Hearth Record

First Choice Home Care

A home health agency in Boise, Idaho 83709

12400 West Overland Road, Suite 100, Boise, Idaho 83709. (208) 322-7061.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 23, 2025: a recertification inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 23, 2025: recertification inspection5 deficiencies
  • Receive All Services In Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “Receive all services in plan of care CFR(s): 484.50(c)(5) Receive all services outlined in the plan of care. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to ensure all elements of the POC were addressed at each visit for 1 of 17 patients (Patient #11) whose records were reviewed. Failure to address depression as stated in the POC had the potential to put all patients receiving services at risk of a negative outcome due to unmet needs. Findings include: An agency policy titled, “Orders for Care,” updated May 2024 stated, “The Agency will obtain orders and provide care in accordance with physician’s...orders which are established prior to initiating patient/client care.” This policy was not followed. An example included: Patient #11 was a 66 year old female admitted to the agency on 4/29/25 with a primary diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Additional diagnoses included left hemiparesis, epilepsy, optic neuritis and unspecified mood disorder. She received PT and OT services. Patient #11’s record was reviewed for the certification period of 4/29/25 to present. Patient #11’s POC orders included: “Physical therapy to monitor plan for current treatment of depression such as effects of medication and/or need for referral for other treatment.” POC goals included: “Verbalize/demonstrate ability to properly manage depression by DC. Depression was not addressed during the PTA visits of 5/08/25, 5/06/25, 5/13/25, or 5/15/25. The Clinical Supervisor was interviewed on 5/22/25 at 11:30 AM and Patient #11’s record was reviewed in her presence. She confirmed Patient #11’s POC included an order to address depression, but depression was not addressed in any of the above visits. The agency failed to address all orders in the POC. m”

    Rule G0436. Element-level.

  • Patient’S Needs

    The inspectors’ words, 459 words

    “Patient’s needs CFR(s): 484.55(c)(4) The patient’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, social, and discharge planning needs; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review, policy review, incident report review, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment included a patient’s nursing needs for 1 of 2 patients (Patient #9) whose records were reviewed and who died. Failure to recognize all relevant needs for all patients had the potential to put all patients receiving services at risk of a negative outcome due to unmet needs. Findings include: An agency policy titled, “Initial Patient/Client Comprehensive Assessment,” updated May 2024, stated, “The comprehensive assessment will include, but not be limited to the following: … The patient’s/client’s medical, nursing, rehabilitative, social, and discharge planning needs.” This policy was not followed. An example includes: Patient #9 was a 76 year old male admitted to the agency on 12/20/23 with a primary diagnosis of gastroenteritis with colitis. Additional diagnoses included orthostatic hypotension and end stage renal disease. He received PT services. His record for the certification period 12/20/23 to his death on 1/27/24 was reviewed. Patient #9’s SOC note dated 12/20/23 completed by the Physical Therapist. The note stated, “PATIENT WAS RECENTLY HOSPITALIZED FOR GASTROENTERITIS, COLITIS, AND ORTHOSTATIC HYPOTENSION. THE PATIENT’S BLOOD PRESSURE DROPS DRASTICALLY WHEN STANDING UP AND HE HAS HAD SOME RECENT FALLS.” It was unclear how a Physical Therapist would address Patient #9’s orthostatic hypotension which was causing his falls. Patient #9’s POC was reviewed. Twenty-nine diagnoses were listed which included but were not limited to hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, heart attack, heart block, pacemaker, and end stage renal disease with dialysis. Additionally, 15 medications were listed which included but were not limited to aspirin, calcitrol, fludrocortisone, hydrocodone acetaminophen, and midodrine. It was unclear how a Physical Therapist would manage Patient #9’s significant medical issues. Agency incident reports were reviewed which included an incident for Patient #9 on 1/30/24 which stated, “PER SPOUSE’S REPORT: PATIENT WENT TO THE BATHROOM AND STOOD UP AND WAS DIZZY SO HE LAID ON THE FLOOR. SHE COVERED HIM UP TO KEEP HIM WARM AND HE WAS GOING TO GET UP WHEN HIS BLOOD PRESSURE CAME BACK UP. SHE CHECKED ON HIM A COUPLE OF TIMES AND HE WAS OK THEN SHE CHECKED ON HIM AND HE WAS ‘GONE’.” The incident report also stated, “DEATH AT HOME. CHART AUDIT COMPLETED. NO ISSUES NOTED” The Clinical Supervisor was interviewed on 5/22/25 at 2:57 PM and Patient #9’s record was reviewed in her presence. She confirmed Patient #9 was medically complex. She agreed Patient #9 should have had nursing services involved, but stated she was not sure if it was brought up. The agency failed to recognize nursing needs for Patient #9.”

