Hearth Record

Centerwell Home Health

A home health agency in Austin, Texas 78731

3307 Northland Drive, Ste 302, Austin, Texas 78731. (512) 342-0331.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 15, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 345 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the Agency failed to encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system within 30 days of completing the assessment of the patient for 139 assessments processed for the time-period reviewed of 01/08/2024 – 01/08/2025. This failure resulted in quality data used to continuously improve the effectiveness of home healthcare and improve patient care failing to be reported to CMS in the required time frame. Findings included: The HHA Error Summary Report, retrieved from the iQIES website for the time period of 01/08/2024 - 01/08/2025 was reviewed. Review of the HHA Error Summary Report for the time period of 01/08/2024 - 01/08/2025 identified Error #-3330. The description for Error #-3300 read in part, “Record Submitted Late: The submission date is more than 30 days after M0090 (item M0090 specifies the date the actual assessment was completed) on this new record.” The documentation further identified the number of assessments with this error was 139 assessments and the percentage of assessments with this error was 2.58% of assessments completed by the Agency. An interview was completed with the Administrator on 1/15/25 at 11:50 AM the surveyor showed Administrator the “Home Health Error Summary” report which indicated that 139 OASIS assessments were late by the agency. Administrator reported that she was aware that this was an issue and that previously they were late due waiting on face-to-face encounters to occur, revisions being made to the plan of care, and a personnel issue where one of the clinical managers was falling behind. Review of the Agency’s policy titled “QAO (Quality Assessment Only) and OASIS Timely Submission”, dated 04/24, revealed that timely OASIS assessment submission was defined as within 30 days of completion.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 734 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interview, the Agency failed to enforce written policies to address infection control and prevent the spread of infectious and communicable disease for 2 of 7 clients (Client 10 and Client 3). This failure placed clients at risk of acquiring infections and diseases. Findings included: Review of policy titled “10-03 Patient Care: Standard Precautions,” dated 10/2024, revealed that “all clinical associated when performing work-related responsibilities will utilize standard precautions,” and that standard precautions included “clinician bag technique.” Review of document provided by agency titled “Bag technique, home care,” dated 05/20/2024, revealed that placement of the bag was advised to be “on a flat surface that appears to be clean and dry” and that clinicians should use a “fluid-impermeable pad as a barrier beneath the bag as needed if a clean, dry surface isn’t available.” On 1/14/25 at 12:00 PM, the surveyor observed PT A place his equipment bag directly on Client 10’s bed without using a protective barrier between the bag and the Client 10’s bed. PT A did not clean area of the bed with a disinfectant prior to placing his bag on the bed. PT A placed his stethoscope, blood pressure cuff, pulse oximeter, and tape measure directly on Client 10’s bed. After using the items and prior to placing them back into his equipment bag PT A did disinfect the items. PT A did not disinfect his equipment bag after removing it from the surface of Client 10’s bed and leaving the home. On 1/15/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor observed RN A place her equipment bag directly on Client 3’s dining table without using a protective barrier between the bag and Client 3’s table. RN A did not clean dining table surface prior to placing bag or equipment on the table. RN A removed her blood pressure cuff and pulse oximeter from the bag. RN A used her pulse oximeter and blood pressure cuff on Client 3. RN A did not clean the blood pressure cuff or pulse oximeter prior to placing them back into the bag. In an interview with PT A on 1/15/25 at 11:31 AM, the Surveyor asked PT A if he was aware if the agency had a policy on using a barrier to separate his equipment from the client’s when placing down his equipment bag. PT A reported that he was not sure what the agency policy was for this. Surveyor informed PT A that on the home visit with Client 10 surveyor observed PT A place his equipment bag directly on Client 10’s bed. Surveyor asked if he thought that he should have used a protective barrier. PT A responded that he used to use a protective barrier during COVID-19, but has not used it since. Surveyor asked if he was concerned about transferring microbes between patient homes. PT A responded that the agency likely has a policy for them to use a barrier and that he just personally has not been doing it. In an interview with the Administrator on 1/15/25 at 11:50 AM, the surveyor asked the Administrator if the agency had a specific policy regarding using a barrier between the clinician’s bag and the surface in the Client’s home. Administrator found that within the infection control policy it stated clinicians should use a clean bag technique. The surveyor asked Administrator to describe what the agency’s expectation is for using a barrier. Administrator responded that clinicians should always be using a barrier between their bag and the surface in the client’s home and that they can place their equipment bag anywhere except on the Client’s floor. The surveyor informed Administrator that on home visits with PT A and RN A, the surveyor observed the clinicians place their bag’s directly on the Client’s bed and dining table without using a barrier. Administrator reported that they both should have used a barrier. Administrator stated that clinicians should always clean their equipment prior to placing it back in the bag and reported that RN A may have taken her smaller equipment bag and cleaned the contents when she returned to her vehicle prior to placing the contents in her larger equipment bag.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 15, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 1, 1969.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Aberdeen Holdings Inc. owns 100% directly since Mar 1, 2022.
  • 16 owners or officers are people: Courtney D Durall (corporate officer, 0%); Stuart Bradley Keller (corporate officer, 0%); Celeste Mellet (corporate officer, 0%); Daniel K Feld (corporate officer); Caleb Gallifant (corporate officer, 0%); Robert M Marcoux (corporate officer); Sharday Merdja (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Valerie Talkers (corporate officer, 0%); Richard Lindsay-Jones (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly D Machac (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Cassie Houff (corporate officer, 0%); Amaka Agumadu (corporate officer, 0%); Casey Mckeon (corporate officer, 0%); Casey Mckeon (corporate director, 0%); Kendra Clark (corporate officer, 0%); Sean Turner (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Kentucky Homecare Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Kentucky Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Humana Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 17, 2021
Pf Development 9 LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Centerwell Health Services Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 18, 2013
Integracare Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 1, 2022
Aberdeen Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Mar 1, 2022

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (226 surveys completed): 86% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, better.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate80.55% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.45% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.15% (better than the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 48 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 78731, where this agency’s office is, 46 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.