Hearth Record

Ascension Hospice LLC

A hospice in Scottsdale, Arizona 85250

6263 North Scottsdale Rd Ste 138 Office A, Scottsdale, Arizona 85250. (480) 201-4163.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.

The last 24 months 9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

9 deficiencies cited in the last three years

The middle of the 50 hospices serving ZIP code 85250 had 7.

The last inspection on record was on Apr 15, 2026: a reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

When those deficiencies happened

9 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

9 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Apr 15, 2026: reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies
  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))

    The inspectors’ words, 138 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2, 6, 7) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient #2: Patient had indwelling Foley with ongoing UTI requiring treatment . There are no related problems, goals, interventions for catheter or infection. Patient #6: Patient has DM and protein calorie malnutrition with sliding scale insulin with Metformin and Megace prescribed. There are no related problems, goals, interventions. Patient #7: Patient admitted with Foley catheter, but no related problems, goals, interventions.”

    Rule L0545. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(2))

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) did not have evidence the plan of care must includes all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including the following: • A detailed statement of the scope and frequency of services necessary to meet the specific patient and family needs • The IDG demonstrates a proactive approach in developing each patient’s plan of care by planning ahead for anticipated patient changes and needs. Decisions should reflect the patient/family preferences rather than be solely a response to a crisis. Patient #3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9: MSW and SC 1/monthly and 3 prn every 30 days prn visits for acute and follow up needs. Patient #10: SN frequency 1 visit every 90 days, 3 prn visits every 30 days - prn visits for acute and follow up needs. RN is 1x/week and 6 prn every 30 days. MSW and SC 1x/monthly and 3 prn every 30 days prn visits for acute and follow up needs.”

    Rule L0547. Standard-level.

  • Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))

    The inspectors’ words, 166 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #2, 7, 12) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient #2: Patient admitted 1/23/26 with Foley catheter in place. 1/23/26 order says may add administration of Foley catheter care; change 1x/month and prn. The order does not state the reason for the PRN catheter change. In addition, there was no reference to catheter size or balloon size. Patient #7: 2/10/26 order, May add administration of Foley catheter care; change 1x/month and prn. The order does not state the reason for the PRN catheter change. In addition, there was no reference to catheter size or balloon size. Patient #12: 1/6/16 order, May add administration of Foley catheter care; change 1x/month and prn. The order does not state the reason for the PRN catheter change. In addition, there was no reference to catheter size or balloon size.”

    Rule L0549. Standard-level.

  • Review of the plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 144 words

    “Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #5, 6, 7) did not have evidence that a revised plan of care includes information from the patient’s updated comprehensive assessment and must note the patient’s progress towards outcome/goals from the plan of care. Patient #5: Order on 3/27/26 for Doxycycline 100 mg twice/day wound LLL. No update to problems, goals, interventions. Patient #6: 4/11/26 PRN visit related to red, hot LLE. Doxycycline ordered. No update to problems, goals, interventions. Patient #7: 4/6/26 order for Depakote for seizure activity. No update to problems, goals, interventions. Patient experienced fall 3/2/26. RN made visit. Patient had fallen and hit head. Lacerations visualized. Wife had applied gauze and Bandaid dry and intact, requested no change dressing at this time. Wound supplies left on site. Eliquis discontinued. No update to problems, goals, interventions related to fall or related wound care.”

    Rule L0553. Standard-level.

  • Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))

    “Upon client record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2, 5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient #2: The 2/3/26 SN visit note stated Foley catheter removed 2/3/26. No documented evidence of a physician order for removal at that time. Patient #5: SN visit notes on 3/27, 3/31 and 4/7/26 documented providing wound care to LLE. No documented evidence of orders for wound care provided.”

    Rule L0555. Standard-level.

  • Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #3, 7, 8, 9, 12) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient #3: Patient admitted with ESRD and cessation of dialysis. Patient has dialysis catheter right upper chest and right sided nephrostomy (inadvertently documented as urostomy). Neither are identified on the aide care plan for catheter safety. Patient #7: Patient had Foley catheter and documented seizures with no reference on the aide care plan. Patient #8, 9: Patient has Oxygen 2-4 LPM via NC continuously as needed ordered. No oxygen flow rate or precautions included on the aide care plan. Patient #12: Patient admitted with Foley catheter with no reference on the aide care plan”

    Rule L0625. Standard-level.

