Hearth Record

Health Watch Health Care of Altus, LLC

A home health agency in Altus, Oklahoma 73521

3000 North Main, Suite 100, Altus, Oklahoma 73521. (580) 379-9770.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 11, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 11, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 189 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that an order was obtained for newly identified wounds for one (Pt #1) of seven patients. Findings: A policy titled Physician Communication read in part, the agency will establish and maintain communication with the physician or allowed practitioner to ensure safe and appropriate care for the patient/client... when there are significant changes in the patient’s/client’s medical condition, vital signs out of parameter. Pt #1 A review of the clinical record showed a SN assessment dated 11/07/25 identified new wounds to the right buttock (#4) and left buttock (#5). Wound care was provided as follows: cleansed with wound wash, patted dry with 4x4 gauze. Applied Triad cream to red areas. The SN assessment showed no physician notification of new wounds and no orders were obtained for wound care. On 12/10/25 at 1:58 pm, Staff B stated the physician for Pt #1 was not notified of the new wounds.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Communication With All Physicians

    The inspectors’ words, 333 words

    “Communication with all physicians CFR(s): 484.60(d)(1) Standard: Coordination of Care. The HHA must: (1) Assure communication with all physicians or allowed practitioners involved in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that a physician was notified of: 1) a change in skin integrity for one (Pt #1) of seven patients; 2) a pain level above acceptable level in a timely manner for one (Pt #1) of seven patients. Findings: A policy titled Coordination of Services with Other Clinicians read in part, Coordination includes but is not limited to: ... Initiation of communication with other organizations/individuals when there are changes in the patient’s/client’s overall care. A policy titled Physician Communication read in part, the agency will establish and maintain communication with the physician or allowed practitioner to ensure safe and appropriate care for the patient/client... when there are significant changes in the patient’s/client’s medical condition, vital signs out of parameter. Pt #1 A review of the clinical record for the certification period of 09/28/25 - 11/26/25 showed a SN assessment dated 11/07/25 identified two new wounds as #4 right buttock and #5 left buttock. The SN visit note showed no physician notification of new wounds sites and showed no orders were obtained for wound care. On 12/10/25 at 1:58 pm, Staff B stated the physician for Pt #1 was not notified of the additional wounds. Pt #2 A review of a POC for the certification period dated 07/03/25 - 08/31/25 showed an order to notify the physician if pain greater than 8. A nurse assessment dated 07/17/25 showed the patient reported a pain level of 10 out of 10 and showed no physician notification at the time of the assessment and no further follow up was noted. On 12/10/25 at 2:05 pm, Staff B stated the nursing assessment showed no physician notification the patient reported a pain level of 10 of 10 at the time of the visit.”

    Rule G0602. Element-level.

  • Visit Schedule

    The inspectors’ words, 136 words

    “Visit schedule CFR(s): 484.60(e)(1) Visit schedule, including frequency of visits by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the ordered visit frequency was followed for one (Pt #2) of four patients. Findings: Pt #2 A review of a POC dated 07/03/25 - 08/31/25 showed a PT ordered frequency beginning the week of 07/06/25 twice a week for three weeks. The following PT visits were noted during the week of 07/06/25 - 07/12/25 a PT visit dated 07/07/25, no other visit, no patient refusal, and no missed visit was completed (two visits ordered, one visit conducted). On 12/10/25 at 2:05 pm, Staff B stated there was only one PT visit during the week of 07/06/25.”

    Rule G0614. Element-level.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 120 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure services were provided as ordered in the POC for one (Pt #4) of four patients. Findings: Pt #4 A review of a POC dated 10/31/25 - 12/29/25 showed orders for a physical therapist to evaluate. The clinical record showed no PT evaluation was conducted, showed no physician’s order to cancel the PT evaluation, and no patient refusal of a PT evaluation. On 12/10/25 at 2:18 pm, Staff B stated no PT evaluation was conducted.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 11, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Apr 28, 2011.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Health Watch Holding Company LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 30, 2014; Health Watch Health Care of Altus LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 30, 2014.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: John Murta (corporate director); Julie A Clarkson (corporate officer, 0%); Ernest A Woods (corporate director); Cherie Elledge (corporate officer); Cherie Elledge (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Health Watch Holding Company LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 30, 2014
Deaconess Healthcare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 16, 2021
Health Watch Health Care, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 30, 2014
Health Watch Health Care of Altus LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 30, 2014

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate69.75% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate13.11% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.16% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 73521, where this agency’s office is, 12 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.