Vital Hc, Inc.
A hospice in Mesa, Arizona 85206
4447 East Broadway Road Suite 101, Mesa, Arizona 85206. (520) 278-5003.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 23, 2026.
- 10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- Not rated family caregiver rating
- 10of 10 CMS’s Hospice Care Index
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean2
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
10 deficiencies cited in the last three years
The middle of the 88 hospices serving ZIP code 85206 had 5.
The last inspection on record was on Feb 6, 2025: an initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
When those deficiencies happened
10 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Feb 6, 2025: initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care10 deficiencies
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(6))
The inspectors’ words, 373 words
“Upon patient record review, 7 of 14 (Patient #1,2,4,6,8,9,10) did not have evidence in the patient record that a review was completed of all prescription and non-prescription medications, including herbal remedies that could affect drug therapy. This review includes, but is not limited to: • Effectiveness of drug therapy • Drug side effects • Actual or potential drug interactions • Duplicate drug therapy • Drug therapy currently associated with laboratory monitoring Patient 1: Medication list with order for Miralax: 17 grams powder by mouth daily as needed for constipation if no bowel movement in 24 hours. There is no evidence of diluent for this medication in the medication list. COS. In addition, medication list with no evidence of oxygen 2-4 liters per minute via NC PRN listed on the profile. Patient 2: Medication list with order for Miralax: 17 grams powder by mouth daily as needed for constipation if no bowel movement in 24 hours. There is no evidence of diluent for this medication in the medication list. COS Patient 4: Medication list with no evidence of oxygen 2-4 liters per minute via NC PRN listed on the profile. Patient 6: Medication list with order for lidocaine 5 percent transdermal patch: apply one patch to affected area for 12 hours, then remove for 12 hours as needed for pain. There is no evidence of application site in the medication list. COS Medication list with order for triamcinolone 0.1 percent topical cream: apply one inch to affected area every 6 hours as needed for itching. There is no evidence of application site in the medication list. COS Patient 8: Medication list with order for Miralax: 17 grams powder by mouth daily as needed for constipation if no bowel movement in 24 hours. There is no evidence of diluent for this medication in the medication list. COS Patient 9: Medication list with order for ketoconazole 2 percent topical cream: Apply 1-2 grams topical daily for nail infection. There is no evidence of application site in the medication list. COS Patient 10: Medication list with order for ammonium lactate 12 percent: Apply topically to affected area twice daily for dry skin. There is no evidence of medication type or application site in the medication list COS”
-
Content of comprehensive assessment (42 CFR 418.54(c)(7))
The inspectors’ words, 108 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #8,11,13) did not have evidence in the patient record that the comprehensive assessment includes a bereavement component which includes the needs of the patient’s family and other individuals focusing on the social, spiritual, and cultural factors that may impact their ability to cope with the patient’s death. Information gathered from the initial bereavement assessment is incorporated into the plan of care and is considered in the bereavement plan of care. Patient 8: Patient admitted 08/30/2023. Initial bereavement assessment documented 01/26/2024. Patient 11: Patient admitted 11/18/2023. Initial bereavement assessment documented 02/15/2024. Patient 13: Patient admitted 08/15/2023. Initial bereavement assessment documented 08/22/2023.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c))
The inspectors’ words, 210 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #4,6,9) did not have evidence in the patient record that the hospice has developed an individualized written plan of care for each patient. The plan of care must reflect patient/family goals and interventions based on the problems identified in the initial, comprehensive, and updated comprehensive assessments. The plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions. Patient 4: Identified needs: pain, neuro/confusion; agitation; respiratory with oxygen; nutrition with aspiration precautions; risk for skin breakdown; high risk for falls. No evidence of problems, goals, or interventions on the plan of care: risk for skin breakdown. Patient 6: Identified needs: pain, anxiety, cardiac, weakness, respiratory with dyspnea and oxygen; constipation, insomnia, high risk for skin breakdown; fall, neuro/TIAs. No evidence of problems, goals, or interventions on the plan of care: oxygen, insomnia, TIAs. Patient 9: Identified needs: neuro/confusion; respiratory with dyspnea, gastrointestinal with nausea; nutrition with anorexia and aspiration; high risk for skin breakdown; falls, bleeding risk due to Plavix 75mg by mouth daily. No evidence of problems, goals or interventions on the plan of care: respiratory with dyspnea, high risk for skin breakdown; bleeding risk due to Plavix 75mg by mouth daily.”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(4))
The inspectors’ words, 273 words
“Upon patient record review, 6 of 14 (Patient #1,2,6,8,9,10) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including medications and treatments. Patient 1,8: Plan of care with order for Miralax: 17 grams powder by mouth daily as needed for constipation if no bowel movement in 24 hours. There is no evidence of diluent for this medication in the plan of care. COS Patient 2: Plan of care with order for Miralax: 17 grams powder by mouth daily as needed for constipation if no bowel movement in 24 hours. There is no evidence of diluent for this medication in the plan of care. COS Patient 6: Plan of care with order for lidocaine 5 percent transdermal patch: apply one patch to affected area for 12 hours, then remove for 12 hours as needed for pain. There is no evidence of application site in the plan of care. COS Plan of care with order for triamcinolone 0.1 percent topical cream: apply one inch to affected area every 6 hours as needed for itching. There is no evidence of application site in the plan of care. COS Patient 9: Plan of care with order for ketoconazole 2 percent topical cream: Apply 1-2 grams topical daily for nail infection. There is no evidence of application site in the plan of care. COS Patient 10: Plan of care with order for ammonium lactate 12 percent: Apply topically to affected area twice daily for dry skin. There is no evidence of medication type or application site in the plan of care COS”
-
Content of plan of care (42 CFR 418.56(c)(5))
The inspectors’ words, 91 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #7,8) did not have evidence the plan of care must include all services necessary for the palliation and management of the terminal illness and related conditions, including equipment and supply needs. Patient 7: Identified DME needs: hospital bed with alternating air mattress; overbed table. No evidence of DME on plan of care: overbed table. Patient 8: Identified DME needs: oxygen, hospital bed with alternating air mattress; overbed table, wheelchair, shower chair, hoyer lift; nebulizer. No evidence of DME on plan of care: nebulizer.”
