Hearth Record

Home Health Specialty Services, Inc.

A home health agency in Hamden, Connecticut 06514

2524 Dixwell Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut 06514. (203) 288-8200.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 24, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jul 24, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Ep Training And Testing

    The inspectors’ words, 518 words

    “EP Training and Testing CFR(s): 484.102(d) §403.748(d), §416.54(d), §418.113(d), §441.184(d), §460.84(d), §482.15(d), §483.73(d), §483.475(d), §484.102(d), §485.68(d), §485.542(d), §485.625(d), §485.727(d), §485.920(d), §486.360(d), §491.12(d), §494.62(d). *[For RNCHIs at §403.748, ASCs at §416.54, Hospice at §418.113, PRTFs at §441.184, PACE at §460.84, Hospitals at §482.15, HHAs at §484.102, CORFs at §485.68, REHs at §485.542, CAHs at §486.625, “Organizations” under 485.727, CMHCs at §485.920, OPOs at §486.360, and RHC/FHQs at §491.12:] (d) Training and testing. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(d):] (d) Training and testing. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least annually. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(d):] Training and testing. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training and testing program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training and testing program must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. The ICF/IID must meet the requirements for evacuation drills and training at §483.470(i). *[For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(d):] Training, testing, and orientation. The dialysis facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness training, testing and patient orientation program that is based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, policies and procedures at paragraph (b) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The training, testing and orientation program must be evaluated and updated at every 2 years. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the agency Emergency Preparedness Plan, the agency failed to identify the scheduling and completion of a review of the agency Emergency Preparedness risk assessment and response plan, and failed to identify the participation in an annual testing exercise, including the inclusion of a full scale exercise every 2 years, during the calendar years 2022 and 2023. Review of the the agency Emergency Preparedness Plan with the Administrator on 7/24/24 at 11:00am, failed to identify the scheduling and completion of an agency specific and/or participation in a municipal sponsored tabletop exercise that included a group discussion using a narrative , clinically relevant emergency scenarios, and problem statements with resolutions, along with documentation of tabletop exercises summary.”

    Rule E0036. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 359 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on an onsite observations, interview with agency personnel, and review of agency policy, for one (1) of five (5) patients (Patient #4), receiving skilled nursing services, the agency personnel failed to utilize accepted infection control practice techniques during a nursing visit. The findings include. Patient # 4 had a start of care date to the home care agency on 4/7/23, with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus -Type II, Hypertension, Dysphagia, Epilepsy, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), with forgetfulness. Review of the physician orders for certification period dated 5/31/24 through 7/29/24 identified skilled nursing visits daily (7 days a week) for eight weeks, and 2 times for 1 week, for daily medication administration, general health evaluation, reinforcement of diabetic education, blood glucose monitoring, weekly medication pre-pour for evening medication self administration by patient, and diet compliance education. During a joint onsite home nursing visit with Registered Nurse (RN #1) on 7/23/24 at 8:15am, medication administration, weekly evening medication pre-pour, and a nursing health evaluation visit, the surveyor observed RN #1 perform a blood pressure evaluation utilizing a blood pressure cuff and stethoscope from her agency nursing bag, but failed to identify RN #1 cleaned/disinfected the equipment at the completion of the patient evaluation before replacing it in her agency nursing bag. Interview with the agency Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) and the agency Administrator (Admin.) on 7/24/24 at 11:00am, identified all direct care staff complete onboard and annual training that includes education and updates on the agency infection control practices, and proper nursing bag technique, but failed to identify that RN #1 followed the agency policy on Nursing Bag technique. Review of the agency policy for Nursing Bag Technique, identified all agency visiting home health providers will utilize proper nursing bag technique. All visiting home health providers that have utilized reusable equipment, including a blood pressure cuff, and stethoscope etc., must be cleaned with 70% isopropyl alcohol before returning to the bag.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Services By Skilled Professionals

