Hearth Record

Lhc Homecare of South Alabama

A home health agency in Opp, Alabama 36467

1802 Us Highway 84 West, Suite A, Opp, Alabama 36467. (334) 493-2087.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 21, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 10, 2025: a recertification inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 24, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 10, 2025: recertification inspection3 deficiencies
  • Infection Prevention

    The inspectors’ words, 835 words

    “Infection Prevention CFR(s): 484.70(a) Standard: Infection Prevention. The HHA must follow accepted standards of practice, including the use of standard precautions, to prevent the transmission of infections and communicable diseases. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of medical records (MR), observations, agency policy and procedure, and interviews with staff, it was determined the agency failed to ensure agency policy and procedure for infection prevention were followed. This deficient practice did affect three of seven home visits (HV) including HV # 4, HV # 5, and HV # 7, and had the potential to affect all patients receiving care by this agency. Agency Policy: Cleaning of Re-Useable Equipment Policy Number: 8.006 Revised: 6/1/22 Purpose: To ensure equipment required for patient care is clean and sanitized to prevent the spread of infections. Equipment that comes in contact with non-intact skin will undergo intermediate level disinfection. Definition: Intermediate-Level Disinfection: destroys vegetative bacteria, mycobacterium tuberculosis and most fungi. It neutralizes most viruses but does not kill bacterial spores. Agency Policy and Procedure: Hand Hygiene Policy Number: 8.004 Revised: 5/1/19 Purpose: To help prevent the spread of microorganisms and infection by cross-contamination and to provide practice guidelines. Policy: Staff are required to perform hand hygiene prior to, at specified points during, and following patient contact. Hand hygiene will be performed using soap and water or an alcohol-based hand sanitizer. Procedure: 1...f. before and after removal of personal protective equipment (PPE). 3. HV # 7 was admitted on 3/14/25 with diagnoses including Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 3/14/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for nine weeks to perform procedure of wound care to wound # 1, distal pretibial venous stasis ulcer, # 2 distal lower leg venous stasis ulcer, and wound # 3 distal lower leg venous stasis ulcer. A HV was conducted on 4/9/25 at 9:25 AM to observe wound care provided by EI # 5, Registered Nurse. EI # 5 removed dressing from left lower leg with gloved hands then removed the gloves, failed to perform hand hygiene, and donned new gloves and measured the wound. EI # 5 then cleansed the wound with 4 x 4 soaked with normal saline, removed the gloves then donned new gloves and applied clean dressing to the wound. EI # 5 failed to perform hand hygiene after removing contaminated gloves. An interview was conducted on 4/10/25 at 3:50 PM with EI # 1, who confirmed the staff failed to follow agency hand hygiene policy. 1. HV # 4 was admitted on 3/15/25 with diagnoses including Non-ST Elevation (NSTEMI) Myocardial Infarction, and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) with Foot Ulcer. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 3/15/25 revealed physician’s orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) one visit per week for one week then two visits per week for eight weeks to perform procedure of wound care to wound # 5, left mid-dorsum, surgical incision, # 6, right mid-edge foot, diabetic ulcer, and wound # 7, right posterior edge foot, diabetic ulcer. A HV was conducted on 4/8/25 at 11:35 AM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 3, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) to observe wound care. EI # 3 performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, removed soiled bandage from patient’s right foot wound with bandage scissors, and placed scissors on table with clean wound supplies. EI # 3 picked up the bandage scissors from table, cut clean wound dressing, and applied to wound bed on right foot. EI # 3 failed to cleanse the bandage scissors after removing soiled bandage, and prior to cutting wound dressing. An interview was conducted on 4/10/25 at 3:20 PM with EI # 1, Executive Director (ED) who confirmed staff failed to follow the agency policy for cleaning of re-useable equipment. 2. HV # 5 was admitted on 11/26/24 with diagnoses including Other Complications of Procedures, Necrotic, and Type 2 DM with Other Specified Complication. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 3/26/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for one week, then two visits per week for eight weeks to perform procedure of wound care to wound # 2, left fifth toe, diabetic ulcer. A HV was conducted on 4/9/25 at 9:05 AM with EI # 4, Registered Nurse (RN) to observe wound care. EI # 4 performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, removed soiled bandage from patient’s left foot wound with bandage scissors, and placed scissors on table with clean wound supplies. EI # 4 picked up the bandage scissors from table, cut clean wound dressing, and applied to wound bed on left foot. EI # 4 failed to cleanse the bandage scissors after removing soiled bandage, and prior to cutting wound dressing. An interview was conducted on 4/10/25 at 3:22 PM with EI # 1, who confirmed staff failed to follow the agency policy for cleaning of re-useable equipment.”

