Chase Health Care Inc.
A home health agency in Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70818
8755 Sullivan Road , Bldg 2c, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70818. (225) 274-1444.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 4of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 7 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 21, 2025: a recertification inspection.
7 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
7 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 21, 2025: recertification inspection7 deficiencies
-
Encoding And Transmitting Oasis
The inspectors’ words, 593 words
“Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure each OASIS (Outcome and Assessment Information Set) was successfully transmitted to the CMS system within 30 days of completion. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy titled “Oasis Policy” revealed the following, in part: The Oasis collection and reporting- All OASIS collection and reporting will be guided by the timeframes set by CMS. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 02/17/2025 revealed 10 records were processed with 2 records receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 02/25/2025 revealed 8 records were processed with 2 records receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 02/27/2025 revealed 4 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 03/06/2024 revealed 3 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 03/13/2025 revealed 2 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 03/21/2025 revealed 30 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 05/13/2025 revealed 7 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 05/14/2025 revealed 11 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. Review of the agency’s OASIS Agency Final Validation Report with a submission date of 05/16/2025 revealed 23 records were processed with 1 record receiving a message the record was submitted late due to a submission date of more than 30 days after date on the record. An interview was conducted with S2AADM on 05/20/2025 at 12:24 p.m. She confirmed she was responsible for submitting the agency’s OASIS Assessments. She reviewed and confirmed the above listed OASIS Agency Final Validation Reports and confirmed the OASIS was submitted late. She stated the requirement was to submit the OASIS within 30 days of the assessment date.”
-
Infection Prevention
The inspectors’ words, 497 words
“Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the agency failed to ensure staff followed accepted standards of infection control practices for 1 (#2) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) patients observed during home visits. The agency staff failed to practice proper hand hygiene while providing wound care for Patient #2. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy, titled “Standard Precautions” revealed the following, in part: 1. Hand Hygiene- Perform hand hygiene before having direct contact with a patient. Perform hand hygiene after touching blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions, and contaminated items whether or not gloves are worn. Perform hand hygiene immediately after gloves are removed. 2. Gloving- Change gloves during patient care if the hands move from a contaminated site to a clean site. Remove gloves after contact with a patient and/ or the surrounding environment. Review of Patient #2’s Clinical Record revealed he began receiving services with the Home Health Agency on 07/26/2024 and had a current Certification Period of 03/23/2025 through 05/21/2025. Patient #2 had a diagnosis which included Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 3. A home visit was conducted with Patient #2 on 05/19/2025 at 12:46 p.m. with S4RN present. Upon entering the home S4RN was observed applying gloves to her hands without performing hand hygiene prior to assessing Patient #2. After patient #2’s assessment she applied a second pair of clean gloves over the gloves used to assess Patient #2. She assisted Patient #2 into a standing position with his walker by holding the walker and patient’s left arm with her gloved hands, and S4RN removed Patient #2’s soiled dressings to his Sacrum. Patient’s legs became weak and he sat down in his recliner onto a washable pad. While patient was sitting in his recliner she removed the top pair of soiled gloves and applied a new pair of clean gloves. S4RN assisted patient back into a standing position holding his walker and left arm with her clean gloves, and without changing gloves S4RN cleansed his sacral wound with wound cleanser and gauze. Without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves she applied collagen to wound bed and covered the wound with a dry cover dressing. She removed the top pair of gloves and finished assisting patient to a comfortable position. After she removed the bottom gloves she was not observed washing her hands or performing hand hygiene. On 05/19/2025 at 1:15 p.m., an interview was conducted with S4RN. She confirmed she did not perform appropriate hand hygiene. On 05/20/2025 at 11:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with S3DON who stated staff were expected to perform appropriate hand hygiene and not washing hands with soap and water or changing gloves when going from soiled to clean dressings was not appropriate infection control practices.”
