Hearth Record

Advocate Home Health Care Inc.

A home health agency in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105

200 NE 28th Street, Suite 100, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73105. (405) 242-2788.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 9, 2024: a complaint and recertification inspection.

14 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

14 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

14 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 9, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection14 deficiencies
  • Care Planning, Coordination, Quality Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 393 words

    “Care planning, coordination, quality of care CFR(s): 484.60 Condition of participation: Care planning, coordination of services, and quality of care. Patients are accepted for treatment on the reasonable expectation that an HHA can meet the patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, and social needs in his or her place of residence. Each patient must receive an individualized written plan of care, including any revisions or additions. The individualized plan of care must specify the care and services necessary to meet the patient-specific needs as identified in the comprehensive assessment, including identification of the responsible discipline(s), and the measurable outcomes that the HHA anticipates will occur as a result of implementing and coordinating the plan of care. The individualized plan of care must also specify the patient and caregiver education and training. Services must be furnished in accordance with accepted standards of practice. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure individualized patient POC included: 1. Documentation of aide service provisions and goals for two (Patients #6 and #7) of eight patients and; 2. Identified a wound site location for one (Patient #7) of eight patients. This failed practice had the potential to affect the health and health care outcomes of 35 patients that required skilled care interventions to improve their health status. See Tag #G574. Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a physician order for catheter change intervals from weekly to monthly were a part of the patient’s plan of care for one (Patient #2) of eight patients. The failed practice had the potential to affect a patient’s response to health care interventions to achieve management of health conditions for all patients. See tag G576. Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to notify the physician of changes in health conditions for one (Patient #8) of eight patients. The failed practice had the potential to affect a patient’s health and wellbeing in the management of their health conditions for all patients. See tag G590. Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure coordination of care with outside facility care staff for one (Patient #1) of eight patients. The failed practice had the potential to affect a patient’s response to health care interventions to meet health related outcomes for all patients. See tag G608. .”

    Rule G0570. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan Based On All Hazards Risk Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 382 words

    “Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment CFR(s): 484.102(a)(1)-(2) §403.748(a)(1)-(2), §416.54(a)(1)-(2), §418.113(a)(1)-(2), §441.184(a)(1)-(2), §460.84(a)(1)-(2), §482.15(a)(1)-(2), §483.73(a)(1)-(2), §483.475(a)(1)-(2), §484.102(a)(1)-(2), §485.68(a)(1)-(2), §485.542(a)(1)-(2), §485.625(a)(1)-(2), §485.727(a)(1)-(2), §485.920(a)(1)-(2), §486.360(a)(1)-(2), §491.12(a)(1)-(2), §494.62(a)(1)-(2) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach.* (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. * [For Hospices at §418.113(a):] Emergency Plan. The Hospice must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing residents. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(a):] Emergency Plan. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing clients. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency failed to ensure a community-based risk assessment (All Hazards Risk Assessment) was developed and implemented for the agency for all patients and employees. Findings: A review of administrative records showed no community-based risk assessment for the agency, its patient population, or its employees. On 05/09/24 at 1:00 p.m., Staff B stated the agency did not develop and implement a community based All Hazards Risk Assessment.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Names And Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 409 words

