Angels Care Home Health
A home health agency in Omaha, Nebraska 68154
10832 Old Mill Road, Ste 3, Omaha, Nebraska 68154. (402) 934-4752.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Sep 18, 2025: a complaint inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Sep 18, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
-
Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 697 words
“Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to provide all services as ordered on the plan of care for 3 of 9 patient records reviewed (Patient 1, 7, and 8). The census was 356 (75 at the Columbus branch, 138 at the Lincoln branch, and 143 at the Omaha parent location). Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Plan of Care, CC.032, revised 2/22 revealed clinical services are implemented in accordance with a plan of care (POC) established by a provider’s written orders. B. Review of Patient 1’s clinical record revealed: 1. The patients start of care (SOC) was 12/16/24. 2. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/16/24 through 2/13/24 included orders for Physical Therapy (PT) 1 time a week for 1 week to evaluate and establish a PT POC. The form indicated that a verbal SOC order was received on 12/16/24. 3. A PT Initial Evaluation Visit form (which also establishes the PT POC) was completed on 12/23/24, the evaluation form includes orders for PT 1 time a week for 1 week, then 2 times per week for 3 weeks, effective 12/22/24. The form indicates a verbal order was received for the PT POC. 4. Missed Visit notes dated 1/2/25, 1/3/25, 1/8/25, and 1/10/25 indicate the reason for these missed visits was the clinician was awaiting verbal orders, and the therapist was “unable to see the patient, waiting on physician signature.” C. Review of Patient 7’s clinical record revealed: 1. A Physician Order, dated 3/5/25, included orders for admit to home health care within 48 hours of patients discharge from the hospital for Skilled Nurse (SN), PT, and OT to evaluate and treat. 2. A hospital Discharge document to the home health agency revealed the patient discharged from the hospital to home on 3/6/25. 3. The patient’s SOC was 3/8/25. The admission consent forms, signed by the patient on 3/8/25, indicate that the patient was informed they would receive PT and OT 1-3 times per week after an evaluation. 4. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 3/8/25 through 5/6/25 included orders for PT and OT to evaluate and treat. 5. There was no documentation in the clinical record that an OT or PT evaluation was conducted for this patient. 5. Patient discharged 3/18/25. D. Review of Patient 8’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 7/26/25 through 9/23/25 included orders for PT and OT 1 time per week for 1 week to evaluate and establish a POC. 2. A PT Initial Evaluation Visit form was completed on 7/29/25, the evaluation form includes orders for PT 1 time a week for 2 weeks, then 2 times per week for 3 weeks. 3. An OT Initial Evaluation Visit form (which also establishes the OT POC) was completed on 7/29/25, the evaluation form includes orders for OT 1 time a week for 2 weeks, then 2 times per week for 3 weeks. 4. Documentation revealed 1 PT visit was conducted and no OT visits were conducted after evaluation visits were completed. 5. A Client Coordination Note Report, Discharge Summary, dated 8/19/25, revealed the patient requested discharge due to the agency’s inability to staff therapy. E. During an interview on 9/18/25 at 11:20 AM, the Business Manager/designated survey contact confirmed the agency failed to provide all services as ordered on the plan of care for patient’s 1, 7, and 8.”
-
5 Calendar Days After Start Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 969 words
“5 calendar days after start of care CFR(s): 484.55(b)(1) The comprehensive assessment must be completed in a timely manner, consistent with the patient’s immediate needs, but no later than 5 calendar days after the start of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed within 5 days of the patient’s start of care by all disciplines ordered for 6 of 9 patient records reviewed (Patient 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 9). The agency census was 356 (75 at the Columbus branch,138 at the Lincoln branch, and 143 at the Omaha parent location). Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Patient Assessment/Reassessment, CC.026, revised 4/23 revealed: 1. Typically, the comprehensive assessment is conducted on the same visit as the initial assessment. 2. A patient requiring referrals to additional disciplines will have an assessment initiated by the referred discipline within 96 hours. 