-
Services By Skilled Professionals
The inspectors’ words, 877 words
“Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record reviews, the home health agency failed to ensure the Registered Nurse (RN) provided home health agency services in accordance with current clinical practice guidelines and accepted professional standards for 2 (#2 and #12) of 5 (#1, #2, #6, #10, and #12) patients reviewed with Pressure Ulcers. The agency failed to ensure the RN assessed and measured wounds at least weekly for Patients #2 and #12. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy titled, “Wound Care” revealed the following, in part: Policy: A RN, or Physical Therapist (PT) will see all patients with a wound at least once weekly unless patient is seen by the Physician (MD) or Nurse Practitioner (NP) for wound assessment. Procedure: 1. Measurements and new orders are to be obtained from visit and followed. Review of the Louisiana State Board of Nursing, Declaratory Statement Scope of Practice for Registered Nurses - Wound Care Management revealed, in part, the following: Registered nurses render care that is directed towards the prevention and the treatment of wounds. Scope of Practice - The Louisiana State Board of Nursing recognizes that assessment, planning, intervention, teaching, evaluation, and supervision are the major responsibilities of the registered nurse in the practice setting. The Registered Nurse initiates appropriate wound prevention measures, stages wounds and collaborates with the wound care team in the implementation and evaluation of nursing interventions as prescribed by the authorized prescriber. Wound care management requires the registered nurse to collaborate with other members of the interdisciplinary team to ensure that the individual’s nutritional and psychosocial needs are being met and to provide for preventive and therapeutic measures. The Registered Nurse should consult with the physician and/or CWCN (certified wound care nurse) to assure safe, quality nursing measures that facilitate appropriate skin and wound management. Review of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide revealed, in part, the following: Pressure Ulcer Assessment 1. Assess the pressure ulcer initially and re-assess it at least weekly. 1.1. Document the results of all wound assessments. Assess and document physical characteristics including: location, Category/Stage, size, tissue type(s), color, peri-wound condition, wound edges, sinus tracts, undermining, tunneling, exudate, and odor. Patient #2 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Patient #2 began receiving services with the agency on 07/26/2024 and had a current Certification Period of 03/23/2025 through 05/21/2025. Patient #2 had a diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region – Stage 3. Patient #2 was ordered to receive skilled nursing visits twice weekly for 5 weeks then once weekly for 1 week. Review of Patient #2’s skilled nursing visits conducted for the Certification Period of 03/23/2025 through 05/21/2025 revealed he was seen by a RN on the following dates: 04/17/2025, 04/19/2025, 04/23/2025, 04/25/2025, and 05/02/2025. Further review revealed no documented evidence Patient #2’s Stage 3 Sacral Pressure Ulcer was measured. The RN documented “patient refused wound measurements” on the above dates. Review of Patient #2’s Wound History for his Stage 3 Sacral Pressure Ulcer revealed an onset sate of 04/17/2025 and no documented measurements. A home visit was conducted on 05/19/2025 at 12:46 p.m. with Patient #2, and S4RN was present. An observation was conducted of S4RN performing wound care on Patient #2’s Stage 3 Sacral Pressure Ulcer. S4RN did not perform wound measurements or ask Patient #2 for permission to measure the wound. An interview was conducted on 05/19/2025 at 3:27 p.m. with Patient #2. Patient #2 reported he had never refused to allow the RN to measure his Sacral Pressure Ulcer. He confirmed the RN had not been measuring the wound. An interview was conducted on 05/20/2025 at 11:30 a.m. with S3DON. S3DON reviewed Patient #2’s Clinical Record and confirmed there was no documented evidence of wound measurements for Patient #2’s Stage 3Sacral Pressure Ulcer. She confirmed the RN should have measured the wound at least once weekly or obtained measurements from the Certified Wound Care Nurse Practitioner weekly for documentation in the Clinical Record. S3DON confirmed the agency was not following the progression of the wound via measurements from an RN, NP or MD. Patient #12 Review of the Clinical Record revealed Patient #12 began receiving services with the agency on 12/23/2024 and had a current Certification Period of 04/12/2025 through 06/10/2025. Patient #12 had a diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region – Stage 4. Patient #12 was ordered to receive skilled nursing visits three times weekly for eight weeks then once weekly for one week. Review of Patient #12’s skilled nursing visit notes dated 04/13/2025 through 04/19/2025 revealed a RN made no documented evidence the RN, NP or MD measured Patient #12’s Stage 4 Sacral Pressure Ulcer. An interview was conducted on 05/20/2025 at 2:17 p.m. with S3DON. She reviewed Patient #12’s Clinical Record and confirmed there was no documented evidence of wound measurements between 04/13/2025 through 04/19/2025. She confirmed the RN made a nursing visit on 04/18/2025 and should have measured Patient #12’s wound.”