    The inspectors’ words, 594 words

    “Services by skilled professionals CFR(s): 484.75(a) Standard: Provision of services by skilled professionals. Skilled professional services are authorized, delivered, and supervised only by health care professionals who meet the appropriate qualifications specified under §484.115 and who practice according to the HHA’s policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, review of agency documentation, review of agency policy, and interview with agency personnel, for one (1) of five (5) patients (Patient #4), receiving daily medication administration and weekly medication pre pour from the agency, the agency personnel failed to monitor, evaluate and supervise the Registered Nurse staff, in the delivery of skilled nursing services. The findings include. Patient # 4 had a start of care date to the home care agency on 4/7/23, with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus -Type II, Hypertension, Dysphagia, Epilepsy, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), with Forgetfulness. Review of the physician orders for certification period dated 5/31/24 through 7/29/24 identified skilled nursing visits daily (7 days a week) for eight weeks and 2 times for 1 week, for daily medication administration, general health evaluation, reinforcement of diabetic education, and blood glucose monitoring, weekly medication pre-pour for evening medication self-administration by patient, and diabetic diet compliance. During a joint home nursing visit with Registered Nurse (RN#1) on 7/23/24 at 8:15am, for medication administration, medication pre-pour, and a nursing health evaluation. The surveyor observed LPN #1 perform a blood pressure evaluation, removing and utilizing a blood pressure cuff and stethoscope from her agency nursing bag, but failed to identify RN #1 cleaned/disinfected the equipment at the completion of the evaluation for patient, before replacing it in her agency nursing bag. During the same joint onsite visit with RN #1 on 7/23/24, the surveyor observed the nurse prepare the morning oral medications, including an injectable medication syringe of Insulin Glargine (Lantus Solostar) 100units/ml (per milliliter) 20 units for administration, without the use of a paper and/or electronic medication administration record (MAR). While RN #1 was preparing Patient #1’s, she turned to this surveyor and said, “ I have memorized all his meds, I’ve done them for so long”. Interview with the agency Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) and the Administrator (Admin.) on 7/24/24 at 11:00am, identified all direct care staff complete onboarding and annual training that includes education and updates on the agency infection control practices, including proper nursing bag technique, and medication profile reconciliation, medication administration and medication pre-pour techniques, along with the corresponding policy reviews. The SCS identified that all staff are expected to clean/disinfect any equipment at the completion of a task, before being stored in the nursing bag. The SCS further identified that all care providers are supplied with computer tablets, for use during each home visits. Medication profile reconciliation, new medication order verification and review of the patient’s medication administration record (MAR) are to be completed at every nursing visit, per agency policy, but failed to identify the monitoring and evaluation of the RN’s performance in the provision of services, treatments and care, and adherence to the agency policies. Review of the agency policy for Nursing Bag Technique, identified all agency visiting home health providers will utilize proper nursing bag technique. All visiting home health providers that have utilized reusable equipment, including a blood pressure cuff, and stethoscope etc., must be cleaned with 70% isopropyl alcohol before returning to the bag. Review of the agency policy on medication administration identified that medication will be administered only per the order of a physician, and the medication profile must be reconciled at each visit.”

    Rule G0702. Standard-level.

  • Provide Services In The Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 400 words

    “Provide services in the plan of care CFR(s): 484.75(b)(3) Providing services that are ordered by the physician or allowed practitioner as indicated in the plan of care; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on clinical record review, review of agency documentation, observation, review of agency policy and interviews with agency personnel, for one (1) of five (5) patients (Patient #4), the agency failed to ensure that care delivered was in accordance to the physician ordered plan of care, in accordance to the agency policy. The findings include. Patient # 4 had a start of care date to the home care agency on 4/7/23, with diagnoses that included Diabetes Mellitus -Type II, Hypertension, Dysphagia, Epilepsy, Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), with forgetfulness. Review of the physician orders for certification period dated 5/31/24 through 7/29/24 identified skilled nursing visits daily ( 7 days a week) for eight weeks and 2 times for 1 week, for daily medication administration, general health evaluation, reinforcement of diabetic education, and blood glucose monitoring, weekly medication pre-pour for evening medication self administration by patient, and diet compliance, During a joint onsite home nursing visit with Registered Nurse (RN #1) on 7/23/24 at 8:15am, for medication administration, medication pre-pour, and a nursing health evaluation. The surveyor observed RN #1 perform a medication administration and weekly pre pour of the patient’s evening self administered medications, but failed to identify RN #1 reconciled the patient’s medications, or utilized a written or computerized medication list for the morning medication administration, and for the evening medication pre pour. Interview with agency Supervisor of Clinical Services (SCS) and the Administrator (Admin.) on 7/24/24 at 11:00am, identified all direct care staff complete onboard and annual training that includes education and updates on the agency policy for medication administration and medication pre pours. The SCS further identified that all care providers are supplied with computer tablets, for use during each home visits for medication reconciliation, order verification and review of the patient’s medication administration record (MAR) during a medication administration and medication pre-pour, per agency policy, but failed to identify the monitoring and evaluation of the RN’s performance in the provision of services, treatments and care, and adherence to the agency policies. Review of the agency policy on Medication Administration identified that medication will be administered only per the order of a physician, and the medication profile must be reconciled at each visit.”

    Rule G0710. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 24, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 8, 2015.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 5 owners or officers are people: Janine Martino (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Janine Martino (corporate officer, 50%); Derrick C Gibbs (owns 5% or more directly, 50%); Silvana C Kokkoros (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Derrick C Gibbs (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (64 surveys completed): 74% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 69% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 52 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate78.58% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.62% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.11% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 30 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 06514, where this agency’s office is, 25 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.