    “Names and Contact Information CFR(s): 484.102(c)(1) §403.748(c)(1), §416.54(c)(1), §418.113(c)(1), §441.184(c)(1), §460.84(c)(1), §482.15(c)(1), §483.73(c)(1), §483.475(c)(1), §484.102(c)(1), §485.68(c)(1), §485.542(c)(1), §485.625(c)(1), §485.727(c)(1), §485.920(c)(1), §486.360(c)(1), §491.12(c)(1), §494.62(c)(1). [(c) The [facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness communication plan that complies with Federal, State and local laws and must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. The communication plan must include all of the following:] (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [facilities]. (v) Volunteers. *[For Hospitals at §482.15(c) and CAHs at §485.625(c)] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians (iv) Other [hospitals and CAHs]. (v) Volunteers. *[For RNHCIs at §403.748(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Next of kin, guardian, or custodian. (iv) Other RNHCIs. (v) Volunteers. *[For ASCs at §416.45(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For Hospices at §418.113(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Hospice employees. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Other hospices. *[For HHAs at §484.102(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (1) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Patients’ physicians. (iv) Volunteers. *[For OPOs at §486.360(c):] The communication plan must include all of the following: (2) Names and contact information for the following: (i) Staff. (ii) Entities providing services under arrangement. (iii) Volunteers. (iv) Other OPOs. (v) Transplant and donor hospitals in the OPO’s Donation Service Area (DSA). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure an Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan included the required current employee contact information for the agency, for all patients and employees. Findings: Administrative records showed no updated Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan which included current employee contact information for the agency. On 05/09/24 at 1:00 p.m., Staff B stated the Emergency Preparedness Communication Plan was not updated to include contact information for current employees of the agency.”

    Rule E0030. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Discharge Or Transfer Summary Content

    The inspectors’ words, 130 words

    “Discharge or Transfer Summary Content CFR(s): 484.58(b)(1) Standard: Discharge or transfer summary content. The HHA must send all necessary medical information pertaining to the patient’s current course of illness and treatment, post-discharge goals of care, and treatment preferences, to the receiving facility or health care practitioner to ensure the safe and effective transition of care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure completion of a discharge summary for one (Patient #8) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #8 A review of the clinical record showed the patient was discharged from the agency on 12/14/23. Documentation showed a blank and unsigned discharge summary. On 05/09/24 at 12:15 p.m., Staff B stated patient #8 did not have a completed discharge summary.”

    Rule G0564. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Home Health Aide Assignments And Duties

    The inspectors’ words, 292 words

    “Home health aide assignments and duties CFR(s): 484.80(g)(1) Standard: Home health aide assignments and duties. Home health aides are assigned to a specific patient by a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, with written patient care instructions for a home health aide prepared by that registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional (that is, physical therapist, speech-language pathologist, or occupational therapist). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the development of a home health aide care plan for two (Patients #4 and #7) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #4 A review of the clinical record showed no documented home health aide care plan for the episode of 03/07/24 through 05/05/23. POC documentation showed an aide visit frequency of two times a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed home health aide visits were completed on 03/08/24, 03/12/24, 03/15/24, 03/19/24, 03/22/24, 03/26/24, 03/29/24, 04/02/24, 04/05/24, 04/09/24, 04/12/24, 04/16/24, 04/19/24, 04/23/24 and on 04/26/24. Documentation showed no home health aide care plan, or receipt of assignment by the CHHA. On 05/09/24 at 11:50 a.m., Staff B stated the clinical record for patient #4 showed no documented home health aide care plan. Patient #7 A review of the clinical record showed no documented home health aide care plan for the episode of 04/30/24 through 06/28/23. POC documentation showed an aide visit frequency of two times a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed no home health aide visits were completed during the week of 04/30/24 to 05/04/24. Documentation showed no home health aide care plan, or receipt of assignment by the CHHA. On 05/09/24 at 12:05 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record for patient #7 showed no documented home health aide care plan.”

    Rule G0798. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • At Discharge

    “At discharge CFR(s): 484.55(d)(3) At discharge. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency failed to ensure a discharge oasis was completed for one (Patient #1) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the clinical record showed a start of care date of 11/02/23. Documentation showed discharge from agency services on 12/23/23. Documentation showed no discharge OASIS assessment was completed. On 05/09/24 at 11:18 a.m., Staff B stated the discharge OASIS was not completed for patient #1.”

