Hearth Record

Supreme Hospice and Palliative Care

A hospice in Valencia, California 91355

28312 Constellation Road Suite B, Valencia, California 91355. (661) 254-2206.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

17 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 92 hospices serving ZIP code 91355 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 25, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

17 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

17 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Mar 13, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission17 deficiencies
  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement service it was noted that the hospice had not developed a bereavement plan of care and as a result had not made bereavement services available to the family and other individuals specified in the bereavement plan of care. This was discussed and confirmed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0596. Condition-level.

  • Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, for extended prognosis discharge it was noted that the patient and caregiver did ot participate in decisions about their care. For example, in RRDC#1 the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was signed and dated the day of discharge, not 2 days prior as required. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0513. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(8))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement services it was noted that the post death assessment was not done to assessment bereavement risk in order to inform the decisions made by the IDG in a timely manner. During the Bereavement Program session with the bereavement coordinator he stated that post death bereavement assessments were to be completed within 48 hours of a patient’s death. In RRBR#1 the post death bereavement assessment was completed 5 days after death and in RRBR#2 it was completed 3 days after death. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0532. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 128 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 10 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the written plan of care was not individualized and did not reflect patient and family goals and interventions. For example, in record RRNHV#7 the social worker documented monthly visits however there were no goals or interventions for social services documented on the POC. In record RRHV#1 the goal Reduce pain to below SIT level within 48 hrs of admission for comfort. Pain will remain in comfortable level during care. had been updated at last IDG however the patient had been admitted 8 months prior. RRNHV#6 Pt will be assessed for urinary issues every visit and educate Cg to understand elimination needs while providing proper care every diaper change. Discussed and confirmed with Administrator.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, that included volunteer services, it was noted that the POC did not include a complete statement of the scope and frequency of the services necessary to meet the patient’s need. For example In record RRNHV#6 there was documentation that volunteer visits had been made, but no frequency of volunteer visits. This was discussed the Clinical Manager present.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d ))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement services it was noted that while a post death assessment had been completed there was no documentation of the interdisciplinary group reflecting on the bereaved and bereavement plan of care. For example, in records RRBR#1 and RRBR#2 there was no documentation of an IDG discussion taking place after the patient death. In both cases the last IDG documentation was prior to death. This was discussed and confirmed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0552. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 1 patient records reviewed, that included volunteer services it was noted that the services provided were not based on the individualized plan of care. In record RRNHV#6 there was no POC developed for the volunteer. There was a check list of items to complete during a visit and the volunteer documented completion of 5 of 7 items and documented providing 1 additional item that had not been identified. This was discussed and confirmed with the Clinical Manager present.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Program data (42 CFR 418.58(b)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Data Session. During the Data session it was noted that the hospice had collected a large amount of data, however there was no data analysis performed over time to determine trends in performance. For example, hand hygiene data had been collected monthly, but there was no analysis or trending completed. This was discussed with the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, Alternate Administrator and Clinical Manager present.”

    Rule L0564. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement services it was noted that the hospice had not developed a bereavement plan of care that specified the type of bereavement services to be offered and the frequency of service delivery. For example in RRBR#1 and RRBR#2 the comment Follow usual Bereavement POC. was documented in the area for the plan of care with no goals or interventions. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 7 patient records reviewed, that included aide services it was noted that the patient care instructions for the hospice aide were incomplete. For example, in record RRHV#3 the patient had a wound dressing on his right heel, but the aide POC did not provide directions regarding the dressing. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 7 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the patient care and services provided were not according to the patient’s plan of care. For example, in record RRHV#3 the hospice aide did not follow the POC that required the patient’s teeth to be brushed at each visit, and hair to be shampooed and blow dried each visit, however these were not completed. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 122 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 7 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the patient care and services provided were not according to the patient’s plan of care. For example, in record RRHV#3 the hospice aide did not follow the POC order If the patient is experiencing pain and/or change in condition notify RN. Upon entering the patient’s home the aide stated to the surveyor that she was aware the patient had pain in left shoulder and right lower extremity and may become agitated. During the aides care the patient yelled out in pain at multiple times and became agitated. There was no documentation that the aide had notified the RN of the situation. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0628. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 7 patient records reviewed, that included aide services it was noted that the hospice aide supervision was not done every 14 days. For example, in record RRHV#1 during the past 4 months aide supervision was documented at 15 days twice and at 20 days once. This was discussed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by condition level finding at 418.64.”

    Rule L0651. Standard-level.

  • Services (42 CFR 418.100(c)(1))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, for bereavement service it was noted that the hospice had not developed a bereavement plan of care and as a result had not made bereavement services available to the family and other individuals specified in the bereavement plan of care. This was discussed and confirmed with the Administrator.”

    Rule L0652. Standard-level.

  • Training (42 CFR 418.100(g)(3))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 7 HR files reviewed, it was noted that staff competence was not initially assessed and documented. For example in file HR-SC/BR Coordinator it was noted that a competency was documented for Spiritual Counselor, but no competency was documented for Bereavement Coordinator. This was discussed with the Administrator and HR employee.”

    Rule L0663. Standard-level.

  • Label dispose storage drugs (42 CFR 418.106(e)(2)(i))

    “Observed in Patient Home. During 1 of 1 visits that included medication disposal it was noted that the nurse did not follow the organization’s policy for disposal of medications. During visit HOS RRHV#1 the nurse placed tablets in a bag and mixed with water and disposed and the organization’s Medication Disposal policy stated that the medication was to be placed in cat litter or coffee grounds. This was discussed with the administrator.”

    Rule L0694. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 25, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 13, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission17 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Jan 19, 2016.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 13.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 20.1% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 98.4% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 15% at home, 85% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day13.2 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends20.1%
Visits near death98.4% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this hospice.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 80.95% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 3.8% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold8 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 92 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91355, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 17.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.