Hearth Record

Evergreen Home Care

A home health agency in Evergreen, Alabama 36401

308 South Main Street, Evergreen, Alabama 36401. (251) 578-6800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Aug 13, 2025: a recertification inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 13, 2025: recertification inspection4 deficiencies
  • Develop Ep Plan, Review And Update Annually

    The inspectors’ words, 334 words

    “Develop EP Plan, Review and Update Annually CFR(s): 484.102(a) §403.748(a), §416.54(a), §418.113(a), §441.184(a), §460.84(a), §482.15(a), §483.73(a), §483.475(a), §484.102(a), §485.68(a), §485.542(a), §485.625(a), §485.727(a), §485.920(a), §486.360(a), §491.12(a), §494.62(a). The [facility] must comply with all applicable Federal, State and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [facility] must develop establish and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section. The emergency preparedness program must include, but not be limited to, the following elements: (a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [reviewed], and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do all of the following: * [For hospitals at §482.15 and CAHs at §485.625(a):] Emergency Plan. The [hospital or CAH] must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local emergency preparedness requirements. The [hospital or CAH] must develop and maintain a comprehensive emergency preparedness program that meets the requirements of this section, utilizing an all-hazards approach. * [For LTC Facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. * [For ESRD Facilities at §494.62(a):] Emergency Plan. The ESRD facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be [evaluated], and updated at least every 2 years. . This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the agency’s Emergency Preparedness (EP) documentation and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to develop and maintain a comprehensive EP plan that was reviewed and updated at least every two years. This had the potential to negatively affect all 25 patients serviced by the agency and agency employees. Findings include: A review of the agency’s EP plan revealed there was no documentation the agency had reviewed and updated their EP plan since 2020. An interview was conducted on 8/13/25 at 2:00 PM with Employee Identifier # 1, Director, who confirmed the agency failed to review and update the EP plan at least every two years.”

    Rule E0004. Standard-level.

  • Plan Based On All Hazards Risk Assessment

    The inspectors’ words, 438 words

    “Plan Based on All Hazards Risk Assessment CFR(s): 484.102(a)(1)-(2) §403.748(a)(1)-(2), §416.54(a)(1)-(2), §418.113(a)(1)-(2), §441.184(a)(1)-(2), §460.84(a)(1)-(2), §482.15(a)(1)-(2), §483.73(a)(1)-(2), §483.475(a)(1)-(2), §484.102(a)(1)-(2), §485.68(a)(1)-(2), §485.542(a)(1)-(2), §485.625(a)(1)-(2), §485.727(a)(1)-(2), §485.920(a)(1)-(2), §486.360(a)(1)-(2), §491.12(a)(1)-(2), §494.62(a)(1)-(2) [(a) Emergency Plan. The [facility] must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following:] (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach.* (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. * [For Hospices at §418.113(a):] Emergency Plan. The Hospice must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment, including the management of the consequences of power failures, natural disasters, and other emergencies that would affect the hospice’s ability to provide care. *[For LTC facilities at §483.73(a):] Emergency Plan. The LTC facility must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least annually. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing residents. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. *[For ICF/IIDs at §483.475(a):] Emergency Plan. The ICF/IID must develop and maintain an emergency preparedness plan that must be reviewed, and updated at least every 2 years. The plan must do the following: (1) Be based on and include a documented, facility-based and community-based risk assessment, utilizing an all-hazards approach, including missing clients. (2) Include strategies for addressing emergency events identified by the risk assessment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of the agency’s Emergency Preparedness (EP) documentation and staff interview, it was determined the agency failed to develop and maintain an EP plan specific to the location of the agency, considering particular hazards most likely to occur in the surrounding area (Hazard Risk Assessment) at least every two years. This had the potential to negatively affect all 25 patients served by the agency and agency employees. Findings include: A review of the agency’s EP plan revealed there was no documentation the agency had completed a Hazard Risk Assessment, specific to the location of the agency, since 2022. An interview was conducted on 8/13/25 at 2:00 PM with Employee Identifier # 1, Director, who confirmed the agency failed to complete the Hazard Risk Assessment every two years.”

    Rule E0006. Standard-level.

