Hearth Record

D W Mcmillan Home Health

A home health agency in Brewton, Alabama 36426

114 W Jackson Street, Brewton, Alabama 36426. (251) 867-5054.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 26, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Element-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 26, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • A Review Of All Current Medications

    The inspectors’ words, 869 words

    “A review of all current medications CFR(s): 484.55(c)(5) A review of all medications the patient is currently using in order to identify any potential adverse effects and drug reactions, including ineffective drug therapy, significant side effects, significant drug interactions, duplicate drug therapy, and noncompliance with drug therapy. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of medical records (MR), observations, agency policy and procedures and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to keep the medication profile (MP) current. This did affect two of four home visits (HV) including HV # 1, HV # 3, and two of three active MR reviews including MR # 2 and MR # 4, and had the potential to negatively affect all persons served by the agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Monitoring Medications Policy Number: 10.008 Revised Date: 7/1/24 Purpose: To provide a process to ensure continuous monitoring of medications in the patient’s home. Policy: A drug regimen review will be performed on all patient’s in conjunction with all comprehensive assessments. Additionally, all clinicians will participate in medication review and reconciliation throughout the episode... Procedure: 1. The discipline responsible for the drug regimen review will: a. Compare medication list... to actual medications patient is taking. b. Review all medications including over the counter (OTC) medications, vitamins, herbs and herbal products, cream and topical ointments... 3.MR # 4 was admitted on 9/30/24 with diagnoses including Lobar Pneumonia, Unspecified Organism, and Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. Review of the SN Visit Report documentation dated 9/30/24 shows patient was on oxygen via nasal cannula intermittent. The CMR dated 9/30/24 revealed no documentation of oxygen on the MP. An interview was conducted on 6/26/25 at 12:58 PM with EI # 1 who confirmed the agency failed to ensure medications were reconciled and all current medications were listed on the MP. 4.HV # 3 was admitted on 5/27/25 with diagnoses including Encounter for Surgical Aftercare following Surgery on the Circulatory System, and Atherosclerosis of Aorta. Review of the HHC and POC certification period 5/27/25 to 7/25/25 revealed orders for the SN to visit two times for one week, then once a week for eight weeks, Physical Therapy (PT) to visit once a week for one week then, three times a week for one week, two times a week for three weeks, then once a week for three weeks, and Occupational Therapy to visit once a week for four weeks. A HV was conducted on 6/24/25 at 1:44 PM with EI # 3, Physical Therapy Assistant, (PTA). A comparison was made between medications observed in the home and the MP dated 6/24/25 provided by the agency prior to HV. The following medications were on the MP, but “she no longer takes those and hasn’t for several months” per the caregiver. a. Clearlax 17 Gram/Dose Oral Powder, take only as needed. b. Clopidogrel 75 mg (milligram) tablet, daily. c. Estradiol 2 mg tablet, daily. d. Ondansetron 4 mg disintegrating tablet, take only as needed, every 6 hours. An interview was conducted on 6/24/25 at 2:15 PM with EI # 3 who confirmed staff failed to follow agency policy for medication reconciliation and failed to keep the medication profile current. 1. HV # 1 was admitted to the agency on 3/13/24 with diagnoses including Encounter for Fitting and Adjustment of Urinary Device and Hypertensive Chronic Kidney Disease Review of the Home Health Certification (HHC) and Plan of Care (POC) for certification period 5/7/25 to 7/5/25 revealed orders for the skilled nurse (SN) to visit once for one week effective 5/25/25 and once every four weeks, thereafter. A HV was conducted on 6/24/25 at 1:10 PM to observe care provided by Employee Identifier (EI) # 2, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). During the HV, HV # 1’s medicine list was compared to the medications the patient is currently taking. The following medications were noted on the list but not observed in the home: a. Midodrine 10 mg (milligram) tablets by mouth (PO), one daily as needed for blood pressure below 90/60. HV # 1’s caregiver (CG) stated “he/she stopped that over a year ago.” b. Pantoprazole 40 mg tablets, one tablet PO every evening. The CG stated HV # 1 “stopped taking that pill seven to eight months ago.” c. Sodium Bicarbonate 650 mg tablet, take one tablet three x (times) daily. The CG stated he/she also stopped taking this medication “seven to eight months ago.” An interview was conducted on 6/26/25 at 12:43 PM with EI # 1, Patient Care Manager (PCM), who confirmed staff failed to keep the medication profile current per agency policy. 2. MR # 2 was admitted to the agency on 10/6/24 with diagnoses including Encounter for Fitting and Adjustment of Urinary Device, Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, and Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy. Review of the MR Client Medication Report (CMR) dated 6/3/25 revealed no documentation of a nutritional/dietary supplement to administer thru the gastrostomy tube (g-tube). An interview was conducted on 6/26/25 at 1:08 PM with EI # 1, who confirmed MR # 2 did receive a nutritional/dietary supplement thru his/her g-tube, there was no documentation of the nutritional/dietary supplement on the CMR and confirmed staff failed to keep the medication profile current per agency policy.”

    Rule G0536. Element-level.

