Hearth Record

Grace Home Health

A home health agency in Lafayette, Louisiana 70508

1602 Pinhook Rd, Ste 301, Lafayette, Louisiana 70508. (337) 889-5950.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 2, 2026: a complaint and recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 2, 2026: complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 769 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the SN followed the patient’s written individualized POC (plan of care) as evidenced by, the SN failing to monitor blood sugar results for 2 (#10, #15) patients, and failing to obtain weights for 2 (#10, #14) patients. The sample size was 17 patients. 3. Review of the Patient #14’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 06/04/2026.The patient’s diagnoses included unspecified atrial fibrillation, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, chronic systolic congestive heart failure, and end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. The certification period reviewed was 06/04/2026 to 08/02/2026. Review of the Patient’s POC (Plan of Care) for certification period 06/04/2026 to 08/02/2026 revealed an order for “Skilled Nurse visits 1wk1, 2wk1, 1wk7 (1 time a week for 1 week, 2 times a week for 1 week, 1 time a week for 7 weeks).” Further review of the patient’s POC revealed an order and intervention for “Skilled nurse to assess vital signs and all body systems and report out of parameter findings to RN (Registered Nurse) and MD (Medical Doctor)... Notify physician for ...weight greater than 134 lbs. (pounds) or less than 124 lbs.” Review of the patient’s SN (Skilled Nurse) visit notes dated 07/02/2026 and 07/07/2026 revealed that there was no evidence the patient’s weight was obtained and/ or recorded. On 09/02/2026 at 8:48 a.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON reviewed Patient #14’s electronic clinical record and confirmed that there was no evidence the patient’s weight was obtained on 07/02/2026, and 07/07/2026. She stated that due to Patient #14’s diagnosis, her weights should have been documented. Findings: 1. Patient #10. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 03/18/2026. The patient’s diagnoses included chronic kidney disease and diabetes. The certification period reviewed was 03/18/2026 to 05/16/2026. Review of Patient #10’s POC for certification period 03/18/2026 to 05/16/2026 revealed the following orders: SN 1w9 (skilled nurse visit one time a week for nine weeks). Further review of the POC revealed, “skilled nurse to perform blood sugar via finger stick every visit.” Further review of the POC revealed, “Notify physician of weight greater than 124 pounds or less than 114 pounds.” Review of Patient #10’s SN visit notes dated 03/18/2026, 03/31/2026, 04/09/2026, and 04/23/2026 revealed no evidence the SN obtained or recorded the patient’s blood sugar results. Review of Patient #10’s SN visit note dated 04/23/2026 revealed no evidence the SN obtained the patient’s weight. On 09/02/2026 at 1:30 p.m., an interview and review of the patient’s electronic clinical records was conducted with S2DON. She verified there was no evidence the SN obtained or recorded the patient’s blood sugar results for SN visits made on 03/18/2026, 03/31/2026, 04/09/2026, and 04/23/2026. S2DON also verified there was no evidence the patient’s weight was obtained for the SN visit made on 04/23/2026. She confirmed that the blood sugar results and weight should have been obtained and recorded. 2. Patient #15. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 03/25/2026. The patient’s diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes. The certification period reviewed was 03/25/2026 to 05/23/2026. Review of Patient #15’s POC for certification period 03/25/2026 to 05/23/2026 revealed the following orders: SN 1w9 (skilled nurse visit one time a week for nine weeks). Further review of the POC revealed the following orders: “Notify physician of fasting blood sugar greater than 250 or less than 70. Random blood sugar greater than 300 or less than 70.” Review of Patient #15’s SN visit note dated 03/31/2026 revealed there was no evidence the SN obtained or recorded the patient’s blood sugar result. On 09/02/2026 at 1:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2DON. S2DON reviewed the above mentioned SN visit note for Patient #15 and confirmed there was no evidence the skilled nurses obtained or recorded the patient’s blood sugar result and stated that it should have been done.