Hearth Record

Alpha Care Health Services of WI, Inc.

A home health agency in Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203

600 N. Plankinton Ave. Suite 105, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. (414) 937-5888.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 12, 2024: a complaint inspection.

7 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 3 of them at condition level, the most serious.

3 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

7 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

7 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 12, 2024: complaint inspection6 deficiencies
  • Condition Of Participation: Patient Rights.

    The inspectors’ words, 127 words

    “Condition of Participation: Patient rights. CFR(s): 484.50 Condition of participation: Patient rights. The patient and representative (if any), have the right to be informed of the patient’s rights in a language and manner the individual understands. The HHA must protect and promote the exercise of these rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure Home Health Agency federal and state regulations were followed in 1 of 1 Home Health Agency reviewed. Findings include: The agency failed to complete a thorough discharge summary for 1 of 1 discharged patients reviewed (Patient #1). See tag G0464. The cumulative effect of this systemic problem resulted in the home health agency’s inability to ensure all patients understood their rights.”

    Rule G0406. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Care Planning, Coordination, Quality Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 235 words

    “Care planning, coordination, quality of care CFR(s): 484.60 Condition of participation: Care planning, coordination of services, and quality of care. Patients are accepted for treatment on the reasonable expectation that an HHA can meet the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs in his or her place of residence. Each patient must receive an individualized written plan of care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment, including identification of the responsible discipline(s), and the measurable outcomes that the HHA anticipates will occur as a result of implementing and coordinating the plan of care. The individualized plan of care must also specify the patient and caregiver education and training. Services must be furnished in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure Home Health Agency federal and state regulations were followed in 1 of 1 Home Health Agency reviewed. Findings include: The agency failed to ensure patient plans of care were reviewed at least every 60 days for 4 of 4 patient (Patients #1, 2, 3, 4) records reviewed. See tag G0588. The cumulative effect of this systemic problem resulted in the home health agency’s inability to ensure the provision of quality health care in a safe environment.”

    Rule G0570. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Organization And Administration Of Services

    The inspectors’ words, 177 words

    “Organization and administration of services CFR(s): 484.105 Condition of participation: Organization and administration of services. The HHA must organize, manage, and administer its resources to attain and maintain the highest practicable functional capacity, including providing optimal care to achieve the goals and outcomes identified in the patient’s plan of care, for each patient’s medical, nursing, and rehabilitative needs. The HHA must assure that administrative and supervisory functions are not delegated to another agency or organization, and all services not furnished directly are monitored and controlled. The HHA must set forth, in writing, its organizational structure, including lines of authority, and services furnished. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure Home Health Agency federal and state regulations were followed in 1 of 1 Home Health Agency reviewed. Findings include: The agency failed to ensure certification procedures were followed to admit skilled patients. See tag G0942. The cumulative effect of this systemic problem resulted in the home health agency’s inability to ensure oversight of management and agency.”

    Rule G0940. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Governing Body

    The inspectors’ words, 307 words

    “Governing body CFR(s): 484.105(a) Standard: Governing body. A governing body (or designated persons so functioning) must assume full legal authority and responsibility for the agency’s overall management and operation, the provision of all home health services, fiscal operations, review of the agency’s budget and its operational plans, and its quality assessment and performance improvement program. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency’s governing body failed to maintain oversight of the agency to ensure certification procedures are followed to admit skilled patients in 1 of 1 program census reviewed. (Governing Body.) Findings include: Record review of agency total active census revealed 111 unskilled patients (40 personal care and 71 supportive care) and 1 skilled patient. Record review of skilled patient census revealed 1 skilled patient (Patient #3) with a start of care of 05/14/2024. Record review of skilled patient admissions for the past 12 months revealed 1 admission. (Patient # 3) Record review of agency skilled patient referrals since 01/01/2024 revealed 38 total referrals and 37 declined referrals. During an interview with Administrator B on 09/13/2024 at 10:10 AM, when asked for the reason skilled referrals were declined, Administrator B stated, “Most referrals are not coming directly to us but coming into a pool that different home health agencies can choose to take on.” Administrator B states, “Since it has been over a year since the agency has had skilled patients, we (Agency) wanted to make sure were following all regulations and doing it right, so we are taking on skilled patients again slowly.” When asked what the agency plan is to increase skilled patient census, Administrator B stated, “We have a board meeting this month and this was a topic of discussion.” Administrator B stated that there is no date set for this board meeting at this time.”