3. Relevant assessment findings are communicated to the provider to aid in the development of the plan of care (POC). 4. Discipline specific comprehensive assessments contain information specific to the scope of practice of the specific discipline. B. Review of Patient 1’s clinical record revealed: 1. The patients start of care (SOC) was 12/16/24. 2. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/16/24 through 2/13/24 included orders for Physical Therapy (PT) 1 time a week for 1 week to evaluate and establish a PT POC. The form indicated that a verbal SOC order was received on 12/16/24. 3. A PT Initial Evaluation visit form was completed on 12/23/24 (7 days after the patient’s SOC). C. Review of Patient 2’s clinical record revealed: 1. The patients SOC was 7/9/25. 2. A Client Coordination Note, Therapy Referral Form, dated 7/9/25, for a referral for PT. This note contained a follow-up comment for therapy to restart the week of 7/13/25 (leaving 2 days to complete the comprehensive assessment within the regulatory time frame). 3. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 7/9/25 through 9/6/25 included orders for PT 1 time per week for 1 week to evaluate and establish a PT POC effective 7/13/25 (leaving 2 days to complete the comprehensive assessment within the regulatory time frame). 4. A PT Initial Evaluation visit form was completed on 7/15/25 (6 days after the patient’s SOC). D. Review of Patient 3’s clinical record revealed: 1. The patients SOC was 7/15/25. 2. A Client Coordination Note, Therapy Referral Form, dated 7/15/25, for a referral for PT and Occupational Therapy (OT). This note contained the comment wants started as soon as possible. The note indicated the referral was sent to therapy on 7/16/25. 3. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 7/15/25 through 9/12/25 included orders for PT 1 time per week for 1 week to evaluate and establish a PT POC and Occupational Therapy (OT) 1 time per week evaluate and establish an OT POC, both effective 7/20/25 (leaving only 7/20/25 to complete the comprehensive assessment within the regulatory time frame). 4. A PT Initial Evaluation visit form was completed on 7/21/25 (6 days after the patient’s SOC). 5. An OT Initial Evaluation visit form was completed on 7/15/25 (6 days after the patient’s SOC). E. Review of Patient 4’s clinical record revealed: 1. A referral to home health dated 8/4/25 for skilled nursing (SN), PT, and OT. 2. A Client Coordination Note Report, Intake, dated 8/5/25 revealed the ordered disciplines included OT. The note revealed the patient would be discharged to home on 8/7/25. 3. A Physicians Order dated 8/7/25 for PT and OT to evaluate and treat. 4. The patient’s SOC was 8/7/25. 5. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 8/7/25 through 10/5/25 included orders for OT 1 time per week for 1 week to evaluate and establish an OT POC effective 8/10/25 (leaving 3 days to complete the comprehensive assessment within the regulatory time frame). 6. An OT Initial Evaluation visit form was completed on 8/15/25 (8 days after the patient’s SOC). F. Review of Patient 7’s clinical record revealed: 1. A Physician Order, dated 3/5/25, included orders for admit to home health care within 48 hours of patients discharge from the hospital for SN, PT, and OT to evaluate and treat. 2. A hospital Discharge document to the home health agency revealed the patient discharged from the hospital to home on 3/6/25. 3. The patient’s SOC was 3/8/25. The admission consent forms, signed by the patient on 3/8/25, indicate that the patient was informed they would receive PT and OT 1-3 times per week after an evaluation. 4. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 3/8/25 through 5/6/25 included orders for PT and OT to evaluate and treat. 5. There was no documentation in the clinical record that an OT or PT evaluation was conducted for this patient. 6. The patient was discharged from home health on 3/18/25. G. Review of Patient 9’s clinical record revealed: 1. The patient’s SOC was 8/3/25. 2. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 8/3/25 through 10/1/25 included orders for PT 1 time per week for 1 week to evaluate and establish a PT POC. 3. A PT Initial Evaluation visit form was completed on 8/14/25 (11 days after the patient’s SOC). H. During an interview on 9/18/25 at 10:00 AM, The Branch Manager/designated survey contact confirmed the agency did not ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed by all disciplines ordered on the plan of care within 5 days of the SOC for Patient 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 9.”
