Hearth Record

Family Care Hospice

A hospice in Bullhead City, Arizona 86442

2580 Highway 95, Suite 201, Bullhead City, Arizona 86442. (928) 299-5100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 32 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

32 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 16 hospices serving ZIP code 86442 had 6.

The last inspection on record was on Feb 18, 2026: a follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission.

6 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

32 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

32 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Feb 25, 2025: follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies
  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Leaders did not manage implementation of patient care policies and procedures governing the provision of care as evidenced by condition level findings at:418.102. This was discussed with the Administrator, Administrative Assistant and Hospice DON.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 106 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 4 patient records reviewed, certificates of terminal illness (CTI) did not consistently support patient life expectancies of six months or less if the illness was to run its normal course. For example upon patient records reviewed certificates of terminal illness (CTI) did not consistently support patient life expectancies of six months or less if the illness was to run its normal course. For example, documentation was repeated verbatim from the nurse’s comprehensive note documentation and examples of decline were ambiguous. lacked metrics, or did not support on-going appropriateness for the hospice benefit. This was discussed with the Hospice DON.”

    Rule L0667. Condition-level.

  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 4 hospice patient records reviewed of patients admitted since the triannual survey it was noted that the organization had not addressed and documented the need for volunteer services. During discussion with the Hospice DON she stated that she had not been aware of the need for the volunteer service assessment. In 1 of 4 patient records reviewed the organization did not document the completion of an initial comprehensive assessment. For example, in record HOSRR#2 the psychosocial assessment was documented on day 28 after admission. This was discussed with the Hospice DON.”

    Rule L0520. Standard-level.

  • Timeframe for completion of assessment (42 CFR 418.54(b))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 4 patient records reviewed, the organization did not document the completion of an initial comprehensive assessment in 5 calendar days. For example, in record HOSRR#2 the psychosocial assessment was documented on day 28 after admission. This was discussed with the Hospice DON.”

    Rule L0523. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 156 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 4 of 4 patient records reviewed, the plan of care goals were not specific, measurable or individualized to the patient and family. For example in record HOSRR#2 Patient and Caregiver follow company policy regarding tubing changes, filter changes (up to manufacturer recommendations) and how to add water to humidifier. There is no description of what the company policy or the manufacturer recommendations are. Patient and/or CG will verbalize & demonstrate understanding a Foley cath management as evidence by being able to empty foley cath bag, demonstrate foley care, irrigate foley cath, and foley bag etiquette. In record HOSRR#3 Pain will be well controlled. There is no description of what well controlled pain would be for this patient. Record HOSRR#4 Pt will have easy breathing.Pt to have minimal edema. There is no description of what easy breathing or minimal edema would be for this patient. This was discussed with the Hospice DON.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

Jan 17, 2025: reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission27 deficiencies
  • Establishment of the Emergency Program (EP) (42 CFR 418.113)

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a written comprehensive emergency management program that utilizes an all-hazards approach. The program includes, but is not limited to, the following: - Leadership structure and program accountability - Hazard vulnerability analysis - Mitigation and preparedness activities - Emergency operations plan and policies and procedures - Education and training - Exercises and testing - Continuity of operations plan - Disaster recovery - Program evaluation. This finding was discussed with and verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0001. Condition-level.

  • Initial & comprehensive assessment of patient (42 CFR 418.54)

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the organization did not assess and document the need for volunteer services because there were no volunteers available. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing. Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 active patient records reviewed, .the organization did not document the completion of an initial comprehensive assessment. In record RRHV#1, and RRNHV#1there was no psychosocial, spiritual, or bereavement assessment documented. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing”

    Rule L0520. Condition-level.

  • IDG, care planning, coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56)

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharge records reviewed, where the patient was leaving hospice for an extended prognosis there was no order written in record RRDC#2. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0536. Condition-level.

  • Governing body and administrator (42 CFR 418.100(b))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. Leaders did not manage implementation of patient care policies and procedures governing the provision of care as evidenced by condition level findings at §418.52, §418.56, §418.78, §484.102, and §484.110. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and Directors of Nursing.”

    Rule L0651. Condition-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 186 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a hazard vulnerability analysis included the following: - Natural hazards (such as flooding, wildfires) - Human-caused hazards (such as active shooter or cyber/information technology crimes) - Technological hazards (such as utility or information technology outages) - Hazardous materials (such as radiological, nuclear, chemical) - Emerging infectious diseases (such as Ebola, Zika Virus, SARS-CoV-2). This finding was verified by the Administrator. Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not conducted a hazard vulnerability analysis (HVA) using an all-hazards approach that includes the following: - Hazards that are likely to impact the organization’s geographical region, community, facility, and patient population - A community-based risk assessment (such as those developed by external emergency management agencies) - Separate HVAs for its other accredited organizations if they significantly differ from the main site The findings are documented. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment (42 CFR 418.113(a)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 146 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not conducted a hazard vulnerability analysis in order to prioritize hazards to identify and implement mitigation and preparedness actions to increase the resilience of the organization and help reduce disruption of essential services or functions. This finding was verified by the Administrator. Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not evaluated and prioritize the findings of the hazard vulnerability analysis to determine which hazards present the highest likelihood of occurring and the impacts those hazards will have on the operating status of the organization and its ability to provide services as there had not been a hazard vulnerability analysis performed. .”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • EP Program Patient Population (42 CFR 418.113(a)(3))