    Rule G0550. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 417 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure individualized patient POC included: 1. Documentation of aide service provisions and goals for two (Patients #6 and #7) of eight patients and; 2. Identified a wound site location for one (Patient #7) of eight patients. This failed practice had the potential to affect the health and health care outcomes of 35 patients that required skilled care interventions to improve their health status. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 03/08/24 to 05/06/24 showed a frequency order for aide services two times a week for nine weeks but documented no aide service provisions or goals. Documentation showed aide visits were conducted on 03/11/24, 03/14/24, 03/18/24, 03/20/24, 03/25/24, 03/27/24, 04/01/24, 04/03/24, 04/08/24, 04/10/24, 04/15/24, 04/17/24, 04/22/24 and on 04/24/24. Documentation showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 11:18 a.m., Staff B stated the POC for patient #6 did not include aide service provisions or goals. Patient #7 A review of the POC dated 04/30/24 to 06/28/24 showed orders for SN to conduct wound site assessment and care every visit but did not identify the site location of the wound on the POC. Documentation showed a frequency order for aide services two times a week for nine weeks but documented no aide service provisions or goals. Documentation showed no physician notifications and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 11:32 a.m., Staff B stated the POC for patient #7 did not include aide service provisions or goals; and did not identify a wound site location.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 190 words

    “All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure a physician order for catheter change intervals from weekly to monthly were a part of the patient’s plan of care for one (Patient #2) of eight patients. The failed practice had the potential to affect a patient’s response to health care interventions to achieve management of health conditions for all patients. Findings: Patient #2 A review of the POC dated 03/01/24 to 04/29/24 showed orders for foley catheter management, including catheter changes weekly. SN visit note documentation on 03/06/24, 03/08/24, 03/11/24 and on 03/13/24 documented foley catheter changes to occur monthly. Documentation showed no physician orders to change the foley catheter change interval from weekly to monthly. Documentation showed no physician notification and no changes in orders. On 05/09/24 at 11:32 a.m., Staff B stated the POC for patient #2 showed no physician order transcription into the clinical record, no physician notification, and no changes in orders.”

    Rule G0576. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes

    The inspectors’ words, 223 words

    “Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to notify the physician of changes in health conditions for one (Patient #8) of eight patients. The failed practice had the potential to affect a patient’s health and wellbeing in the management of their health conditions for all patients. Findings: Patient #8 A plan of care dated 04/30/24 to 06/28/24 documented diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus Type II and cardiomyopathy. Documentation showed orders for SN to perform assessment and monitoring of health conditions every visit. SN visit notes dated 10/26/23 showed a patient weight of 230 pounds with 2+ pitting edema, and a subsequent SN visit note dated 10/30/23 showed a patient weight of 237 pounds (weight gain of 7 pounds) and continued 2+ pitting edema. Documentation showed no physician provider notifications or coordination of care communications related to changes in the patient’s change in condition and no changes in orders. On 05/09/24 at 12:15 p.m., Staff B stated the agency did not notify the physician of changes in the patient’s condition.”

    Rule G0590. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Coordinate Care Delivery

    The inspectors’ words, 336 words

    “Coordinate care delivery CFR(s): 484.60(d)(4) Coordinate care delivery to meet the patient’s needs, and involve the patient, representative (if any), and caregiver(s), as appropriate, in the coordination of care activities. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure coordination of care with outside facility care staff for one (Patient #1) of eight patients. The failed practice had the potential to affect a patient’s response to health care interventions to meet health related outcomes for all patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the POC dated 11/02/23 to 12/29/23 showed orders for SN to discontinue a PICC (intravenous access device) upon completion of antibiotic therapy treatment. Documentation showed a SN visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks. Documentation showed a last SN visit dated 11/27/23 (intravenous antibiotic therapy ongoing) and showed no follow up SN visit after that date. Documentation showed a desk discharge from agency services on 12/23/23. Documentation showed no patient request to discontinue nursing services, no coordination of care communications with the patient care organization overseeing the patient’s care (VA services), no physician notifications that the patient had no SN visits after 11/27/23 while the antibiotic therapy was still ongoing and showed no changes in orders. Documentation related to complaint #103180 showed the patient had to return to the VA hospital services to have the PICC line discontinued after the course of antibiotic treatments were concluded and had to arrange pick up of the infusion pump equipment from the infusion company as the agency did not return to the patient’s residence. On 05/09/24 at 11:18 a.m., Staff B stated: 1. The patient requested no further SN visits after 11/27/23; 2. Documentation showed no patient request to discontinue nursing services, no coordination of care communications with the patient care organization overseeing the patient’s care (VA services), no physician notifications that the patient had no SN visits after 11/27/23 while the antibiotic therapy was still ongoing and showed no changes in orders.”