    Rule G0682. Standard-level.

  • Interdisciplinary Assessment Of The Patient

    The inspectors’ words, 315 words

    “Interdisciplinary assessment of the patient CFR(s): 484.75(b)(1) Ongoing interdisciplinary assessment of the patient; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on medical record review, agency policy, and interview with staff, it was determined the agency failed to ensure wounds were assessed and measured per agency policy. This deficient practice affected one of nine patients reviewed with wounds including Home Visit (HV) # 7 and had the potential to affect all patients with wounds. Agency Policy: Wound Assessment, Documentation, and Photography Policy Number: 2.2.001 Revised: 9/1/24 Purpose: To ensure the accurate and consistent assessment and documentation of wounds. Policy: Upon initial and subsequently as indicated below, all wounds will be assessed with appropriate documentation in the medical record... Unless otherwise ordered by the physician, the qualified clinician ... will assess wounds at least: Weekly for patients ... receiving daily wound care performed by the agency, have an infected wound... Every other week for patients receiving wound care by the agency at least at a frequency less than daily... The assessment includes measurement of the length, width, and depth... 1. HV # 7 was admitted on 3/14/25 with diagnoses including Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 3/14/25 revealed physician’s orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) 3 times a week for eight weeks to perform procedure of wound care to wound # 1, distal pretibial venous stasis ulcer, wound # 2 distal lower leg venous stasis ulcer, and wound # 3, distal lower leg venous stasis ulcer. Review of the SN Visit Note Reports for the week of 3/16/25, 3/23/25 and 3/30/25 revealed no documentation of each of the wound measurements. An interview was conducted on 4/10/25 at 3:40 PM with Employee Identifier # 1, Executive Director, who confirmed the staff failed to measure wounds per agency policy.”

    Rule G0706. Element-level.

  • Patient And Caregiver Education

    The inspectors’ words, 425 words

    “Patient and caregiver education CFR(s): 484.75(b)(5) Patient and caregiver education; This Element is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of Medical Records, agency policy and procedure, and interview, it was determined the agency failed to ensure wound care education with return demonstration was provided. This deficient practice affected two of nine patients with wounds reviewed including Home Visit (HV) # 1, HV # 2, and had the potential to affect all patients requiring wound care education. Findings include: Agency Policy: Patient Education Policy Number: 3.001 Revised: 11/1/17 ...Policy: The agency plans, supports, and coordinates patient and caregiver education designed to promote optimal patient health... Procedure: ...3. The patient and caregiver receive ongoing information specific to the identified needs...including... b. Patient/caregiver plan of care responsibilities... 1. HV # 1 was admitted on 2/2/25 with diagnoses including Displaced Fracture of Left Tuberosity, Unspecified Fracture of Left Patella, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care revealed physician’s orders for Skilled Nurse (SN) one visit per week for nine weeks to perform/instruct patient/caregiver the procedure for wound care to pressure ulcer of the coccyx. Patient/caregiver to cleanse wound with warm soap and water, pat dry with clean towel, and cover with foam dressing daily. Review of the SN Visit Note Reports from 2/2/25 through 2/20/25 revealed no documentation the patient or caregiver was provided instructions for wound care or return demonstration. The wound was healed on 2/20/25 and the wound care was discontinued. An interview was conducted on 4/10/25 at 3:20 PM with Employee Identifier (EI) # 1, Executive Director, who confirmed the staff failed to provide patient and or caregiver education for care of the wound. 2. HV # 2 was admitted on 3/8/25 with diagnoses including Encounter for Change or Removal of Nonsurgical Wound Dressing, and Abrasion of Left Upper Arm. Review of the Home Health Certification and Plan of Care dated 3/8/25 revealed physician’s orders for SN one visit per week for nine weeks. SN to perform/instruct patient/caregiver procedure of wound care to wound # 8 mid forearm and wound # 9 left elbow, cleanse with warm soap and water, dry using a clean towel, and leave open to air. Review of the SN Visit Note Reports dated 3/8/25 through 4/3/25 revealed no documentation the patient or caregiver was provided education for the care of the wounds. An interview was conducted on 4/10/25 at 3:45 PM with EI # 1 who confirmed the staff failed to provide patient and or caregiver education for care of the wounds.”

