Idaho Home Health & Hospice
A home health agency in Twin Falls, Idaho 83301
722 N College Rd 150, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301. (208) 734-4061.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.
- 3of 5 quality of patient care rating
- 4of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Feb 8, 2024: a recertification inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Feb 8, 2024: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
-
Authentication
The inspectors’ words, 544 words
“Authentication CFR(s): 484.110(b) Standard: Authentication. All entries must be legible, clear, complete, and appropriately authenticated, dated, and timed. Authentication must include a signature and a title (occupation), or a secured computer entry by a unique identifier, of a primary author who has reviewed and approved the entry. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to ensure death records were complete for 2 of 3 patients (Patients #3 & #6) who died and whose records were reviewed. Failure to document the cause of death for patients resulted in incomplete findings in the clinical record. Findings include: 1. Patient #3 was a 72 year old male admitted to the agency on 10/25/22 with a primary diagnosis of dysfunction of bladder. Additional diagnoses included urinary retention and urinary tract infection. He received SN services. His record for the certification period 10/20/23 to 12/18/23 was reviewed. Patient #3 died at home on 10/25/23. Patient #3’s medical record included a note dated 10/25/23 titled “Death at Home” signed by the RN. The note stated, “wife called to notify HH [home health] that patient had passed away in the night period MD notified.” There was no additional documentation about the death. There was no documentation how Patient #3 died or if the death was expected. Incident reports regarding Patient #3’s death were requested but not provided. The DCS was interviewed on 2/07/24 at 12:23 PM and Patient #3’s medical record was reviewed. The DCS confirmed there was no documentation about Patient #3’s cause of death. She stated he died of a suspected heart attack. She confirmed this should have been documented. Additionally, she stated there should have been an incident regarding Patient #3’s death, and there was not. 2. Patient #6 was a 68 year old male admitted to the agency on 1/18/23 with a primary diagnosis of alcohol use withdrawal. Additional diagnoses included hypertension, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. He received SN and PT services. His record for the certification period 1/24/23 to 3/24/23 was reviewed. Patient #6 died at home on 3/10/23. Patient #6’s medical record included a note dated 3/10/23 titled “Death at Home” signed by the RN. There was no documentation how Patient #6 died or if the death was expected. Patient #6’s medical record included a coordination note dated 3/10/23 which stated, “received report by coroners office on 3/10/ 23 that patient had died at home either last night or early this morning.” Patient #6’s medical record did not include any other documentation regarding his death. Incident reports regarding Patient #6’s death were requested but not provided. The DCS was interviewed on 2/07/24 at 12:23 PM and Patient #6’s medical record was reviewed. She confirmed there was no documentation regarding what happened around Patient #6’s death. She stated agency staff called the coroner on 2/07/24 who stated Patient #6’s cause of death was due to pneumonia, alcohol use, and chronic pain. She confirmed Patient #6’s record did not have documentation regarding his cause of death and should have. Additionally, she confirmed there should have been an incident report regarding Patient #6’s death and there was not. The agency failed to ensure clinical documentation was complete in patients who died.”
-
Patient’S Needs
The inspectors’ words, 561 words
“Patient’s needs CFR(s): 484.55(c)(4) The patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, social, and discharge planning needs; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to identify need for social work intervention during the initial comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 discharged patients (Patient #6) whose records were reviewed. This failure caused lack of social work interventions on a patient with identified problems with depression and alcohol use. Findings include: Patient #6 was a 68 year old male admitted to the agency on 1/18/23 with a primary diagnosis of alcohol use withdrawal. Additional diagnoses included hypertension, anxiety disorder, and schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. He received SN and PT services. His record for the certification period 1/24/23 to 3/24/23 was reviewed. Patient #6 died at home on 3/10/23. Patient #6’s record included an RN SOC admission dated 1/24/23. The admission visit note contained the following answers for Patient #6’s depression screening: “over the last two weeks have you been bothered by any of the following problems? … - little interest or pleasure in doing things … yes … 7 - 11 days (half or more of the days) - feeling down, depressed, or hopeless … yes … 7 – 11 days (half or more of the days) - feeling tired or having little energy … yes … 12 - 14 days (nearly every day) - feeling bad about yourself - or that you are a failure or have let yourself or your family down … yes … 12 - 14 days (nearly every day) - How often do you feel lonely or isolated from those around you? ... often - Cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric symptoms that are demonstrated at least once a week... Impaired decision-making: failure to perform usual ADLS or IADLS, inability to appropriately stop activities, jeopardizes safety through actions - Frequency of disruptive behavior symptoms (reported or observed) any physical, verbal, or other disruptive/ dangerous symptoms that are injurious to self or others or jeopardize personal safety ... at least daily” There was no documentation a Social Worker was contacted based off Patient #6’s depression screening on 1/24/23. Patient #6’s record included a PT evaluation dated 2/07/23. The visit note contained the following documentation: - “Patient was observed as drunk based on gait pattern, slowed visual scanning, strong smell of beer, multiple cans near patient, forgetfulness ... Therapist educated patient to use the walker always and that physical therapy will not be helpful until his drinking is controlled.” There was no documentation a Social Worker was contacted regarding the Physical Therapist’s observations on 2/07/23. Patient #6’s medical record included an RN visit note dated 3/07/23. The note stated the following: - “patient still drinking 3-4 + beers daily, drinking during visit. Encouraged patient to not drink but he now states hes [sic] never gonna [sic] stop drinking … patient verbalizes understanding but shows no signs of compliance. No other questions or concerns at this time.” There was no documentation a Social Worker was contacted regarding Patient #6’s identified alcohol concerns on 3/07/23. The DCS was interviewed on 2/07/24 at 12:23 PM and Patient #6’s medical record was reviewed. The DCS confirmed a Social Worker should have been ordered based on the identified issues with alcohol use and depression. The agency failed to provide a Social Worker for Patient #6.”
