Hearth Record

Hoosier Homecare Services LLC

A home health agency in Anderson, Indiana 46013

614 East 53rd Street, Anderson, Indiana 46013. (765) 622-1000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 15, 2024: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 15, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 550 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the home health agency failed to ensure medications were reviewed as part of the comprehensive assessment for 2 of 7 patient records reviewed with a home observation visit (Patient #3 and #4). Findings include: 1. The comprehensive patient assessment policy indicated “The Comprehensive Assessment will include a review of all medications the patient is using.” 2. The medication profile policy indicated “To provide documentation of the comprehensive assessment of all medications the patient is currently taking, and identify discrepancies between patient profile and the physician and/or agency profile.” 3. Review of Patient #3’s clinical record indicated a start of care of 5/23/24 and included a comprehensive assessment performed by PT 2 on 7/17/24. The clinical record also included a medication list. The medication list included Amlodipine Besylate (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 5 milligrams (mg) to be taken by mouth once daily and also included Norvasc (brand name for Amlodipine Besylate) to be taken by mouth once daily. The clinician failed to ensure the medication list did not contain duplicate medications. During an interview on 8/15/24 at 1:47 PM, PT 2 indicated he guessed that one of the medications must have stayed in the patient’s medication profile from a previous entry and had not been deleted. 4. Review of Patient #4’s clinical record indicated a start of care of 4/8/24 and included a comprehensive assessment performed by PT 2 on 8/01/24. The clinical record also included a medication list. The medication list included Lomotil (a medication used to treat diarrhea) 2.5-0.25 mg to be taken by mouth 4 times per day as needed, Tums gas relief chewy bites (a medication used to relieve heartburn, indigestion, and upset stomach) oral 750-80 mg to be taken by mouth as needed 3-4 times per day for indigestion, Miralax (a medication used to treat constipation) 17 grams to be taken 1 packet by mouth once per day, Amlodipine Besylate 5 mg to be taken by mouth once per day, and Triamcinolone Acetonide External 0.1% (a topical medication used to treat a variety of skin conditions) to be applied topically twice daily. During a home visit observation of PTA 1 providing care to Patient #4, Patient #4 and their caregiver indicated Patient #4 no longer had Lomotil, Tums, Miralax, Amlodipine Besylate, or Triamcinolone Acetonide in the home as it had been at least one year since the patient had used those medications. PT 2 failed to perform an accurate comprehensive assessment of Patient #4’s medications. During an interview on 8/15/24 beginning at 1:47 PM, PT 2 indicated he looked at Patient #4’s pill bottles at start of care but wasn’t sure if he looked at them at the recertification assessment. PT 2 indicated he did not know why the Lomotil, Tums, Miralax, amlodipine, and triamcinolone were on the medication list when the patient and caregiver had indicated the patient had not taken these in at least a year. 410 IAC 17-14-1(a)(1)(B)”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 301 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the agency failed to ensure the plan of care (POC) included all medical equipment for 1 of 4 active records reviewed receiving physical therapy (PT) service with no home visit observation (Patient #11). Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record of Patient #11 included a PT Evaluation completed on 06/21/2024 by PT 1 that indicated an overhead trapeze was used (medical equipment used to assist with moving, raising and lowering the body while in bed) to assist with bed mobility. Review of the POC for Patient #11 for certification period 06/21/2024 – 08/19/2024 failed to evidence orders for an overhead trapeze. During an interview on 08/14/2024 at 12:37 PM, when asked what durable medical equipment was used by Patient #11, PT 1 indicated a wheelchair, shower chair, safety bars, hospital bed, and overhead trapeze. 410 IAC 17-13-1(a)(1)(c)(ii)”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Patient And Caregiver Education

    The inspectors’ words, 208 words

    “Patient and caregiver education CFR(s): 484.75(b)(5) Patient and caregiver education; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the skilled nurse failed to provide the patient with individualized education for 1 of 5 active records reviewed with no home visit observation (Patient #11). Findings include: 1. Review of the clinical record of Patient #11 with start of care date, 09/10/2020, included diagnoses, but were not limited to, cystostomy (surgical opening into the bladder through the abdominal wall to allow urine to drain) and hereditary spastic paraplegia (disorder that causes progressive weakness and stiffness in leg muscles). Review of documentation completed by licensed practical nurse (LPN) 1 on 04/25/2024, 05/22/2024, and 07/18/2024 included patient education provided by LPN 1 that included emptying bladder entirely each time urinating and to refrain from holding urine. The agency failed to ensure individualized education was given to the Patient. During an interview on 08/14/2024 at 12:46 PM, when asked how Patient #11 eliminated urine, LPN 1 indicated Patient #11 was unable to urinate due to paralysis, unable to hold urine, and urine was eliminated through a suprapubic catheter (a hollow tube used to drain urine from the bladder through a cut in the abdomen) 410 IAC 17-14-1(a)(2)(E)”

    Rule G0714. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 15, 2024Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since May 15, 2009.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 15 owners or officers are people: Lidia Kedziora (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Lidia Kedziora (general partner, 50%); Lidia Kedziora (corporate officer, 50%); Lidia Kedziora (corporate director, 50%); Lidia Kedziora (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Christopher Daggy (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Christopher Daggy (general partner, 50%); Christopher Daggy (corporate officer, 50%); Christopher Daggy (corporate director, 50%); Christopher Daggy (runs it (operational or managerial control), 50%); Cheryan Cheryan (managing employee (on the payroll), 30%); Cheryan Cheryan (runs it (operational or managerial control), 30%); Cheryan Cheryan (corporate officer, 10%); Patricia Mikesell (corporate officer, 0%); Patricia Mikesell (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (191 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 77% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 53 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate86.45% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate16.07% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.90% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 19 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 46013, where this agency’s office is, 17 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 19 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 46013
PlaceQuality rating
Hoosier Homecare Services LLC This home health agency3.5
Cj’s Abundant CareNot given
Community Health at Home LLC3.5
Ascension at Home4.5
Acme Health Service Inc.Not given
Suburban Home Health LLC3.5
Redcrest Home Health LLC3
Centerwell Home Health4.5
Purposecare of Indiana4.5
Hcmh Home Care3
Angels of Mercy Homecare3.5
Elara Caring4.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.