    Rule G0942. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Advise The Patient Of Discharge For Cause

    The inspectors’ words, 576 words

    “Advise the patient of discharge for cause CFR(s): 484.50(d)(5)(i) (i) Advise the patient, representative (if any), the physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s), issuing orders for the home health plan of care, and the patient’s primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) that a discharge for cause is being considered; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, agency staff failed to complete a 30-day summary, which includes a date of discharge, a description of the care provided, reason for discharge and any referrals to alternate providers for continued services, in 1 of 1 discharged record reviewed. (Patient #1) Findings include: Review of policy “Discharge Criteria and Planning”, revealed in part, “Patients will be discharged from services as follows: 2. the patient’s behavior is disruptive, abusive, or uncooperative to the extent delivery of care or the ability of the agency to operate effectively is seriously impaired, the agency will discharge for cause. The agency will do the following prior to discharging for cause. a) Advise the patient and physician ordering the home health plan of care and other health care providers who will provide care after discharge, that a discharge for cause is being considered. b) Provide the patient with contact information of other providers who may be able to provide care. c) Document the problems, behaviors that warranted discharge for cause and efforts made to resolve the problems, in the clinical record. d) In extreme situations with serious imminent threat of harm to agency staff, agency may discharge immediately. Document the behavior or threat supporting immediate harm. e) Evidence in the record that the agency provided the patient with contact numbers for other community resources and other agencies that could provide services. 6. The patient’s continuing care needs are assessed at discharge. 9. Patients are informed prior to discharge of plans for discharge and the reason for discharge.” Review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed Patient #1 was discharged from home care services on 08/07/24. Reason for discharge on the discharge notification form was “staff safety.” Review of a communication note dated 08/07/2024 revealed reason for discharge “Medicaid Fraud.” There was no documentation within the record that supported either reasons for discharge or that a written notice of pending discharge was given to the patient or ordering Physician prior to discharge. There was no documentation within the clinical record that a Summary was completed in 30-days following discharge, which included the date of discharge, a description of the care provided, reason for discharge and contact numbers for community resources or other agencies per the agencies policy and procedures. During an interview with Administrator B on 09/03/2024 at 3:05 PM, when asked if there was any additional documentation supporting the discharge of patient #1 for staff safety, Administrator B replied. ”there was concern for staff safety,” no additional documentation was found in the clinical record. When asked if per agency policy and procedure “a discharge evaluation was done, a discharge summary was completed and if any contact numbers were given to the patient for continued care,” Administrator B stated, “we sent the discharge notice to the patient and ordering Physician.” During an interview on 09/03/2024 at 3:22 PM, Administrator B stated “I (Administrator B) was under the impression and told supportive care and personal care follow their own regulations and program guidelines.””

    Rule G0464. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Reviewed, Revised By Physician Every 60 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 501 words

    “Reviewed, revised by physician every 60 days CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The individualized plan of care must be reviewed and revised by the physician or allowed practitioner who is responsible for the home health plan of care and the HHA as frequently as the patient’s condition or needs require, but no less frequently than once every 60 days, beginning with the start of care date. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, agency staff failed to ensure that patient’s Plans of Care were reviewed by the Physician no less often than every 60 days in 4 of 4 patient records reviewed. (Patients #1, #2, #3 and #4). Findings include: Review of policy “Plan of Care” not dated revealed in part, “The care plan is reviewed and/or revised, with physician participation, at least every 60 days.” Review of Patient #1’s “Home Health Plan of Care and Certification” revealed a start of care date 01/29/2024 and certification period dates of 01/29/2024-01/30/2025. This is a total of 365 days. There is no documentation within the record that the physician reviewed the Plan of Care on or before 03/28/2024, 05/27/2024 or 07/27/24, which would have been every 60 days. Review of Patient #2’s “Home Health Plan of Care and Certification” revealed a start of care date 09/02/2022 and the certification period dates of 08/27/2023--08/28/2024 which is a total of 371 days. There is no documentation within the record that the physician reviewed the Plan of Care on or before 10/26/2023, 12/25/2023 or 02/27/24, 04/26/2024, 06/26/2024, or 08/27/2024, which would have been every 60 days. As of 09/03/2024 the current “Home Health Plan of Care and Certification” expired on 08/28/2024. Review of Patient #3’s “Home Health Plan of Care and Certification” revealed a start of care date 05/14/2024 and a certification period date of 07/13/2024—no date. This is a total of 115 days. There is no documentation within the record that the physician reviewed the Plan of Care on or before 07/14/2024 or to date 09/03/2024, which would have been every 60 days. As of 09/03/2024 the current “Home Health Plan of Care and Certification” expired on 07/12/2024. Review of Patient #4’s “Home Health Plan of Care and Certification” revealed a start of care date 12/21/2020 and certification period dates of 12/21/2020--02/18/2021. This is the only physician signed “Home Health Plan of Care and Certification” found in the medical record. There is a total of 1,293 days between 02/18/2021—09/03/2024. There is no documentation within the record that the physician reviewed the Plan of Care every 60 days after 02/18/2021. During an interview with Administrator B on 09/03/2024 at 2:20 PM, when asked if there were current physician orders, Administrator B replied “no, what you have is all we have. The plan of care is determined by the authorizing entity.” During an interview on 09/03/2024 at 3:22 PM, Administrator B stated “I (Administrator B) was under the impression and told supportive care and personal care follow their own regulations and program guidelines.””