  • Authentication (42 CFR 418.104(b))

    The inspectors’ words, 267 words

    “Upon patient client record review, 4 of 14 (Patient #2, 3, 5, 7) did not have evidence that all entries are legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated and dated in accordance with the organizations policies and procedures and currently accepted standards of practice. Electronic signatures are acceptable as long the hospice is following appropriate safeguards to prevent unauthorized access to the patient records. Patient #2: There was a 2/3/26 SN visit to remove Foley catheter, but no reference to deflation of balloon/amount. Record did not contain size/balloon of existing cath. This RN removed the indwelling catheter, catheter was intact. Patient tolerated w/o pain, discomfort, small amount yellow urine <100 ml in bag. Patient #3: Initial comprehensive assessment, SN documented presence of urostomy, but upon visit and interview with staff, confirmed the patient actually has nephrostomy tube. Patient #5: Visit 4/7/26: This RN provides wound care - wound to LLE is mostly healed, no pain or redness at wound site, bandage encouraged to protect scab from accidental removal by dog claws. 3/31/26: This RN provides wound care to anterior LLE r/t skin tear; wound appears to be healing with increased granulation tissue and decreased pain and redness at wound site. Patient reports changing bandage daily, decreased pain and discomfort. This RN cleansed with wound cleanser, pat dry with gauze, applied ointment (not specified) and foam dressing. 3/27/26 This RN cleaned wound with wound spray, applied ointment (not specified), covered with foam dressing. Patient #7: Foley was documented at admission related to status post cancer prostate. No further documentation in the record of whether patient has a foley catheter.”

    Rule L0679. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d))

    The inspectors’ words, 114 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that a written hospice plan of care is established and maintained in consultation with SNF/NF or ICF/IID representatives. All hospice care provided is in accordance with this hospice plan of care. Patient #3: SNF resident admitted with dialysis catheter and nephrostomy (inadvertently documented as urostomy), according to comprehensive assessment. However, there are no related problems, goals, interventions on the plan of care. Patient has IDDM and complaints of intermittent pruritus with no related problems, goals, interventions. In addition, visits on 4/6/26 and 4/12/26 the SN documented multiple areas of skin breakdown both breasts, with no update to problems, goals and interventions.”

    Rule L0773. Standard-level.

  • Hospice plan of care (42 CFR 418.112(d)(1))

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “Upon client record review, 1 of 14 (Patient #3) did not have evidence that the hospice plan of care identifies the care and services that are needed and specifically identify which provider (nursing facility or hospice) is responsible for performing the respective functions that have been agreed upon and included in the hospice plan of care. Patient #3: SNF resident admitted with dialysis catheter and nephrostomy (inadvertently documented as urostomy), according to comprehensive assessment. Upon interview, ADON states that facility manages the catheter and urostomy, although this is not reflected in care plan on who is providing the catheter care.”

    Rule L0774. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 15, 2026Reaccreditation inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care9 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified hospice since May 1, 2023.
  • CMS doesn’t list its type of ownership.
  • No deficiency or on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who does the caring?

  • From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 10.8 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 5.8% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 95.1% of patients who died.
  • Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 14% at home, 15% in assisted living, 13% in a nursing facility, 58% elsewhere.
Source:

CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Staffing measures
MeasureThis provider
Nurse care minutes per routine home care day10.8 min
Skilled nursing minutes at weekends5.8%
Visits near death95.1% of patients who died

Who owns it?

  • 9 owners or officers are people: Linda N Michelson (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); David N Garcia (corporate officer, 100%); David N Garcia (corporate director, 100%); David N Garcia (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); David N Garcia (runs it (operational or managerial control), 100%); Linda N Michelson (corporate officer); Linda N Michelson (corporate director); Linda N Michelson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Randolph A Clark (managing employee (under contract), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What do families say?

  • CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
  • In CMS’s survey of family caregivers (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025): 87% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • 95.51% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 63% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
Source:

CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5Not rated
Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold10 of 10

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 50 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85250, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 9.
Source:

CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
  • Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the hospice

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.