Hearth Record

Cj’s Abundant Care

A home health agency in Anderson, Indiana 46016

1002 Central Avenue, Anderson, Indiana 46016. (765) 378-4600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 1, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 1, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 845 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the home health agency failed to ensure OASIS transmissions were sent on time for 1 of 1 agency. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated Encoding and Reporting OASIS Data policy, indicated “… Agency will encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system within 30 days of completing the assessment of the client, Validation reports will be obtained and reviewed to determine if corrections are needed. 2. Review of an OASIS Agency Final Validation report for the period 01/01/2023 to 12/31/2023 indicated the following: On 12/05/2022 an OASIS assessment of Patient #5 was completed and was transmitted on 01/27/2023, 53 days later. On 12/19/2022 an OASIS assessment of Patient #5 was completed and was transmitted on 01/27/2023, 39 days later. On 12/26/2022 an OASIS assessment of Patient #5 was completed and was transmitted on 01/27/2023, 32 days later. On 11/22/2022 an OASIS assessment of Patient #3 was completed and was transmitted on 01/27/2023, 66 days later. On 01/03/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #10 was completed and was transmitted on 03/03/2023, 60 days later. On 01/20/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #3 was completed and was transmitted on 03/03/2023, 43 days later. On 03/21/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #3 was completed and was transmitted on 05/11/2023, 51 days later. On 05/04/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #6 was completed and was transmitted on 06/06/2023, 33 days later. On 05/23/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #3 was completed and was transmitted on 07/06/2023, 44 days later. On 06/30/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #10 was completed and was transmitted on 08/08/2023, 39 days later. On 06/29/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #6 was completed and was transmitted on 08/08/2023, 40 days later. On 08/24/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #5 was completed and was transmitted on 10/23/2023, 60 days later. On 08/29/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #10 was completed and was transmitted on 10/23/2023, 55 days later. On 09/19/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #3 was completed and was transmitted on 10/23/2023, 34 days later. On 08/31/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #6 was completed and was transmitted on 10/23/2023, 53 days later. On 08/11/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #11 was completed and was transmitted on 10/23/2023, 73 days later. On 08/31/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #12 was completed and was transmitted on 10/23/2023, 53 days later. 3. Review of an OASIS Agency Final Validation report for the period 01/01/2024 to 10/29/2023 indicated the following: On 10/24/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #5 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 86 days later. On 11/07/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #5 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 72 days later. On 11/17/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #5 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 62 days later. On 10/31/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #10 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 79 days later. On 10/31/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #3 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 79 days later. On 10/31/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #6 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 79 days later. On 12/05/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #2 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 44 days later. On 10/31/2023 an OASIS assessment of Patient #12 was completed and was transmitted on 01/18/2024, 79 days later. 4. Review of QAPI meeting minutes indicated the following: In the 2023 Quarter 1 minutes, dated 04/19/2023, two of the six late transmissions were identified as late. No trends were noted. In the 2023 Quarter 2 minutes, dated 07/12/2023, one of the two late transmissions was identified as late. No trends were noted. In the 2023 Quarter 3 minutes, dated 10/23/2023, none of the three late transmissions were identified. No trends were noted. In the 2023 Quarter 4 minutes, dated 01/31/2024, none of the six late transmissions were identified. No trends were noted. In the 2024 Quarter 1 minutes, dated 04/22/2024, none of the eight late transmissions were identified. No trends were noted. 5. During an interview on 10/29/2024 at 3:16 PM, the Biller indicated she checks whether there are any OASIS assessments to submit about every six weeks. The Biller further indicated she thought OASIS assessments were supposed to be submitted within 30 days of the assessment and that some of the transmissions may have been late because they were put in late or some might have just gotten transferred late. The Biller indicated the Administrator was responsible for obtaining and reviewing the validation reports. 6. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 3:20 PM, the Administrator indicated she oversees the OASIS transmissions by receiving the printout from the Biller and reviews them in QAPI.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Hha Administrator Contact Information

    The inspectors’ words, 224 words

    “HHA administrator contact information CFR(s): 484.50(a)(1)(ii) (ii) Contact information for the HHA administrator, including the administrator’s name, business address, and business phone number in order to receive complaints. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interview, the home health agency failed to ensure patients were provided with the Administrator’s contact information, including name, in order to receive complaints for 1 of 1 agency. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated Home Care Bill of Rights policy indicated “Clients and their representatives will be informed of their rights as a consumer of home care services prior to the start of care.” 2. Review of the agency admission packet included a section titled “Patient’s Rights & Responsibilities” which indicated complaints or questions may be registered with Person 1, a former agency Administrator. 3. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 1:46 PM, the Administrator indicated the old Administrator was listed in the admission packet, and it should have been the current Administrator. The Administrator further indicated the Human Resources staff copied it from the master and must have forgotten to change the Administrator. 4. During an interview on 10/29/24 at 1:51 PM, the Human Resources person indicated the master copy was the same as what was in the admission packet, and she must have missed that when she updated the packet.”

    Rule G0414. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 1, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 3, 2007.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Ashton Huston (managing employee (on the payroll), 75%); Shannda Gregg (managing employee (on the payroll), 25%); Amy Fetty (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Carolyn Jent (owns 5% or more directly); Carolyn Jent (corporate director).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS gives no : “The number of patient episodes for this measure is too small to report.”
  • CMS gives no : “No survey results are available for this period.”
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half starsNot rated
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • CMS gives this agency no quality of patient care rating to compare.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.