Hearth Record

Beacon of Hope Hospice

A hospice in Lake Havasu, Arizona 86403

1760 Mcculloch Boulevard North, Suite 204, Lake Havasu, Arizona 86403. (928) 854-4200.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

10 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 13 hospices serving ZIP code 86403 had 1.5.

The last inspection on record was on Sep 6, 2024: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

10 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Sep 6, 2024: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
  • Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))

    The inspectors’ words, 198 words

    “Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patients #1, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: Patient #1: Patient had oxygen in the home which was not included on the medication profile. Patient #3: Patient had oxygen in the home which was not included on the medication profile. Patient #4: Metronidazole was ordered for wound care but did not include the location to apply medication on the medication profile. Patient #5: Patient has the following medications on the medication profile: Acetaminophen 650mg suppository every 6 hours as needed; Acetaminophen 500mg tablets, 1-2 tablets every 6 hours as needed; and Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 5/325mg 1 tablet every 4 hours as needed. None of these acetaminophen entries indicate not to exceed maximum dose of 4000 mg daily. Patient #6: Patient has order for Triple Antibiotic Cream to be applied to stage 2 skin tear. This medication is not on medication profile. Patient #8: Patient has order for Miralax on medication profile but does not include directions for reconstitution.”

    Rule L0530. Standard-level.

  • Approach to service delivery (42 CFR 418.56(a)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 308 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patients #3, 6, and 8) did not have evidence that a Registered Nurse was designated to ensure continuous assessment of the patient and family’s needs, and to coordinate activities with other members of the interdisciplinary group (IDG): Patient #3: Received a prn visit on 08/31/24. During the visit the patient reported pain at 10/10 and had a foley catheter that was not draining. Foley was replaced by nurse and Tylenol was administered for pain. There was no follow up phone call or visit to evaluate patient status until a routine scheduled nursing visit on 09/04/24. Patient #6: Received a prn visit on 8/28/24 for c/o painful urination. RN did urine dipstick which showed UTI. Orders received to start antibiotic. On 8/29/24 a call was received from facility staff stating patient had a choking episode and they requested thick-it. An RN supply drop visit was made to deliver thick-it. There was no further follow up phone calls or visits to evaluate the patient status, painful urination, response to antibiotic, or if there were further choking episodes until 9/05/24. Patient #8: Received a prn visit on 08/09/24 after call from patient’s spouse stating that patient catheter was not draining. Visit was made and catheter was replaced. On 8/10/24 spouse called stating catheter replacement from 08/09/24 had not been effective and patient developed level 10/10 pain. Spouse states after 2 hours of reported pain level of 10/10, she removed the indwelling catheter and attempted straight catheterization, as that was the treatment plan prior to the indwelling catheter, with no success. RN visit was made and new indwelling catheter was placed with 1000 ml return of urine and patient pain returned to 0/10. There was no follow up phone call or visit to evaluate patient status with catheter and pain until routine visit scheduled 08/13/24.”

    Rule L0540. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 116 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #9, 10) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #9: Patient utilizes a nebulizer. Respiratory/nebulizer use is not included in nursing for problems/goals/interventions on the plan of care. Patient #10: Patient utilizes a nebulizer. Respiratory/nebulizer use is not included in nursing for problems/goals/interventions on the plan of care.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 207 words

    “Upon patient record review, 4 of 14 (Patients #1, 3, 5, 6) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments: Patient #1: Patient had oxygen in the home. There was no order for oxygen in the medical record. Patient #3: Patient had oxygen in the home. There was no order for oxygen in the medical record. Patient #5: Patient has 2 separate orders for Morphine on medication profile. First order reads Morphine 10mg/0.5ml, 1ml every 3 hours prn pain/shortness of breath. The second order reads “Morphine 20mg/ml, 0.25mg every hour as needed for mild pain/shortness of breath 0.5mg moderate pain shortness of breath 0.75mg severe pain shortness of breath.” This is also unclear as to which order to use under specific circumstances. Patient #6: Wound care order reads, “Stage 2 skin tear to R lower distal leg calf, clean with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply triple antibiotic ointment, cover with non adherent dressing every 3 days or prn.” This order does not specify who is to change the dressing outside RN scheduled visits. This order also does not specify an indication for the prn dressing changes.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #1, 3) did not have evidence that the plan of care included all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs: Patient #1: Patient has an indwelling foley catheter. However, catheter supplies were not included on the plan of care. Patient had oxygen equipment in the home which was not included on the plan of care. Patient #3: Patient had oxygen equipment in the home which was not included on the plan of care”

    Rule L0550. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 142 words

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #4) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care indicates what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable: Patient #4: Current aide plan of care assigns the following task: “May file (patient name) long or uneven fingernails at each on 1st first of every week.” A task, whether for personal care or non-personal care needs to be specific without leaving the task to the discretion of the aide.”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 204 words

    “Upon patient record review 3 of 14 (Patients #2, 5, and 9) did not have documented evidence in the patient record that a hospice aide provides services that are: • Ordered by the interdisciplinary group • Included in the plan of care Patient #2: The aide plan of care assigned “Skin care after shower. Apply lotion”. Showers were assigned for the first and third visits of each week, however, skin care/application of lotion was performed on second visits of the week when showers were not performed. Patient #5: The aide plan of care states aide will change linens first visit of each week. Visit on Monday, 9/2/24 was a missed visit, therefore, first visit of week was completed on Wednesday, 9/4/24 and linens were not changed per plan of care. Patient #9: The aide plan of care states change linens each visit. On 08/20/24, 09/03/24, the aide documented that they were unable to document and that this task was not applicable to this visit. On 08/23/24, the aide documented that linen change was refused by patient. The aide plan of care states electric razor to be used each visit to shave patient. On 09/06/24, the aide documented unable to document, not applicable to visit.”

    Rule L0626. Standard-level.

  • Supervision of hospice aides (42 CFR 418.76(h)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 93 words

    “Upon patient record review 1 of 14 (Patient #13) did not have evidence documented in the patient record that a Registered Nurse made an on-site visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days to assess the quality of care and services provided by the hospice aide and to ensure that services ordered by the hospice interdisciplinary group meet the patient’s needs: Patient #13: This patient received an RN visit with aide supervision on 01/17/2024. There was no further aide supervision up to and including date of death on 02/06/24.”

    Rule L0629. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 98 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 1 of 14 (Patients #4) did not have evidence that all entries were legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice: Patient #4: On multiple aide visits, aide documents that the patient is signing to authenticate the visit date and time. This patient is alert and oriented only to person, is in a facility, and has an active DPOA. Administrator reports that the agency expectations would be that the aide have facility staff sign for authentication of these visits.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Discharge or transfer of care (42 CFR 418.104(e)(3))

    “Upon patient record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #11) did not have evidence that the discharge summary included all required information: Patient 11: The discharge summary does not include the patient’s current plan of care.”

    Rule L0684. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 6, 2024Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since Sep 17, 2012.
  • Ownership: for-profit.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 11.1 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 7.6% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 96.5% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 70% at home, 27% in assisted living, 3% in a nursing facility.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day11.1 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends7.6%
Visits near death96.5% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • National Hospice Management, Inc. owns 100% directly since Jul 13, 2005.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Christine L Kaplan (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); William John Moriconi (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Shirley Noronha (managing employee (under contract), 0%); Tracey Sulzberger (corporate officer); Tracey Sulzberger (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kandy M Mecum (corporate officer); Jenica Lyons (managing employee (on the payroll)); William John Moriconi (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
National Hospice Management, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jul 13, 2005

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 82% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 94.12% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 70.9% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 13 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 86403, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 1.5; this one had 10.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.