-
Coordination of services (42 CFR 418.56(e)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Upon patient record review, 2 of 14 (Patient #2,5) did not have evidence that the IDG ensures that the care and services are provided in accordance with the plan of care. Patient 2: SC visit frequency order is monthly and 1prn. There is evidence in the medical record of visits made: 10/16/2024, 10/30/2024, 11/06/2024, 11/21/2024. These visits are all documented as scheduled (not PRN) visits. Patient 5: SC visit frequency order is monthly and 1prn. SC visit documented in November: 11/7/24-unscheduled. No evidence of scheduled November 2024 SC visit. December: 12/19/24-unscheduled. No evidence of scheduled December 2024 SC visit.”
-
Hospice aide assignments and duties (42 CFR 418.76(g)(1))
The inspectors’ words, 142 words
“Upon patient record review, 3 of 14 (Patient #1,2,5) did not have evidence in the patient record that hospice aide assignments and duties are: • Assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse that is a member of the interdisciplinary group • Written patient care instructions for a hospice aide must be prepared by a Registered Nurse who is responsible for the supervision of a hospice aide as specified under paragraph (h) of 418.76 • There is evidence in the patient record that the plan of care; indicate what tasks are to be done by the Aide and the frequency of these tasks. The use of “PRN” or “per patient choice”, for any task, whether personal care or non-personal care tasks, are not acceptable Patient 1,2,5: tasks on the aide care plan without frequencies: documentation of last BM; change linen COS”
-
Content (42 CFR 418.104(a)(2))
The inspectors’ words, 338 words
“Upon patient record review, 5 of 14 (Patient #3,6,7,8,10) did not have evidence that each patient record contains: • Signed copies of the notice of patient rights in accordance with 418.52 • Signed election statement in accordance with 418.24 Patient 3: On hospice notice of election signed 10/17/2024, addendum choice provided yes and no choices. Neither choice was made. There is no evidence of start of care date documented on hospice notice of election. Patient 6: On hospice notice of election signed 08/16/2024, addendum choice provided yes and no choices. Neither choice was made. On notice of election addendum document provided to patient: no evidence: date of request documented on form. There is no evidence of date document was furnished. Area of document titled, “non-covered items, services, drugs” is blank. Notice of election: 08/17/2024 start of care date chosen, 08/16/2024 start of care documented by the hospice. Patient 7: On hospice notice of election signed 05/02/2024, addendum choice provided yes and no choices. Neither choice was made. On notice of election addendum document provided to patient: there is no evidence of signer’s relationship or date document was signed. Document: consent for primary caregiver. No primary caregiver is named in document. Top of document: “I (print name) -area blank- agree to accept the role of primary caregiver for (print name)-patient’s name-who is requesting admission to -Hospice’s Name- program of care.” Patient 8: On notice of election addendum document provided to patient: there is no evidence of reason patient was unable to sign despite area provided on form for this documentation. Admission consent: POA signed document for patient. No reason given for patient not signing (space provided for documenting this). Notice of election: in Right to Choose Attending Physician section- both choices “I do not wish to choose an attending physician” and “my choice for attending physician is:” are chosen. Attending physician S.S. written in. No NPI or address documented. Patient 10: On hospice notice of election signed 01/29/2025, addendum choice provided yes and no choices. Neither choice was made.”
