Hearth Record

Lourdes Home Health

A home health agency in Lafayette, Louisiana 70508

901 Hugh Wallis Road South, Suite B103, Lafayette, Louisiana 70508. (337) 406-2539.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 3, 2025: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 3, 2025: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 408 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s written individualized POC (Plan of Care) was followed as evidenced by the SN (Skilled Nurse) failing to make visits as ordered for 2 (#4 and #12) of 17 sampled patients. Findings: Patient #4 Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 11/23/2025. The patient’s diagnosis included acute kidney failure. The certification period reviewed was 11/23/2025 to 1/21/2026. Review of the patient’s POC for certification period 11/23/2025 to 1/21/2026 revealed an order for “SN 6wk1,3wk2,1wk6 (skilled nurse visit 6 times a week for one week, 3 times a week for 2 weeks, 1 time a week for 6 weeks)”. Review of the patient’s skilled nurse visit notes for the week of 11/23/2025 to 11/29/2025 revealed he received 4 of 6 skilled nurse visits ordered for that week. Patient #12 Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 11/11/2025. The patient’s diagnosis included muscle wasting and atrophy. The certification period reviewed was 11/11/2025 to 1/9/2026. Review of the patient’s POC for certification period 11/11/2025 to 1/9/2026 revealed an order for “SN 3wk1,1wk8 (skilled nurse visit 3 times a week for one week, 1 time a week for 8 weeks)”. Review of the patient’s skilled nurse visit notes for the week of 11/11/2025 to 11/15/2025 revealed she received 1 of 3 skilled nurse visits ordered for that week. On 12/03/2025 at 8:45 a.m., an interview and record review was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). She confirmed that patient #4 had orders for SN visits 6 times a week for week 1, but only received 4 visits that week. She confirmed patient #12 had orders for SN visits 3 times a week for week 1, but only received 1 visit that week.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Promptly Alert Relevant Physician Of Changes

    The inspectors’ words, 413 words

    “Promptly alert relevant physician of changes CFR(s): 484.60(c)(1) The HHA must promptly alert the relevant physician(s) or allowed practitioner(s) to any changes in the patient’s condition or needs that suggest that outcomes are not being achieved and/or that the plan of care should be altered. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure Patient #3’s physician was notified of a four-pound weight gain in one day that was noted by the skilled nurse during the skilled nurse visit made on 11/24/2025 for 1 (#3) out of 17 sampled patients. Patient #3. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical record revealed the start of care date was 11/23/2025. The patient’s diagnoses included infection/inflammation reaction due to cardiac valve prosthesis and chronic diastolic congestive heart failure. The certification period reviewed was 11/23/2025 to 01/21/2026. Review of the patient’s POC (Plan of Care) for certification period 11/23/2025 to 01/21/2026 revealed the following order, SN 2wk1, 1wk8, 2 prns for… cardiac complications… (skilled nurse visit two times a week for one week, one visit a week for eight weeks, two visits as needed for cardiac complications). Further review of the POC revealed, “Skilled nurse to obtain weight every visit and notify RN (Registered Nurse)/physician of weight gain of 3 lbs (pounds) within one day or 5 lbs within one week.” Review of the patient’s SN Visit Note dated 11/23/2025 revealed the patient’s weight was 200 pounds. Review of the patient’s SN Visit Note dated 11/24/2025 revealed the patient’s weight was 204 pounds, which was a four-pound weight gain in one day. There was no evidence the SN, which was a RN, notified the physician of the patient’s four-pound weight gain in one day. On 12/02/2025 at 10:52 a.m., a telephone interview was conducted with S2RN. S2RN reviewed Patient #3’s electronic clinical record and she verified the patient had a four pound weight gain in one day. S2RN confirmed she did not notify the patient’s physician of the four pound weight gain. S2RN stated that she should have notified the physician concerning the weight gain. On 12/02/2025 at 1:20 p.m., an interview was conducted with S1ED (Executive Director). S1ED reviewed Patient #3’s clinical record and she confirmed the patient had a four pound weight gain in one day. S1ED confirmed there was no evidence the physician was notified of the patient’s weight gain. Also, S1ED stated that S2RN should have notified the patient’s physician of the weight gain.”

    Rule G0590. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 3, 2025Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 6, 1979.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Louisiana Health CARE Group LLC owns 67% directly since Jan 22, 2007; Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc. owns 33% directly since Jul 1, 2007.
  • LHC Group Inc. runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer); Kayla Sonnier (managing employee (on the payroll)); Kaci Potier (managing employee (on the payroll)); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies67%Feb 22, 2023
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies67%Feb 1, 2007
LHC Group Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)67%Feb 1, 2007
Louisiana Health CARE Group LLCOwns 5% or more directly67%Jan 22, 2007
Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly33%Jul 1, 2007

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (176 surveys completed): 90% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.43% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.46% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.39% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70508, where this agency’s office is, 23 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.