    The inspectors’ words, 287 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a continuity of operations plan that identified in writing how and where it will continue to provide its essential business functions when the location of the essential or critical service has been compromised due to an emergency or disaster incident. This finding was verified by the Administrator. Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization’s emergency operations plan had not identified the patient population(s) that it will serve and the types of services it would have the ability to provide in an emergency or disaster event. This finding was verified by the Administrator. Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a written continuity of operations plan (COOP) that is developed with the participation of key executive leaders, business and finance leaders, and other department leaders as determined by the organization. These key leaders identify and prioritize the services and functions that are considered essential or critical for maintaining operations. This finding was verified by the Administrator. Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a written delegation of authority plan that provides the individual(s) with the legal authorization to act on behalf of the organization for specified purposes and to carry out specific duties. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0007. Standard-level.

  • Local, State, Tribal Collaboration Process (42 CFR 418.113(a)(4))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization’s emergency operations plan had not included a process for cooperating and collaborating with other health care organizations, relevant community partners (such as fire, police, local incident command, public health departments), and relevant authorities (such as federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff). This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0009. Standard-level.

  • Homebound HHA/Hospice Inform EP Officials (42 CFR 418.113(b)(2))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a plan for providing patient care and clinical support includes policies and procedures that describe how it will inform state and local emergency preparedness officials about its patients in need of evacuation from their residences at any time due to an emergency situation based on the patient’s medical and psychiatric condition and home environment. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0019. Standard-level.

  • Arrangement with Other Facilities (42 CFR 418.113(b)(5))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a plan for providing patient care and clinical support includes written procedures and arrangements with other health care providers for how it will share patient care information and medical documentation and how it will provide transportation to other health care facilities to maintain continuity of care. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0025. Standard-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3)(i))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization’s communications plan identifies its primary and alternate means for communicating with staff and relevant authorities (such as federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff). The plan includes procedures for the following: - How and when alternate/backup communication methods are used - Testing the functionality of the organization’s alternate/backup communication systems or equipment. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Primary/Alternate Means for Communication (42 CFR 418.113(c)(3)(ii))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization’s communications plan identifies its primary and alternate means for communicating with staff and relevant authorities (such as federal, state, tribal, regional, and local emergency preparedness staff). The plan includes procedures for the following: - How and when alternate/backup communication methods are used - Testing the functionality of the organization’s alternate/backup communication systems or equipment. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0032. Standard-level.

  • Methods for Sharing Information (42 CFR 418.113(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 172 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a plan for providing patient care and clinical support includes written procedures and arrangements with other health care providers for how it will share patient care information and medical documentation and how it will provide transportation to other health care facilities to maintain continuity of care. This finding was verified by the Administrator. Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization’s communications plan had not included a method for sharing and/or releasing location information and medical documentation for patients under the organization’s care to the following individuals or entities, in accordance with law and regulation: - Patient’s family, representative, or others involved in the care of the patient - Disaster relief organizations and relevant authorities - Other health care providers. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0033. Standard-level.

  • Information on Occupancy/Needs (42 CFR 418.113(c)(7))

    The inspectors’ words, 101 words

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization’s communications plan had not described how the organization will communicate with and report information about its needs, available occupancy, and ability to provide assistance to relevant authorities. Note: Examples of what an organization may need to report to relevant authorities include, but are not limited to, shortages in personal protective equipment, staffing shortages, evacuation or transfer of patients, and temporary loss of part or all of the organization’s function. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0034. Standard-level.

  • EP Testing Requirements (42 CFR 418.113(d)(3)(iii))

    “Observed in Emergency Management Session. During review and discussion of the Emergency Management plan for Home Health and Hospice, the Surveyor noted that the organization had not had a committee that oversees the emergency management program reviews and evaluates all exercises and actual emergency or disaster incidents. The committee reviews after-action reports (AARs), identifies opportunities for improvement, and recommends actions to take to improve the emergency management program. The AARs and improvement plans are documented. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule E0039. Standard-level.

  • Notice of rights and responsibilities (42 CFR 418.52(a)(2))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 4 of 4 home visits conducted, the hospice’s advance directive policy and information from the state of Arizona was not found in the handbook in patients’ homes, nor was there documentation in the record that the information was provided and reviewed. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0503. Standard-level.

  • Exercise of rights/respect for proprty/person (42 CFR 418.52(b)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 1 of 2 discharge records reviewed, a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage was not signed by the patient’s guardian a minimum of 48 hours prior to discharge as required by law. In RRDC#2 there was no documentation of the document having been signed. This was confirmed by an Administrator.”

