Hearth Record

Crystal Home Health Care, LLC

A home health agency in Des Plaines, Illinois 60018

2720 S River Road, Suite 154, Des Plaines, Illinois 60018. (630) 887-1600.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 14, 2024: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 14, 2024: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Encoding And Transmitting Oasis

    The inspectors’ words, 157 words

    “Encoding and transmitting OASIS CFR(s): 484.45(a) Standard: An HHA must encode and electronically transmit each completed OASIS assessment to the CMS system, regarding each beneficiary with respect to which information is required to be transmitted (as determined by the Secretary), within 30 days of completing the assessment of the beneficiary. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on a review of the Agency’s OASIS submission report and Staff interview it was determined that the Agency failed to submit OASIS assessments within the required time frame. Findings include: 1. The Agency’s past 12 months (11/12/23 to 11/12/24) OASIS submission report was reviewed on 11/12/24. The report contained information that out of the 1317 Agency’s OASIS assessment reports, 284 (21.56 %) were submitted beyond the required time frame of 30 days. 2. During an interview with the Clinical Manager and Quality Assurance Nurse on 11/13/24 at 12:00 PM the Clinical Manager confirmed the Agency’s late OASIS submission.”

    Rule G0372. Standard-level.

  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 460 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical records review and staff interview it was determined that in 4 of 13 (Pts # 9,10,7 and 8) clinical records reviewed Agency staff failed to provide services ordered in the Plans of Care. 3. Pt. #7 was admitted for home health services with the diagnosis of Hypertensive Health and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure Stage 1 to 4. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. The POC effective 9/10/24 required, “Orders…for Treatment: Notify Physician of vital sign parameters out of range: Blood Sugar, Fasting - Greater than 180 Less Than 70, Blood Sugar, Random – Greater than 250 Less than 70. The SN notes in the clinical record lacked blood glucose assessment. 4. Pt. #8 is admitted for home health services with the diagnosis of Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Body Dementia. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. The POC effective 9/9/24 required, “PT Frequency: 1 wk 9 as of Effective Date 09/09/24.” The clinical record included documentation of 2 PT visits dated 10/02/24 and 10/03/24 for the week of 09/29/24 to 10/05/24. The clinical record lacked documentation of a physician order for the second visit. 5. During an interview with the Director/Clinical Manager and Quality Assurance Specialist on 11/13/24 at 12:00 PM, and on 11/14/24 at 10:30 AM, the above findings were confirmed. Findings include: 1. Pt # 9 was admitted to home health services on 9/26/24 with diagnosis of Hemiplegia. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24. The clinical record contained a POC for certification period of 9/26/24 to 11/24/24 that required “ Notify Physician of fasting blood sugar: greater than 200mg /dl less than 60mg/dl and random blood sugar: greater than 170mg/dl less than 60mg/dl.” The clinical record contained SN visit notes dated 10/25/24 and 11/01/24 that lacked blood sugar assessment. 2. Pt # 10 was admitted to home health services on 9/7/24 with diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24. The clinical record contained a physician order addendum to the POC dated 11/01/24 for PT and OT to evaluate and treat. As of 11/13/24 no PT or OT evaluation have been provided.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • Authentication

    The inspectors’ words, 558 words

    “Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical records reviewed and staff interviews it was determined that in 4 of 13 (Pts # 9,1,5, and 7) clinical records reviewed the Agency failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate. 3. Pt. #1 was admitted to home health services on 02/07/24 with a diagnosis of Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. During the home visit conducted on 11/12/24, the Admission Booklet which contained the form “Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage.” The forms were signed by the Pt. on 02/07/24, but the areas containing “Effective Date of Coverage your current home health services will end” was left blank. 4. Pt. #5 was admitted to home health services on 10/02/24 with a diagnosis of Venous Insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral). The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. The clinical record lacked the consent for treatment. 5. Pt. #7 was admitted to home health services on 09/10/24 with a diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure Stage 1 to 4. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. As of 11/14/24, the PT POC lacked the Physician’s signature. 6. During an interview with the Director/Clinical Manager and Quality Assurance Specialist on 11/13/24 at 12:00 PM, and on 11/14/24 at 10:30 AM, with the Director, Quality Assurance Specialist and Managing Partner/Administrator, the above findings were confirmed. 1. Pt # 9 was admitted to home health services on 9/26/24 with diagnosis of hemiplegia. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24. The clinical record contained a document titled “ Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage” the document lacked the date home health services will end. 1. Pt # 9 was admitted to home health services on 9/26/24 with diagnosis of hemiplegia. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24. The clinical record contained a document titled “ Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage” the document lacked the date home health services will end. 2. Pt. #1 was admitted to home health services on 02/07/24 with a diagnosis of Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. During the home visit conducted on 11/12/24, the Admission Booklet which contained the form “Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage.” The forms were signed by the Pt. on 02/07/24, but the areas containing “Effective Date of Coverage your current home health services will end” was left blank. 3. Pt. #5 was admitted to home health services on 10/02/24 with a diagnosis of Venous Insufficiency (chronic) (peripheral). The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. The clinical record lacked the consent for treatment. 4. Pt. #7 was admitted to home health services on 09/10/24 with a diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease with Heart Failure Stage 1 to 4. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/13/24. As of 11/14/24, the PT POC lacked the Physician’s signature. 5. During an interview with the Director/Clinical Manager and Quality Assurance Specialist on 11/13/24 at 12:00 PM, and on 11/14/24 at 10:30 AM, with the Director, Quality Assurance Specialist and Managing Partner/Administrator, the above findings were confirmed.”

