Hearth Record

Sutter Auburn Faith VNA & Hospice-Hospice

A hospice in Auburn, California 95602

11775 Education Street, Suite 201, Auburn, California 95602. (530) 886-6650.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Oct 27, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean4
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 28 hospices serving ZIP code 95602 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Jul 14, 2025: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

May 30, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies
  • Core services (42 CFR 418.64)

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During review of the Bereavement program and review of records it was noted that the hospice had not made counseling services available to the patient and family or other persons caring for the patient at home. For example bereavement counseling was not provided after the patient’s death. This was discussed with the bereavement coordinator and Clinical Manager.”

    Rule L0587. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization did not manage implementation of policies which resulted in conditions level deficiencies at: 418.56 and 418.64.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • EP Training Program (42 CFR 418.113(d)(1)(iii))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 3 of 3 volunteer records reviewed, the organization had not documented ongoing emergency management education and training consistent with their roles and responsibility in an emergency. The volunteer staff had not received any emergency management training within the last 3 years. This finding was discussed with the Volunteer Coordinator at the time of discovery.”

    Rule E0037. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 99 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 7 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that an initial bereavement assessment was not completed. For example in HOSRRHV#2 the ‘initial bereavement assessment’ was documented by the MSW on day 25 of care and in HOSRRNHV#10 it was documented on day 33 of care. In HOSRRHV#4 and HOSRRNHV#1 there was no initial bereavement assessment documented. In HOSRRNHV#6 the initial Bereavement assessment was documented on day 58, HOSRRNHV#5 it was documented on day 77 and HOSRRNHV#4 it was documented on day 24. This was confirmed with the Clinical Manager and Case Manager present.”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(b ))

    The inspectors’ words, 265 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 10 of 14 patient records reviewed, the written plan of care was not based on the patient’s goals and the time frames, setting and services required to meet the goals. For example, in HOSRRHV#2 the record included documentation of visits by the spiritual counselor and volunteer however there was no documented POC for these disciplines, no goals and no interventions. Also in the same record the patient had a foley catheter and there was no documentation of urinary or catheter related goals and interventions. In records HOSRRNHV#2, HOSRRHV#3 and #4 the spiritual counselor was seeing the patient, but there was no POC documented, no goal or interventions for this discipline. Also in record HOSRRHV#3 the documentation indicated that the patient had a wound with dressings ordered, however there were no POC goals or interventions related to the wound or wound care. In record HOSRRNHV#4 the goals were not individualized and did not have time frames such as Patient’s pain will be reduced to the level of the stated goal. Record HOSRRNHV#7 goals were not individualized and did not have time frames such as; Spiritual distress identified and decreased with visit. In record HOSRRNHV#9 the respiratory goals time frame was within 2 weeks from admission and has remained unchanged or not updated after 4 months. In record HOSRRNHV#10 on admission there was documentation of wound related goals and interventions with a time frame of within 2 weeks and currently at 6 weeks the goal has remained unchanged or updated. This was confirmed with the Clinical Manager and RN Case Manager present.”

    Rule L0543. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 133 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the organization had not obtained orders for care, treatment, or services. For example, in record HOSRRHV#2 there was documentation of the patient receiving volunteer and spiritual counselor visits, however there was no documented frequency for volunteer or spiritual counselor on the IDG, POC, or supplemental order. This patient also had a foley catheter and there was no documentation of an order for foley catheter care. For example, records HOSRRHV#1, #2, #3 and #4 and HOSRRNHV#1 through #10 included 4 nurse visits as needed or PRN and were not accompanied by a description of the patient’s medical signs and symptoms that would occasion a visit. This was confirmed and discussed with the Clinical Manager and RN Case Manager present.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 95 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that the plan of care had not been revised. For example, in record HOSRRNHV#9 the respiratory goals time frame was within 2 weeks from admission and has remained unchanged or not updated after 4 months. In record HOSRRNHV#10 on admission there was documentation of wound related goals and interventions with a time frame of within 2 weeks and currently at 6 weeks the goal has remained unchanged or updated. This was confirmed with the Clinical Manager and RN Case Manager present.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 patient records reviewed, it was noted that care was not provided according to the plan of care. For example in record HOSRRNHV#4 the plan of care included MSW visits 2 visits every 2 weeks and for 3 weeks there were no visits documented and no missed visit or refused visit notes. In record HOSRRNHV#10 the plan of care included aide visits twice a week and for 2 weeks in May only 1 visit was completed with no missed visit or patient refused notes. This was confirmed with the nurse Case Manager present.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Counseling services (42 CFR 418.64(d)(1)(iv))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. In 3 of 3 bereavement records reviewed, the organization had not developed bereavement care plans. In record #1, the bereaved requested bereavement services but there was no documentation of follow up or a care plan. In records #2 and #3, the bereaved received mailings, but there was no documented care plan. This finding was discussed with the bereavement coordinator”