    Rule G0534. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 712 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, policy review, medical record review, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to ensure the POC included all relevant treatments and interventions for 1 of 2 patients (Patient #9) whose records were reviewed and who died and 1 of 7 patients (Patient #5) whose records were reviewed and for whom an observation was completed. Failure to recognize all relevant diagnoses and treatments put the patient at risk for unmet needs due to lack of assessment of a significant medical diagnosis. Findings include: An agency policy titled, “Plan of Care,” reviewed May 2024 stated, “The individualized Plan of Care must include the following: … The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; a. The POC should list required, non-routine supplies and equipment that are medically necessary for the patient’s/client’s care … Patient/client-specific interventions and education.” This policy was not followed. An example includes: Patient #9 was a 76 year old male admitted to the agency on 12/20/23 with a primary diagnosis of gastroenteritis with colitis. Additional diagnoses included orthostatic hypotension, end stage renal disease, and renal dialysis. He received PT services. His record for the certification period 12/20/23 to his death on 1/27/24 was reviewed. His end stage renal disease was listed as a severity of 2 which meant “Symptoms controlled with difficulty, affecting daily functioning; patient needs ongoing monitoring.” The PT SOC note, dated 12/20/23 was reviewed. It stated Patient #9 was on peritoneal dialysis. There were no interventions related to dialysis or end stage renal disease. There was no assessment of his peritoneal dialysis catheter. There was no information on what dialysis equipment Patient #9 used to complete his peritoneal dialysis. The Clinical Supervisor was interviewed on 5/22/25 at 2:57 PM and Patient #9’s record was reviewed in her presence. When asked what monitoring she would expect for a patient with end stage renal disease, she stated monitoring of weight, vital signs, and monitoring of the catheter site. She confirmed this monitoring was not present in Patient #9’s POC. The agency failed to ensure the POC included all relevant treatments and interventions. Patient #5 was an 84 year old female admitted to the agency on 5/09/25 with a primary diagnosis of age related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture of the left femur. Additional diagnoses included other specified cardiac arrhythmias, and hypercalcemia. Patient #5’s medical record was reviewed. A SOC visit note report narrative dated 5/09/25 stated, “PATIENT HAS A PHM [past medical history] OF: MILD DEMENTIA, OSTEOPENIA, URINARY RETENTION AND ARRHYTHMIA.” An observation of a HHA visit was completed on 5/21/25 at 10:15 AM. During the visit the patient was helped to sit on the toilet by the HHA and stated to the HHA, “I feel like I need to pee, and I can’t.” The patient then stated “Okay body just go” while motioning to her genital area. The patient sat on the toilet for several minutes struggling to urinate. The patient did not successful urinate during the visit. The Clinical Supervisor was interviewed on 5/22/25 at 2:47 PM and Patient #5’s record was reviewed in her presence. When asked if she would expect Patient #5’s urinary retention to be on the POC and monitored she stated, “Yes, since it is something that is currently affecting her.” She confirmed that the POC did not include Patient #5’s urinary retention.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Patient Medication Schedule/Instructions