-
Inpatient care provided under arrangements (42 CFR 418.108(c)(3))
The inspectors’ words, 105 words
“Upon inpatient contract review, Contract 1 of 3, #1(Center at Val Vista) did not have evidence that the hospice patient’s inpatient clinical record includes a record of all inpatient services furnished and events regarding care that occurred at the facility; that a copy of the discharge summary be provided to the hospice at the time of discharge; and that a copy of the inpatient clinical record is available to the hospice at the time of discharge. Contract#1: Center at Val Vista-there is no evidence that there is a requirement in the contract that facility will provide hospice with discharge summary and copy of medical records.”
-
Written agreement (42 CFR 418.112(c)(1))
“Upon SNF/NF contract review, Contract 1 of 3, #1 (Center at Val Vista) did not have evidence of the manner in which the SNF/NF and the hospice are to communicate with each other and how each will document such communications to ensure that the needs of patients are addressed and met 24 hours a day. Contract #1: Center at Val Vista-there is no evidence in the contract that the facility will be required to allow hospice 24 hour access to facility.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2025 | Initial inspection by the Accreditation Commission for Health Care | 10 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified hospice since Jun 3, 2022.
- Ownership: for-profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency or CMS’s most serious finding: the place’s failure to meet a rule caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment or death to someone in its care. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 489.3. on record in the last three years.
CMS, Hospice General Information. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who does the caring?
- From Medicare claims (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024): 14.2 nurse care minutes per routine home care day, 8.3% of skilled nursing minutes at weekends and a visit near death for 99.2% of patients who died.
- Where its patients were cared for (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024): 86% at home, 14% in assisted living.
CMS, Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | This provider |
|---|---|
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care day | 14.2 min |
| Skilled nursing minutes at weekends | 8.3% |
| Visits near death | 99.2% of patients who died |
Who owns it?
- Ngu Alliance LLC owns 25% directly since Sep 15, 2023.
- 14 owners or officers are people: Lona Lewis (owns 5% or more directly, 35%); Ruben Sukiasyan (owns 5% or more directly, 25%); Brooke W Eisenhart (owns 5% or more directly, 15%); Brooke W Eisenhart (corporate officer); Brooke W Eisenhart (corporate director); Brooke W Eisenhart (managing employee (on the payroll)); Lona Lewis (corporate officer); Lona Lewis (corporate director); Lona Lewis (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ruben Sukiasyan (corporate officer); Ruben Sukiasyan (corporate director); Ruben Sukiasyan (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael James Lucherini (managing employee (under contract)); Stacie Tenney (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospice All Owners and Hospice Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ngu Alliance LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 25% | Sep 15, 2023 |
What do families say?
- CMS gives no family caregiver survey rating: “The number of cases is too small to report Star Ratings.”
- CMS’s Hospice Care Index: 10 of 10 (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
- 92.86% of patients were assessed on all seven of CMS’s measures at the start of care (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025); 78.1% had visits from a nurse or social worker on at least 2 of their last 3 days (Jan 1, 2023 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, CAHPS Hospice Survey and Hospice Provider Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Family caregiver survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of patients’ family caregivers, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Hospice Care IndexCMS’s Hospice Care Index, 0 to 10 (higher is better): a point for each of ten measures from Medicare claims on which the hospice meets CMS’s threshold | 10 of 10 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 88 hospices CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 85206, where this hospice’s office is, the middle number of deficiencies cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 10.
CMS, Hospice ZIP Data. Released Aug 26, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR hospice inspection reports. Released Oct 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Deficiencies, 3 years |
|---|---|
| Vital Hc, Inc. This hospice | 10 |
| Endeavor Hospice | 12 |
| Arizona Life Hospice | 0 |
| Americare Hospice and Palliative Care | Not given |
| Casa De La Luz East Valley | Not given |
| Aegis Hospice, Inc. | Not given |
| Hospice at Home of Arizona, LLC | Not given |
| Enhabit Hospice | Not given |
| Holy Cross Hospice | Not given |
| Hospice of America, LLC | Not given |
| Anthem Hospice Care | 3 |
| Ahc Home Health of Arizona, LLC | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospices, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- CMS ended its Special Focus Program for hospices with serious problems on Feb 14, 2025, so no hospice is marked as one.
- Hospice quality measures have a gap from October 2025: CMS replaced its patient assessment then, and public results from the new one (HOPE) are expected around November 2027.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice General Information (yc9t-dgbk).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Provider Data (252m-zfp9).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, CAHPS Hospice Survey (gxki-hrr8).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR hospice inspection reports (Hospice Survey Reports - Oct 2021 through Sep 2026.xlsx).
Released Oct 23, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice All Owners (e983965e-1603-4cb8-82b5-c40090e380d1).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice Enrollments (25704213-e833-4b8b-9dbc-58dd17149209).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospice ZIP Data (95rg-2usp).
Released Aug 26, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospice
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospice adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospice will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospice”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.