    Rule G0608. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 914 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure: SN visit frequencies were conducted as ordered for five (Patients #1, 4, 6, 7 and #8) of eight patients; SN to discontinue a PICC (intravenous access device) at the conclusion of intravenous antibiotic therapy for one (Patient #1) of eight patients; SN to conduct wound site assessment with measurements weekly for one (Patient #2) of eight patients; Aide visit frequency was conducted as ordered for one (Patient #4) of eight patients; PT evaluation was conducted for one (Patient #7) of eight patients; OT evaluation was conducted for one (Patient #7) of eight patients and; ST evaluation was conducted for one (Patient #7) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #1 A review of the POC dated 11/02/23 to 12/29/23 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for eight weeks and SN to discontinue a PICC (intravenous access device) upon completion of antibiotic therapy treatment. Documentation showed no SN visits were conducted during the weeks of 12/03/23 to 12/09/23 (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), 12/10/23 to 12/16/23 (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), 12/17/23 to 12/23/23 (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed SN did not discontinue the PICC (intravenous access device) at the end of the antibiotic therapy treatments. Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of SN visits, no physician notifications, and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 11:18 a.m., Staff B stated: 1. The patient requested no further SN visits after 11/27/23; 2. Documentation showed no patient request to discontinue nursing services, no coordination of care communications with the patient care organization overseeing the patient’s care (VA services), no physician notifications that the patient had no SN visits after 11/27/23 while the antibiotic therapy was still ongoing and showed no changes in orders. Patient #2 A review of the POC dated 03/01/24 to 04/29/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of three times a week for nine weeks for wound site assessment and measurements weekly. Documentation showed no wound site measurements during SN visits on 03/04/24, 03/06/24, 03/08/24, 03/11/24 and on 03/13/24 (patient transferred to inpatient services on 03/15/24). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of wound site measurements, no physician notifications, and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 11:32 a.m., Staff B stated the SN visit documentation showed no measurements of the wound sites. Patient #4 A review of the POC dated 03/07/24 to 05/05/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks and an aide visit frequency of two times a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 03/07/24 to 03/09/24; no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted) and one aide visit was conducted on 03/08/24 (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of SN or aide visits, no physician notifications, and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 11:50 a.m., Staff B stated the SN and aide should have conducted visits as ordered on the POC. Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 03/08/24 to 05/06/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 03/08/24 to 03/10/24 no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted) and 04/28/24 to 05/02/24 no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of SN visits, no physician notifications, and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 11:55 a.m., Staff B stated the SN should have conducted visits as ordered on the POC. Patient #7 A review of the POC dated 04/30/24 to 06/28/24 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks, PT to evaluate and treat one week one, OT to evaluate and treat one week one and ST to evaluate and treat one week one. Documentation showed during the week of 04/30/24 to 05/04/24 no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), 04/30/24 to 05/09/24 no PT evaluation visit conducted (one visit ordered), no OT evaluation visit conducted (one visit ordered) and no ST evaluation visit conducted (one visit ordered). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of visits, no physician notification, and no changes in orders. On 05/09/24 at 12:05 p.m., Staff B stated the clinical record for patient #7 showed: 1. No SN visit was conducted week of 04/30/24 to 05/04/24 and; 2. No PT, OT or ST evaluation was conducted and documentation showed no referral to the therapy services company contracted with the agency to perform the evaluations. Patient #8 A review of the POC dated 10/20/23 to 12/18/23 showed orders for SN visit frequency of one time a week for nine weeks. Documentation showed during the weeks of 11/12/23 to 11/18/23 no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), 11/19/23 to 11/25/23 no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), 11/26/23 to 12/02/23 no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted), and 12/03/23 to 12/09/23 no SN visit conducted (one visit ordered, no visit conducted). Documentation showed no patient/caregiver refusal of SN visits, no physician notifications, and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 12:15 p.m., Staff B stated the SN should have conducted visits as ordered on the POC.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Onsite Supervisory Visit Every 14 Days