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 567 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the agency failed to follow accepted standard precautions to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases by the SN (Skilled Nurse) failing to remove gloves and perform hand hygiene during wound care for 1 (Patient #2) out of 17 sampled patients. Findings: A review of the facility’s policy titled “Infection Control Program” with a last reviewed date of 11/01/2025 revealed in part…Procedure…C. Prevention and Control Activities 1. The Agency will follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions and as needed, transmission-based precautions with standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable disease…3. Other policies to be followed by staff to prevent, control, and improve infection include but are not limited to: Hand Hygiene… Review of Patient #2’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 04/23/2026. The patient’s diagnoses included, but were not limited to, pressure ulcer of right buttock, personal history of diseases of the skin, diabetes mellitus, and morbid obesity. The certification period reviewed was from 08/21/2026 to 10/19/2026. Review of the Patient #2’s POC (Plan of Care) revealed the following order: SN 1w1, 3w8 effective 08/21/2026 (skilled nurse visit one time a week for one week, three visits a week for eight weeks, effective 08/21/2026). Further review of the patient’s POC revealed the following orders: Wound care three times weekly by SN each visit, SN to perform wound care to: Right buttocks, Wound Type: Pressure Ulcer Stage 2, Treatment to be performed: Clean with wound cleanser, apply barrier cream, cover with bordered foam, Frequency of treatment to be performed: MWF (Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and prn (as needed) soiling; Treatment to be performed by: SN during each visit; Wound care to left breast, traumatic ulceration-wash with wound cleanser, pat dry, apply calcium alginate to wound bed and cover with border foam dressing. On 08/31/2026 at 2:08 p.m., during a scheduled home visit, an observation was conducted of S3SN as she provided wound care to Patient #2’s right buttocks. S3SN cleaned the patient’s wound. With the same gloves, S3SN retrieved barrier cream, applied it to the patient’s wound, and then covered the wound with a clean dressing. S3SN did not change gloves or sanitize hands after cleaning Patient #2’s wound nor prior to applying the barrier cream and clean dressing. Observation was continued of S3SN as she provided wound care to Patient #2’s left breast. S3SN cleaned the patient’s wound. With the same gloves, S3SN retrieved calcium alginate, applied it to the patient’s wound, and then covered the wound with a clean dressing. S3SN did not change gloves or sanitize hands after cleaning Patient #2’s wound nor prior to applying the calcium alginate and clean dressing. On 08/31/2026 at 3:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with S3SN. S3SN confirmed she should have changed gloves and sanitized her hands after cleaning Patient #2’s wound to right buttocks and prior to applying barrier cream and the clean dressing and did not. S3SN also confirmed she should have changed gloves and sanitized hands after cleaning Patient #2’s wound to her left breast and prior to applying calcium alginate and the clean dressing and did not.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 2, 2026Complaint and recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Feb 21, 2003.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Grace Home Health Holding LLC owns 100% directly since Oct 15, 2021.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Alicia R Manning (managing employee (on the payroll)); Alicia R Manning (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Lindsey S Thibeaux (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Excellin Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 15, 2021
Excelin Health, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 15, 2021
Excelin Health Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 15, 2021
Grace Home Health Holding LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 15, 2021
Ccg-Ehh Management, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies88.6%Oct 15, 2021
Ccg-Ehh Blocker LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies74.7%Oct 15, 2021
Corinthian Equity Fund II LPOwns 5% or more through other companies27.8%Oct 15, 2021
Corinthian Co-Investment Fund, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies20%Oct 15, 2021
Uk Railways Pension Schemes (United Kingdom)Owns 5% or more through other companies12%Oct 15, 2021
Corealpha Private Equity Partners Co-Investment Fund V, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies12%Oct 15, 2021
Wp Global Rr Investors, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies12%Oct 15, 2021
Corealpha Private Equity Partners Co-Investment Fund V (Cayman), LPOwns 5% or more through other companies10.67%Oct 15, 2021
Wonder Women LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies10%Oct 15, 2021
Santander (Cr Trustee) Limited (United Kingdom)Owns 5% or more through other companies8.53%Oct 15, 2021
Gemini Investors VI LPOwns 5% or more through other companies6%Oct 15, 2021
Corinthian Equity Partners II, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies0%Oct 15, 2021
Gemini Gp VI, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies0%Oct 15, 2021
Wp Corealpha Co-Investment Gp V, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies0%Oct 15, 2021
Wp Rr Gp, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies0%Oct 15, 2021

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (137 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate79.14% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate20.20% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.59% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70508, where this agency’s office is, 23 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.