Hearth Record

Horizon Home Health West

A home health agency in Caldwell, Idaho 83605

211 E Logan Street, Caldwell, Idaho 83605. (208) 465-7121.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Oct 17, 2024: a recertification inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 17, 2024: recertification inspection2 deficiencies
  • Receive All Services In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 697 words

    “Receive all services in plan of care CFR(s): 484.50(c)(5) Receive all services outlined in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to ensure patients received services outlined in the plan of care for 2 of 12 patients (Patients #8 and #10) whose records were reviewed. This caused potential for patient needs not being met. Findings include: An agency policy titled, “Care Planning Process,” revised November 2020 stated, “Based on the assessment and findings, the approved medical provider-ordered plan of care will include … specific services and treatments to be provided.” The policy also stated, “Documentation of changes in the plan of care will include … progress towards measurable outcomes and goals.” This policy was not followed. Examples include: 1. Patient #8 was an 80 year old male admitted to the agency 4/15/24 with a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure. Additional diagnoses included type 2 diabetes and respiratory failure. He received PT and OT services. His record for the certification period 4/15/24 to 6/13/24 was reviewed. Patient #8’s SOC visit note was reviewed. It stated, “PATIENT IS SEATED AT DINING TABLE, FINISHING LUNCH, INLUDING POTATO CHIPS. HE CHOKED ON A SIP OF WATER, TURNING A DEEP RED, WHEN HE WAS ABLE TO START TO BREATH AGAIN. PER PATIENT AND AMY, PATIENT HAS HAD THESE EPISODES BEFORE BUT HAS HAD MORE LATELY,” and, “PLAN TO OBTAIN VERBAL AUTHORIZATION FOR: ADD-ON SLP EVAL [evaluation].” Patient #8’s POC, dated 4/15/24, and verbally authorized by the physician on the same day, included a speech therapy assessment. It stated, “SPEECH THERAPY EVALUATION. SPEECH THERAPIST TO ASSESS PATIENT AND INFORM PHYSICIAN OF FINDINGS TO ENABLE PHYSICIAN TO ESTABLISH AND INITIATE A PLAN OF CARE.” Patient #8’s record included a hospital hold order dated 4/23/24 which stated, “RESUME HOME HEALTH SERVICES FOR PHYSICAL THERAPY, SPEECH THERAPY UPON DISCHARGE FROM HOSPITAL/SNF AS APPROPRIATE.” Patient #8’s visit notes were reviewed. There was no speech therapy assessment documented during the certification period. The DCS was interviewed on 10/17/24 beginning at 9:30 AM and Patient #8’s medical record was reviewed in her presence. She stated Patient #8 was admitted to the hospital a few days after the SOC. She stated speech therapy was not added on the ROC order when Patient #8 was discharged from the hospital. She was unable to provide documentation why speech therapy was not ordered after Patient #8 was discharged from the hospital. She confirmed Patient #8 would have benefitted from a speech therapy assessment. 2. According to the American Heart Association, (https://www.heart.org/en/health-topics/heart-failure/warning-signs-of-heart-failure/managing-heart-failure-symptoms accessed 9/10/24), “Daily weight. Many people are first alerted to worsening heart failure when they notice a weight gain of more than two or three pounds in a 24-hour period or more than five pounds in a week. This weight gain may be due to retaining fluids since the heart is not functioning properly. It’s a good idea to track your weight and check in with your health care professional if you notice sudden changes.” This guideline was not followed. An example includes: Patient #10 was a 90 year old female admitted to the agency on 7/09/24 with a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Additional diagnoses included atrial fibrillation and respiratory failure. She received PT and OT services. Her record for the certification period 7/09/24 to 9/06/24 was reviewed. Patient #10’s POC, dated 7/09/24 included, “PATIENT/CAREGIVER WILL UNDERSTAND AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH MANAGEMENT OF CHF AS EVIDENCED BY … STABILIZED WEIGHT.” Patient #10’s medical record was reviewed. It included one weight documented on the SOC on 7/09/24. There were no other weights documented for the certification period. It was unclear how the agency tracked Patient #10’s weight if it was not assessed. The DCS was interviewed on 10/17/24 beginning at 9:30 AM and Patient #10’s medical record was reviewed in her presence. She confirmed there were no weights documented for Patient #10 after 7/09/24. She confirmed Patient #10’s weight should have been assessed on a regular basis. The agency failed to ensure patients received services as outlined in the POC.”

