Hearth Record

Chi St Vincent Hot Springs Health at Home

A home health agency in Hot Springs National, Arkansas 71913

220 Mcauley Court, Hot Springs National, Arkansas 71913. (501) 318-6800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 21, 2024: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 21, 2024: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Plan Of Care

    The inspectors’ words, 386 words

    “Plan of care CFR(s): 484.60(a)(1) Each patient must receive the home health services that are written in an individualized plan of care that identifies patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals, and which is established, periodically reviewed, and signed by a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatry acting within the scope of his or her state license, certification, or registration. If a physician or allowed practitioner refers a patient under a plan of care that cannot be completed until after an evaluation visit, the physician or allowed practitioner is consulted to approve additions or modifications to the original plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: This STANDARD is NOT MET as evidenced by: Based on Clinical Record Review, observation and staff interview, it was determined the Agency Staff failed to ensure 16 of 18 records reviewed had an individualized plan of care that identified the patient-specific measurable outcomes and goals which were established, periodically reviewed, and signed by the patients physician or practitioner, Specifically, the Clinical Records lacked parameters for measuring the patients pain. This had the potential to affect all patients on census in that a clinician should have the ability to measure and document any pain the patient may have had prior to treatment, during the delivery of care and treatment, after treatment or as an unusual symptom. Without the ability to measure and reassess or remeasure the patients pain, there is no way a physician or practitioner can make an informed decision to intervene with changes to Plan of Care. It was determined during review, all but two Clinical Records record to have a pain parameter. (#6 and #13 were the exception). All Home Health Plan of Care And Certifications for each patient had the following: “Skilled Nurse for observation/Assessment of pain, effectiveness of pain management including medication review and pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments and skilled teaching related to pain management. Skilled nurse to intervene with increased pain level to minimize complications.” On observation during home visits, Surveyor noticed the lack of Skilled Nurse (SN) asking about patient’s discomfort or pain. The Surveyor observed a patient exhibit physical indications of pain AEB: grimace, wince, grunting and holding breath during wound care. On 11/21/2024 at 10:00 AM, Agency Representative #1 agreed that there was a lack of pain parameters on the Agency’s Clinical Records.”

    Rule G0572. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 654 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on Clinical Record review and staff interview, it was determined the Agency failed to assure all medications were included in a comprehensive medication review to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy in seven (#2, #4, #5, #8, #9, #10, #12) of Eighteen (#1-#18) records reviewed Findings follow: 1. Review of Record #2 revealed the following: a) A document titled “Home Health Certification And Plan of Care” with dates of 08/30/2024-10/28/2024 diagnosis of “dependence on supplimental oxygen” b) A document titled “Client Medication Report “ lists Oxygen 3 liters continuous. When viewed on the computer screen, it is colored in blue to indicate it was not checked against all other medications. 2. Review of Record #4 revealed: a) Document titled “Home Health Certification And Plan of Care” with dates of 10/18/2024-12/16/2024 showed a diagnosis of “Dependence on Supplimental Oxygen” b) A document titled “Client Medication Report” with Oxygen 2 liters, continuous. When viewed on the computer screen, this medication is blued out, indicating it was not checked against all other medications. 3. Review of Record #5 showed: a) Document titled “Home Health Certification And Plan of Care dated 10/20/2024-12/18/2024, listed a diagnosis of “Dependence on Supplimental Oxygen” b) A document titled “Client Medication Record” with Oxygen 2 liters, continuous. When viewed on the computer screen, this medication is highlighted by the color blue to indicate the EMR system did not check it against all other medications. 4. Review of Record #8 revealed: a) Document titled “Home Health Certification And Plan of Care” with dates of 10/24/2024-12/22/2024 and listing a diagnosis of “Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia”. b) Document titled “Client Medication Report” with Oxygen-use via Trilogy at bedtime. May increase to 4lpm (liters per minute) for shortness of breath. When this is viewed on the computer screen, the Oxygen is highlighted in the color blue to indicate it is not checked against all other medications by the computer program used. 5. Review of Record #9 showed: a) Document titled “Home Health Certification And Plan of Care” with dates of 10/19/2024-12/17/2024 showed a diagnosis of “Malignant Neoplasm of Esophagus (growing cancer of the throat) b) A document titled “Client Medication Report” with a listing of “Marijuana (cannabis) oral edible every three hours for pain. When this medication is viewed on the computer screen, it shows up highlighted in blue indicating it isn’t checked against all other medications in the patients record. 6. Review of Record # 10 revealed the following: a) Document titled “Home Health Certification And Plan of Care” dated 11/14/2024-01/12/2025 with diagnosis of “Acute and Chronic Respiratory failure.” b) A physicians order from above named document stating, “Instruct patient/caregiver in oxygen therapy including administration, care of equipment and safety. c) A document titled “Client Medication Record” without oxygen listed as a medication. 7. Review of record #12 showed: a) A document titled, “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” with dates of 10/12/24 to 12/10/24 listed a diagnosis of Encounter for attention to colostomy and Hypertension. b) A document titled, “Client Medication Report” listed Magnesium Glycinate 800 mg (milligrams) with Zinc and Vitamin D3 by mouth at bedtime. When this medication is viewed in the computer system, it is highlighted in blue indicating it was not checked against all other medications. On 11/21/2024 at 10:15 AM, Agency Representative #1 was asked to present evidence that the medications above were reconciled against all other client medications. Agency Representative #1 stated, “There isn’t any. We need to work on that.””