    Rule L0505. Standard-level.

  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 14 active patient records reviewed, the organization did not document the completion of an initial comprehensive assessment. In record RRHV#1, and RRNHV#1there was no psychosocial, spiritual, or bereavement assessment documented. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing”

    Rule L0531. Standard-level.

  • Update of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(d))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 11 of 14 active patient records reviewed, where the interdisciplinary group met two or more times the organization failed to update the comprehensive assessment based on changes occurring since the initial assessment. Interdisciplinary group meeting notes did not document patient decline, progress towards desired outcomes and goals, and plans for the following two weeks. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0533. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 126 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records reviewed, plan of care goals were not specific or measurable. Here are some examples: the patient and/or caregiver will verbalize and demonstrate proper safe use of oxygen concentrator and back up tanks; understanding of indication and storage of comfort medications; understanding of indications and proper administration of comfort medication; safe use of nebulizer. Additional goals included: shortness of breath to be controlled while on hospice; pain will be controlled while on hospice; anxiety to be managed while on hospice; and will verbalize a decrease in symptoms of depression. More than 90% of interventions were directed toward staff, not the patient or caregiver. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    “Observed in Patient Home. In 1 of 4 fire barrier wall checks, an order was not obtained to change a medication. At the home visit for RRHV#1 the RN stated that Atropine sulfate ophthalmic ointment 1% was discontinued because it was no longer available from the contracted pharmacy. The list provided to the surveyor for the visit still included the medication because the physician was not contacted for an order to discontinue it. This RFI was reviewed with and confirmed by the Hospice Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Infection control (42 CFR 418.60)

    “Observed in Infection Control Tracer. During review and discussion of the Infection Prevention and Control program for Home Health and Hospice, the surveyor noted that the organization had not had current written policies and procedures to guide its activities and methods for preventing and controlling the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. The policies and procedures are in accordance with applicable law and regulation and nationally recognized evidence-based guidelines, and standards of practice. This finding was verified by the Administrator.”

    Rule L0577. Standard-level.

  • Recruiting and retaining (42 CFR 418.78(c))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During a discussion with the volunteer coordinator and review of available volunteer recruitment initiatives, the pharmacy Hospice surveyor noted that current documentation of this requirement was not available for 2024. .The validation of this missing information was reviewed with the volunteer coordinator at thew time of the survey”

    Rule L0645. Standard-level.

  • Cost saving (42 CFR 418.78(d)(3))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During a discussion with the volunteer coordinator and review of any available records prepared in 2024, the pharmacy Hospice surveyor noted that current documentation of this requirement was not available for 2024--no estimates of the dollar amount saved by volunteers providing services and care rather than employees providing care was available. The validation of this missing information was reviewed with the volunteer coordinator at thew time of the survey”

    Rule L0646. Standard-level.

  • Level of activity (42 CFR 418.78(e))

    “Observed in Tracer Activities. During a discussion with the volunteer coordinator and review of available records prepared in 2024, the pharmacy Hospice surveyor noted that current documentation of direct patient care and administrative to equal 5% was not available for 2024--no estimates of the amount saved by volunteers providing services and care rather than employees providing care was now ongoing. The validation of this missing information was reviewed with the volunteer coordinator at thew time of the survey”

    Rule L0647. Standard-level.

  • Initial certification of terminal illness (42 CFR 418.102(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 121 words

    “Observed in Record Review. In 14 of 14 active patient records reviewed, certificates of terminal illness (CTI) did not consistently support patient life expectancies of six months or less if the illness was to run its normal course. For example, documentation was repeated verbatim in consecutive CTIs, examples of decline were ambiguous, lacked metrics, or did not support on-going appropriateness for the hospice benefit. In several records the CTI included a statement that a patient’s mid arm circumferences had decreased 3 centimeters since the last certification, however there was no documentation in nursing assessments, updates to the comprehensive assessments, or interdisciplinary group meeting notes to support this statement. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0667. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(1)(i))

    “Observed in Record Review. In 2 of 2 patient records reviewed, discharge summaries were not written and attending physicians were not notified of the availability of the summaries in records RRDC#1 and RRDC#2. This RFI was reviewed with the Administrators and the Hospice Director of Nursing.”

    Rule L0682. Standard-level.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 18, 2026Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Mar 21, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint CommissionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 25, 2025Follow-up inspection by The Joint Commission5 deficiencies cited
Jan 17, 2025Reaccreditation inspection by The Joint Commission27 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 2, 2018.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 12 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 93% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 93% at home, 6% in assisted living.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day12.0 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5%
Visits near death93.0% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Mohammed Ahmed (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Mohammed Ahmed (corporate director, 100%); Mohammed Ahmed (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Natacha Vanhorn (managing employee (on the payroll)); Vivek Narasimhan (managing employee (under contract)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 80% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 85.87% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 50.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 16 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 86442, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 32.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.