-
A Review Of All Current Medications
The inspectors’ words, 1,393 words
“A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations during home visits, interviews, and record review, the agency failed to ensure each patients’ comprehensive assessment included a review of all medications the patients were currently using. The agency failed to ensure skilled nursing and therapy staff reconciled patients’ medications for 3 (#1, #2, and #4) of 5 (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5) patients reviewed with home visits. Findings: Review of the agency’s undated policy, titled “Medication Information Policy” revealed the following, in part: Purpose: To ensure agency staff have access to and are knowledgeable of the effects, side effects, indications and contraindications of all the medications a patient is taking. Procedure: 1. The Medication Profile is completed on admission; 5. Medication reconciliation is to occur with each skilled nurse visit. Patient #1 Review of Patient #1’s Clinical Record revealed she began receiving services from the agency on 03/15/2025 and had a current Certification Period of 05/14/2025 through 07/12/2025. Patient #1 had diagnoses, which included Pressure Ulcer of Right Buttock – Stage 4 and Hypertension. Patient #1 was ordered to receive Skilled Nursing Visits once weekly for one week then twice weekly for eight weeks. A home visit was conducted with Patient #1 on 05/20/2025 at 9:00 a.m. with S5RN present in the home. Patient #1 stated he managed his own medications. Patient #1’s medications were reviewed during the home visit and the following discrepancies were identified when compared to the current medication profile provided by the agency: Hydrocodone 10 mg 1 tab twice daily – listed on the medication profile and the patient was currently taking Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10-325 mg by mouth twice daily; and Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg by mouth daily – not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and the patient was currently taking. An interview was conducted with Patient #1 during the home visit. He stated he had never taken Hydrocodone 10mg without the Acetaminophen. He stated he had been taking Olmesartan Medoxomil 40 mg daily for years and since the start of his current episode. An interview was conducted with S5RN during the home visit. He confirmed the above medication discrepancies. Patient #2 Review of Patient#2’s Clinical Record revealed he began receiving services from the agency on 07/25/2024 and had a current Certification Period of 03/23/2025 through 05/21/2025. Patient #2 had diagnoses, which included Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region- Stage 3, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease, Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, and Colostomy Status. A home visit was conducted with Patient#2 on 05/19/2025 at 12:46 p.m. with S4RN present in the home. Patient #1 stated he managed his own medications and took them as prescribed on the bottles. Patient #2’s medications were reviewed during the home visit and the following discrepancies were identified when compared to the current medication profile provided by the agency: Cyanocobalamin 1200mcg oral, extended release 1 tablet by mouth daily- listed on the medication profile and the patient reported he was no longer taking this medication; Metoprolol Tartrate 25mg oral take 0.5 tablet by mouth twice daily- listed on the medication profile and the patient was currently taking Metoprolol Tartrate 25mg 1 tablet by mouth twice daily; Miralax 17gm once daily or as needed by mouth for constipation- listed on the medication profile and patient was no longer taking; Mupirocin 2% External Ointment apply small amount to scrotum twice a day- listed on the medication profile and patient was no longer taking; Potassium Chloride 20 MEQ one tablet by mouth once daily- listed on the medication profile and patient was no longer taking for at least six months; Ferrous Sulfate 325mg one tablet by mouth once daily with a start date of 5/12/2025- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and the patient was currently taking. An interview was conducted with S4RN during the home visit. She confirmed the above medication discrepancies. Patient #4 Review of Patient#4’s Clinical Record revealed she began receiving services from the agency on 05/10/2025 and had a current Certification Period of 5/10/2025 through 07/08/2025. Patient #4 had diagnoses, which included Aftercare Following Joint Replacement Surgery, Presence of Right Artificial Knee Joint, Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure, Anxiety Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder, and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. A