-
Revisions Communicated To Patient And Mds
The inspectors’ words, 817 words
“Revisions communicated to patient and MDs CFR(s): 484.60(c)(3)(i) (i) Any revision to the plan of care due to a change in patient health status must be communicated to the patient, representative (if any), caregiver, and all physicians or allowed practitioner’s issuing orders for the HHA plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure coordination with the patient, patient caregiver, and/or physician when changes to the plan of care were indicated for 2 of 9 (Patient 6 and 7) patient records reviewed. The agency census was 356 (75 at the Columbus branch,138 at the Lincoln branch and 143 at the Omaha parent location). Findings are: A. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Plan of Care, CC.032, revised 2/22 revealed changes to the plan of care were to be communicated to the patient and/or the patient’s caregiver, and the provider prior to the initiation of the change whenever possible. B. Review of the agency policy and procedure titled Documentation Practices, CC.013, revised 2/22 revealed: 1. Documentation of clinical activities was to be completed on the day it was provided. 2. Documentation facilitates communication, promotes care, informs care providers, on an ongoing basis, about the patient’s health status and care or services provided. ` C. Review of Patient 6’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 12/15/24 through 2/15/25 included orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) 3 times per week for 1 week, then 2 times per week for 1 week, and then 1 time per week for 7 week for wound care and teaching patient wound care/management. 2. A SN note, dated 1/27/25, revealed the patient had a wound to the left shin area. The wound was noted to have purulent (a thick pus-like fluid) drainage and bright red skin surrounding the wound bed. The SN indicated that the physician was notified. The patient was instructed on signs and symptoms of wound infection and to contact agency, physician, or seek urgent care if symptoms worsen. 3. A Client Coordination Note Report, dated 1/27/25, revealed the SN contacted the physician’s office to inform of changed wound status and was awaiting new orders. 4. A Physicians Order Form dated 2/2/25. The note revealed the SN found a new antibiotic in the patient’s home for the treatment of the leg infection. The start date of the antibiotic was 1/31/25. 5. There was no documented communication in the clinical record to indicate the SN followed up with the physician from 1/27/25 to 2/2/25, to receive a new order for the signs and symptoms of wound infection. 6. There was no documentation of follow-up communication with the patient or the patient’s caregiver from 1/27/25 to 2/2/25 to check wound status or to inform the patient of pending orders. D. Review of Patient 7’s clinical record revealed: 1. The patient’s start of care (SOC) was 3/8/25. 2. An L & C Consent Form Angels Home Health Care, the form included information to the patient that SN, Physical Therapy (PT), and Occupational Therapy (OT) services would be provided 1-3 times per week after evaluation. The form was signed by the patient and the agency SN on 3/8/25. 3. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care for the certification period of 3/8/25 through 5/6/25 included orders for SN 1 week for 1 week, then 2 times a week for 1 week, then 1 time per week for 7 weeks; PT1 time per week for 1 week to evaluate; OT 1 time per week for 1 week to evaluate. 4. A Client Coordination Note Report, Therapy Referral Form, dated 3/8/25 to inform therapy of the patient PT and OT evaluation needs. The form included a follow-up comment dated 3/11/25 that the agency did not have therapy coverage for the patient’s location. The follow-up comment also revealed the Columbus branch office would also not be able to provide therapy coverage. 5. A Physicians Order dated 3/18/25 for a request for outpatient referral and discharge from home health care due to the agency’s inability to provide therapy in the patient’s location. 6. A Client Coordination Note Report dated 3/18/25. The note documented an outpatient therapy scheduled appointment time. The note also revealed the patient voiced confusion about SN versus outpatient therapy requirements. 7. There was no documented communication between the patient and the agency regarding the agency’s inability to provide PT and OT services from 3/8/25 admission through 3/18/25 discharge from home health care. E. During an interview on 9/18/25 at 11:20 AM, The Business Manager/designated survey contact, confirmed the agency failed to communicate with Patient 6 and their physician to ensure wound care orders were received timely, and the agency failed to communicate the agency’s inability to provide PT and OT services to Patient 7 and/or their caregiver.”
Apr 23, 2024: complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies
-
Infection Prevention
The inspectors’ words, 450 words
“Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, observation of the provision of care, and staff interviews, 1 of 7 staff (Staff E), observed during the provision of care for 1 or 7 patients (Patient 2), failed to follow the agency’s policy and procedure for disposal of sharps and contaminated test strips. The total sample size was 17. The census was 377. A. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled Infection Control, Policy Number CC.015, Revision Date August 2022 revealed: 1. Employees were to be educated on the agency’s policy and procedure for handling medical waste which includes any material or item contaminated with dried, semi-liquid or liquid blood or other potentially infectious material. 2. Contaminated/used sharps, including needles, lancets, and contaminated slides, were to be disposed of in a closable, puncture resistant, leakproof container during handling, storage, and transport. 3. The Home Health Agency supplies sharps containers to staff to dispose of sharps and contaminated slides, used during the provision of care for the patient. 4. Medical waste, in sharps containers, transported from the patient’s home is to be disposed of at the Home Health Agency in a secured area, in a waste disposal container, to be collected by a licensed waste disposal contractor. B. Review of Patient 2’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification 2/28/24 through 4/27/24, included orders for Skilled Nursing to check an INR (a blood test that indicates how well blood is able to clot) via finger stick, the week of 3/3/24. 2. A Verbal order on 4/8/24 at 4:05 PM, included orders to recheck INR on the following Monday. (Date 4/15/24). C. The observation of provision of care, for Patient 2 on 4/15/24 at 2:00 PM, revealed Staff E failed to: 1. Place contaminated lancets, used to perform a fingerstick to obtain a blood sample for an INR, into a sharps container. 2. Place contaminated Coagucheck strips (a test strip where a blood sample is dropped on the strip), used for an INR test, into a sharps container. D. During an interview on 4/15/24 at 3:30 PM, Staff E confirmed, [gender] did not have a sharps container to dispose of contaminated lancets and contaminated Coagucheck strips. E. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 11:30 AM, the Administrator confirmed Staff E failed to follow the agency’s policy and procedure for disposal of sharps and contaminated test strips used during the provision of cares for Patient 2.”
