Hearth Record

Elara Caring

A home health agency in Opelousas, Louisiana 70570

1310 S Union St, Ste 4, Opelousas, Louisiana 70570. (337) 942-5367.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 20, 2024: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 20, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 356 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the patient’s written individualized POC (Plan of Care) was followed for 1 (#17) out of 17 (#1 to #17) sampled patients as evidenced by the PT (Physical Therapist) failing to notify physician when Patient #17’s pain level was outside parameter. Patient #17. Review of the patient’s electronic clinical records revealed the start of care date was 08/17/2023. The patient’s diagnoses included Leprosy, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The certification period reviewed was 08/17/2023 to 10/15/2023. Review of the patient’s POC for certification period 08/17/2023 to 10/15/2023 revealed an order for “PT effective 08/20/2023 1 Every2wk2, 1wk2 (Physical Therapy visits effective 08/20/2023 one visit one time a week every two weeks for two weeks, one time a week for two weeks).” Further review of the POC revealed an order “Licensed professional to report vital signs outside the following established parameters…pain > (greater than) 5…” Review of the patient’s physical therapy visit note dated 09/13/2023 revealed the patient’s pain level was 6 out of 10 on pain scale, which was outside the parameter of 5. Further review of the patient’s PT visit note and electronic clinical record revealed that there was no evidence the patient’s pain was reported to the physician. On 03/19/2024 at 2:35 p.m., an interview and review of the patient’s clinical record was conducted with S1DON (Director of Nurses). S1DON confirmed that there was no evidence the patient’s pain was reported to the physician on 09/13/2023.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 463 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that the SN (Skilled Nurse) reviewed all medications during the SN visits to confirm that the patient was currently administered the correct medications and dosages as ordered per the plan of care for 1 (#4) out of 17 (#1-17) patient records reviewed. Patient #4: Review of the patient’s electronic clinical records revealed the start of care date was 01/22/2024. The patient’s diagnoses included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease—Stage 1-4, Chronic Kidney Disease, Personal History Of TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack) and Cerebral Infarction without Residual Deficits. Review of the patient’s POC (Plan Of Care) for certification period 01/22/2024 to 03/21/2024 revealed an order for “SN 1wk9 (skilled nurse visit one time a week for nine weeks).” Further review of the POC revealed an order “Skilled nurse to review patient medications…” Review of the Skilled Nurse visit notes dated 02/28/2024, 03/04/2024 and 03/15/2024 revealed the SN documented that the patient’s medications were not reviewed because the patient’s daughter had the medications. Further review of the patient’s electronic record revealed no additional attempts were made by the skilled nurses to review the patient’s medications with her daughter to ensure the patient was receiving the correct medications and dosages as indicated in her plan of care. On 03/19/2024 at 12:48 p.m., S3LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) stated she visited the patient on 03/04/2024 and 03/15/2024. She confirmed that she did not reconcile the patient’s medications on those SN visits. She also confirmed that she did not make additional attempts to contact the patient’s daughter in order to reconcile the patient’s medications. She confirmed that the patient’s medications should be reconciled during every SN visit. On 03/19/2024 at 3 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADM (Administrator) and S1DON (Director of Nurses). A review of the patient’s SN visit notes for 02/28/2024, 03/04/2024 and 03/15/2024 was conducted with S2ADM and S1DON and both agreed that the nurses did not conduct a medication reconciliation during the visits. They both agreed there was no evidence in SN visit notes that additional attempts were made to contact the patient’s daughter in order to reconcile the patient’s medications. They both agreed that the patient’s medications should be reconciled on every SN visit to ensure the patient was taking the correct medications as per the POC or to ensure that new medication orders were added to the POC.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • All Orders Recorded In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 317 words

    “All orders recorded in plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(3) All patient care orders, including verbal orders, must be recorded in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure that medications were recorded on the patient’s POC (plan of care) for 1 (#4) out of 17 (#1-17) patient records reviewed. Patient #4: Review of the patient’s electronic clinical records revealed the start of care date was 01/22/2024. The patient’s diagnoses included in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease—Stage 1-4, Chronic Kidney Disease, Personal History Of TIA (Transient Ischemic Attack) and Cerebral Infarction without Residual Deficits. Review of the SN (skilled nurse) visit notes for the certification period 01/22/2024 to 03/21/2024 revealed in the SN visit note dated 02/14/2024, the nurse documented that the patient had an appointment with her medical doctor on 02/19/2024. Review of the SN visit notes dated 2/28/2024 revealed the patient informed the skilled nurse that the doctor had made changes to her blood pressure medication. Review of the patient’s electronic record revealed the following: A SOAP (Subjective, Objective, Assessment and Plan) note dated 02/19/2024 that read as following: Medication changes/recommendations: to change Diltiazem (blood pressure medication) ER (extended release) 420 mg (milligram), one daily for blood pressure and an order to restart Clonidine (blood pressure medication) patch TTS-2 transdermal (through the skin). Review of the patient’s current medication list revealed that the changes the doctor made to the patient’s medications on 02/19/2024 were not included in the patient’s plan of care. On 03/19/2024 at 3 p.m., an interview was conducted with S2ADM and S1DON. A review of the Soap note dated 02/19/2024 and the patient’s plan of care was conducted. They both confirmed that changes the doctor made to the patient’s medications on 02/19/2024 were not included in the patient’s POC.”

    Rule G0576. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 20, 2024Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 8, 1980.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Carecycle Solutions LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 25, 2003.
  • 8 owners or officers are people: Daniel R Manley (corporate officer); Ananth P Mohan (corporate officer, 0%); Ananth P Mohan (corporate director); John Mcmahon (corporate officer); Katie L Monastiere (corporate officer); Sally Roberts (managing employee (on the payroll)); Leslie Truax (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Angel Stansbury (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Jhh Parent Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
Airjaguar Holdco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings Buyer, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
Jordan Health CARE Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
Airjaguar Acquisition, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Ec Homecare Holdings Intermediate, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
Ec Homecare Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 15, 2026
Jhh/Cima Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
Carecycle Solutions LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 25, 2003
Jordan Louisiana Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
JHH Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2017
Bw Nhhc Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%May 15, 2018
Acof VII Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies49.3%Jul 15, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII, L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies35.8%Jul 15, 2026
Davita Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 15, 2026
Total Renal Care, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies32.9%Jul 15, 2026
Ares Corporate Opportunities Fund VII Parallel (Te), L.P.Owns 5% or more through other companies9.07%Jul 15, 2026
Dawson Holdings (Armstrong), LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 15, 2026
Acof VII Axiom Holdings, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies7.8%Jul 15, 2026

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (171 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 89% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate89.24% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.36% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.36% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 24 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 70570, where this agency’s office is, 23 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.