  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 480 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, agency policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, it was determined the agency failed to ensure staff followed agency policy to prevent the spread of infection. This deficient practice did affect Home Visit (HV) # 2 and had the potential to negatively affect all patients admitted to this agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Home Care Bag Policy Number: Not Listed Revised: 6/2022 Policy: ...The home Care Bag will provide the basic equipment and supplies ... The Home Care Bag shall be used to prevent the potential spread of infection between and among staff and patients. Procedure: ... 4. Handwashing supplies shall be kept in the outermost pocket of the Home Care Bag for easy accessibility... 1. HV # 2 was admitted on 7/16/25 with diagnoses including Laceration Without Foreign Body, Right Lower Leg, Cellulitis of Right Lower Leg, and Chronic Kidney Disease. A HV was conducted on 8/12/25 at 9:50 AM to observe wound care provided by Employee Identifier (EI) # 2, Licensed Practical Nurse. The following is a summary of the visit: EI # 2 obtained Vital Signs, removed hand sanitizer from the uniform pocket, performed hand hygiene, then placed the sanitizer bottle back in the uniform pocket. EI # 2 then applied gloves, placed a plastic bag over the trash receptacle, removed gloves, removed sanitizer bottle from the pocket, performed hand hygiene, then returned the sanitizer bottle to the pocket. EI # 2 applied gloves, cleaned the re-useable vital sign equipment with disinfecting wipes, removed gloves, removed hand sanitizer from the pocket, performed hand hygiene, then returned the sanitizer bottle to the pocket. EI # 2 applied gloves, removed the soiled dressing from the right lower leg, removed gloves, removed sanitizer bottle from the pocket, performed hand hygiene, then returned the sanitizer bottle to the pocket. EI # 2 applied gloves, performed wound cleansing, removed gloves, removed hand sanitizer bottle from the pocket, performed hand hygiene, then returned the sanitizer bottle to the pocket. EI # 2 applied gloves, applied Xeroform gauze to wound bed, removed gloves, then performed hand hygiene with hand sanitizer from the uniform pocket. EI # 2 applied gloves, applied bordered dressing to the wound, removed gloves, then performed hand hygiene with the hand sanitizer from the uniform pocket. An interview was conducted on 8/13/25 at 8:15 AM with EI # 2 who confirmed he/she used the hand sanitizer from the uniform pocket each time hand hygiene was required. An interview was conducted on 8/13/25 at 1:30 PM with EI # 1, Director, who confirmed the agency failed to ensure staff followed the agency policy for hand hygiene and storing of hand sanitizer.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 591 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, agency policy and procedure, medical record (MR) review, and interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure medications in the home were reconciled with the current physician’s medication orders. This deficient practice affected one of three home visit (HV) patients, including HV # 3, and had the potential to affect all patients admitted to this agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Medication Management Policy Number: Not Listed Revised: 9/2019 Purpose: It is the policy of Evergreen Home Care to ensure that every patient has an accurate and complete list of patient medications they are taking at home recorded in their medical record... A medication list is completed at the time of the patient’s start of care and updated as medications are added, changed, or discontinued. ...It is the policy of ... that the Skilled Nurse (SN) assess home medications on each visit... 1. HV # 3 was admitted on 8/1/25 with diagnoses including Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Foot Ulcer, Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of Right Foot, and Pressure Ulcer of Other Site, Stage 2. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 8/1/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for one week, two visits per week for eight weeks, then one visit per week for one week. SN to perform medication review each skilled nursing visit and reconcile medications as indicated. A HV was conducted on 8/12/25 at 2:30 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 3, Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA). A review of the home medications was conducted with HV # 3 at the completion of the PTA visit. The following is a list of the medication discrepancies: 1. Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) take one daily was listed on the Medication Profile (MP). HV # 3 stated he/she had not been taking the Aspirin for three to four years. 2. Metformin 500 mg take one half tablet twice daily was listed on the MP. HV # 3 stated he/she has not taken the Metformin for over a year. 3. Gabapentin 300 mg take two tablets three times a day was in the home but not on the MP. HV # 3 stated he/she had been taking the Gabapentin for leg pain for a few years. 4. Clopidogrel 75 mg take one daily, prescription bottle dated 8/4/25, was in the home and not on the MP. HV # 3 stated he/she had been taking the medication since the prescription was filled on 8/4/25. Review of the SN Visit Notes revealed SN visits on 8/7/25 and 8/11/25. 5. Allopurinol 300 mg take one daily, prescription bottle dated 7/31/25, was in the home but not on the MP. HV # 3 stated he/she had been taking the medication since the prescription was filled on 7/31/25. Review of the SN Visit Notes revealed SN visits on 8/4/25, 8/7/25, and 8/11/25. 6. Empagliflozin 25 mg take one half tablet every morning was in the home but not on the MP. HV # 3 stated he/she had been taking the medication for over a year. An interview was conducted on 8/13/25 at 1:40 PM with EI # 1, Director, who confirmed the medications were not reconciled during each SN visit per agency policy.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Aug 13, 2025Recertification inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 12, 1993.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care and physical therapy.
  • Doesn’t offer occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Evergreen Medical Center LLC owns an unstated share directly since Feb 1, 2008.
  • 3 owners or officers are people: Kenneth Jeremy Craig (corporate officer, 0%); Melissa Dunn (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); James M Scott (owns 5% or more directly).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 3 of 5.
  • CMS gives no : “Fewer than 70 patients completed the survey.”
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, the same; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars3 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 5Not rated
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate73.92% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.09% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.61% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36401, where this agency’s office is, 11 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.