    Rule L0596. Standard-level.

  • Competency evaluation (42 CFR 418.76(c)(1))

    “Observed in HR File Review. In 1 of 1 hospice aide competency files reviewed, the organization had not documented completed competency for a hospice aide. This was evidenced by the lack of a competency that documented an observed performance of the aide reading and recording temperature, pulse and respirations. The aide job description outlined these skills as a part of the aide duties. This finding was discussed with the Clinical Effectiveness Consultant.”

    Rule L0615. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization’s documented volunteer hours did not provide at least 5% of the total patient care hours of all paid hospice employees and contracted staff. The organization calculated volunteer hours was 3.5% of the total paid patient care hours. This finding was discussed with the Volunteer Coordinator at the time of discovery.”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Professional management responsibility (42 CFR 418.100(e)(3))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization’s contract for DME services did not include the following: a stipulation that services will be delivered in accordance with the patient’s plan of care, the manner in which contracted services will be coordinated, supervised and evaluated by the hospice, the delineation of the role of the hospice and contractor in the admission process, patient/family assessment, and the interdisciplinary group conferences. This finding with discussed with the hospice leadership team.”

    Rule L0655. Standard-level.

  • Use and mintenance of equipment and supplies (42 CFR 418.106(f)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 2 home visits conducted, that included oxygen therapy in the home it was noted that the staff did not provide education on the safe storage of oxygen cylinders in the home. For example, during home visit HOSRRHV#1 at the end of the visit upon questioning by the surveyor the board and care staff showed the nurse and surveyor that the E tank was stored in a closed closet. The nurse did not educate/re-educate about safe storage of oxygen. This was confirmed with the Clinical Manager present.”

    Rule L0702. Standard-level.

  • Criminal background checks (42 CFR 418.114(d)(1))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. The organization’s contract for DME services did not include the following: a stipulation that the outside agency will complete criminal background checks on contracted employees who provide direct patient care or have access to patient records. This finding with discussed with the hospice leadership team.”

    Rule L0795. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 14, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
May 30, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Aug 18, 1994.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12.4 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 13.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 91.6% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 55% at home, 19% in assisted living, 23% in a skilled nursing facility, 2% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.4 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends13.3%
Visits near death91.6% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • Sutter Health owns 100% directly since May 3, 2012.
  • 17 owners or officers are people: Peter V Hull (corporate director); Ronnie Yamanaka (corporate officer); Ronnie Yamanaka (managing employee (on the payroll)); I-Mei Hsiu (corporate director); Todd C Smith (corporate director); Marie F Seward (corporate director); Daniel Flores (corporate director); Helen M Thomson (corporate director); David H Adkins (corporate director); Timothy A Byrd (corporate director); Scott N Howell (corporate director); Bronwyn Fields (corporate director); Maria G Pallavicini (corporate director); Narendra M Pathipati (corporate director); Kurt J Shuler (corporate director); Jerry Tokunaga (corporate director); Viva Ettin (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Sutter HealthOwns 5% or more directly100%May 3, 2012

What do families say?

  • Family caregivers rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 79% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 90.85% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 64% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 54 of 5
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 28 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 95602, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 14.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.