home visit was conducted with Patient #4 on 05/19/2025 at 3:20 p.m. with S6LPN present in the home. Patient#4 stated her sister assisted her with her medications and she took them as prescribed on the bottles. Patient #4’s medications were reviewed during the home visit and the following discrepancies were identified when compared to the current medication profile provided by the agency: Synthroid 125mcg one tablet by mouth every morning- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Omeprazole Delayed Release 40mg one capsule by mouth twice daily- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Tylenol 500mg capsule one capsule by mouth twice daily as needed for pain- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Duloxetine HCL Delayed Release 60 mg capsule one by mouth daily- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Gabapentin 300mg one capsule by mouth twice daily- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Fluticasone 50mcg 2 sprays each nostril once daily- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Asprin 81 mg one tablet by mouth once daily was on the medication profile, but patient was one tablet by mouth twice daily with a prescribed date of 05/12/2025; Oxycodone/ Acetaminophen 5/325mg one tablet by mouth every 4-6 hours as needed for pain- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Promethazine 12.5mg one tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for nausea with a prescribed date of 05/12/2025- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Lasix 40mg one tablet by mouth daily- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Docusate sodium with Senna 50mg/8.6mg one tablet by mouth twice daily-was not listed on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Coreg 3.125mg tablet one tablet by mouth twice daily- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Albuterol HFA 90mcg 1-2 puffs inhaled every 4 hours as needed for shortness of breath- not listed as a current medication on the medication profile but present in the home and patient was currently taking; Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen 10/325mg one tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain- was listed on the medication profile but patient was no longer taking; Docusate sodium 50mg one capsule by mouth as needed was on the medication profile but patient was no longer taking. An interview was conducted with Patient #4 who reported when she was admitted to the home health agency on 05/10/2025 the admitting nurse did not request her medications to be reviewed during the admission process. An interview was conducted with S6LPN during the home visit. She confirmed the above medication discrepancies. She confirmed medications should be reconciled each visit, but was not completed due to all the discrepancies found. An interview was conducted with S3DON on 05/20/2025 at 2:55 p.m. She was made aware of the above medication discrepancies for Patients #1, #2, and #4. She stated each patients’ medications should have been reconciled each Skilled Nursing Visit. She confirmed every patient’s medication profile should have reflected the current medications they were taking.”
-
All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 270 words
“All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview the agency failed to ensure all patient care orders were recorded in the Plan of Care (POC) for 1 (#2) of 13 (#1-#13) patient records reviewed. The agency failed to ensure Patient #2’s POC was revised to reflect current wound treatment orders. Findings: Review of Patient #2’s Clinical Record revealed he began receiving services with the Home Health Agency on 07/26/2024 and had a current Certification Period of 03/23/2025 through 05/21/2025. Review of Patient #2’s Plan of Care for current certification period revealed, in part: Wound Care Orders- Skilled Nurse perform Pressure Ulcer care to stage 3 Sacrum Ulcer. Cleanse with wound cleanser, apply hydrofiber dressing with silver, cover and secure with border dressing, using aseptic technique. Review of Patient #2’s current wound care orders dated 05/06/2025 revealed the following: Skilled Nurse to perform treatment to Pressure Ulcer to Sacrum 3 times weekly: Cleanse with wound cleanser and pat dry, apply an antiseptic to peri-wound, then apply medical-grade honey and Collagen to the wound bed, and secure with dry dressing. An interview was conducted on 05/21/2025 at 11:00 a.m. with S3DON. She reviewed Patient #2’s POC and confirmed his wound care orders were not updated. She reported that the Plan of Care is only updated with a Resumption of Care or Recertification. She confirmed that the Plan of Care should be updated with current orders to prevent any errors in patient care.”
