Hearth Record

Cohesive Healthcare

A home health agency in Shawnee, Oklahoma 74804

2510 E Independence, Ste 102, Shawnee, Oklahoma 74804. (405) 309-3960.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 14, 2023: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 14, 2023: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Conformance With Physician Orders

    The inspectors’ words, 560 words

    “Conformance with physician orders CFR(s): 484.60(b) Standard: Conformance with physician or allowed practitioner orders. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: 1. SN notified the physician of blood pressure levels outside the ordered parameters for one (Patient #3) of twelve patients; 2. SN provided treatment as ordered for one (Pt #4) of twelve patients; 3. SN notified the physician of pain levels outside the ordered parameters for one (Patient #5) of twelve patients; and 4. SN frequencies were followed as ordered for two (Patient #6 and 12) of twelve patients. 1. Patient #3 A review of the POC dated 09/13/23 to 11/11/23 showed an order for the physician to be notified of diastolic blood pressure less than 60. A review of a vital signs record showed diastolic readings of 58 (9/18/23), 58 (9/25/23), 41 (10/2/23), 56 (10/16/23), 52 (10/23/23), and 51 (11/6/23). Documents showed no physician notification for the diastolic blood pressure readings less than 60. 2. Patient #4 A review of the POC dated 09/23/23 to 11/21/23 showed an order for SN to provide bilateral ear irrigation for ear wax removal monthly or as needed for prevention of ear wax impaction. A review of clinical records showed no ear irrigation treatments were provided. Documentation showed no refusal of services from the patient or caregiver and no physician order for a change in treatment. 3. Patient #5 A review of the POC dated 09/10/23 to 11/08/23 showed an order for the physician to be notified of pain greater than five out of ten. A review of a SN note dated 10/25/23 showed the patient’s reported pain as an eight out of ten. Documents showed no physician notification for the reported pain greater than five. 4. Patient #6 A review of a physician’s order dated 10/04/23 showed a SN frequency of once a week for eight weeks and two as needed, from 10/09/23 to 12/02/23. A review of a SN missed visit note dated 10/23/23 documented the reason the missed visit as other schedule conflicts, and no other visits documented for the week of 10/22/23 to 10/28/23. Documentation showed no refusal of visits or services from the patient or caregiver and no contact made with the patient or caregiver and no physician order for a change in services. Patient #12 A review of the POC dated 10/14/23 to 12/12/23 showed a SN frequency of once a week for eight weeks and two as needed. A review of a SN missed visit note dated 10/26/23 documented the reason the missed visit as patient in care of family, and no other visits documented for the week of 10/22/23 to 10/28/23. Documentation showed no refusal of visits or services from the patient or caregiver and no contact made with the patient or caregiver and no physician order for a change in services. On 12/14/23 at 2:23 p.m., Staff A stated: 1. there were no documentation of physician notification of the diastolic blood pressures being out of parameters for Patient #3; 2. the ear treatment were not provided as ordered by the physician for Patient #4; 3. there were no documentation of physician notification of the pain level being out of parameters for Patient #5; and 4. the SN frequencies for Patient’s #6 and #12 were not met as ordered by the physician.”

    Rule G0578. Standard-level.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 286 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech-language pathology services, a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in §484.80(g), must make an onsite visit to the patient’s home no less frequently than every 14 days. The home health aide does not have to be present during this visit. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a home health aide supervisory visit were completed every 14 days for two (Patients #1 and 2) of seventeen patients. Patient #1 A plan of care dated 09/05/23 to 11/03/23 showed a home health aide visit frequency of once a week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical record showed home health aide visits were completed on 09/12/23, 09/18/23, 09/25/23, 10/02/23, 10/09/23, 10/18/23, 10/25/23, and 11/01/23, with no supervisory aide visits conducted from 10/11/23 to 11/03/23 (24 days without supervisory visits). Patient #2 A plan of care dated 09/12/23 to 11/10/23 showed a home health aide visit frequency of once a week for one week and twice a week for eight weeks. A review of the clinical record showed home health aide visits were completed on 09/15/23, 09/18/23, 09/22/23, 09/25/23, 09/29/23, 10/02/23, 10/06/23 and 10/09/23, 10/13/23, 10/16/23, 10/19/23, 10/23/23, and 10/27/23, with no supervisory aide visits conducted from 10/03/23 to 10/29/23 (27 days without supervisory visits). On 12/14/23 at 2:30 p.m., Staff A stated the supervisory visits were not completed every 14 days for Patient’s #1 and #2.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 14, 2023Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Dec 29, 2014.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 7 owners or officers are people: Godwin Feh (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Shemika Feh (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Kathy Hammons (managing employee (on the payroll)); Godwin Feh (corporate officer); Godwin Feh (corporate director); Shemika Feh (corporate officer); Shemika Feh (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 2 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (84 surveys completed): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars2 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate54.41% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.20% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.99% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 41 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74804, where this agency’s office is, 41 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.