-
All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 617 words
“All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, policy and procedure review, and staff interview, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s medication profile (a real-time document used by the agency that lists the patient’s medications, including new and updated orders received between certification periods), included all medication orders as received by the agency, for 2 of 17 patient records reviewed (Patients 2 and 15). The census was 377. A. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled, Medication Profile / Drug Regimen Review, Policy Number CC.020, Revision Date February 2022, revealed: 1. Medication reviews will occur when any new medications are added during the episode of care, but no less than every 60 days. 2. During medication review, if the clinician identifies medications that are changed or new and is not on the medication profile, the clinician will report discrepancy to the patient’s physician to obtain resolution and will document this into the medical record. 3. The medication profile must be current and is updated as changes occur with the patient’s medication. 4. The medication profile in the clinical record is consistent with the physician orders and the patient’s plan of care. B. Review of the agency’s policy and procedure titled, Physician Orders, Policy Number CC.031, Revision Date December 2019, revealed, new or changed medications are to include dose, route, frequency, medication name, and duration if applicable. C. Review of Patient 2’s clinical record revealed: 1. The Home Health Certification and Plan of Care (POC) for the certification periods of 12/30/23 through 2/27/24 and 2/28/24 through 4/27/24, included orders for Warfarin (a medication to prevent blood clots), 5 mg (milligrams) tabs, take 10 mg on Thursday and 15 mg all other days. Okay to skip dose of Warfarin on 10/23/23. 2. A verbal order received on 3/13/24, included an order to hold Warfarin on 3/13/24, then take 10 mg on Thursday, 15 mg on Friday, 10 mg on Saturday, and 15 mg on Sunday. The medication profile was not updated. 3. A verbal order received on 3/19/24, included an order for Warfarin 15 mg daily except on Thursday, Warfarin 10 mg on Thursday. The medication profile was not updated. 4. A verbal order received on 3/27/24, included an order for Warfarin 5 mg on Monday, 15 mg on Tuesday, 10 mg on Wednesday, then starting on Thursday, alternate 15 mg and 10 mg every other day. The medication profile was not updated. 5. A verbal order received on 4/1/24, included an order for Warfarin 15 mg on all days except on Thursday, Warfarin 10 mg on Thursday. The medication profile was not updated. 6. A verbal order received on 4/8/24, included an order to hold the Warfarin on 4/8/24, take 10 mg on Tuesday, 15 mg on Wednesday, 10 mg on Thursday, 15 mg on Friday, 10 mg on Saturday, 15mg on Sunday. The medication profile was not updated. D. Review of Patient 15’s clinical record revealed: 1, The POC 6/22/23 through 8/20/23, included orders for Skilled Nursing to instruct the patient on new and changed medications. 2. A Skilled Nurse Visit on 6/29/23 at 12:15 PM, the Registered Nurse documented that the patient had PRN (as needed) Hydrocodone (a medication used to treat severe chronic pain). 3. The medication profile printed on 4/16/24, did not include Hydrocodone. E. During an interview on 4/23/24 at 11:30 AM, the Administrator confirmed agency staff failed to follow the agency’s policy and procedure for keeping the medication profile updated when medication orders were new or changed for Patients 2 and 15.”
All 2 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 18, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
| Apr 23, 2024 | Complaint and recertification inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 29, 2007.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 10 owners or officers are people: Angela W Eddins (owns 5% or more directly, 51%); Angela W Eddins (corporate officer, 51%); Angela W Eddins (corporate director, 51%); Mark A Eddins (owns 5% or more directly, 49%); Mark A Eddins (corporate officer, 49%); Mark A Eddins (corporate director, 49%); Michael Heath Beaty (corporate officer); Michelle Wenner (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Cindy M Godfrey (managing employee (on the payroll)); Jessica Moyers (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (240 surveys completed): 85% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 71% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 77.63% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 14.20% (worse than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 4.21% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 68154, where this agency’s office is, 17 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Centerwell Home Health | 4.5 |
| Amakes Quality Home Care Inc. | Not given |
| Angels Care Home Health This home health agency | 3 |
| Neighbors Keeper, LLC | Not given |
| Amedisys Home Health of the Midlands | 4.5 |
| Chi Health at Home - Omaha | 4 |
| Good Samaritan Society - Omaha Metro Home Care | 3.5 |
| Home Nursing With Heart | 3.5 |
| Physicians Choice Home Health Care | 3.5 |
| Aveanna Home Health | 4 |
| Freedom in Home Services, LLC | 4 |
| Accentcare Home Health of Nebraska | 4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.