  • Plan Of Care Must Include The Following

    The inspectors’ words, 506 words

    “Plan of care must include the following CFR(s): 484.60(a)(2)(i-xvi) The individualized plan of care must include the following: (i) All pertinent diagnoses; (ii) The patient’s mental, psychosocial, and cognitive status; (iii) The types of services, supplies, and equipment required; (iv) The frequency and duration of visits to be made; (v) Prognosis; (vi) Rehabilitation potential; (vii) Functional limitations; (viii) Activities permitted; (ix) Nutritional requirements; (x) All medications and treatments; (xi) Safety measures to protect against injury; (xii) A description of the patient’s risk for emergency department visits and hospital re-admission, and all necessary interventions to address the underlying risk factors. (xiii) Patient and caregiver education and training to facilitate timely discharge; (xiv) Patient-specific interventions and education; measurable outcomes and goals identified by the HHA and the patient; (xv) Information related to any advanced directives; and (xvi) Any additional items the HHA or physician or allowed practitioner may choose to include. This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of medical records (MR), agency policy and procedure, and staff interviews, it was determined the agency failed to ensure staff developed an individualized Plan of Care (POC) to care for a patient’s gastrostomy tube (g-tube). This deficient practice did affect one of one active MR’s reviewed of a patient with a g-tube including MR # 2, and had the potential to negatively affect all patients with g-tubes served by the agency. Findings include: Agency Policy: Plan of Care Policy Number: 2.1.007 Revised Date: 9/1/24 Purpose: To assure an appropriate POC is developed and revised in a timely manner for each patient. Policy: Each patient has an individualized POC developed in consultation with the patient, physician or authorized practitioner, and staff that integrates comprehensive assessment findings to address patient problems, needs and goals, as well as to address specific services being provided. Procedure: 1. A POC is developed for all patients... 2. The POC includes: ...e. nutritional requirements... i. patient specific interventions... 1. MR # 2 was admitted to the agency on 10/6/24 with diagnoses of Encounter for Fitting and Adjustment of Urinary Device, Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation, and Encounter for Attention to Gastrostomy. Review of the MR Home Health Certification (HHC) and Plan of Care (POC) dated 6/3/25 revealed Skilled Nurse (SN) visits, effective 6/15/25, once a week for one week then one visit every four weeks. Further review of the HHC and POC revealed documentation of DME (Durable Medical Equipment) and Supplies... Feeding Tube Supplies... Review of the SN visit note dated 6/16/25 revealed in a narrative,... feeding tube intact and patent... Review of the medications listed in the Client Medication Report (CMR) revealed no documentation of a nutritional supplement to be administered thru the g-tube. There was no documentation in the POC for care of the patients g-tube or the nutritional supplement to be administered. An interview was conducted on 6/26/25 at 1:08 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Patient Care Manager (PCM), who confirmed there was no documentation in the POC for care of the patient’s g-tube or nutritional supplement to be administered.”

    Rule G0574. Element-level.

  • Interdisciplinary Assessment Of The Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 323 words

    “Interdisciplinary assessment of the patient CFR(s): 484.75(b)(1) Ongoing interdisciplinary assessment of the patient; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record (MR) review, agency policy and procedure, and interview with staff, it was determined the agency failed to ensure wounds were assessed and measured per agency policy. This deficient practice affected one of six patients reviewed with wounds including Home Visit (HV) # 3 and had the potential to negatively affect all patients with wounds. Findings include: Agency Policy: Wound Assessment, Documentation, and Photography Policy Number: 2.2.001 Revised: 9/1/24 Purpose: To ensure the accurate and consistent assessment and documentation of wounds. Policy: Upon initial and subsequently as indicated below, all wounds will be assessed with appropriate documentation in the medical record... Unless otherwise ordered by the physician, the qualified clinician...will assess wounds at least: Weekly for patients...receiving daily wound care performed by the agency, have an infected wound... Every other week for patients receiving wound care by the agency at least at a frequency less than daily... The assessment includes measurement of the length, width, and depth... 1.HV # 3 was admitted on 5/27/25 with diagnoses including Encounter for Surgical Aftercare following Surgery on the Circulatory System, and Atherosclerosis of Aorta. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 5/27/25 revealed physician’s orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) two times a week for one week, then one time a week for eight weeks to perform procedure of care to wound # 1, closed incision/suture line to left lower quadrant of abdomen, wound # 2, left inferior thoracic open surgical incision, and wound # 3, right buttock Stage I pressure ulcer. Review of SN Visit Note Reports dated 5/27/25 to 6/18/25 revealed no documentation of each of the wound measurements. An interview was conducted on 6/26/25 at 12:50 PM with Employee Identifier # 1, Patient Care Manager, who confirmed the staff failed to measure wounds per agency policy.”

    Rule G0706. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 26, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jan 23, 1995.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology, medical social services and home health aide services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Alabama Health Care Group, LLC owns 75% directly since Oct 1, 2016; Escambia County Health Care Authority owns 25% directly since Oct 1, 2016.
  • LHC Group Inc. runs it.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Marcus Macip (corporate officer); Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Tiffany Eggert (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies75%Feb 22, 2023
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies75%Oct 1, 2016
Alabama Health Care Group, LLCOwns 5% or more directly75%Oct 1, 2016
Escambia County Health Care AuthorityOwns 5% or more directly25%Oct 1, 2016
LHC Group Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Oct 1, 2016

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (157 surveys completed): 94% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 90% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.54% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate12.89% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.05% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 11 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36426, where this agency’s office is, 11 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.