    The inspectors’ words, 549 words

    “Patient medication schedule/instructions CFR(s): 484.60(e)(2) Patient medication schedule/instructions, including: medication name, dosage and frequency and which medications will be administered by HHA personnel and personnel acting on behalf of the HHA. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policies, it was determined the agency failed to ensure accurate medication reconciliation was completed for 1 of 7 patients who had observational visits by surveyors. This had the potential to affect all patients on service not receiving accurate medication reconciliation. Example included: An agency policy titled, “Medication List and Monitoring”, last reviewed May 2024, stated, “The Agency will maintain a current, accurate list of all prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) medications taken by the patient/client.” This policy was not followed. An example included: Patient #3 was a 76 year old male admitted to the agency on 4/14/25 with a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure. Additional diagnoses included acute and chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, Type 2 diabetes, venous insufficiency, unspecified open wounds, and personal history of urinary tract infections. An observational visit was performed with the RN on 5/21/25 beginning at 1:30 PM. During the visit, the RN reconciled medications with the patient. The patient stated he was still taking Bactrim twice daily for his UTI. The RN noted the antibiotic was not on the medication list. The RN asked the patient when he had started the Bactrim and patient stated he had been taking it since 5/12/25 when he had signs of a UTI. The RN was interviewed outside the patient home after the visit on 5/21/25 beginning at 2:45 PM. She agreed the Bactrim was not on the medication list prior to this visit and therefore, Patient #3’s medication list had not been accurate since 5/12/25. The agency failed to ensure all patients had accurate medications listed in their medical records. An agency policy titled, “Medication List and Monitoring,” last reviewed May 2024, stated, “The Agency will maintain a current, accurate list of all prescription and over-the-counter (OTC) medications taken by the patient/client.” This policy was not followed. An example included: Patient #3 was a 76 year old male admitted to the agency on 4/14/25 with a primary diagnosis of hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure. Additional diagnoses included acute and chronic combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, Type 2 diabetes, venous insufficiency, unspecified open wounds, and personal history of urinary tract infections. An observational visit was performed with the RN on 5/21/25 beginning at 1:30 PM. During the visit, the RN reconciled medications with the patient. The patient stated he was still taking Bactrim twice daily for his UTI. The RN noted the antibiotic was not on the medication list. The RN asked the patient when he had started the Bactrim and patient stated he had been taking it since 5/12/25 when he had signs of a UTI. The RN was interviewed outside the patient home after the visit on 5/21/25 beginning at 2:45 PM. She agreed the Bactrim was not on the medication list prior to this visit and therefore, Patient #3’s medication list had not been accurate since 5/12/25. The agency failed to ensure all patients had accurate medications listed in their medical records.”

    Rule G0616. Element-level.

  • Aides Are Members Of Interdisciplinary Team

    The inspectors’ words, 476 words

    “Aides are members of interdisciplinary team CFR(s): 484.80(g)(4) Home health aides must be members of the interdisciplinary team, must report changes in the patient’s condition to a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional, and must complete appropriate records in compliance with the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, medical record review, policy review, and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to ensure the home health aides were members of the interdisciplinary team and reported changes in the patient’s condition to a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional and completed appropriate records in compliance with the HHA’s policies and procedures. This directly affected 1 of 7 patients (Patient #5) whose records were reviewed and for whom an observation was completed. Failure to report changes in patients condition allowed the patient’s needs to go unmet and had the potential to affect all patients receiving care through the agency. Findings include: An agency policy titled, “Implementing Care and Treatment,” updated May 2024 stated, “The duties of the home health aide include, but are not limited to:……..6.Reporting changes in the patient’s/client’s condition or needs to a registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional; and 7. Completing appropriate documentation/records in compliance with the Agency’s policies and procedures.” This policy was not followed. An example includes: Patient #5 was an 84 year old female admitted to the agency on 5/09/25 with a primary diagnosis of Age related osteoporosis with current pathological fracture of the left femur. Additional diagnoses included other specified cardiac arrhythmias, and hypercalcemia. She received HHA and PT services. An observation of a HHA visit was completed on 5/21/25 at 10:15 AM. During the visit the patient was helped to sit on the toilet by the HHA and stated to the HHA, “I feel like I need to pee, and I can’t.” The patient sat on the toilet for several minutes struggling to urinate. The patient did not urinate during the visit. On 5/22/25 Patient #5’s visit note report for the previous observed visit was reviewed. It did not include mention of the patient having the sensation of the need to urinate but not being able to urinate successfully. The Clinical Supervisor was interviewed on 5/22/25 at 2:47 PM and Patient #5’s record was reviewed in her presence. The observation of the patient struggling to urinate was shared with her and she was asked if the HHA would be expected to document the patient struggling to urinate and report to the registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional. The clinical supervisor stated she would expect the findings to be reported, and she acknowledge it was not documented and it was not reported to the case manager. The agency failed to ensure changes in patient condition was reported to the registered nurse or other appropriate skilled professional. m”

    Rule G0804. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 23, 2025Recertification inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Nov 10, 2004.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • A Better Way Health Management, Inc. owns 100% directly since Aug 15, 2012.
  • 2 owners or officers are people: Catherine E. Jerrems (managing employee (on the payroll)); Larry Nabb (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
A Better Way Health Management, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Aug 15, 2012
Jet Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Apr 26, 2019
Sv Life Sciences Fund VI LPOwns 5% or more through other companies54.9%Jan 1, 2025
Health Enterprise Partners II, LPOwns 5% or more through other companies27.4%Apr 26, 2019

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3.5 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (424 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3.5 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 54 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate87.74% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate9.98% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.68% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 12 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 83709, where this agency’s office is, 12 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.75 of 5, and this one is rated 3.5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.