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 383 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on Clinical Record Review and Agency staff interview, the Agency staff failed to ensure the patients Plan of Care (POC) included the required elements of all patient specific interventions, education, measurable outcomes, goals and supplies and equipment specific to the individual patient in 1 (#13) 0f 18 records reviewed. Review of Record #13 revealed the following: a. A document titled, “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” with dates of 09/28/24 to 11/26/24 listed a diagnosis of Encounter for Fitting and Adjustment of Urinary Device, Paraplegia. b. The Plan of Care documented, “…Skilled nurse for insertion of catheter using 20G [gauge], 30 ml [milliliters] balloon. Change every 3 weeks and prn [as needed] dislodgement or stoppage…” c. The Skilled Nurse Coordination notes dated 10/24/24, 10/03/24, and 09/12/24 documented the patient has a coude’ catheter. ( A coude’ catheter is a type of urinary catheter that has a curved tip, allowing it to navigate around obstructions in the urethra). d. On 11/20/24 at 10:30 a.m., during a home visit, it was noted the patient has a coude’ catheter. e. On 11/20/24 at 3:50 p.m., Agency Representative #1 was asked about the patient having a coude’ catheter vs. an indwelling foley catheter and the physician’s order is not specific to which type of catheter. She stated, “I’ll look at that. I believe it should be in there.””

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Interventions And Patient Response

    The inspectors’ words, 271 words

    “Interventions and patient response CFR(s): 484.110(a)(2) All interventions, including medication administration, treatments, and services, and responses to those interventions; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on Clinical Record review and staff interview, it was determined the Agency failed to ensure documentation of wound measurements and assessment, including late entry documentation, of all assessments and wound measurement in 1 (#13) of 18 (#1-#18) medical records reviewed. Wound measurements are important as they monitor the healing process and determine if a wound is getting better or worse by tracking the changes in its size over time. This failed practice had the potential to affect all patients on census in that direct caregivers and practitioners would not have a full and accurate patient file to reference and use for care planning.. Review of Record #13 revealed the following: a. A document titled, “Home Health Certification and Plan of Care” with dates of 11/13/24 to 01/11/25 listed a diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism. b. The Plan of Care documented an order for a dressing change to an open wound to Left Lower Extremity two times weekly. c. There were no measurements of the wound by the agency personnel in the clinical record since admission on 11/13/24. d. On 11/20/24, Agency Representative #1 was asked for additional measurements completed by the agency personnel and there was none. The Skilled Nurse visit dated 11/18/24 had an assessment but not a measurement of the wound. e. On 11/21/24, Agency Representative #1 provided a Skin and Wound Care Protocol which documented, “… Wound Measurements Time Period: Weekly (or with each visit if frequency is less than weekly).”

    Rule G1014. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 21, 2024Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jul 26, 1976.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer speech pathology and medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Chi National Services LLC owns 100% directly since Nov 14, 2014.
  • Consolidated Health Services LLC runs it.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Loretta Sanford (managing employee (on the payroll)); Daniel Scott Dietz (corporate officer); Jack D Hawkins (corporate officer).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Commonspirit Health at Home, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 1, 2022
Chi National Services LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Nov 14, 2014
Consolidated Health Services LLCRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Nov 14, 2014
Health at Home Blocker, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies67%Dec 1, 2022
Health at Home Holdco, LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies33%Dec 1, 2022
Commonspirit HealthOwns 5% or more through other companiesNov 14, 2014

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (196 surveys completed): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 82% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, worse; potentially preventable hospital stays, worse; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate69.05% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate14.25% (worse than the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.17% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 71913, where this agency’s office is, 9 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 3.5 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 9 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 71913
PlaceQuality rating
Chi St Vincent Hot Springs Health at Home This home health agency4
Center Well Home Health4
Elite Home Health3
Commonspirit Health3.5
Elite Home Health3.5
Stat Home Health - Cenark, LLC2.5
Trinity Home Health of Arkansas3
Care IV Home Health3.5
Baptist Health Home-Health Arkadelphia2

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.