    Rule G0714. Element-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 10, 2025Recertification inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified home health agency since Jun 14, 1994.
  • Ownership: proprietary (for profit).
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has anything been proven against it?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • 0 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR home health inspection reports. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • Offers nursing care, physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech pathology and home health aide services.
  • Doesn’t offer medical social services.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for home health agencies.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Alabama Health Care Group, LLC owns 90% directly since Jan 17, 2005; Mizell Memorial Hospital, Inc. owns 10% directly since Jan 17, 2005.
  • LHC Group Inc. runs it.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Kimberly Seymour (corporate officer, 0%); Kimberly Seymour (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Sherry R Hunko (managing employee (on the payroll)); Joni Babineaux (corporate officer, 0%); Joshua Lee Proffitt (corporate officer); Amy Cormier (corporate director, 0%).
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Agency All Owners and Home Health Agency Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Unitedhealth Group IncorporatedOwns 5% or more through other companies90%Feb 22, 2023
LHC Group Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies90%Jan 17, 2005
Alabama Health Care Group, LLCOwns 5% or more directly90%Jan 17, 2005
Mizell Memorial Hospital, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly10%Jan 17, 2005
LHC Group Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Jan 17, 2005

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates its quality of patient care 4 of 5.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (272 surveys completed): 91% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 88% would definitely recommend it.
  • CMS compares it with the national rate: discharged to the community, better; potentially preventable hospital stays, the same; potentially preventable readmissions after discharge, the same.
Source:

CMS, Home Health Care Agencies and Home Health Patient Survey. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Quality of patient care ratingCMS star rating, 1 to 5 in half stars4 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the agency’s patients, 1 to 55 of 5
Discharged to the communityCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate90.38% (better than the national rate)
Potentially preventable hospital staysCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate11.76% (same as the national rate)
Potentially preventable readmissions after dischargeCMS’s risk-adjusted rate, compared with the national rate4.11% (same as the national rate)

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 6 agencies CMS’s data show serving patients in ZIP code 36467, where this agency’s office is, 6 have a quality of patient care rating; the middle one is 4 of 5, and this one is rated 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Home Health ZIP Codes and Home Health Care Agencies. Released Oct 21, 2026. Updated quarterly.

The 6 agencies CMS lists serving ZIP code 36467
PlaceQuality rating
Lhc Homecare of South Alabama This home health agency4
Alabama Department of Public Health Home Care3
Centerwell Home Health3.5
Enhabit Home Health4
Adoration Home Health4.5
Centerwell Home Health4.5

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for home health agencies, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says some of its home health reports are accurate or available only through May 19, 2021, because of a systems migration.
  • Many home health agencies are inspected by a private accrediting organisation instead of the state, and QCOR’s home health file doesn’t appear to include those inspections: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 24, 2026.

From the agency

The public record above comes first. Anything the agency adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the agency will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the agency”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.