-
Provide Services In The Plan Of Care
The inspectors’ words, 411 words
“Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the agency failed to provide wound care as ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the Plan of Care for 1 (#2) of 2 (#1, and #2) patients wound care observed during home a visit. Findings: Review of Patient #2’s Clinical Record revealed he began receiving services with the Home Health Agency on 07/26/2024 and had a current Certification Period of 03/23/2025 through 05/21/2025. Patient #2 had a diagnosis of Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Stage 3. Patient #2 was ordered to receive skilled nursing visits twice weekly for 5 weeks then once weekly for 1 week. Review of Patient #2’s current wound care orders dated 05/06/2025 revealed the following: Skilled Nurse to perform treatment to Pressure Ulcer to Sacrum 3 times weekly: Cleanse with wound cleanser and pat dry, apply an antiseptic to peri-wound, then apply medical-grade honey and Collagen to the wound bed, and cover and secure with dry dressing. A home visit was conducted with Patient #2 on 05/19/2025 at 12:46 p.m. with S4RN present. S4RN was observed providing wound care for Patient #2. S4RN removed the soiled dressing, cleansed wound bed with wound cleanser and gauze, and applied Collagen and a dry dressing. S4RN did not apply an antiseptic to the peri-wound or medical grade honey to the wound bed. An interview was conducted on 05/20/2025 at 10:00 a.m. with Patient #2’s wound care Nurse Practitioner (NP). He confirmed Patient #2’s current wound care order was to cleanse with wound cleanser and pat dry, apply an antiseptic to peri-wound, then apply medical-grade honey and Collagen to the wound bed, and cover and secure with dry dressing. He stated he expected the nurses to follow the current wound treatment orders. An interview was conducted on 05/20/2025 at 11:30 a.m. with S3DON. She reviewed Patient #2’s Clinical Record. She confirmed Patient #2’s current wound care order was to cleanse with wound cleanser and pat dry, apply an antiseptic to peri-wound, then apply medical-grade honey and Collagen to the wound bed, and cover and secure with a dry dressing. She was made aware of the observation of Patient #2’s wound care on 05/19/2025 and stated Patient #2’s wound care should have been completed as ordered.”
-
Communication With Physicians
The inspectors’ words, 284 words
“Communication with physicians CFR(s): 484.75(b)(7) Communication with all physicians involved in the plan of care and other health care practitioners (as appropriate) related to the current plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review, the agency failed to ensure a patient’s physician was notified when physician ordered Home Health Aide services were refused for 1 (#7) of 4 (#2, #7, #11, and #13) patients reviewed with Home Health Aide services. Findings: Review of Patient #7’s Clinical Record revealed he began receiving services from the agency on 04/01/2025 and had a current Certification Period of 04/01/2025 through 05/30/2025. Further review revealed Patient #7 had diagnoses, which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hemiplegia. Patient #7 was ordered to receive a Home Health Aide evaluation effective the week of 04/07/2025. Review of Patient #7’s Visit Notes and Coordination Notes for Certification Period of 04/01/2025 through 05/30/2025 revealed no documented evidence a Home Health Aide visit was conducted. Further review revealed no documentation Patient #7’s ordering physician was notified Patient #7 did not receive or refused Home Health Aide services. An interview was conducted with S7RN on 05/20/2025 at 3:14 p.m. She stated Patient #7 refused services from the Home Health Aide. She confirmed the refusal was not communicated with the physician and should have been. An interview was conducted with S3DON on 05/20/2025 at 2:25 p.m. She reviewed Patient #7’s clinical record. She confirmed Patient #7 had Home Health Aide services ordered effective the week of 04/07/2025. She stated Patient #7 notified S7RN he did not want the Home Health Aide services. She confirmed Patient #7’s physician was not notified of the refusal and should have been.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2025 | Recertification inspection | 7 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Nov 29, 1989.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- 4 owners or officers are people: Russell Starns (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Russell Starns (corporate officer, 100%); Jennifer Starns (corporate director); Jennifer Starns (managing employee (on the payroll)).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (87 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 84% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 4 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 74.74% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 9.18% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.89% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 22 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70818, where this agency’s office is, 22 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Chase Health Care Inc. This home health agency | 4 |
| Baton Rouge General Home Health | 3 |
| Ochsner Home Health of Baton Rouge | 3 |
| Cypress Home Health | 4 |
| Elara Caring | 4.5 |
| Superior Home Health Care Inc. | 3 |
| Amedisys Home Health | 3.5 |
| Clarity Home Health | 2 |
| Pinnacle Home Health of Baton Rouge | 4 |
| Audubon Home Health | 3 |
| Home Health Care 2000-Baton Rouge | 3.5 |
| Feliciana Home Health | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.