Hearth Record

Hana Care Texas

A home health agency in Austin, Texas 78752

223 W Anderson Lane Suite A110, Austin, Texas 78752. (512) 284-7757.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 2, 2026: a recertification inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 2, 2026: recertification inspection1 deficiency
  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 1,162 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview the agency failed to review all of the medications the client was currently taking as part of the patient’s comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 Patients (Patient 3). This failure placed Clients at risk for adverse events due to the nurses not being able to adequately monitor for side effects, interactions, and effectiveness of medications, due to not having an accurate assessment of what they are on. Findings included: Record review of Patient 3’s file included the document titled, Home Health Plan of Care and Certification, date for the Certification Period of 3/6/26 to 5/4/26, revealed the following diagnoses: “Acute systolic heart failure, chronic kidney disease, anemia, unspecified dementia, cardiac arrythmias (disorders of heart rate), nonrheumatic aortic valve disorders (disease of a heart valve). Review of this document also showed an order for skilled nursing once a week for 9 weeks. Record review of Patient #3’s file included the document titled, “Medication Profile,” undated, revealed that the current medications for Patient 3 included the following: Aspirin Adult Low Dose Oral Tablet Delayed Release 81 MG (blood thinner) Atorvastatin Calcium Oral Tablet 40 MG (for cholesterol) Calmoseptine External Ointment (moisture barrier cream to protect and soothe skin) Furosemide Oral Tablet 40 MG (diuretic/water pill to help with swelling) Ketoconazole External Cream 2 % (antifungal for flaky skin) Metoprolol Succinate ER Oral Tablet (beta blocker for heart failure) Sildenafil Citrate Oral Tablet 50 MG (treats pulmonary hypertension/high pressure in lungs) Spironolactone Oral Tablet 25 MG (diuretic/water pill to help with swelling) During an observation and interview during home visit on 4/1/26 at 11:30 AM in Patient 3’s home with FM #3 and RN A, the Surveyor asked Patient 3 to see all of his medications. He stated that FM 3 handles his medications. FM 3 came into the room and Surveyor asked if she could review Patient 3’s medications with her. FM 3 brought three bottles - Levothyroxine 125 mcg oral tablet (a thyroid medication) and the Furosemide Oral tablet 40 mg, Spironolactone Oral Tablet 25mg, along with the 2 skin creams listed above. Surveyor went through all medications with FM 3 in front of RN A. The patient did not have the following medications in the home: Metoprolol, Sildenafil, Atorvastatin, or Aspirin with Patient #3’s current medications. FM 3 was a licensed pharmacist and stated she managed Patient 3’s medications (Patient 3 had dementia). Surveyor asked FM 3 if Patient 3 was taking anything else, and she stated “no, this is it.” Surveyor asked her how long Patient #3 had been taking the Levothyroxine, and she stated, “for some time.” She stated that Patient #3 had not taken the Atorvastatin for a long time, and he stopped taking the Metoprolol shortly after returning home from the hospital in January because it gave him hallucinations. FM 3 stated Patient #3 did not take aspirin because “he is a hemophiliac” (bleeding disorder). She stated that a regional doctor put Patient #3 on the aspirin, but that was before they knew he had bleeding problems and it “was never taken off his [med] list.” FM 3 stated Patient #3 was not taking sildenafil and did not think he had taken it outpatient at all. In an interview during the home visit with RN A on 4/1/26 at 12:00 PM, the Surveyor asked RN A why the medication profile for Patient #3 was not up to date. She stated it was because the medication profile had been created based on a list of medications from the patient’s PCP. The Surveyor asked if RN A had reviewed the list with the Patient#3 and /or FM 3 during visits to ensure it was accurate and she said she must have missed those. In an interview with the Administrator on 4/2/26 at 2:00 PM, the Surveyor asked what the expectation was for nurses to review and update the medication profile. She stated that they, the agency. trained nurses to check the patient’s medications at every visit and update the medication profile in their EHR and send any changes to their PCP. She stated that they also trained nursing staff to look at the medication bottles and ask the patient or family if there were any changes after the patient went to a physician appointment. The Surveyor asked who was responsible for updating the medication profile, and the Administrator stated it was the responsibility of the nurse in the home. The Surveyor asked why it was important to included medications in the comprehensive assessment of the client. The Administrator stated it was important because they sent the current medication list to the patient’s physician, so they knew what the patient was taking. She also stated that a lot of their patients didn’t even know what meds they were taking and for what reason, so the nurse needed to be able to explain that to them, why they were taking it, and ensure they took it correctly. In an interview with RN A on 4/2/26 at 4:00 PM, the Surveyor asked what she typically did on each visit when reviewing patients’ medications. She stated that she asked the patient and/or family if they took the medication correctly. The Surveyor asked if she looked at the patients’ current medications at each visit. She stated that she usually did, but said, “Not exactly for [Patient 3] because [FM 3] told me she managed his medications and she was a pharmacist.” The Surveyor asked when she first completed the initial comprehensive assessment for Patient 3, did she reconcile all the patient’s current medications. She stated that she had a medication list she had from Patient 3’s PCP that she used to input Patient 3’s medications initially, but that she did not go through and compare it to what the patient was currently taking. The Surveyor asked if she was aware of the agency’s policy on ensuring patients have an updated medication list. She stated that she was aware it was supposed to be updated at every visit. The Surveyor asked why it was important to included medications in the comprehensive assessment of the patient. She stated it was because they were caring long term for the patient’s disease and needed to ensure the patient was on the correct medications and needed to monitor them for medication side effects or interactions. Review of the agency’s policy titled, “Medication List and Monitoring,” last reviewed 12/01/2018, read in part: “I. The Agency will maintain a current, accurate list of all prescription and over-the­counter (OTC) medications taken by the client/patient. (Medication Profile) Professional clinical staff will update the medication list with any change in the medication regimen.””

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 2, 2026Recertification inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 22, 2004.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and physical therapy.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Ryan W Kim (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Ryan W Kim (corporate director, 100%); Ryan W Kim (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate24.96% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate20.35% (worse than the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 41 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78752, where this agency’s office is, 38 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.