    Rule G0436. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 749 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the POC did not include all medications for 3 of 12 patients (Patients #1, #11, and #12) whose records were reviewed. Failure to include all medications created the potential for duplicate drug therapy or medication interactions. Findings include: An agency policy titled, “Medication Profile,” revised November 2020 stated, “Patient receiving medications administered by the organization will have a current, accurate medication profile in the clinical record. Medication profiles will be updated for each change to reflect current medications, new, and/or discontinued medications.” This policy was not followed. Examples include: 1. Patient #1 was a 71 year old female admitted to the agency on 5/10/24 with a primary diagnosis of hypothyroidism. Additional diagnoses included anxiety and dementia. She received PT services. Her record for the certification period 9/07/24 to 11/05/24 was reviewed. A visit to Patient #1’s ALF was conducted on 10/15/24 beginning at 10:05 AM. During the visit, a medication list was obtained from the facility. Patient #1’s medication list from the ALF was compared with the medication list from the agency. The following discrepancies were noted: - Acetaminophen 2 325 mg tablets: The ALF medication list stated to take every 4 hours. The agency medication list stated to take every 6 hours - Acetaminophen 650 mg extended release tablet: This medication was on the ALF medication list but not the agency medication list - Loperamide 2 2 mg tablet: This medication was on the ALF medication list but not the agency medication list - Mirtazapine 15 mg tablet: This medication was on the ALF medication list but not the agency medication list The DCS was interviewed on 10/17/24 beginning at 9:30 AM and Patient #1’s medications were reviewed in her presence. She confirmed the ALF medications did not match the agency medications. 2. Patient #11 was an 81 year old male admitted to the agency on 7/15/24 with a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis. Additional diagnoses included dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. His visit notes, infection report, and medication list were reviewed. Patient #11’s medical record included a PTA visit note dated 8/01/24. It stated, “ADD; DOXYCYLINE FOR UTI.” Patient #11’s medical record included an infection report dated 8/01/24 which stated he had a suspected urinary infection and had “CLOUDY FOUL URINE.” Patient #11’s medications were reviewed. There was no doxycycline added to Patient #11’s medication list. The DCS was interviewed on 10/17/24 beginning at 9:30 AM and Patient #11’s medications were reviewed in her presence. She confirmed doxycycline was not added to Patient #11’s medication list. 3. Patient #12 was a 92 year old female admitted to the agency 7/23/24 with a primary diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Additional diagnoses included subdural hematoma and heart disease. Her visit notes, infection report, and medication list were reviewed. Patient #12’s medical record included a PTA visit note dated 9/05/24 which stated, “PATIENT WENT TO URGENT CARE ON SUNDAY AND TO HER PCP ON TUEDAY [sic] DUE TO THROAT PAIN. PATIENT HAS A THROAT INFECTION AND WAS PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS FOR THE NEXT 14 DAYS.” Patient #12’s medical record included an infection report dated 9/05/24 which stated she had a throat infection and was prescribed fluconazole for the infection. Patient #12’s medications were reviewed. There was no fluconazole added to Patient #12’s medication list. The DCS was interviewed on 10/17/24 beginning at 9:30 AM and Patient #12’s medications were reviewed in her presence. She confirmed fluconazole was not added to Patient #12’s medication list. The agency failed to ensure the POC included all medications.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Oct 17, 2024Recertification inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Aug 24, 2018.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Cornerstone Healthcare Inc. owns 100% directly since Aug 1, 2024.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Brent Mills (corporate officer, 0%); Brent Guerisoli (corporate director, 0%); John Gochnour (corporate officer, 0%); Randy Schellhous (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Amber L Tueller (corporate officer, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Cornerstone Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 1, 2024
The Pennant Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Aug 1, 2024

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (267 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 80% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, better; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.64% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate6.70% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate3.90% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 83605, where this agency’s office is, 12 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 4.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.