and live discharge rates. There was no evidence of a written plan of correction developed for these issues.”

    Rule L0570. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 140 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 20 (Patients #1,#2,#7) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care • Permitted to be performed under state law by such hospice aide • Consistent with the hospice aide training Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of second visits completed the weeks of 8/11/24, 8/18/24, 8/25/24, and 9/1/24. Patient 2: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of second visits completed the weeks of 8/25/24 and 9/8/24. Patient 7: The medical record contained an order for aide visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit completed the weeks of 8/4/24.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review 2 of 20 (Patients #1,#5) did not have evidence documentation in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs. Patient 1: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit completed since 8/23/24. Patient 5: There was no evidence of an aide supervisory visit completed since 8/28/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Upon observation, there was no evidence the annual report documents the use of volunteers providing day to day administrative and/or direct patient care services in an amount that, at a minimum, equals 5 percent of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contract personnel. The agency volunteer utilization rate for 2023 was 0.7%.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))

    “Upon patient client record review, 2 of 20 (Patients #1,#6) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 1,6: The medical records contained an election form identifying the patient representatives elected to receive a Notification of Hospice Non-Covered Items. There was no evidence the forms were received.”

    Rule L0673. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(6))

    “Upon patient client record review, 3 of 20 (Patients #1,#6,#8) did not have evidence that each patient record contains Advance Directives. Patients 1,6,8: There was no evidence of Advance Directives to support the patients’ DNR status.”

    Rule L0677. Standard-level.

  • Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(7))

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #19) did not evidence that each patient record contains physician orders. Patient 19: There was no evidence of an order to discharge the patient for extended prognosis.”

    Rule L0678. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #20) did not have evidence that the discharge summary includes all required information. Patient 20: There was no evidence of a discharge summary. Patient discharged 8/28/24 due to moving out of the service are per documentation.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 119 words

    “Upon client record review, 3 of 20 (Patients #1,#2,#14) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient 1: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits once weekly. There was no evidence of a visit completed the week of 9/8/24. Patient 2: The medical record contained an order for nursing visits twice weekly. There was no evidence of a second visit made week of 9/1/24. Patient 14: The medical record contained an order for social work visits once monthly. There was no evidence of visits made in July or August.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.112(e)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 20 (Patient #1) did not have evidence that the hospice provided the following information: • The most recent hospice plan of care specific to each patient • Hospice election form and any Advance Directives specific to each patient • Physician certification and recertification of the terminal illness specific to each patient • Names and contact information for hospice personnel involved in hospice care of each patient • Instructions on how to access the hospice’s 24-hour on-call system • Hospice medication information specific to each patient • Hospice physician and attending physician (if any) orders specific to each patient Patient 1: Upon observation during the home visit, there was no evidence the hospice agency provided the required paperwork to the SNF.”

    Rule L0781. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 19, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care18 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 10, 2000.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.3 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 54% at home, 27% in assisted living, 19% in a skilled nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.3 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.3%
Visits near death93.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLC owns 99% directly since Jun 1, 2002; Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLC owns 1% directly since Jun 1, 2002.
  • Curo Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Sheree Addison (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Abbas S Hasnain (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Ronald C Lazas (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (corporate officer, 0%); David Robinson Arnold (other role (CMS gives no detail), 0%); Thomas Joseph Dolan (corporate officer, 0%); David Allen Causby (corporate officer, 0%); Janet L Combs (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ch Services Midco Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2002
Charlotte Midco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Falcon Hospice, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 11, 2022
Charlotte Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Curo Health Services LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Holding CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jun 1, 2002
Kah Hospice Company, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Group Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Ch Services Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare LP, LLCOwns 5% or more directly99%Jun 1, 2002
Cd&r Falcon Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies60%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies40%Aug 11, 2022
Odyssey Healthcare Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more directly1%Jun 1, 2002
Curo Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)Jul 11, 2018

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 81% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 96.86% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63.4% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 53 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 54 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 93309, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 18.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.