-
Discharge Plans Communication
The inspectors’ words, 508 words
“Discharge plans communication CFR(s): 484.60(c)(3)(ii) (ii) Any revisions related to plans for the patient’s discharge must be communicated to the patient, representative, caregiver, all physicians or allowed practitioner’s issuing orders for the HHA plan of care, and the patient’s primary care practitioner or other health care professional who will be responsible for providing care and services to the patient after discharge from the HHA (if any). This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on policy review, medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure a patient’s physician was notified a discharge was being considered prior to the discharge for 1 of 5 patients (Patient #7) who were discharged and whose records were reviewed. This caused a lack of coordination of after care between the agency and the physician. Findings include: An agency policy titled, “Coordination of Care, From Admit through Discharge,” revised 9/01/23 stated, “At admission, throughout care, and at discharge, coordination of services is promoted through routine communication with the patient’s physician: … When changes occur in the patient’s condition or response to treatment … when a missed visit occurs altering the plan of care.” This policy was not followed. An example includes: Patient #7 was a 56 year old male admitted to the agency on 8/01/23 with a primary diagnosis of disruption of surgical wound. Additional diagnoses included colon and lung cancer. He received SN, PT, and OT services. His record for the certification period 8/01/23 to 9/29/23 was reviewed. Patient #7 had nursing visits ordered twice weekly for wound care. There were no visits made to Patient #7 the weeks of 9/10/23 and 9/17/23. There were no missed visit notes documenting why the visits were missed. Patient #7’s record included a case conference note dated 9/20/23 which stated, “Patient not answering texts/calls for dc [discharge] visit. Unknown if wound present. If unable to locate may desk dc.” There was no documentation this was communicated to the physician. Patient #7’s record included a physician order dated 9/28/23 which stated, “per patient request would like to discharge from agency and has been refusing in person visits with no further communication.” Patient #7’s record included a discharge note dated 9/28/23. There was no documentation Patient #7’s physician was notified prior to 9/28/23 that a discharge due to refusal was being considered. Additionally, the weeks of 9/10/23 and 9/17/23 did not include documentation of attempts made to contact Patient #7 for visits and notification to the physician the visits were missed. There was no documentation Patient #7’s physician was notified a discharge was being considered. The DCS was interviewed on 2/07/24 at 12:23 PM and Patient #7’s medical record was reviewed. She confirmed the physician was not notified a discharge was being considered for Patient #7 until the day he was discharged. She confirmed there was no documentation of missed visits the weeks of 9/10/23 and 9/17/23. She confirmed the physician should have been notified prior to the discharge. The agency failed to notify the physician prior to Patient #7’s discharge.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2024 | Recertification inspection | 3 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 1, 1977.
- Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has anything been proven against it?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Idaho Health Care Group, LLC owns 100% directly since Jul 1, 2010.
- LHC Group Inc. runs it.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Amanda Torres (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Wendy Daigle (corporate director, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unitedhealth Group Incorporated | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 22, 2023 |
| LHC Group Inc. | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Jul 1, 2010 |
| LHC Group Inc. | Runs it (operational or managerial control) | 100% | Jul 1, 2010 |
| Idaho Health Care Group, LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Jul 1, 2010 |
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
- Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (298 surveys completed): 89% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 83% would definitely recommend it.
- CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5 | 4 of 5 |
| Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 93.53% (better than the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 11.65% (same as the national rate) |
| Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate | 3.29% (same as the national rate) |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 9 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 83301, where this agency’s office is, 9 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Quality rating |
|---|---|
| Idaho Home Health & Hospice This home health agency | 3 |
| Enhabit Home Health of Idaho | 3.5 |
| Visions Home Health & Visions Home Care LLC | 2.5 |
| Horizon Home Health Magic Valley | 4.5 |
| Auburn Crest Home Health LLC | 2.5 |
| A Bridge Home LLC | 2 |
| Intermountain Home Care of Cassia | 4 |
| St Lukes Home Care and Hospice | 3 |
| Heritage Home Health | 3.5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
- Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Care Agencies (6jpm-sxkc).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Patient Survey (ccn4-8vby).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR home health inspection reports (HHA_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency All Owners (fc009b2d-7846-44b1-b4a1-692f0c143879).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health Agency Enrollments (15f64ab4-3172-4a27-b589-ebd67a6d28aa).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Home Health ZIP Codes (m5eg-upu5).
Released Oct 21, 2026 and checked Oct 24, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.
From the agency
The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.