Beacon Hospice Care
A hospice in Ontario, California 91762
221 W F Street, Ontario, California 91762. (909) 608-7555.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 14 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 8of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
14 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 132 hospices serving ZIP code 91762 had 6.
The last inspection on record was on Jun 30, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.
3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
May 22, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies
-
Quality assessment & performance improvement (42 CFR 418.58)
“Observed in Data Session. The organization failed to ensure the QAPI program involve all hospice services to include those services provided under contract or arrangement. When reviewing the QAPI program there was no documentation of including volunteer, bereavement, and contracted services in the QAPI plan. This observation was reviewed with the QAPI Coordinator and the Alternate Administrator.”
-
Core services (42 CFR 418.64)
“Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization failed to routinely provide substantially all core services directly by hospice employees to include medical social services. On discussion with the Operations Manager, DPCS, and the Medical Social Worker (MSW) it was revealed that the core services of the MSW were provided under contract as a 1099 contractor and not provided directly by the organization as required. This observation was reviewed with the Operations Manager, and DPCS.”
-
Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))
“Observed in Tracer Activities. There was no evidence that the governing body and leadership had established requirements to support patient care treatment and services as evidenced by the leadership did not ensure that the Conditions of Participation for 418.58, and 418.64 were met per policy as determined through observations, documentation, and staff interviews.”
-
Rights of the patient (42 CFR 418.52(c)(4))
“Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the patient’s right to choose and attending physician. On review of RRHV#2, RRNHV#4, RRNHV#7, and RRNHV#10 the section to choose an attending physician was left blank on the patient’s election of benefits was left blank. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure documentation of a patient-specific comprehensive assessment and reassessment of the patient’s need for hospice care and services. On review of RRHV#3 the patient had documentation of wounds. On admission the comprehensive assessment failed to document the size of the wound to the heel. On recertification there was documentation of 2 new wounds yet the size of the wounds was not documented as required policy and standards of practice. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Patient outcome measures (42 CFR 418.54(e)(2))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to maintain complete and accurate records. On review of RRNHV#9 the hospice aide services were declined after November 2024, yet the RN continued to document aide supervisory visits up until current most recent visit. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 159 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 10 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the plan of care include all services needed for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. On review of RRHV#3 the documentation specified an issues with swallowing that required aspiration precautions with education provided on most all nursing visits yet the issue was not reflected in the patient’s plan of care. In RRNHV#8 there was an incomplete order that read Abdominal Folds: Cleanse with soap and water. Pat dry. Apply dime size amount to redness 2 times per day. The order did not specify what to apply. In RRNHV#10 there were wound care orders that did not specify a frequency to perform the care. The order for the right and left buttocks wounds read cleanse with wound cleanser, pat dry, and applied medi-honey then covered with calcium alginate and 4x4 island dressing. These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
In-service training (42 CFR 418.76(d))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 HR files reviewed, for the hospice aide, the organization failed to ensure the hospice aide participate in at least 12 hours of in-service training during each 12 month period. On review of the organization process to provide 12 hours of annual aide in-services training, there was not 12 hours of training documented for HR#4 aide. This observation was reviewed with the Intake Coordinator/HR director.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2)(ii))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure the hospice aide provided services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as assigned in the plan of care. On review of RRHV#1 the Aide’s plan of care assigned a bed bath yet the aide documented each visit that shower was given or assisted with shower. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1)(i))
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure that a registered nurse supervise the hospice aide during an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently that every 14 days. On review of RRHV#1 there was a 28 day gap in aide supervisory visits from March to April. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Recertification of the terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(c))
“Observed in Record Review. In 5 of 8 patient records reviewed, with recertifications, the organization failed to ensure complete and accurate records. For example: on review for RRHV#3 the Certificate of Terminal Illness narrative by the hospice Medical Director remained nearly identical from certification to recertification and failed to address how the patient continued to meet the criteria for terminal status with current subjective and objective findings. Similar finding can be seen in RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, and RRNHV#10. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 10 patient records reviewed, The organization failed to ensure the patient record contain all information to reflect the patient’s care, treatment, and services. On review of RRHV#3 the patient had wounds that required wound treatment however there was no documentation of the wound care dressing procedure. The documentation noted wound care provided per MD order - patient tolerated well and complete wound care treatment to right heel. There was documentation of the procedure followed to explain what care was provided. This observation was reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Observed in Record Review. In 8 of 10 patient records reviewed, the organization failed to ensure all entries to the record were appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with hospice policy and accepted standards of practice. On review of patient records there multiple entries for clinical notes there were not signed and dated. In RRHV#1 and RRHV#3 all skilled nursing notes were in various stages of QA/approval and were not signed and dated as part of the record. Further examples of notes not signed and dated in the electronic system could be seen in RRNHV#5, RRNHV#6, RRNHV#7, RRNHV#8, RRNHV#9, RRNHV#10 These observations were reviewed with the DPCS.”
-
Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))
“Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 8 HR files reviewed, the organization failed to obtain a criminal background check on hospice employees that have direct patient contact or access to patient records. On review of HR#8 for the hospice volunteer there was no documentation that a criminal background check was obtained. This observation was reviewed with the Intake Coordinator/HR Director.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2025 | Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission | No deficiencies cited |
| May 22, 2025 | Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission | 14 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Nov 12, 2015.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 9.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 97.8% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 63% at home, 35% in assisted living, 1% in a skilled nursing facility.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 9.2 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 8.8% |
| Visits near death | 97.8% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- 9 owners or officers are people: Don Arthur Estuita (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Rosemarie Soriano (owns 5% or more directly, 65%); Rosemarie Soriano (corporate officer, 50%); Rosemarie Soriano (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Don Arthur Estuita (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Al Justin Pintor (owns 5% or more directly, 35%); Al Justin Pintor (corporate officer, 35%); Al Justin Pintor (runs it (operational or managerial control), 35%); Vishal Govil (managing employee (under contract)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 8 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 78.26% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 55.6% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 8 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 132 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 91762, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 14.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Bristol Hospice - Inland Valley LLC | 8 |
| Beacon Hospice Care This hospice | 14 |
| Cardinal Hospice and Palliative Care | 7 |
| Dignity Hospice | 10 |
| Vnacare | 9 |
| Accentcare Hospice & Palliative Care of California - San Bernardino | 9 |
| 24/7 Care at Home - Hospice | 11 |
| Alta Loma Hospice, Inc. | 2 |
| Caring Angels Hospice | 6 |
| Vineta Hospice Care, Inc. | 22 |
| Kaiser Foundation Hospital Hospice | 4 |
| Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.