Hearth Record

Unity Home Health LLC

A home health agency in Durant, Oklahoma 74701

1305 North Washington, Durant, Oklahoma 74701. (580) 931-0995.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 25, 2026: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 25, 2026: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of administrative documents and interview, the agency failed to submit OASIS assessments within 30 days as required of completing the assessment. Review of OASIS reports for the prior year showed 342 records transmitted with a 7.02% -3330 (Late Submission) error rate and the most recent month OASIS report showed 29 records transmitted with a 6.90% -3330 (Late Submission) error rate. During an interview on 02/24/26 at 2:15 PM, the Business Manager and Administrator explained the agency’s OASIS submission process and were informed the Late Submission -3330 error rate exceeded the 1% threshold.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Laboratory Services/Clia Waivers

    The inspectors’ words, 151 words

    “Laboratory services/CLIA waivers CFR(s): 484.100(c)(1) Laboratory services. If the HHA engages in laboratory testing outside of the context of assisting an individual in self-administering a test with an appliance that has been cleared for that purpose by the Food and Drug Administration, the testing must be in compliance with all applicable requirements of part 493 of this chapter. The HHA may not substitute its equipment for a patient’s equipment when assisting with self-administered tests. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of administrative documents and interview, the agency failed to maintain a current CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment) certificate as required to conduct laboratory testing. Review of the CLIA Certificate posted in the agency showed an expiration date of 03/27/25. During an interview on 02/24/26 at 3:00 PM, the Business Manager and Administrator confirmed the CLIA certificate was not current and stated the renewal was in process.”

    Rule G0862. Standard-level.

  • 5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 182 words

    “5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the PT (Physical Therapist) failed to conduct the initial evaluation timely as part of the comprehensive assessment for one (#4) of seven (#1-#7) records reviewed. Patient #4 Review of Patient #4 record for SOC period 02/01/26 to 04/01/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure and orders for SN visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks and PT to evaluate and treat. Further review of PT documentation showed the initial PT evaluation was conducted on 02/09/26 (8 days after SOC) and no documentation was evident as to the reason the PT evaluation was delayed. On 02/25/26 at 2:15 PM, the Administrator stated the PT initial evaluation was not conducted timely and there was no documentation as to the reason for the delayed evaluation of Patient #4.”

    Rule G0520. Element-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 171 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to include all medications the patient was currently using on the medication profile for one (#6) of seven (#1 - #7) records review. Patient #6 Review of Patient #6 record for recertification period 12/11/25 to 02/04/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The RN recertification visit note on 12/10/25 documented the patient was currently using “Oxygen at 2 liters per minute” and a fire safety assessment was completed for the home environment. Review of the Medication Profile failed to include Oxygen as a current medication. On 02/25/26 at 2:00PM, RN2 stated Oxygen was not included on the Medication Profile as ordered for Patient #6.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 493 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to complete interventions as ordered on the POC for five (#1 - #5) of seven (#1- #7) records reviewed. Patient #1 Review of Patient #1 record for re-certification period 02/03/26 to 04/03/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Left Ventricular Failure and orders for SN visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks and for SN to assess patient’s weight log every visit. Further review of SN documentation and Vital Sign Report failed to provide evidence weights were assessed or obtained for SN visits conducted on the weeks of 02/01/26, 02/08/26 or 02/15/26. Patient #2 Review of Patient #2 record for re-certification period 12/28/26 to 02/25/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Heart Failure and orders for SN 1 time a week for 8 weeks and for “SN to instruct patient on daily weight self-monitoring...assess patient’s weight log every visit”. Further review of SN documentation and Vital Sign Report failed to provide evidence weights were assessed or obtained for SN visits conducted the weeks of 12/28/25, 01/04/26, 01/11/26/ 01/18/26, 01/25/26 02/08/26 or 02/15/26. Patient #3 Review of Patient #3 record for re-certification period 02/22/26 to 04/22/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Metabolic Encephalopathy and secondary diagnosis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus. The POC included orders for SN visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks and orders to “Notify physician of: Fasting Blood sugar greater than 200 or less than 70 and Random Blood sugar greater than 250 or less than 70”. Further review of SN documentation and Vital Sign Report failed to provide evidence blood sugar results were assessed or obtained for SN visits conducted the weeks of 02/08/26 or 02/15/26. Patient #4 Review of Patient #4 record for SOC certification period 02/01/26 to 04/01/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. The POC included orders for SN visits 1 time a week for 9 weeks with orders to “Notify physician of: Weight greater than 185 lbs. or less than 165 lbs”. Further review of SN documentation and Vital Sign Report failed to provide evidence weights were assessed or obtained for the SN visit conducted the week of 02/15/26. Patient #5 Review of Patient #5 record for re-certification period 02/07/26 to 04/07/26 showed a primary diagnosis of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and a secondary diagnosis of Heart Disease. The POC included orders for “SN to instruct patient on daily weight self-monitoring...assess patient’s weight log every visit”. Further review of SN documentation and Vital Sign Report failed to provide evidence weights were assessed or obtained for SN visits conducted the weeks of 02/08/26 or 02/15/26. On 02/25/26 at 2:00PM, RN1 and RN2 stated weights and blood glucose results were not obtained as ordered for Patients #1 - #5.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 25, 2026Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 22, 2008.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • CMS’s ownership file has no owners listed for this agency.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 1.5 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars1.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate31.66% (worse than the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 21 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 74701, where this agency’s office is, 19 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 1.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.