    The inspectors’ words, 249 words

    “Onsite supervisory visit every 14 days CFR(s): 484.80(h)(1)(i) (1)(i) If home health aide services are provided to a patient who is receiving skilled nursing, physical or occupational therapy, or speech language pathology services— (A) A registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional who is familiar with the patient, the patient’s plan of care, and the written patient care instructions described in paragraph (g) of this section, must complete a supervisory assessment of the aide services being provided no less frequently than every 14 days; and (B) The home health aide does not need to be present during the supervisory assessment described in paragraph (h)(1)(i)(A) of this section. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure certified home health aide supervisory visits were completed every 14 days for one (Patient #6) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #6 A review of the POC dated 03/08/24 to 05/06/24 showed orders for showed a CHHA visit frequency of two times a week for nine weeks. A review of the clinical record showed CHHA supervisory visits were completed on 03/14/24 and showed no further documentation of aide supervision from 03/15/24 to 05/09/24 (date of clinical record review, 55 days). Documentation showed no patient refusal of supervisory visits, physician notification and no change in orders. On 05/09/24 at 12:05 p.m., Staff B stated the CHHA supervisory visits for patient #6 should be conducted every 14 days from the date of the last supervisory visit.”

    Rule G0808. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Available During All Operating Hours

    The inspectors’ words, 188 words

    “Available during all operating hours CFR(s): 484.105(b)(3) The administrator or a pre-designated person is available during all operating hours. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview, the agency failed to ensure an administrator or alternate administrator was available during all operating hours for all patients and employees. Findings: On 05/08/24 at 9:09 a.m., OSDH arrived at the agency to conduct a survey. Upon entrance to the agency a staff member identified as the Field staff Licensed Practical Nurse/schedular was observed as the only agency personnel available on site at the agency. Field staff Licensed Practical Nurse/schedular stated the administrator was not present. Telephone call attempts to reach the administrator and the designated alternate administrator by the Field staff Licensed Practical Nurse/schedular went unanswered from 09:09 a.m. until the administrator’s arrival to the agency at 11:15 a.m. Office operating hours for the agency are Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. At 11:15 a.m., the administrator stated he was not aware of attempts to reach him by telephone and did not know why the designated alternate administrator was not available for survey.”

    Rule G0956. Element-level. From a complaint.

  • Discharge And Transfer Summaries

    The inspectors’ words, 214 words

    “Discharge and transfer summaries CFR(s): 484.110(a)(6)(i-iii) (i) A completed discharge summary that is sent to the primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any) within 5 business days of the patient’s discharge; or (ii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of a planned transfer, if the patient’s care will be immediately continued in a health care facility; or (iii) A completed transfer summary that is sent within 2 business days of becoming aware of an unplanned transfer, if the patient is still receiving care in a health care facility at the time when the HHA becomes aware of the transfer. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record reviews and interview, the agency failed to ensure a completed transfer summary was provided to the receiving service provider for one (Patient #3) of eight patients. Findings: Patient #3 A review of the clinical record documented transfer from the agency on 03/18/24 to inpatient hospital services. Documentation showed no transfer summary was provided to the inpatient hospital service provider. At 11:45 a.m., Staff B stated the transfer summary was not provided to the receiving service provider for patient #3.”

    Rule G1022. Element-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 9, 2024Complaint and recertification inspection14 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Oct 1, 2012.
  • Ownership: non-profit.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 14 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 3 owners or officers are people: Divine Titajani (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Divine Titajani (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Divine Titajani (corporate director, 50%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate46.49% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.42% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.