    Rule G1024. Standard-level.

  • Only As Ordered By A Physician

    The inspectors’ words, 398 words

    “Only as ordered by a physician CFR(s): 484.60(b)(1) Drugs, services, and treatments are administered only as ordered by a physician or allowed practitioner. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record reviews and record reviews, it was determined that for 2 of 5 home visits conducted (Pts. #2 and #5), the Agency failed to obtain Physician orders prior to providing care or treatment. Findings include: 1.Pt. #2 was admitted for home health services with the diagnosis of Hypertensive Heart Disease with Heart Failure. During the home visit with the PT on 11/12/24, Pt. #2 was wearing a cervical collar brace. Pt. #2 was interviewed and stated that the brace had been in use for last 2 or 3 weeks and said that the only time it is taken off is during baths. During the home visit, the PT stated that Pt. #2 has been using the neck brace/collar since returning from the hospital after a fall incident. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24. The clinical record included SN notes dated 11/1/24 that included the documentation, “SN educated patient and caregiver on monitoring skin under neck brace for redness or open areas, to wash (with) soap and water, pat dry and to call SN if skin breakdown.” During the review of findings with the Quality Assurance Specialist and the Director on 11/13/24, the clinical record lacked a physician order for the use and care of a cervical collar brace. 2. Pt. #5 was admitted for skilled home health services with the diagnosis of Venous Insufficiency (Chronic) (Peripheral). A home visit was conducted with RN on 11/13/24. During the home visit, the following was observed: for the left lower leg, the RN took off the dressing, cleansed the wound with normal saline, applied zinc oxide, gentamycin 01. % ointment and (bordered foam dressing) and a self-adhesive dressing; for the right lower leg, the RN took the dressing off, cleansed the wound with normal saline, applied (collagenase), zinc oxide, xeroform dressing, silicon and hydro conductive dressing, applied a rolled gauze and covered it with an adhesive dressing. The clinical record was reviewed on 11/12/24. As of 11/12/24, the clinical record lacked a physician order for the wound treatment. 3. During an interview with the Director/Clinical Manager and Quality Assurance Specialist on 11/13/24 at 2:30 PM, and on 11/14/24 at 10:30 AM, the above findings were confirmed.”

    Rule G0580. Element-level.

  • Influenza And Pneumococcal Vaccines

    The inspectors’ words, 416 words

    “Influenza and pneumococcal vaccines CFR(s): 484.60(b)(2) Influenza and pneumococcal vaccines may be administered per agency policy developed in consultation with a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist, and after an assessment of the patient to determine for contraindications. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of clinical records, policy review and staff interviews, it was determined that for 6 of 13 (Pts. #1, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 13) clinical records reviewed, the Agency failed to assess the need for Pneumococcal Pneumonia and Influenza immunization. Findings include: 1. As of 11/14/24, the following clinical records reviewed lacked documentation of Influenza and/or Pneumococcal Pneumonia inquiry: Pt. #1. SOC 02/27/24 – lacked Pneumococcal Pneumonia immunization assessment. Pt. #3. SOC 11/5/24 - lacked Influenza immunization assessment. Pt. #5. SOC 10/02/24 – lacked Pneumococcal Pneumonia immunization assessment. Pt. #7. SOC 09/10/24 – lacked Influenza immunization assessment. Pt. #8. SOC 09/09/24 – lacked Pneumococcal Pneumonia immunization assessment. Pt. #13. SOC 04/18/24 – lacked Pneumococcal Pneumonia immunization assessment. 2. The Policy “Pneumonia Vaccination Program” was reviewed on 11/14/24 and required, “ The Agency shall administer or arrange for administration of a pneumococcal vaccination, in accordance with CDC recommendations to each client/patient who is age 65 or over and who has not received this immunization prior or upon service initiation, unless the patient refuses the offer for vaccination or the vaccination is medically contraindicated….The agency shall document in each client’s medical record that a vaccination against pneumococcal pneumonia was offered, and was administered, arranged, refused or medically contraindicated or that the client is not a member of a vaccination priority population… a. individual client record entries identifying the assessment for the need of the vaccination; date of offer or referral, client/patient response; administration; contraindication or refusal and any follow up activities; b. Standardized check-off form recording client/patient specific information, including the assessment for the need of vaccination; date of offer or referral; client/patient response; administration; contraindication, or refusal; and any follow up activities.” 3. During an interview was conducted during a home visit on 11/12/24, the Registered Nurse stated that patient Influenza immunization assessment is done during the Influenza season and are documented on the patient records. 4. During an interview with the Managing Partner/Administrator, Director/Clinical Manager and Quality Assurance Specialist on 11/14/24 at 11:00 AM, and it was stated that the Influenza and Pneumococcal Pneumonia immunization status inquiry are conducted and documented in the clinical record. During the same interviews, the above findings were confirmed.”

    Rule G0582. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 14, 2024Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 29, 2009.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and medical social services.
  • Doesn’t offer home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 4 owners or officers are people: Raj Pillai (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%); Alex Johnson (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Raj Pillai (owns 5% or more directly, 40%); Chandran Pillai (owns 5% or more directly, 20%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 1 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (161 surveys completed): 70% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 59% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 51 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.55% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate8.72% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.78% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 151 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 60018, where this agency’s office is, 141 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.