    Rule G0588. Element-level. From a complaint.

Jul 10, 2024: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • Nursing Services Supervised By Rn

    The inspectors’ words, 453 words

    “Nursing services supervised by RN CFR(s): 484.75(c)(1) Nursing services are provided under the supervision of a registered nurse that meets the requirements of §484.115(k). This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) supervision to the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) services provided in 4 (Patient #1, #3, #6, #7) out of 5 patients receiving LPN services in a total of 7 records reviewed. During an interview with Administrator A on 07/09/2024 at 3:30 PM, when asked how often the RN is expected to supervise the LPN, Administrator A replied, “The LPN is supervised every 30 days.” When asked for a policy for RN supervision of the LPN, Administrator a replied, “I don’t have a policy that states how often. We have stand up meetings every morning that discusses patients but doesn’t really have formal supervision documented.” Record review of Administrator A documented stand up meetings dated 12/2021 to 08/2022 revealed no evidence of LPN supervision by the RN. Record review for Patient #6 “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” orders dated 12/14/2022 – 02/11/2023 revealed “SN frequency: 2 times a week for 1, 3 times a week for 8 and 3 as needed visits.” The LPN conducted home visits 1 to 3 times weekly for the weeks of 12/14/2022 to 01/08/2023. There was no documented evidence of LPN supervision completed by the RN every 30 days during this timeframe. Record review for Patient #7 “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” orders dated 05/14/2024-07/12/2024 revealed “SN frequency: 3 times a week for 8 and as needed visits.” The LPN conducted home visits 1 to 3 times weekly for the weeks of 05/14/2024 to 07/08/2024. There was no documented evidence /of LPN supervision completed by the RN every 30 days during this timeframe. Findings include: Record review of Patient #1’s “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” orders dated 11/09/2022 – 01/07/2023 revealed “SN (Skilled Nurse) frequency: 1 time a week for 1, 2 times a months for 2, and 3 as needed visits.” The LPN conducted home visits on 11/22/2022 and 12/06/2022, and there was no documented evidence of LPN supervision by the RN every 30 days from 11/22/2022 until the day of patient discharge 01/07/2023. Record review for Patient #3 “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” orders dated 12/09/2022 – 02/06/2023 revealed “SN frequency: 1 time a week for 1, 3 times a week for 8 and 3 as needed visits.” The LPN conducted home visits 1 to 3 times weekly the weeks of 12/11/2022, 12/18/2022, 12/25/2022, and 01/01/2023. There was no documented evidence of LPN supervision completed by the RN every 30 days during this timeframe.”

    Rule G0726. Element-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 12, 2024Complaint inspection6 deficiencies cited
Jul 10, 2024Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited
Jan 17, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 21, 2018.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 6 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 8 owners or officers are people: Svetlana Falikman (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Svetlana Falikman (corporate officer, 50%); Svetlana Falikman (corporate director, 50%); Svetlana Falikman (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Aleksandr Falikman (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Aleksandr Falikman (corporate officer, 50%); Aleksandr Falikman (corporate director, 50%); Aleksandr Falikman (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

6 compared
PlaceQuality rating
Alpha Care Health Services of WI, Inc. This home health agencyNot given
North Shore at HomeNot given
Aurora at Home4.5
Horizon Home Care and Hospice4
Ascension at Home4
Heartland Home Health (Milwaukee)3.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.